Nutritive value of four tropical forage legume hays fed to pigs in the Democratic Republic of Congo Kambashi B., Boudry C., Picron P.,
Download ReportTranscript Nutritive value of four tropical forage legume hays fed to pigs in the Democratic Republic of Congo Kambashi B., Boudry C., Picron P.,
Nutritive value of four tropical forage legume hays fed to pigs in the Democratic Republic of Congo Kambashi B., Boudry C., Picron P., Kiatoko H., Théwis A., Bindelle J. University of Liege, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech University of Kinshasa Pig breeding in Kinshasa and Bas-Congo Total area : 2 345 000 km ² Forests: about 145 million hectares arable land : 80 million hectares Varied climates Dense river network 2 / 3 population agriculture (animal husbandry ) Kambashi & al. 2 Pig breeding in Kinshasa and Bas-Congo Survey of 319 households Pig breeding • Around of towns • Villages Role in farming system • Source of cash • improving livelihood • nutritional security of poor people Kambashi & al. 3 Commercial pig feeds Soya 75 % feed meal Barley Maize Pea Wheat Minerals Kambashi & al. 4 Cereals Price Volatility 280 Maïs fourrager 260 240 €/t 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 • Low and insufficient grain production • Net importers of food Kambashi & al. 5 Free-range pig keeping and its results Rubbish Range 3% Bare ground Pens 12% 18% 67% (Buldgen et al., 1992) Time spent on feed resources Impact on sanitation Taenia solium Cysticercosis in the Democratic Republic of Congo: How Does Pork Trade Affect the Transmission of the Parasite? Kambashi & al. 6 Aim of my research project • Develop sustainable feeding practices for stall fed pigs raised by smallholders based on unconventionnal locally produced feed ingredients Kambashi & al. 7 Methodology • 3 Steps – What is / could be distributed? What seems interesting, what does not seem interesting? • Investigations • Lab analyzes and in vitro test – What is the nutritional value of feeds most promising ? • Ingestibility tests • Digestibility tests – What are the performance achieved by the pigs ? • Growth tests – Related reseaches • Impact on health (protein, lactate, etc.) • Conservation practices and anti-nutritional factors (eg silage) Kambashi & al. 8 Feedstuffs for pigs Use frequency • Concentrate feeds – – – – – – Wheat bran 80 % Palm kernel meal 73 % Brewers grain 50 % Corn 38 % … Commercial concentrate diets 4 % • Green plants – – – – – – (> 30 ingredients) Manihot esculenta leaves Ipomoea batatas leaves Leafy vegetables Eichornia crassipes Psophocarpus scandens … 90 % (> 40 plants) 32 % 29 % 25 % 23 % 22 % Kambashi & al. 9 Results of screening Ingredients Acacia mangium Amaranthus hybridus spp Brachiaria ruziziensis Cajanus cajan Calopogonium muconoides Centrosema pubescens Eichornia crassipes Ipomea batatas Leucaena leucocephala Manihot esculenta Moringa oleifera Mucuna pruriens Panicum maximum wild cultivar Panicum maximum var. T58 Pennisetum purpureum Psophocarpus scandens Pueraria javanica Saccharum officinarum Stylosanthes guianensis Trypsacum laxum Vigna unguiculata Part IVDMD (-) leaves plant plant leaves plant plant plant leaves leaves leaves leaves plant plant plant plant plant plant leaves plant plant plant 0.31 0.56 0.34 0.32 0.37 0.42 0.31 0.45 0.37 0.43 0.43 0.46 0.29 0.25 0.30 0.49 0.38 0.42 0.25 0.27 0.48 DP (g/kg) 32 188 86 34 144 173 59 144 103 176 179 187 101 77 68 247 156 30 101 60 221 A (ml/g) Rmax (ml/g.h) 39 1 215 18 235 8 53 2 136 12 119 5 92 3 203 17 85 4 169 15 168 13 155 9 170 5 196 6 207 7 155 8 122 8 88 3 173 11 183 5 183 12 (Kambashi et al., 2010) Kambashi & al. 11 Voluntary feed intake (vfi) 140 P < 0.05 130 Volontary intake g/kg BW 0,75 120 110 100 Psophocarpus Pueraria Stylosanthes Vigna 90 80 70 60 0 10 20 Incorporation rate (%) 30 40 Kambashi & al. 12 Digestibility test Coefficients of Total tract apparent digestibility (DM, CP, NDF and Gross energy) Vigna Control Psophocarpus Pueraria Stylosanthes 125 250 125 250 125 250 125 g/kg DM g/kg DM g/kg DM g/kg DM g/kg DM g/kg DM g/kg DM DM 0.760a 0.720 b 0.646 fg 0.713 bc 0.659 ef 0.692 cd 0.620 g CP 0.802 a 0.771 b 0.718 c 0.756 b 0.704 cd 0.683 de 250 g/kg DM 0.627g 0.746 b 0.686 d 0.751 b 0.694 cd NDF 0.526 a 0.522 a 0.435cde 0.491 ab 0.401 def 0.444 bcd 0.352 f 0.479 abc 0.390 ef GE 0.753 a 0.708 b 0.645 d 0.699 bc 0.638 de 0.687 c 0.610 f 0.690 bc 0.621 ef All 4 forage species decreased the total tract apparent digestibility (TTAD) but forage species differed in the way they influenced DM (P<0.040) and NDF (P<0.020) digestibilities. No differences in CP and gross energy digestibilities of forage-based diets were observed between species. TTAD of DM and NDF were, on average, higher for Psophocarpus scandens and Vigna unguiculata. Kambashi & al. 13 Conclusion • In case of scarcity or lack of protein source, P. scandens and V. unguiculata are an option. • Preferably in adult pigs. • Due to their negative effect on the overall digestibility of the diets, the rate of TFL in the diet should not exceed 25 %. • Further work required : – forage on quality of meat and animal performance – the impact of storage and antinutrients on the nutritional value Kambashi & al. 14 Thank you for your time! I like eating forages Jérôme Bindelle & Bienvenu Kambashi 15