Behavioral Observation Data for Individual Intervention Decision Making George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Nov 18, 2010 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org.

Download Report

Transcript Behavioral Observation Data for Individual Intervention Decision Making George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Nov 18, 2010 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org.

Behavioral Observation Data
for Individual Intervention
Decision Making
George Sugai
OSEP Center on PBIS
Center for Behavioral Education & Research
University of Connecticut
Nov 18, 2010
www.pbis.org
www.cber.org
www.swis.org
Participants should be able to describe…
Assumptions & principles of a behavioral approach to
observational data
Relationship between response or behavior class or
setting
Functional and testable explanations
Important of using functional assessment information to
develop behavior intervention plans
SWPBS Conceptual Foundations
Behaviorism
ABA
Laws of Behavior
Applied Behavioral Technology
PBS
Social Validity
SWPBS
All Students
OUR BEHAVIORAL
PERSPECTIVE
Behavior is
environmentally
influenced
Behavior is
learned
Behavior is
biological
Observable
behavior is
emphasized
Behavior is
influenced by
environmental
manipulations
Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports
Socially & educationally important behaviors are
emphasized
Culture, context, & learning history are important
Individual is integrally related to all
Student benefits are related to integration of evidencebased practices, valid data, effective implementation
systems, and important student outcomes
IMPLEMENTATION
W/ FIDELITY
CONTINUUM OF
CONTINUOUS
EVIDENCE-BASED
PROGRESS
INTERVENTIONS
MONITORING
UNIVERSAL
SCREENING
RtI
DATA-BASED
DECISION MAKING
& PROBLEM
SOLVING
CONTENT
EXPERTISE &
FLUENCY
PREVENTION
& EARLY
INTERVENTION
SWPBS is
Framework for enhancing
adoption & implementation of
Continuum of evidencebased interventions to
achieve
Academically & behaviorally
important outcomes for
All students
Integrated
Elements
Supporting Social Competence &
Academic Achievement
OUTCOMES
Supporting
Decision
Making
Supporting
Staff Behavior
PRACTICES
Supporting
Student Behavior
Practices
Outcomes
Effective
Students
Evidence-based
practice
Training &
coaching
Relevant
Measurable
Implementation
fidelity
Evaluation
Progress
monitoring
Leadership
Efficient
Durable
Scalable
Educationally/soc
ially importance
Examples,
demonstrations, &
exemplars
Data
Systems
Political
support
Funding &
visibility
Policy
CONTINUUM OF
SCHOOL-WIDE
INSTRUCTIONAL &
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR
SUPPORT
FEW
~5%
~15%
SOME
Primary Prevention:
School-/ClassroomWide Systems for
All Students,
Staff, & Settings
ALL
~80% of Students
Tertiary Prevention:
Specialized
Individualized
Systems for Students
with High-Risk Behavior
Secondary Prevention:
Specialized Group
Systems for Students
with At-Risk Behavior
Intensive
Targeted
Universal
Few
Some
All
Dec 7, 2007
RTI
Continuum of
Support for
ALL
Math
Intensive
Continuum of
Support for ALL
Science
Targeted
Spanish
Reading
Soc skills
Universal
Soc Studies
Basketball
Label behavior…not
people
Dec 7, 2007
Intensive
RTI
Anger man.
Prob Sol.
Targeted
Continuum of
Support for ALL
Ind. play
Adult rel.
Attend.
Universal
Coop play
Peer interac
Label behavior…not
people
Dec 7, 2007
ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS
~5%
~15%
TERTIARY PREVENTION
• Function-based support
• Wraparound
• Person-centered planning
•
•
SECONDARY PREVENTION
• Check in/out
• Targeted social skills instruction
• Peer-based supports
• Social skills club
•
PRIMARY PREVENTION
• Teach SW expectations
• Proactive SW & classroom discipline
• Positive reinforcement
• Effective instruction
• Parent engagement
• Active supervision
~80% of Students
Databased
decision
making
Continuous
progress
monitoring of
some
Universal
Screening of
All
Good Data Systems
Behavior defined in observable terms
Data easy to collect/access
Data easy to summarize & present
Data linked to decisions & actions
4 Main Data Concerns
Student outcomes
Practice selection
Practice implementation
Systems integration
What are “behavioral
observation data?”
Information
collected from
direct observations
of social behavior
event
Information
sample
Why collect behavioral observation data?”
1. Describe
Learning
history
Relationship
Context
Observation
context
Behavior
Student
doing
2. Improve
quality of
behavioral
intervention
3. Monitor
progress &
implement.
fidelity
Behavior
Speed/frequency
Locus
Intensity
Latency
With clear
beginning &
end
Duration
Perceptible
&
measurable
description
of
individual,
set, or
chains of
actions
Topography
Defined by dimensions
What is Function Based Support?
Foundations in behavioral theory, applied behavior
analysis, & positive behavior support
Attention to environmental context
Emphasis on function of behavior
Focus on teaching effective, efficient, and relevant
behaviors
Attention to behavior of implementers
Non-examples of Function-Based approach
Lantana, you skipped 2 school days, so we’re going to suspend
you for 2 more.”
“Phloem, I’m taking your book away because you obviously
aren’t ready to learn.”
“You want my attention?! I’ll show you attention,…let’s take a
walk down to the office & have a little chat with the Principal.”
“Function”
“Response
Class”
Association
between response
class &
consequence event
Set of behaviors
defined by function
How many “functions” have been validated
Peer/adult social
Activities/tasks
Tangibles
Sensory/stimulation
Get/Access
Avoid/Escape
(positive reinforcement)
(negative reinforcement)
Only 2 Basic Functions
Problem
Behavior
Pos Reinf
Escape/
Avoid
Something
Obtain/Get
Something
Stimulation/
Sensory
Tangible/
Activity
Social
Adult
Neg Reinf
Peer
% Intervals w/ P.B. for Bryce
% Intervals w/ P.B.
Baseline
100
90
80
70
60
ContraIndicated
Indicated
ContraIndicated
Indicated
50
40
30
20
10
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41
Sessions*
*Data points with arrows indicate no medication
Ingram, Lewis-Palmer, & Sugai, 2005
% Intervals w/ P.B. for Carter
100
Baseline
Indicated
90
ContraIndicated
Contrandicated
Indicated
Indicated
Modified
% Intervals w/ P.B.
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
15
Sessions
17
19
21
23
25
27
6
Response Class
Set of topographically different
behaviors with similar or related
function or purpose
Escape difficult task
request:
Hit, spit, runaway, yell
Obtain adult attention:
Cry, hit, whine, raise
hand, spit
Response Chain
Predictable sequence of behaviors with
possibly different functions at beginning & end
of chain
Given doable task, student….
1. Whispers “work is stupid”
2. Writes on papers
3. Yells “work is real stupid”
4. Throws paper in basket
5. Leaves room
Given difficult task, student….
1. Says “work is stupid”
2. Pokes student at next table
3. Argues w/ student
4. Tells teacher to butt out
5. Threatens teacher
6. Runs away from chasing teacher
What is basic behavior unit of
behavioral observation?
Setting Events
Triggering
Antecedents
Infrequent
event/
condition
affecting
main.
conseq.
Events
signal
conseq.
likely if
behavior
emitted
Problem
Behavior
Observ.
action &
response
class
• “Best guess” about behavior & conditions
under which it is observed
• Represents basic working unit of FBA
TE = Functional Relationship when
• Directly
guides
development
of BIP
describing
a predictable
& verifiable
relationship among 4 elements
Maintaining
Consequences
Events
following
behavior &
increase
probability
Testable Hypothesis
“Basic Unit”
Setting Events
Infrequent
events
that affect
value of
maint.
conseq.
Triggering
Antecedents
Preceding
events
that
trigger or
occasion
Problem
Behavior
Set of
related
behaviors
of concern
Maintaining
Consequences
Following
events
that
maintain
behaviors
of concern
When Sequoia misses her 12:30 medication &
teachers present multiple task demands, she
makes negative self-statements & writes profane
language on her assignments. Teaching staff
typically send her to the office with a discipline
referral for being disrespectful.
What
function?
Avoid
difficult
tasks
Setting event
Antecedent
Response
Misses 12:30
medication
Teachers
make
multiple
task demands
Sequoia makes
negative selfstatements &
writes profane
language
Consequence
Teacher sends
Sequoia to
office for being
disrespectful
Caesar has dyed his hair three colors & is teased
several times by his friends before class. When he
enters the class, his teacher stares at his hair.
Caesar immediately says “what are you staring
at?” His teacher immediately sends him to inschool detention.
Setting event
Antecedent
Caesar is
teased several
times about his
hair by his
friends before
class
His teacher
stares at his
hair in class
Escape
adult &
What
function?
peer attention
Response Consequence
Caesar asks
his teacher
what she’s
staring at
His teacher
sends him to
in-school
detention
Cleo is new to the 6th grade, & English is her
second language. When another student
approaches & says something to her in
English, Cleo turns away. The other student
walks away. This happens several times during
the day.
Whatpeer
function?
Escape
attention
Setting event
Antecedent
Response
New student
Student
approaches &
speaks in
English
Cleo turns
away
Consequence
Other
student walks
away
When his teacher asks him what the capitol city
of a country is, Napoleon gives the correct
answers. His teacher praises his correct answer,
& tells him he may work by himself or a friend
on the rest of the assignment.
Setting event
Antecedent
None
Teacher asks
what capitol
city of country
is
Accessfunction?
peer &
What
adult attention
Response Consequence
Napoleon
give correct
answer
Teacher gives
verbal praise
& time to work
with a friend
As Veloce is walking, other kids look at him &
say “what’s up?” He looks back and says:
“Who ya lookin’ at?!” “Ya want some of this?!”
“Ya talkin’ to me?!” Kids shake their heads &
all him “weirdo.”
Setting event
Antecedent
??
Look at him.
“What’s up!”
Access OR escape
What function?
peer attention?
Response Consequence
How do
do you
you know?
know?
How
“Who ya
Kids shake
Assess?
lookin’ at?”
“Ya want
Some?” “Ya
talkin’ to me?
heads &
call him
“weirdo”
What if testable hypothesis is incorrect?
Review
what we
know
Collect more
information
Modify
hypothesis
Test/confirm
new
hypothesis
TH1 for Hillary:
"When Hillary sits next to Bill,
Hillary whispers in his ear. Bill
laughs."
• Test manipulation?
– Put Al in Bill’s seat.
• Effect:
– Hillary whispers in Al’s ear.
Develop new
testable
hypothesis!
TH2:
“When Hillary sits next to boys,
she whispers in their ears. The
boys laugh.”
• Test manipulation?
– Put Monica in Bill’s seat.
• Effect:
– Hillary does not whisper.
Use info to
develop
intervention
Example 1: Different behaviors
with different functions
• Kirsten’s teachers agree that she has 2
response classes that interfere with her
social success at school, & develop two
testable hypotheses:
Setting
Event
Antecedent
Event

None
Teacher
presents
multiple
step
request.

Implication!
2 intervention
Setting
Antecedent
variations
Event
Event

None
Peers play
game &
have
conflict.
Consequence
Event
Behavior
Verbal
protest,
noncompliance,
foot
stomping.

Consequence
Event
Behavior

Pushes
peers away,
uses
profanity,
throws
rocks.
Teacher
repeats
request 4 to
5 times &
threatens
after school
suspension.

Peers stop
playing with
Kirsten.
Example 2: Same behaviors with
different functions
• Amy teachers have noticed two different
conditions when Amy displays same
problem behaviors (1 response class). They
developed following two testable
hypotheses:
Setting
Event
Antecedent
Event

None
Setting
Event

Implication!
Antecedent
2 intervention
Event
variations

None
Peers try to
engage Amy
in conversations.
Teachers
give Amy
corrective
feedback
about her
work.
Consequence
Event
Behavior

Turns eyes
away, does
not comply
verbally,
pulls
sweater
over his
head.

Peers move
away.
Consequence
Event
Behavior
Turns eyes
away, does
not comply
verbally,
pulls
sweater
over his
head.

Teachers sit
down next to
her, rub her
shoulders, &
say comforting
words.
Functional Assessment Checklist for Teachers “FACTS”
STEP 1: Student/ Grade: _____Clarence/5th grade_____
Date: ____January
11___________
Interviewer: ___________Sugai________
Respondent(s): ____Thomas_____
STEP 2: Student Profile: Please identify at least three strengths or contributions the
student brings to school.
C. has leadership potential. Peers listened to him, and he can be very convincing and
sincere. He’s academically competent and seems to be moving smoothly and
successfully through the school curriculum.
STEP 3: Problem Behavior(s): Identify problem behaviors
___Tardy_X Fight/physical Aggression ___ Disruptive___ Theft___ UnresponsiveX
Inappropriate Language_X__ Insubordination___ Vandalism___ Withdrawn_X__
Verbal Harassment____Work not done___ Other __________ ____X _ Verbally
Inappropriate___ Self-injury
Describe problem behavior:C. may have one of the shortest fuses I’ve seen. One little
tease by a peer, and he quickly and predictably escalates through a behavioral
sequence that begins with passive in subordination (non response), moves to a mild
protest, shifts to harassment and name calling, increases to property damage and
even to physical aggression. Its interesting that he seems to “enjoy” the reactions he
gets from peers that he aggresses toward, and from peers who look up to him for his
aggressiveness.
STEP 4: Routine Analysis
Schedule
(Times)
Activity
Likelihood of Problem Behavior
Specific Problem Behavior
8:00
Waiting to enter building
Low
1
2
High
5
6
See escalation described
above
3
4
8:15
Advisory & Planning
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mostly teasing and touching
property of others.
Doesn’t escalate much
further
9:15
Language Arts
1
2
3
4
5
6
Occasional name
calling/teasing
10:15
Recess
1
2
3
4
5
6
See escalation described
above
11:30
Math
1
2
3
4
5
6
Occasional teasing
12:00
Lunch
1
2
3
4
5
6
See escalation described
above
12:35
Earth Science
1
2
3
4
5
6
Minor verbal harassment
1:15
Art or Phy Ed
1
2
3
4
5
6
See escalation described
above
2:00
Reading
1
2
3
4
5
6
Rarely a problem
2:50
Waiting for bus
1
2
3
4
5
6
See escalation described
above
What is FBA?
A systematic process for developing
statements about factors that
contribute to occurrence &
maintenance of problem
behavior, &
more importantly, serve as
basis for developing
proactive & comprehensive
behavior support plans.
When has FBA been done?
Clear & measurable definition of problem behaviors.
Complete testable hypothesis or summary statement is
provided.
Data (direct observation) to confirm testable hypothesis.
Behavior intervention plan based on testable hypothesis
Fundamental Rule
“You should not propose to reduce a
problem behavior without also
identifying alternative, desired
behaviors person should perform
instead of problem behavior” (O’Neill et
al., 1997, p. 71).
How is FBA information used to develop BIP?
“Problem
Behavior”
“Desired
Alternative”
“Acceptable
Alternative”
Set of behaviors
triggered by
antecedent
events, &
maintained by
problem
consequences
(function)
Set of behaviors
that is expected
in problem
context &
maintained by
typical
consequences,
but not triggered
by antecedent
events
Set of behaviors
that are
acceptable in
context &
maintained by
problem
consequences
(function) but not
normative
Summary Statement
Setting Events
Triggering
Antecedents
Desired
Alternative
Typical
Consequence
Problem
Behavior
Maintaining
Consequences
Acceptable
Alternative
Summary Statement
Desired
Alternative
Typical
Consequence
Do work
w/o
complaints.
Points,
grades,
questions,
more work.
Setting Events
Triggering
Antecedents
Problem
Behavior
Maintaining
Consequences
Lack of peer
contact in 30
minutes.
Do difficult
math
assignment.
Noncompliance,
profanity,
physical
aggression,
Avoid task,
remove from
class.
Why is function important?
Because consequences
compete!!
Acceptable
Alternative
Ask for
break,
ask for
help.
Function
Summary Statement
Setting Events
Triggering
Antecedents
Desired
Alternative
Typical
Consequence
Problem
Behavior
Maintaining
Consequences
Acceptable
Alternative
Setting Event
Antecedent
Behavior
Manipulations Manipulations Manipulations
Consequence
Manipulations
Setting Event
Antecedent
Behavior
Manipulations Manipulations Manipulations
Consequence
Manipulations
ADD
antecedent
events that
trigger
desired
behavior
AND
REMOVE
antecedent
events that
trigger
problem
behavior
ADD
consequence
events that
maintain &
support
desired
behavior
AND
REMOVE
consequence
events that
maintain
problem
behavior
Neutralize,
prevent,
remove,
minimize, or
precorrect
for influence
of setting
events
TEACH
alternative &
desired
behavior that
is more
effective,
efficient, &
relevant than
problem
behavior
Summary Statement
Desired
Alternative
Typical
Consequence
Do work
w/o
complaints.
Points,
grades,
questions,
more work.
Setting Events
Triggering
Antecedents
Problem
Behavior
Maintaining
Consequences
Lack of peer
contact in 30
minutes.
Do difficult
math
assignment.
Noncompliance,
profanity,
physical
aggression,
Avoid task,
remove from
class.
Acceptable
Alternative
Ask for
break,
ask for
help.
Setting Event
Manipulations
Arrange for
peer
interaction
before math
class
Provide
positive adult
contact
Sit with
preferred peer
Antecedent
Manipulations
Introduce
review type
problem before
difficult tasks
Remind of
alternative
behaviors
Do first
problem
together
Behavior
Manipulations
Consequence
Manipulations
Immediately
reinforce
entering class.
Teach options to
problem
behavior:
1. Ask for break
2. Ask for help
3. Turn in
assignment as
is.
Provide
reinforcer w/in 1
min. of starting
task (3 min., 5
min., 10
minutes)
Teach missing
math skills
Give break &
help
Sit with
preferred peer
when done
Summary Statement
Setting Events
Rides city
bus
Triggering
Antecedents
Teacher
corrects
peers
Desired
Alternative
Typical
Consequence
Ignore &
problem
solve
later
Delayed
teacher
attention.
Problem
Behavior
Maintaining
Consequences
Profanity
Verbal
protests
Teacher
attention
Function
Why is function important?
Because consequences
compete!!
Acceptable
Alternative
Discuss
in
private
Setting Event
Manipulations
Antecedent
Manipulations
Behavior
Manipulations
On days city bus
ridden, check in
with counselor
to review days
schedule & walk
with counselor
to classroom
Give >3 positive
acknowledgements per
min. to peers
during
transitions.
Teach J. how,
when, & where to
express verbal
protest, & how to
walk away from
problem situations
in transitions.
Give private &
quiet corrections
to peers.
Remind J. of
acceptable &
desired
replacement
behaviors
Consequence
Manipulations
When J. engages
in problem
behavior
immediately
disengage from
him, & engage
peers.
When J. engages
in replacement
behaviors
provide adult
attention
(discussion)
FBA-BIP Team Process
1. Collect information.
2. Develop testable hypothesis or summary statement.
3. Collect direct observation data to confirm summary statement.
4. Develop “competing pathways” summary statement.
5. Develop BIP.
6. Develop details & routines for full implementation of BSP.
7. Develop strategies for monitoring & evaluating implementation of BSP.
Process Guidelines
Conducted by team
• Behaviorally competent
• Student-knowledgeable
Led by behavior specialist
Link behavioral strategies to summary statement
Ensure that implementers are fluent
Monitor continuously & evaluate early
Behavior Support Elements
* Response class
* Routine analysis
* Hypothesis statement
Problem
Behavior
* Alternative behaviors
* Competing behavior analysis
* Contextual fit
* Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes
* Evidence-based interventions
Functional
Assessment
Intervention
& Support
Plan
• Team-based
• Behavior competence
* Implementation support
* Data plan
* Continuous improvement
* Sustainability plan
Fidelity of
Implementation
Impact on
Behavior &
Lifestyle
PBIS Prevention Goals & Bullying Behavior
• Establish positive, predictable, consistent, rewarding
Goal 1 school culture for all across all settings
• Teach social skills that work at least as well as or better
than problem behavior
Goal 2
• Respond to nonresponsive behavior positively &
differently, rather than reactively & more of same
Goal 3
• Actively supervise & precorrect for problem behaviors &
settings, especially nonclassroom
Goal 4
Goal 5
• Individualize support based on responsiveness & effect
Big Ideas
Observable behavior
Behavior in context
Functional relationship
Function based intervention
Responsiveness to Intervention