Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-based Support: Tiers 2 and 3 George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut April 6
Download ReportTranscript Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-based Support: Tiers 2 and 3 George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut April 6
Addressing Individual Challenging Behavior through Function-based Support: Tiers 2 and 3 George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut April 6 2010 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org [email protected] • Prerequisites review • FBA basics • Tier 2 & 3 audit & planning SWPBS Logic! Successful individual student behavior support is linked to host environments or school climates that are effective, efficient, relevant, durable, salable, & logical for all students (Zins & Ponti, 1990) Host Environment Features Effective • Achieve desired outcome? Efficient • Doable by real implementer? Relevant • Contextual & cultural? Durable • Lasting? Scalable • Transportable? Logical • Conceptually Sound? SWPBS is Framework for enhancing adoption & implementation of Continuum of evidencebased interventions to achieve Academically & behaviorally important outcomes for All students Integrated Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior IMPLEMENTATION W/ FIDELITY CONTINUUM OF CONTINUOUS EVIDENCE-BASED PROGRESS INTERVENTIONS MONITORING UNIVERSAL SCREENING RtI DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING & PROBLEM SOLVING CONTENT EXPERTISE & FLUENCY PREVENTION & EARLY INTERVENTION CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT FEW ~5% ~15% SOME Primary Prevention: School-/ClassroomWide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ALL ~80% of Students Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Responsiveness to Intervention Academic Systems Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •High Intensity Circa 1996 1-5% 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response Universal Interventions •All students •Preventive, proactive Behavioral Systems 80-90% 1-5% Intensive, Individual Interventions •Individual Students •Assessment-based •Intense, durable procedures 5-10% Targeted Group Interventions •Some students (at-risk) •High efficiency •Rapid response 80-90% Universal Interventions •All settings, all students •Preventive, proactive Intensive Targeted Universal Few Some All Dec 7, 2007 RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Behavior Continuum Academic Continuum RTI Integrated Continuum Mar 10 2010 Math Intensive Continuum of Support for ALL Science Targeted Spanish Reading Soc skills Universal Soc Studies Basketball Label behavior…not people Dec 7, 2007 Intensive Anger man. Prob Sol. Continuum of Support for ALL Targeted Ind. play Adult rel. Attend. Universal Coop play Peer interac Label behavior…not Dec 7, 2007 people ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS ~5% ~15% TERTIARY TERTIARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Function-based support •• Wraparound •• Person-centered planning •• •• SECONDARY SECONDARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Check in/out •• Targeted social skills instruction •• Peer-based supports •• Social skills club •• ~80% of Students PRIMARY PRIMARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Teach SW expectations •• Proactive SW discipline •• Positive reinforcement •• Effective instruction •• Parent engagement •• SWPBS Practices Classroom Non-classroom Student • Smallest # • Evidence-based Family • Biggest, durable effect District-Region School SWPBS Leadership Team Specialized Behavior Support Team SWPBS Tier 1 T1 Systems T1 Practices Group-based Tier 2 T2 Systems T2 Practices Individual Tier 3 T3 Systems T3 Practices District/Region School School-wideT1 Systems School-wide T1 Practices SW Group-based T2 Systems SW Group-based T2 Practices Individual T3 Systems Individual T3 Practices Non-validated Interventions for Students with EBD • • • • • EXAMPLES Sensory re-integration or stimulation Facilitated communication Introspective psychoanalytic therapies Rebirthing therapies CONCERNS • Poor ecological (school) validity • Redirected specification of actual causal factors • Adverse side effects • False hopes & expectations • Inefficient use of resources & opportunities • Lack of empirical support • Outcomes (“Answers”) • Supporting context – Effective SWPBS • Features & requirements of function-based approach to behavior support – Process • Behavioral description of “function” – Get or escape/avoid • Steps in function-based approach to behavior intervention planning – Behaviorally competent team *Response class *Routine analysis *Hypothesis statement *Function Problem Behavior Functional Assessment Behavior Support Elements *Alternative behaviors *Competing behavior analysis *Contextual fit *Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes *Evidence-based interventions Intervention & Support Plan • Team-based *Implementation support *Data plan *Continuous improvement *Sustainability plan Fidelity of Implementation • Behavior competence Impact on Behavior & Lifestyle Function-based support is all about… Re-design & improvement of learning & teaching environments – Attention to environment & function – Not re-design of individuals – Change in behavior of plan implementers What is function based support? • Foundations in behavioral theory, applied behavior analysis, & pbs • Attention to environmental context • Emphasis on “purpose” or function of behavior • Focus on teaching behaviors • Attention to implementers (adult behaviors) & redesign of teaching & learning environments. SWPBS Conceptual Foundations Behaviorism ABA Laws of Behavior Applied Behavioral Technology PBS Social Validity SWPBS All Students Only 2 Basic Functions Problem Behavior Pos Reinf Escape/ Avoid Something Obtain/Get Something Stimulation/ Sensory Tangible/ Activity Social Adult Neg Reinf Peer Non-examples of Function-Based approach “Function” = outcome, result, purpose, consequence • “Lantana, you skipped 2 school days, so we’re going to suspend you for 2 more.” • “Phloem, I’m taking your book away because you obviously aren’t ready to learn.” • “You want my attention?! I’ll show you attention,…let’s take a walk down to the office & have a little chat with the Principal.” % Intervals w/ P.B. for Bryce % Intervals w/ P.B. Baseline 100 90 80 70 60 ContraIndicated Indicated ContraIndicated Indicated 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 Sessions* *Data points with arrows indicate no medication Ingram, Lewis-Palmer, & Sugai, 2005 % Intervals w/ P.B. for Carter 100 Baseline Indicated 90 ContraIndicated Contrandicated Indicated Indicated Modified % Intervals w/ P.B. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Sessions 17 19 21 23 25 27 Defining behavior Must result in clear, measurable, & objective descriptions of individual, groups, or sequences of related behaviors • Any observable or measurable action or act. • Observable beginning & end • Has measurable dimension(s) • Frequency, duration, latency, force, topography, locus Consider behavior dimensions: – Topography/shape – Frequency – Duration – Latency, – Intensity or force – Locus Non- v. Observable (-) hyperactivity (+) initiates 5 different tasks within 2 minutes (+) leaves room at least 3 times during a 30 minute lesson (+)…. Which is described in observable terms? Hits with his fist OR Aggressive Which is described in observable terms? Hits with his fist OR Aggressive Delinquent OR Takes money from peers Delinquent OR Takes money from peers Psychotic OR Says she hears voices Arrives 10 minutes late OR Irresponsible Arrives 10 minutes late OR Irresponsible Out of seat 55% of time OR Hyperactive Out of seat 55% of time OR Hyperactive Consider response class Set of topographically different behaviors with similar or related purpose or function – Hit, spit, runaway, yell… • Escape difficult task request – Cry, hit, whine, raise hand, spit….. • Obtain adult attention Consider response chains • Predictable sequence of behaviors • Possibly different functions at beginning & end of chains Ex1. Behavior Chain Given doable task, student… 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Whispers that work is stupid, Writes on papers, Says work is stupid, Throws paper in waste basket, & Leaves room. What is function of behavior? (Test) Ex2. Given difficult task, student… 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Says this work is stupid, Pokes student at next table, Argues with student, Tells teacher to butt out, Threatens teacher Runs away from teacher who chases. What is function of behavior? (Test) What is FBA? A systematic process for developing statements about factors that – contribute to occurrence & maintenance of problem behavior, & – more importantly, serve as basis for developing proactive & comprehensive behavior support plans. When has FBA been done? 1. Clear & measurable definition of problem behaviors. 2. Complete testable hypothesis or summary statement is provided. • Statement of function (purpose) of behavior 3. Data (direct observation) to confirm testable hypothesis. 4. Behavior intervention plan based on testable hypothesis • Contextually appropriate supports for accurate implementation Testable Hypothesis “Basic Unit” Setting Events Triggering Antecedents Problem Behavior Class • “Best guess” about behavior & conditions under which it is observed • Represents basic working unit of FBA • Directly guides development of BIP Maintaining Consequences Testable Hypothesis “Basic Unit” Setting Events Infrequent events that affect value of maint. conseq. Triggering Antecedents Preceding events that trigger or occasion Problem Behavior Class Set of related behaviors of concern Maintaining Consequences Following events that maintain behaviors of concern When Sequoia misses her 12:30 medication & teachers present multiple task demands, she makes negative self-statements & writes profane language on her assignments. Teaching staff typically send her to the office with a discipline referral for being disrespectful. What function? Avoid difficult tasks Setting event Misses 12:30 medication Antecedent Response Consequence Teachers make multiple task demands Sequoia makes negative selfstatements & writes profane language Teacher sends Sequoia to office for being disrespectful Caesar has dyed his hair three colors & is teased several times by his friends before class. When he enters the class, his teacher stares at his hair. Caesar immediately says “what are you staring at?” His teacher immediately sends him to inschool detention. Escape adult & What function? peer attention Setting event Caesar is teased several times about his hair by his friends before class Antecedent Response Consequence His teacher stares at his hair in class Caesar asks his teacher what she’s staring at His teacher sends him to in-school detention Cleo is new to the 6th grade, & English is her second language. When another student approaches & says something to her in English, Cleo turns away. The other student walks away. This happens several times during the day. Whatpeer function? Escape attention Setting event Antecedent New student Student approaches & speaks in English Response Cleo turns away Consequence Other student walks away When his teacher asks him what the capitol city of a country is, Napoleon gives the correct answers. His teacher praises his correct answer, & tells him he may work by himself or a friend on the rest of the assignment. Setting event Antecedent Response None Teacher asks what capitol city of country is Napoleon give correct answer Accessfunction? peer & What adult attention Consequence Teacher gives verbal praise & time to work with a friend As Veloce is walking, other kids look at him & say “what’s up?” He looks back and says: “Who ya lookin’ at?!” “Ya want some of this?!” “Ya talkin’ to me?!” Kids shake their heads & all him “weirdo.” Access OR escape What function? peer attention? Setting event ?? Antecedent Look at him. “What’s up!” Response Consequence How do do you you know? know? How “Who ya Kids shake Assess? lookin’ at?” heads & “Ya want Some?” “Ya talkin’ to me? call him “weirdo” WRITE TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS: As Veloce is walking, other kids look at him & say “what’s up?” He looks back and says: “Who ya lookin’ at?!” “Ya want some of this?!” “Ya talkin’ to me?!” Kids shake their heads & all him “weirdo.” Setting event ?? Antecedent Response Look at him. “What’s up!” “Who ya lookin’ at?” “Ya want Some?” “Ya talkin’ to me? Consequence Kids shake heads & call him “weirdo” Example 1: Different behaviors with different functions • Kirsten’s teachers agree that she has two behaviors that interfere with her social success at school, & develop two testable hypotheses: Setting Event Antecedent Event None Teacher presents multiple step request. Setting Event Antecedent Event None Peers play game & have conflict. Consequence Event Behavior Verbal protest, noncompliance, foot stomping. Consequence Event Behavior Pushes peers away, uses profanity, throws rocks. Teacher repeats request 4 to 5 times & threatens after school suspension. Peers stop playing with Kirsten. Example 2: Same behaviors with different functions • Amy teachers have noticed two different conditions when Amy displays same problem behaviors. They developed following two testable hypotheses: Setting Event Antecedent Event None Peers try to engage Amy in conversations. Setting Event Antecedent Event None Teachers give Amy corrective feedback about her work. Consequence Event Behavior Turns eyes away, does not comply verbally, pulls sweater over his head. Peers move away. Consequence Event Behavior Turns eyes away, does not comply verbally, pulls sweater over his head. Teachers sit down next to her, rub her shoulders, & say comforting words. 25 Functional Assessment Checklist for Teachers “FACTS” STEP 1: Student/ Grade: _____Clarence/5th grade_____ Date: ____January 11___________ Interviewer: ___________Sugai________ Respondent(s): ____Thomas_____ STEP 2: Student Profile: Please identify at least three strengths or contributions the student brings to school. C. has leadership potential. Peers listened to him, and he can be very convincing and sincere. He’s academically competent and seems to be moving smoothly and successfully through the school curriculum. STEP 3: Problem Behavior(s): Identify problem behaviors ___Tardy_X Fight/physical Aggression ___ Disruptive___ Theft___ UnresponsiveX Inappropriate Language_X__ Insubordination___ Vandalism___ Withdrawn_X__ Verbal Harassment____Work not done___ Other __________ ____X _ Verbally Inappropriate___ Self-injury Describe problem behavior:C. may have one of the shortest fuses I’ve seen. One little tease by a peer, and he quickly and predictably escalates through a behavioral sequence that begins with passive in subordination (non response), moves to a mild protest, shifts to harassment and name calling, increases to property damage and even to physical aggression. Its interesting that he seems to “enjoy” the reactions he gets from peers that he aggresses toward, and from peers who look up to him for his aggressiveness. STEP 4: Routine Analysis Schedule (Times) Activity Likelihood of Problem Behavior Specific Problem Behavior 8:00 Waiting to enter building Low 1 2 High 5 6 See escalation described above 3 4 8:15 Advisory & Planning 1 2 3 4 5 6 Mostly teasing and touching property of others. Doesn’t escalate much further 9:15 Language Arts 1 2 3 4 5 6 Occasional name calling/teasing 10:15 Recess 1 2 3 4 5 6 See escalation described above 11:30 Math 1 2 3 4 5 6 Occasional teasing 12:00 Lunch 1 2 3 4 5 6 See escalation described above 12:35 Earth Science 1 2 3 4 5 6 Minor verbal harassment 1:15 Art or Phy Ed 1 2 3 4 5 6 See escalation described above 2:00 Reading 1 2 3 4 5 6 Rarely a problem 2:50 Waiting for bus 1 2 3 4 5 6 See escalation described above Fundamental Rule! “You should not propose to reduce a problem behavior without also identifying alternative, desired behaviors person should perform instead of problem behavior” (O’Neill et al., 1997, p. 71). Summary Statement Setting Events Triggering Antecedents Desired Alternative Typical Consequence Problem Behavior Maintaining Consequences Acceptable Alternative Summary Statement Desired Alternative Typical Consequence Do work w/o complaints. Points, grades, questions, more work. Setting Events Triggering Antecedents Problem Behavior Maintaining Consequences Lack of peer contact in 30 minutes. Do difficult math assignment. Noncompliance, profanity, physical aggression, Avoid task, remove from class. Why is function important? Because consequences compete!! Acceptable Alternative Ask for break, ask for help. Function Summary Statement Setting Events Triggering Antecedents Desired Alternative Typical Consequence Problem Behavior Maintaining Consequences Acceptable Alternative Setting Event Manipulations Antecedent Manipulations Behavior Manipulations Consequence Manipulations Summary Statement Desired Alternative Typical Consequence Do work w/o complaints. Points, grades, questions, more work. Setting Events Triggering Antecedents Problem Behavior Maintaining Consequences Lack of peer contact in 30 minutes. Do difficult math assignment. Noncompliance, profanity, physical aggression, Avoid task, remove from class. Why is function important? Because consequences compete!! Acceptable Alternative Ask for break, ask for help. Function Setting Event Manipulations Antecedent Manipulations Arrange for peer interaction before math class Introduce review type problem before difficult tasks Provide positive adult contact Remind of alternative behaviors Sit with preferred peer Do first problem together Behavior Manipulations Teach options to problem behavior: 1. Ask for break 2. Ask for help 3. Turn in assignment as is. Teach missing math skills Consequence Manipulations Immediately reinforce entering class. Provide reinforcer w/in 1 min. of starting task (3 min., 5 min., 10 minutes) Give break & help Sit with preferred peer when done Summary Statement Desired Alternative Ignore & problem solve later Setting Events Rides city bus Triggering Antecedents Teacher corrects peers Problem Behavior Profanity Verbal protests Typical Consequence Delayed teacher attention. Maintaining Consequences Teacher attention Function Why is function important? Because consequences compete!! Acceptable Alternative Discuss in private Setting Event Manipulations On days city bus ridden, check in with counselor to review days schedule & walk with counselor to classroom Antecedent Manipulations Behavior Manipulations Give >3 positive acknowledgements per min. to peers during transitions. Teach J. how, when, & where to express verbal protest, & how to walk away from problem situations in transitions. Give private & quiet corrections to peers. Remind J. of acceptable & desired replacement behaviors Consequence Manipulations When J. engages in problem behavior immediately disengage from him, & engage peers. When J. engages in replacement behaviors provide adult attention (discussion) BIP Guidelines 1. Design antecedent strategies to make triggering antecedents irrelevant….so they no longer serve as triggers. 2. Design behavior teaching strategies to make problem behaviors inefficient….so more acceptable behaviors are easier to do. 3. Design consequence strategies to make maintaining consequences ineffective…so they no longer are present or are less reinforcing. 4. Design setting event strategies to eliminate or neutralize effects of setting events…so they have less impact on routines & reinforcers. Process Guidelines 1. Conducted by team • Behaviorally competent • Student-knowledgeable 2. Led by behavior specialist 3. Link behavioral strategies to summary statement 4. Ensure that implementers are fluent 5. Monitor continuously & evaluate early FBA Team Process Steps 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Collect information. Develop testable hypothesis or summary statement. Collect direct observation data to confirm summary statement. Develop “competing pathways” summary statement. Develop BIP. Develop details & routines for full implementation of BSP. Develop strategies for monitoring & evaluating implementation of BSP. Common Secondary Intervention Features • Regular function-based screening • Direct student orientation, training, practice, & review • Link to SW expectations, routines, etc. • Link to academic programming & expectations Secondary – cont. • Daily-weekly monitoring, review, & evaluations with adult • Regular, overt, & frequent opportunities for positive reinforcement • Individualized academic & behavioral targets, & accommodations Secondary – cont. • Daily-weekly home-school communications • Behavioral contracting • Self-management strategies Examples… “Behavior Education Program” – Fern Ridge Middle School, OR “Check-in Check-out” – Bethel School District, OR “H.U.G.” – Tualatin Elementary School, OR • “Social Skills Club” – Missouri • “Think Time” – University of Nebraska Example: FRMS Behavior Education Plan (BEP) • SW system of behavior support in place • Relatively small # (~10-20%) students not responding to SW • Need for efficient specialized support system Referral, Assessment, & Orientation FRMS Behavior Education Plan (BEP) (Hawkin, Horner, & March, 2002) BEP Plan Morning Check-In Weekly BEP Meeting 9 Week Graph Sent Daily Teacher Evaluation Home Check-In Afternoon Check-In Program Update EXIT Behavior Education Plan Daily Progress Report Goals 1/5 2/6 3/7 HR 4/8 Be respectful 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 Be responsible 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 Keep Hand & Feet to Self 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 Follow Directions 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 Be There – Be Ready 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 TOTAL POINTS 2 HUG: Hello, Update, Goodbye Pam Hallvik, Nancy Ferguson, & Sally Helton Tigard-Tualatin Schools H.U.G. (Hello, Update, Goodbye) Name: ____________________________ Date: ________________ Please indicate whether the student has met the goal during the time period indicated: Meets = 2 pts So, so = 1 point Doesn’t meet = 0 pts HUG Daily Goal _____/_____ HUG Daily Score _____/_____ Teacher Comments: Please state briefly any specific behaviors or achievements that demonstrate the student’s progress. AM to Recess AM Recess Be Safe J K L J K L J K L J K L J K L Be Kind J K L J K L J K L J K L J K L Be Responsible J K L J K L J K L J K L J K L Goals AM Recess to Lunch Lunch Recess PM Total Points Teacher Initials Parent’s Signature ___________________________________ Parent’s Comments _________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ H.U.G. Program • • WHAT AND WHY? The H.U.G. Program is a means to respond positively to students who need extra support with their behavior. On a daily basis, staff can teach them appropriate behaviors and provide them with opportunities to practice as they move from activity to activity. Additionally, the H.U.G. Program provides for reinforcement and positive attention from adults. The H.U.G. Program also provides for daily communication between a student and his/her teacher and between the school and parents. Additionally, data is collected to determine whether the program is successful or whether changes need to be made. The H.U.G. Program was designed to facilitate positive interactions between at-risk students and significant adults, teach good behavior skills, and provide a means for home-school communication. The H.U.G. check-in creates a safe space for these students; they come to trust and respect the adults who are consistently there for them. The program does not include negative consequences or punishment, just encouragement and positive attention. Parents are asked to provide reinforcement at home when the H.U.G. goal is met and consistently offer feedback and encouragement to their sons or daughters. • • • • • • • HOW? The H.U.G. Program consists of a plan and process that allow students to: Check-in with a significant adult before school Carry a tracking form Ask their teacher to rate their behavior Check-out at the end of each day Take the form home to parents Return the H.U.G. form the next morning “Hello” - Morning • • • • • • All H.U.G. students will check in at counselor’s office between 8:00 & 8:30 each morning. At that time they will receive following: Positive, sincere greeting Check to see if they are prepared for day (lunch ticket, materials, etc.) Check to learn how they are feeling (any morning conflicts?) Collection of returned H.U.G. form signed by parents Verbal reinforcement for returning signed form possibly accompanied by sticker or small reward New H.U.G. form “Update” - During Day Student: give H.U.G. form to his or her teacher on arrival to class Teacher will rate student’s behavior at times indicated on form & offer brief, positive comment to student about rating. Adults in other setting, such as PE, Music, & recess, etc., will complete ratings for time period they have students. “Goodbye” - End of Day • Students will return with their H.U.G. forms to counselor’s room at 2:25 each day: • Students will again receive positive, sincere greeting • Counselor or H.U.G. assistant will check to see whether student met his/her goal. – If so, student will receive small reward. – If not, student will receive encouragement to try again tomorrow along with problem-solving discussion of what they might do differently. • Students will put their H.U.G. forms into their backpacks to take home to share with their parents. • Parents are asked to also give positive feedback to their children. Parents then sign form & put it in student’s backpack for return to school. H.U.G. Participant Responsibilities H.U.G. Coordinator Teachers • Sign H.U.G. Contract Agreement. • Sign H.U.G. Contract Agreement. • Facilitate the check-in and check-out process. • Accept H.U.G. Report Form daily from students. • Provide H.U.G. participants with positive, constructive feedback and small tangible rewards. • Evaluate student behaviors and complete the form. • Instruct involved staff members on the use of the HUG form. • Offer constructive and positive feedback to students. • Collect, summarize, and report H.U.G. data each week. Parents of H.U.G. Participants H.U.G. Student Participants • Sign H.U.G. Contract Agreement. • Follow all H.U.G. Program Guidelines. • Review H.U.G. Progress Report with child daily. • Sign H.U.G. Contract Agreement. • Provide positive and constructive feedback. • Communicate with the school when there are concerns or celebrations regarding the student’s behavior. • GIVE IT YOUR BEST!!!! H.U.G Program Contract Agreement I have read the H.U.G. Team Members’ Responsibilities Form. I understand that my signature indicates that I am willing to participate in the H.U.G. Program and fulfill all my responsibilities. • • • • • Student signature: ___________________ Date ______ Parent(s) signature(s): _________________ Date ______ Teacher signature: ____________________ Date ______ Administrator signature: ________________ Date ______ H.U.G. Coordinator signature: _____________Date ______ Copies will be given to all H.U.G. participants. Thank you for your participation and support!!! RTI & Secondary Intervention in classroom Fairbanks, Sugai, Guardino, & Lathrop (2007, EC) Check In/Out Pt Card Name____________________ Date ____________ GOALS: 8:30 9:30 10:30 11:30 12:30 1:30 1. RESPECT OTHERS 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2. MANAGE SELF 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 3. SOLVE PROBLEMS RESPONSIBLY 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 Rating Scale 2 = Great 1 = Ok 0 = Goal Not Met Goal _____ Pts Possible _____ Pts Received_____ % of Pts _____ Goal Met? Y N -O ct 3N o 16 v -N o 30 v -N ov 7D ec 6Ja n 13 -J a n 18 -J a n 27 -J a n 3F eb 8F e 17 b -F eb 25 -F eb 4M a 11 r -M a 30 r -M ar 5A p 13 r -A p 29 r -A p 10 r -M a 19 y -M ay 26 Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior 100 90 10 0 BL CI/ CO CI/CO +75% CI/CO +80% 80 80 90 School Days CI/CO +90% 70 Helena 60 50 40 30 20 10 100 0 90 70 Jade 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 80 Farrell 70 60 50 40 30 20 Began meds. Class B Results Class B Results + Composite Peers 100 BL CI/ CO 90 CI/CO +75% CI/CO +80% CI/CO +90% 80 Helena 70 60 Peer 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 Jade 80 70 60 Peer 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 Farrell 80 70 Peer 60 50 40 30 20 School Days eb 4M a 11 r -M a 30 r -M ar 5A p r 13 -A pr 29 -A p 10 r -M a 19 y -M ay -F 25 17 -F eb eb Began meds. 8F -O ct 3N ov 16 -N ov 30 -N ov 7D ec 0 6Ja n 13 -J a n 18 -J a n 27 -J a n 3F eb 10 26 Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior 50 100 BL 90 Study 2 Results CI/ CO CI/CO 75% CI/CO 80% FB plan FB plan 2 80 Marce llus 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 80 Blair 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 80 Be n 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 80 Oliv ia 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 6Ja n 13 -J a n 18 -J a n 27 -J a n 3F e b 8F e b 17 -F e b 25 -F e b 4M a 11 r -M a 30 r -M ar 5A p r 13 -A p 29 r -A p 10 r -M a 19 y -M ay -O ct 3N ov 16 -N o 30 v -N ov 7D ec 0 26 Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior 90 School Days Summary Statement of Problem Behavior Contingencies across Students Setting Events Antecedents Behavior(s) of Interest Consequences Marcellus N/A (a) Easy unstructured activities (b) Difficult math and writing tasks (a) Out of seat & making faces (b) Talk outs, out of seat, &work not completed (a) Peer attention (b) Escape work Blair N/A Independent work time Out of seat & talking to peers Peer & adult attention Ben N/A Teacher-led instruction When given direction. Non-compliance, Peer & adult talk outs, making attention jokes Olivia Thinking During teacher- led Playing with about the loss instruction things, not of her sibling looking at teacher, & not following directions Teacher attention Study 2 Results + Composite Peer 100 BL 90 CI/ CO CI/CO 75% CI/CO 80% FB plan FB plan 2 80 Marce llus 70 60 Peer 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 80 Peer 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 80 Be n 70 60 Peer 50 40 30 20 10 0 100 90 80 70 Peer Oliv ia 60 50 40 30 20 10 School Days 4M a 11 r -M a 30 r -M ar 5A p r 13 -A p 29 r -A p 10 r -M a 19 y -M ay 6Ja n 13 -J a n 18 -J a n 27 -J a n 3F eb 8F eb 17 -F e 25 b -F eb -O ct 3N ov 16 -N o 30 v -N ov 7D ec 0 26 Percent of Intervals Engaged in Problem Behavior Blair 70