Part III. Matching Feedback and Assessment to Online Activities (Vanessa’s Section…) The Feedback Issue • Students participating in online activities look for feedback to.
Download ReportTranscript Part III. Matching Feedback and Assessment to Online Activities (Vanessa’s Section…) The Feedback Issue • Students participating in online activities look for feedback to.
Part III. Matching Feedback and Assessment to Online Activities
(Vanessa’s Section…)
The Feedback Issue
• Students participating in online activities look for feedback to know: – A. the instructor is reading their contributions – B. their participation is valued – C. their participation is adequate, in terms of quality and quantity • Feedback need not be individualized to be effective – Whole class commentary provided on a regular basis was found to be just as satisfactory from the student point of view (Dennen, 2001)
The Assessment Issue
• Often, online activities go unassessed –“Add-on” syndrome: Adding an online activity to a previously designed class because it sounds like a good idea
The Assessment Issue
•
Students are more likely to participate when then know there is impact on their grade
–
Direct impact: graded on participation (quality, quantity or both)
– –
Indirect impact: participation should bolster performance on other assessments Students quickly become aware if an online activity is not related to assessed learning objectives
The Assessment Issue, Cont.
• •
Sometimes the wrong things are assessed Examples:
–
Assessing students’ online moderation skills when the course topic/learning objectives have nothing to do with online moderation
–
Assessing quantity of participation, but not quality
•
which, granted, is easier, but encourages sloppy message posting rather than thoughtful learning dialogues
Assessing Asynchronous Activities
Some ideas …
1. Social Ice Breakers
• • •
Feedback:
–
Critical because it sets the tone for instructor attentiveness and interactions Assessment:
–
Not really necessary or appropriate What you might do:
– –
Participate in the ice breaker alongside students Compile a list of “who’s who” from student responses and distribute to class
2. Learner-Content Interactions
• • •
Feedback:
– –
Should be built into the activity Computer-automated Assessment:
–
Generally, these activities help prepare students for formal assessment What you might do:
–
Make explicit to students the value of completing these activities and their relationship to success on graded activities
3. Scenario-based Simulations
• • •
Feedback:
– –
Should be built into the activity If not automated, instructor must provide or monitor to ensure peers provide it Assessment:
–
Simulation can be assessed directly themselves or used to prepare students for authentic assessments What you might do:
– –
If objectives are process oriented, assess student performance in simulation Encourage learner reflection on the process and their performance
4. Anonymous Suggestion Box
• • •
Feedback:
–
Important to respond to students Assessment:
–
Neither necessary nor appropriate What you might do:
–
Compile a list of suggestions with corresponding actions taken or reasons why action is not possible/feasible/desirable
• • •
5. Student Formative Surveys
Feedback:
– –
Instructor should reference student responses in aggregate form Individual responses
may
receive feedback, but students should not be singled out Assessment:
–
Neither necessary nor appropriate What you might do:
– –
Use topic-based surveys as a lead-in to a learning unit Use course feedback surveys to make changes to the class
6. Role Play
• • •
Feedback:
–
Students want/need to know if they are adequately playing their roles Assessment:
– –
Based on participation (to ensure the roles get played) Following the role play, based on subject matter What you might do:
– –
Post a general message to the class, filling in missing / misrepresented roles and noting exemplary contributions Have learners write a reflection paper on the topic, highlighting the various perspectives and defending the perspective of their choice
7. Case-based Labs/Experiments
• • •
Feedback:
–
Should be built into the activity Assessment:
–
Generally, these activities help prepare students for formal assessment What you might do:
–
Make explicit to students the value of completing these activities and their relationship to success on graded activities
8. Authentic Data Analysis
• • •
Feedback:
–
Should focus on helping students analyze the data Assessment:
–
Based on results of the analysis OR on the process (depending on learning objectives) What you might do:
–
Have students respond to the activity’s questions, either individually or collaboratively
9. Just-in-time Teaching/Syllabus
• • •
Feedback:
–
Responsiveness to student contributions must be explicit and frequent Assessment:
– –
Appropriate assessments should be developed based on the student contributions in conjunction with the pre-planned course material If participation might be a problem, students should get points for completing quizzes/surveys (Small participation grade, or bonus points on tests) What you might do:
– – –
Have students write a reflection on how their point-of-view is similar to/different from their peers Post results of student quizzes in aggregate form for class review Update regular tests to incorporate the just-in-time materials
10. Perspective Taking
• • •
Feedback:
–
Focus on how well students are representing different perspectives Assessment:
–
Perspective-based role-play will likely be assessed What you might do:
–
Fill in missing perspectives — or have students review their work and identify missing perspectives
Assessing Synchronous Activities
More ideas…
Learning Conversations
• • •
Includes Webinar, chats (regular, expert, guest) Feedback:
–
Instructor can debrief the chat afterwards, providing a summary and commenting on contributions Assessment:
– –
Not really fair to assess students on basis of synchronous chat contribution due to limited airspace Content/experience should be assessed through another means such as reflection, essay, test or project
• • •
Group Work
Includes Team Meeting and Collaborative Online Writing Feedback:
–
Focus on group’s process and how to improve it Assessment:
– –
Based on product (collaborative writing, other project) Based on process (Was work distributed equally? Completed on time? What would be changed the next time?)
•
Peer ratings
•
Assessment of contributions in group’s online work space (archives)
Advisory Activities
• • •
Includes Online Mentoring, Secret Coaches and Protégées Feedback:
– – –
Such activities are all about feedback Should focus on learner performance on past class activities Should look forward to future activities Assessment:
–
Assessment would be neither appropriate nor desired, although participation might be required