MAKING INTANGIBLES A VALUABLE TANGIBLE ASSET GENERATING VALUE BY RELYING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL Geneva, Switzerland 11 July 2006 John D.

Download Report

Transcript MAKING INTANGIBLES A VALUABLE TANGIBLE ASSET GENERATING VALUE BY RELYING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL Geneva, Switzerland 11 July 2006 John D.

MAKING INTANGIBLES A VALUABLE TANGIBLE ASSET
GENERATING VALUE BY RELYING ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL
Geneva, Switzerland
11 July 2006
John D. Swaim
[email protected]
+41 78 808 78 50
REVOLUTIONARY CHANGES IN THINKING ABOUT
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND VALUE
 Economic Paradigm Shift
—
Relative importance of Intangible Assets/ IP
–
In the U.S., since 1980, the average ratio of market
capitalization to book value has risen from slightly
over one to a multiple higher than five.
– In 1970, intangible assets represented less than 20%
of the market value of the majority of U.S. public
corporations. Now they represent 90%.
 Communication/IT Revolution
 Mergers & Acquisitions
TANGIBLE AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS HAVE
VASTLY DIFFERENT CHARACTERISTICS…
 Value from Tangible Nature v. Value from Property Rights
and Intangible Factors
 One Place at One Time v. Multiple Uses for Multiple
Returns
—
Intellectual Property as a “bundle of rights”
 Depreciation v. Cumulative Property of Knowledge
"Knowledge is cumulative, with each idea building on the last,
whereas machines deteriorate and must be replaced."
- Baruch Lev
…LIKE THE ECONOMICS OF THINGS VERSUS THE
ECONOMICS OF INFORMATION
 Costly Replication v. Zero Cost Replication
 Diminishing Returns v. Perfectly Increasing Returns
 Efficient Markets v. Requirement of Imperfect
Markets/Tendancy towards Concentration
RELATIONSHIPS AMONG THE DIFFERENT TYPES
OF ASSETS
 Highest and Best Use Analysis
—
Generally achieved within the context of a business
enterprise
 Business Enterprise as a Portfolio of Assets
—
—
—
Monetary Assets
Tangible Assets
Intangible Assets
–
Intellectual Property
 Complementary Assets
ROLES OF IP IN VALUE CREATION
 Creating Economic Value
 Creating Strategic Value
ROLES OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS & IP IN
CREATING ECONOMIC VALUE
Excess Earnings concept
—
—
Intangible assets & Intellectual Property create value
when their exploitation enables an enterprise to
produce earnings in excess of the returns required by
markets on the assets (tangible & intangible) employed
in the business.
Intangible assets are generally riskier than monetary or
tangible assets and require higher returns.
ASSET CHARACTERISTICS
VALUE
IN USE
Cash
MONETARY
Receivables
Inventory
Return
Requirement
TANGIBLE
INTANGIBLE
General
Purpose Special
Purpose
VALUE IN
LIQUIDATION
8-10%
10-15%
15-40%
Financing
Debt
Debt &
Equity
Equity
Investment
Qualities
Liquid
Versatile
Nonliquid,
Narrow Market
Source: Russell L. Parr and Gordon V. Smith
Valuation of Intellectual Property and Intangible Assets
ROLES OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS & IP IN
CREATING ECONOMIC VALUE
Producing an Economic Advantage
—
From Direct Exploitation
– Increased revenues from new/enhanced products
– Reduced costs from proprietary process technology
—
From Indirect Exploitation
– Licensing revenues
Raising Barriers to Competition
Protecting or Creating a Strong Market Position
Use in Financing the Enterprise
ROLES OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS & IP IN
FINANCING THE ENTERPRISE
 A business that can generate excess returns is attractive
to equity investors.
—
—
—
—
Traditional view is that intangible assets are financed with
equity
Investments in Intellectual Property are, in general, relatively
risky.
Providers of equity are certainly don’t want to lose their
money, but they are willing to take higher risks in order to
share in the potential upside of an investment. They want
potential rewards to match the risks they take. Equity
investors face the highest risk of losing their complete
investment.
Providers of debt want to be repaid with interest. As they do
not share in the upside of the investment, they assume lower
risk than equity investors.
ROLES OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS & IP IN
FINANCING THE ENTERPRISE (cont.)
Traditional view is changing.
— When
90% of the value of corporations is
intangible, new lending structures must follow.
— IP based debt structures have been growing (at an
uneven pace)
– Traditional secured debt
– Securitization of IP revenue streams
– Music Industry
– Film Industry
– Pharmaceutical Industry
TRADITIONAL SECURED DEBT
Lender focuses on the credit worthiness of the
borrower.
—
—
—
Is the cash flow sufficient to service the debt, and preclude
abandonment of the business?
How much risk is associated with the cash flow forecast?
Strength of balance sheet
Lender focuses on value of the collateral in case
things go wrong.
—
—
Collateral: asset pledged to a lender until a loan is repaid.
If the borrower defaults, the lender has the legal right to
seize the collateral and it sell it to pay off the loan.
The lender is granted a security interest in the property of
the borrower.
SECURITIZED LENDING
 Securitization: A device of structured financing where an entity seeks
to pool together its interest in identifiable cash flows over time,
transfer the same to investors either with or without the support of
further collateral, and thereby achieve the purpose of financing.
 Shifts the burden of repayment from the borrower to a designated
pool of assets.
 Assessment of credit risk shifts from the borrower's financial/business
condition to security of the specified stream of cash flows.
 Use of Special Purpose Vehicles to insulate the collateral from claims
of other creditors
 Requires a legal mechanism for taking security over a cash flow
 Highly structured nature may be expensive and require relatively large
deals. This should improve over time.
SECURITIZED LENDING - RISKS TO BE
ASSESSED
Infringement
Technology: market acceptance
Technological obsolescence (the corollary for a
trademark would be whether the trademark is in
fashion and popular)
Functional obsolescence
Licensee payment risk
Servicing risk
Legal risks
SECURITIZED LENDING - CREDIT
ENHANCEMENTS
Examples of Credit Enhancements
— Back-up
servicer
— Lower Loan-to-Value ratio
COPYRIGHTS: COLLATERAL VALUE /SECURITIZATION
POTENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS
 Characteristics consistent with relatively higher collateral value
—
—
—
Currently active literary, dramatic or musical work
Text
General purpose, versatile software with an established market
 Characteristics consistent with relatively lower collateral value
—
—
—
—
High infringement potential
Dormant literary, dramatic or musical work
Advertising program, training materials
Special purpose software specific to company operations
PATENTS/PROPRIETARY TECHNOLOGY: COLLATERAL
VALUE /SECURITIZATION POTENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS
 Characteristics consistent with relatively higher collateral value
—
—
—
—
"Keystone" patent supporting commercially successful product(s)
Versatile patent/proprietary technology that could support a wide range of
products or be employed in a wide range of processes
Market-ready
Congruent innovation
 Characteristics consistent with relatively lower collateral value
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Untransferable technology (much individual know-how / learning involved)
Technology supporting commercially unsuccessful product(s)
Technologically obsolete
Specific / narrow use technology
Embedded in a tangible asset (e.g. in machine designs or settings)
High development cost for commercial viability / adaptation to another use
Incomplete development
Discontinuous innovation
TRADEMARKS: COLLATERAL VALUE / SECURITIZATION
POTENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS
 Characteristics consistent with relatively higher collateral value
—
—
—
Extendable to a wide range of products or services
Associated with commercially successful products and services
Well established
 Characteristics consistent with relatively lower collateral value
—
—
—
—
—
Narrowly defined, and identified with only a specific product or
service
Associated with commercially unsuccessful products and services
Newly introduced
Jurisdiction regards the granting of a security interest to be the
present assignment of an ownership interest
Geographically narrow
ROLES OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS & IP IN
CREATING STRATEGIC VALUE
Option or flexibility value
—
The legal protections afforded IP may allow
management flexibility that is not captured using
traditional discounted cash flow techniques.
Synergy
—
“Bundle of rights” nature of IP makes IP a particularly
flexible tool for entering into transactions that create
synergy.
REAL OPTIONS: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CAN BE LIKE A
STOCK OPTION
 Stock options provide the holder the right, but not the
obligation, to purchase (“call”) or sell (“put”) the underlying
asset.
 Holder is able to wait and learn before spending.
 A patent provides the holder with the exclusive right, but not
the obligation to market the product or attack new market
segments. Management has a series of options to wait and
learn.
 Before investing in Phase II of a new drug development project
(wide-scale deployment), management learns outcome of
Phase I (technology risk).
 Before investing in Phase II, management can reassess
market developments (market risk).
What is synergy?
 Whole is greater than the sum of the parts (Type I)
—
“Synergy is the increase in performance of the combined firm over
what the two firms are already expected or required to accomplish
as independent firms.
Where the acquirers can achieve the performance that is already
expected from the target, the net present value (NPV) of an
acquisition strategy then is clearly represented by the following
formula:
NPV = Synergy – Premium”
Mark L. Sirower, The Synergy Trap: How Companies Lose the
Acquisitions Game (New York: The Free Press, 1997, 2000), 20 & 29
What is synergy? (cont.)
 Unexpected performance (Type II)
—
“Synergy means behavior of whole systems unpredicted by the
behavior of their parts taken separately….Synergy means
behavior of integral, aggregate, whole systems unpredicted by
behaviors of any of their components or subassemblies of their
components taken separately from the whole.”
Buckminster Fuller, Synergetics (New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.,
Inc.) 1975, 3
—
“In management terms, synergy means competing better than
anyone expected. It means gains in competitive advantage over
and above what firms already need to survive in their competitive
markets.”
Mark L. Sirower, 77
Sources of “Type I” Synergies
 Revenue Enhancements
—
Sell a broader line of products/services over an enhanced distribution network
—
Increased market power may allow price increases
 Cost Reductions
—
Consolidation of functions and positions
—
Elimination of redundant fixed assets
—
Spread overheads over a larger revenue base
—
Greater market power with respect to suppliers can result in purchasing economies
 Practice Improvements
—
Leverage technological and process improvements (intangible assets & Intellectual Property) over a
broader base
 Financial Economies
—
Smaller companies generally exhibit greater risk than larger companies. Acquisition of a smaller
company by a larger company can reduce the acquired company’s cost of capital.
—
Financing costs, for example borrowing costs, may also be reduced.
—
Greater economies in cash, working capital and fixed assets management
—
Tax benefits (e.g. use of net operating loss carryovers, transfer pricing benefits)
Sources of “Type II” Synergies
 Increased Core Competencies
—
“In the long run, competitiveness derives from an ability to build, at lower
cost and more speedily than competitors, the core competencies that
spawn unanticipated products. The real sources of advantage are to be
found in management’s ability to consolidate corporate-wide technologies
and production skills into competencies that empower individual
businesses to adapt quickly to changing opportunities.”
C. K. Prahalad & Gary Hamel, “The Core Competence of the Corporation” Harvard Business Review, May-June 1990.
 Intangible Assets & Intellectual Property deployed as “strategic
capital” to exploit new opportunities.
—
“Strategic capital…defined…as the value of unrealized opportunities.”
F. Peter Boer, The Real Options Solution: Finding Total Value in a High-Risk World
(New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2002), 22
CONCLUSIONS
Intellectual capital and intangible assets now drive
the world economy.
A key success driver for the enterprise in this
environment is its ability to profitably exploit its
intellectual capital and intangibles.