Transdisciplinary Collaboration: A Demonstration Project Phyllis M. Connolly, PhD, RN, CS Jean M.

Download Report

Transcript Transdisciplinary Collaboration: A Demonstration Project Phyllis M. Connolly, PhD, RN, CS Jean M.

Transdisciplinary Collaboration:
A Demonstration Project
Phyllis M. Connolly, PhD, RN, CS
Jean M. Novak, PhD, CCC-SLP
San Jose State University, San Jose, CA
Objectives
Discuss
the driving forces related to the need for
transdisciplinary collaboration
Recognize discipline specific assessment tools and interventions
use for SJSU Transdisciplinary Project
Identify client specific outcomes based on the Omaha
Documentation System
Societal Shifts
 Nationalism
replaced
with global economy
 Social ecology--needs
for integration &
connections
 Social capital-networks, norms,
trust, coordination &
cooperation
TRENDS
 High-value
organizations depend
on and expect workers
at all levels to be
capable of making
decisions
 Health care being
driven by changes in
industry
 New
organizations
 New forms of delivery
systems-- managed
care
 New ways of relating
to each other
 Smaller companies
 Outsourcing
 Disease management
Changing Work Environment
 Technology
 Demographics
 Managed
Care
 Purchaser’s Influence
 Health Insurance
Industry
 Changing Health
Systems
 Telemedicine
Relationship to Health

Concern not only with costs & benefits but with
social, emotional, & physical health

Promoting health and providing health care, no
longer the exclusive domain of any discipline

Need for interdependence to improve population
health care outcomes
Primary Care:
Collaboration Needed
Anxiety disorders,
depression &
substance abuse
most frequently
misdiagnosed in
primary care
practices
Project Goal
Through collaborative efforts,
provide quality, cost effective
services for persons with serious
mental illness living in the
community while simultaneously
preparing future mental health
professionals for practice.
Transdisciplinary Collaboration Project
San Jose State University
Psychosocial.
Occupational
Therapy Clinic
Office of Sponsored Programs
College of Applied Sciences and Arts
School of Nursing
Nurse Managed Centers
Communication Disorders & Sciences:
Program & Clinic
Department of Occupational Therapy
Department of Recreation & Leisure Studies: TR
College of Social Work
Institute for Teaching & Learning
Faculty and Students
Santa Clara
County
Mental
Health
Revised 5/99
Santa Clara County
Alliance for the
Mentally Ill
Residents
Staff
Families
ALLIANCE for
Community Care
Zoe House
Crossroads Village
Casa Feliz
Definition Collaboration
 A dynamic
transforming process of creating
a power sharing partnership for pervasive
application in health care practice,
education, research, & organizational
settings for the purposeful attention to
needs and problems in order to achieve
likely successful outcomes (Sullivan, 1998,
p. 6)
Transdisciplinary
 Refers
to a relatively new model based on
the concept that the needs of the recipient
of services (student, patient, client, etc.)
dictates the roles to be performed by
members of the team. There can be much
overlap in individual job descriptions.
Transdisciplinary
Team Advantages
 Individualized
rehabilitation plan-goals
 Integrated service delivery
 Role delineation
 Reduction of redundant care
 Increase of interaction between professionals
 Generalization and maintenance of skills
 Learning with and from each other
 Sharing and growing
 Improved quality of life
 Cost effectiveness
Behavioral Ecological Model of
Community Mental Health
Laws
University
Administration of
Justice
Training of
Professionals
Community
Friends and Peers
Person
Church
Family
Laws
Social Policy
Mental Health
System
Legislation
Behavioral-ecological Perspective
Values & Interventions
 Specific
values:
– Promoting individual competence
– Enhancing psychological sense of community
– Supporting cultural diversity
 Interventions
seek to:
– Optimize human development
– Enhance coping and mastery skills
– Enhance organizational and community strengths
Improved quality of life
Competence Paradigm:
Health Based
View of Families:
Emphasis on:
Role of Professionals:
Assessment:
Goal of Interventions:
Modus Operandi:
Perspective:
Competent
Strengths
Enabling Agents
Competencies
Empowerment
Adaptation
Ecological Framework
Transdisciplinary Project
S TU D E N TS F A C U L TY S TA F F
S em in ar
AMI
M eetin g s
Caring & Sharing
•weekly
•campus
•case presentation
•discipline information
•discussion & feedback
P racticu m
•2 days/week
•on-site/campus
•client contact
•experience
•implementation
•evaluation
Assessment & Outcome Tools
 Pragmatic
Protocol
 Social Skills Rating Scale
 Canadian Occupational Performance
 Omaha Nursing Documentation System
 Allen’s Cognitive Levels
 Kohlman Evaluation of Living Skills
 Psychosocial Assessment
 CERT-Psych
Omaha Nursing Documentation System
Domains
Interventions
 I.
Environmental

II. Psychosocial

III. Physiological
 IV.
Health Related
Behaviors
 I.
Health Teaching
Guidance,
Counseling
 II. Treatments &
Procedures
 III. Case Management
 IV. Surveillance
Domain II. Psychosocial












Communication with
community resources
Social contact
Role change
Interpersonal relationship
Spiritual distress
Grief
Emotional stability
Human sexuality
Caretaking/parenting
Neglected child/adult
Abused child/adult
Growth & development
IV. Health Related Behaviors









Nutrition
Sleep and rest patterns
Physical activity
Personal hygiene
Substance use
Family planning
Health care supervision
Prescribed medication
regimen
Technical procedure
Targets
 Behavior
modification
 Caretaking/parenting
skills
 Communication
 Coping skills
 Exercises
 Food
 Interaction
 Wellness
 Medication
action/side
effects
 Nutrition
 Rehabilitation
 Relaxation/breathing
techniques
 Safety
 Signs/symptoms
 Stress management
Omaha Rating Scale
Concept
1
2
3
Mini- Basic
Knowledge No
knowledge mal
4
5
Adequate Superior
Behavior
Not
appropriate
Rarely Inconsistently
Usually
Status
Extreme
S&S
Severe Moderate Minimal
S&S S&S
S&S
Consistently
No S&S
Issues for Collaboration
Health
Communication
 Weight
loss
 Exercise
 Grooming
 Safe sex
 Nutrition
 Stress management
 Symptom
management
 Memory
Cognition
 Speech
 Narrative discourse
 Conversational skills
 Social skills
 Hearing
 Literacy

Approaches to Collaborative
Outcomes
Primary discipline
Supportive discipline
Assess and evaluate
problems and needs
 Treat & evaluate
 Seek consultation &
referrals
 Collaborate


Validate treatment
approach
 Assess, treat,
recommend
 Collaborate
Collaborative Interventions
 Individual
–
–
–
–
One to one
Consultation
Case Management
Health teaching and
counseling/guidance
– Surveillance
– Treatments &
Procedures
– Referrals
 Group
– Psychoeducational
classes
– Modules
– Activities
– Health teaching
– Advocacy
Weight Loss
 Nursing
– Assess nutritional
status
– Assess eating
behaviors
– Assess environment
– Assess and establish
exercise program
– Teach appropriate food
selections
– Evaluate, weigh
weekly
 Communication
Disorders
– Organizing a eating
schedule
– Categorizing
appropriate food
choices
– Follow up
comprehension
– Food preparation
Stress Management
 Nursing
– Crisis intervention
»
»
»
»
Deep breathing
Self talk
Time out
Visualization
– Prevention
» Diet & nutrition
» Exercise
» Time management
 Communication
Disorders
– Organizing and
creating schedules
– Follow up on
comprehension
– Routines
– Social skills
Memory
 Communication
Disorders
interventions
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Scheduling
Visual, writing notes,
Reminders
Calendars
Routines
Self generated strategies
Repetition
Rehearsals

Nursing interventions
– Assess for physiological
causes
– Assess for nutritional
status
– Assess medication
efficacy
– Develop collaborative
plan utilizing memory
enhancement strategies
Speech (Dysarthria)
 Communication
Disorders
– Oral facial evaluation
– Oral motor exercises
» Voice
» Exaggerated
enunciation
» Oral facial awareness
» Rate of speech
 Nursing
–
–
–
–
–
Assess AIMS
Assess medication
Assess oral hygiene
Assess dental hygiene
Assess nutritional
status
– Follow up on oral
motor exercises
CCF # 9012, Problem 21, Speech,
Communication, Spring 97
 Difficulty
–
–
–
–
–
with
Intelligibility
Topic maintenance
Organizational skills
Withdrawal
Interventions
Outcomes

Decrease in rate of speech

Increased
– Intelligibility
– Narrative discourse,
expanded utterances,
increase volume
– Self expression
– Organizational skills
– Interaction
– Social interaction
– Attention and participation
CCF # 9012, Problem 21,
Speech, Nursing, Spring 97
Initial Rating
Final Rating
 Knowledge:
2
 Knowledge:
4
 Behavior:
2
 Behavior:
4
 Status:
3
 Status:
4
CCF #9513, Problem 21, Speech,
Fall 98
Initial Rating
Final Rating
Knowledge: 4
 Knowledge:
3

 Behavior:
3
 Behavior:
4
 Status:
3

Status:
4
CCF # 9073, Problem 30,
Digestion-Hydration, Spring 99
Initial Rating
Final Rating
 Knowledge:
2
 Knowledge:
4
 Behavior:
2
 Behavior:
3
 Status:
2
 Status:
3
CCF # 9033, Problem 21,
Speech, Fall 98 - Spring 99
Initial Rating
Final Rating
 Knowledge:
2
 Knowledge:
4
 Behavior:
2
 Behavior:
4
 Status:
3
 Status:
4
CCF #9075, Problem 07, Social
Contact, Fall 98 - Spring 99
Initial Rating
Final Rating
 Knowledge:
1
 Knowledge:
3
 Behavior:
2
 Behavior:
3
 Status:
2
 Status:
3
CCF #9012, Problem 38, Personal
Hygiene, Spring 97
Initial Rating
Final Rating
 Knowledge:
2
 Knowledge:
4
 Behavior:
2
 Behavior:
4
 Status:
3
 Status:
4
CCF # 9036, Problem 39,
Substance Use, Spring 97
Initial Rating
Final Rating

Knowledge: 2

Knowledge: 4

Behavior:
2

Behavior:
2
 Status:
 Status:
3
3
Outcomes Interpersonal Relations:
Crossroads S 95 - F 98
Average Omaha Ratings All Contacts
Across Semesters
5
4
3
Knowledge
Behavior
Status
2
1
0
S 95
N = 15
F 95
S 96
F 96
N = 34
N = 28
N = 20
F 98
N=5
Note: Typical interventions: Health Teaching & Surveillance
Typical targets: Communication & Interactions
Additional Resident Outcomes
 Decrease
in symptoms
 Community tenure
 Increased use of
community resources
 Attendance at OT
Clinic on campus
 Increased use of City
& University libraries
 Employment
More independent
housing
 Participation in City
Recreation Program
 Enrollment in College
and University
 Volunteer jobs

Cost Savings Study
Crossroads Village: 1993-94
 N=25
(9 -12 month)
By using Crossroads Village,
25 persons achieved tenure with total
savings of $369,471 in the following areas:
–
–
–
–
Locked facility costs
Emergency psychiatric services costs
Acute in-patient psychiatric services costs
Contract services costs
Outcomes
Fall 1993 - Spring 1999
22,837 hours direct care
321 undergraduates
59 graduate students
10 faculty
Evaluating Student Learning
 Transdisciplinary
Seminar
 Supervision Groups
 Logs
 Direct Observation
 Process Recordings
 Care Plans
 One to one
Challenges and Issues







Conflicts in missions
Supervision of nonnursing students on site
Staffing during nonacademic times
Maintaining faculty
interest
Role strain
Students dropping clients
Inadequate space to meet
with students







Lack of university support
Staff turnover
Client hospitalizations
Communications
Cutbacks in county
funding
Obtaining permission to
provide services from
conservators and case
managers
Conflicts with OT clinic
schedule
Outcomes of Collaboration
Clearly, the closer educators, researchers,
consumers, practitioners, and families
come together in the service area, the
more likely that curricula will be reality
based and congruent with clients’ needs.
At the same time, the possibility of
improving the quality of life increases.