Measuring Bilateral Trade In Services: A note on the data collected and estimated for the Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Trade and Agriculture Directorate WPTGS.
Download ReportTranscript Measuring Bilateral Trade In Services: A note on the data collected and estimated for the Services Trade Restrictiveness Index Trade and Agriculture Directorate WPTGS.
Measuring Bilateral Trade In Services:
A note on the data collected and estimated for the Services Trade Restrictiveness Index
Trade and Agriculture Directorate WPTGS / Paris / 24.09.2008
Services Trade Restrictiveness Index project
• Aims at quantifying barriers to trade in services –
One index capturing all trade-restrictive measures
–
Developed by sector and according to the four GATS modes of supply
• Three pilot sectors: telecommunications,
construction, business services
• Research identifying trade barriers and market
entry costs requires bilateral data disaggregated by sector
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
2
STRI methodology
• – – –
Bottom-up approach Observation of explicit policies that restrict trade in services Qualitative information (regulations) to which scores and weights are assigned
• •
Weighting methodology: Expert judgement Statistical analysis
•
Econometric methods
• –
Top-down approach
• •
An indirect measure inferring the existence of trade barriers from discrepancies between observed trade performance and what would be expected in a free trade regime.
Differences between domestic and world market prices Discrepancies between observed trade flows and expected free-trade flows … that’s where we need accurate bilateral trade data!
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
3
Three derived datasets (bilateral by sector)
• BOP data –
OECD TiSP database and UN service trade statistics (for accession countries and enhanced engagement countries)
• FDI stocks –
Estimates based on OECD FDI data
• FATS statistics (sales) –
Based on OECD data (Globalisation Indicators)
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
4
BOP services trade – conceptual issues
• Balance of payments data and GATS modes of
supply Sector (EBOPS)
Transportation (205) Travel (236) Communications services (245) Construction services (249) Insurance services (253) Financial services (260) Computer and information services (262) Royalties and license fees (266) Other business services (268) Personal, cultural, and recreational services (287)
Predominant mode(s) of supply
1 (most of) and 2 2 1 3 and 4 1 1 1 and 4 1 1 and 4 1 and 4 • Product Classification (EBOPS) in BOP data vs.
Industrial Classification (ISIC) in FATS and FDI data
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
5
BOP Data used in the STRI Project
•
Primary datasource:
–
OECD International Trade in Services by Partner Country Database (TiSP)
•
Data obtained following the request made within the Trade Committee
•
Complementary data from UN Service Trade Statistics Database
– –
Extension for OECD accession and enhanced engagement countries Adding partner countries for Members not included in OECD TiSP database (?)
•
No use of mirror data or estimates
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
6
BOP services trade - coverage issues
•
Limited coverage of bilateral data in terms of sectors and years. Countries with no bilateral data on
– – –
Telecommunications imports (11):
Australia, Canada, Germany, Iceland, Japan, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom
Construction imports (9):
Canada, Germany, Iceland, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Switzerland, Turkey, United States
Other Business Services imports (7):
Canada, Germany, Iceland, Mexico, Switzerland, Turkey, United States
• –
When bilateral data are available: the number of allocated partner countries is rather small (23)
–
reported partner flows do not add up to the sector total
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
7
Imports allocated to partners as a share of total
Country Australia Austria Belgium Czech Republic Denmark Finland France Italy Japan Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Sweden United States
82.3
99.6
96.6
72.8
99.7
92.5
97.6
97.6
86.6
99.8
94.1
95.6
96.7
98.5
92.3
63.8
Total trade (200) Telecom munications (247)
12.1
19.8
12.6
26.5
25.3
18.8
11.9
9.5
7.2
24.4
67.4
20.1
9.8
23.5
8.8
58.6
35.3
25.0
89.1
29.6
2.4
13.8
0.9
2.2
30.5
-
Construction (249) Computer and information (262)
50.1
6.7
27.3
12.1
34.7
20.7
44.0
20.4
96.3
20.3
37.5
16.5
12.5
14.9
34.0
-
Other business (268)
75.5
26.1
22.2
10.1
44.8
28.0
28.3
24.1
93.1
29.7
26.4
21.5
32.4
14.2
44.2
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
8
FDI stocks and FATS sales: measuring mode 3
• FATS sales as preferred measure, however
available for less countries than FDI stocks
• Industry classification for FDI/FATS vs. product
classification for BOP services trade
• Limited availability of bilateral by sector data for
both FDI stocks and FATS sales
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
9
Bilateral FDI stocks/FATS sales by sector
• Using hard data whenever available • Estimation of bilateral FDI stocks (or FATS sales) by
sector using three 2-dimensional matrices:
–
Bilateral stocks between countries
–
Inward and outward stocks by industry and country
• Fill in gaps in 2-dimensional matrices • Constraint required for optimisation: total stocks (or
sales) have to be equal in the bilateral, inward and outward matrices
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
10
Firm-level data: how can they help?
• Several issues in using firm-level data to fill in gaps
in macro data:
–
Coverage: datasets available to OECD contain only a sample of companies
– – –
Definition of variables (e.g. “value added”) Identification of sectors and activities of firms Identification of the ultimate owner
• Micro data can be useful to do some analysis at the
firm level.
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
11
Data on the Mode 4 (presence of natural persons )
• EBOPS components in BOP statistics are not
broken down by mode of supply
• Compensation of employees and workers’
remittances are inadequate proxies
• Migration and visa statistics indicating the number
of people moving under mode 4
• Data collection for mode 4 should focus on the
value of service sold by contractual service suppliers
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
12
Discussion
• –
Short-term Can existing coverage of BOP data be improved by countries? Can some of the gaps be filled in bilateral data by service sector for past years?
• –
Long-term To what extent will countries be able to better distinguish between modes of supply in BOP data? For example, according to the simplified allocation recommended in the revised MSITS Chapter 5.
– –
How could BOP and FATS data be made more comparable or compatible? Could BOP data be broken down according to the ISIC classification? What are the prospects for improving data on mode 4? How should the value of services sold by a contractual service supplier be measured? Is the proper identification of mode 4 in BOP statistics possible and hence an option?
OECD Trade & Agriculture Directorate
13