US Army CERDEC Development of Battlefield Fuel Cell Power Beth Bostic US Army CERDEC Fuel Cell Team [email protected] 703-704-1027
Download
Report
Transcript US Army CERDEC Development of Battlefield Fuel Cell Power Beth Bostic US Army CERDEC Fuel Cell Team [email protected] 703-704-1027
US Army CERDEC Development of
Battlefield Fuel Cell Power
Beth Bostic
US Army CERDEC Fuel Cell Team
[email protected]
703-704-1027
Agenda
Current Power Problem
What is a Fuel Cell?
Army Areas of Focus
Benefits and Technical Challenges
The Fuel Issue
The Path Forward
2
11/6/2015
The Power Problem
FACT: Inadequate supplies of military batteries almost led U.S. forces
to cease operations during Operation Iraqi Freedom. The power
supply dictates mission tempo.
FACT: Over Half of today’s “Highly digitized C4ISR” Force is
powered by 1980’s Generators. They are outdated and
unreliable.
FACT: A soldier normally
carries about 65 pounds worth
of equipment and supplies in
his or her rucksack. Currently,
some soldiers are carrying
upwards of 95 pounds.
3
11/6/2015
Battlefield Power
MOBILE
Tactical Operation Center
SBCT I
~1,200 gals fuel/day to theater; costs
vary ($13 - $133/gal)
133 Generators ( MTOE )
Too Large, Too Noisy, Not Efficient
Redundant Generators
No Smart Power Distribution
•68 TONS of generators!
•$45K-$465K (72 hrs)
• 12 TONS Fuel!
4
SOLDIER
POWER GAP
Forward Area Environment
No non-battery
power away from
vehicles, gensets,
or wall plugs
•
•
•
•
Brigade
Disposable batteries are
costly
Available energy NOT fully
utilized
No Recharge capability
Too many battery types
• ~$700K for 72 hrs
• 7 TONS of batteries!
11/6/2015
Potential Power Solutions
• Advanced Disposable Batteries
• Lithium Ion Pouch/Polymer Batteries
• Fuel Cells
• Stirling Engines
• Flexible Solar Panels
• Metal-Air Batteries
Soldier & Sensor Power
Battery Recharging
Auxiliary Power Units
Fuel Reforming
Component R&D
Vehicle Applications
• Advanced Internal-Combustion Generators
5
11/6/2015
What is a Fuel Cell?
Electrochemical Energy Conversion Device
PEM Fuel Cells take in Hydrogen and Air (Oxygen) and, through a chemical reaction,
make Water and Electricity.
Electrons = Electricity
H2O & Heat Exhaust
H2
IN
+ IONS
Fuel
IN
O2
Air
Anode
(- electrode)
6
Electrolyte
Cathode
(+ electrode)
11/6/2015
CERDEC Focus Areas
Located at Fort Belvoir, VA
approximately 20 miles south of Washington, DC
Soldier and Sensor Power
(0-100W)
Battery Charging
(100-500W)
Auxiliary Power Units
(500W-10kW)
Goal: Transition Technology to areas where it is needed most.
7
11/6/2015
Army Fuel Cell Structure
Soldier & Sensor Power
Portable Power Generation
Stationary Power
Focus on System Development, Test, Demonstration, and Transition
Communications-Electronics,
Research Development and
Engineering Center
Tank & Automotive
Research Development
and Engineering Center
Army Corps of Engineers
Construction Engineering
Research Laboratory
(CERDEC)
(TARDEC)
(CERL)
Focus on Basic Materials R&D, Components, and Testing
Army Research Laboratory (ARL)
Army Research Office (ARO)
8
11/6/2015
DoD Fuel Cell Efforts
Air Force
Navy
More Electric Aircraft
FUEL CELL
DARPA
Distributed
Ship Power &
Propulsion
Unmanned Vehicles &
Sensor Power
Ground Support
Equipment
Soldier
Power
Battery Recharging
Logistics Fuel
Reforming
Auxiliary Power Units
Backup Stationary
Power
Administrative FCV
Demonstrations
Light Vehicle
Propulsion
Army
9
11/6/2015
Benefits of Fuel Cell Technology
Decreased acoustic signature
Decreased thermal signature
Longer, Lighter missions
Improved Efficiency
Increased Power Density
Significant Fuel Savings
Hybrid systems offer the best solution
10
11/6/2015
Technical Challenges
Rugged System, durability in harsh environments
Reduce System Size and Weight
Reliability
• Balance of Plant Components
• Air side contamination
Water Management
Reduce Acoustic and Thermal Signatures
Orientation independent operation
Power Quality
Unit Cost
11
11/6/2015
The Fuel Policy
1999: DoD “One Fuel Forward” Policy states that the military can only
develop or acquire power technologies that utilize currently
supported military logistic fuels.
• kerosene-based fuels such as JP-8 and JP-5 for land and
ground forces
Larger power fuel cell power systems (>500W) must be
logistically fueled.
PROBLEM: Logistic Fuels are not easily reformed into a hydrogen rich
stream compatible with fuel cells.
12
11/6/2015
Fuel Reforming Issues
What is the target fuel cell?
Sulfur Removal
» Regenerable Approach is preferred
» Sulfur levels are variable in logistics fuel up to 3000ppm
Carbon Formation
» Function of operating parameters
» Sensitive trade off of performance
Water Management
» Prefer NO external water source needed
System Performance
» Efficiency
» Start-up Time
» Transient response
» Thermal cycling
13
11/6/2015
Silent Tactical Power Efforts
FY 08 Target
2-5kW Quiet Power Source
• < 150 kgs, < 69dBA noise
• TRL 5
• JP-8 Fueled
Logistics Fuel
Reforming
is critical
System Specs
•
•
•
•
14
Two 1kW Methanol Reforming PEM units
1kW Prototype Liquid Hydrocarbon fuel reforming system
85-100 kg
29” x 27” x 25”
11/6/2015
Tactical Power Benefits
Acoustic and Thermal Signature
Acoustic Signature
2kW MTG
3kW TQG
1kW Idatech FCS-1200
79 dBA
72 dBA
53 dBA
2kW Fuel Cell for C3OTM
2003 Demonstration
•
•
15
Provided Silent Watch Capability
Thermally undetectable from three
sides.
11/6/2015
The Path Forward
Reduce logistic footprint for power!
Focus on Near-Term Military Applications :
• Soldier & Sensor Power
• Auxiliary Power Units
• Portable Battery Chargers
Fuel cells have the potential to significantly reduce
weight & costs over traditional military power sources
Main Technology Barriers to Military Adaptation:
• Fuel Supply
• Affordability, and Reliability/Durability in the
Field
Large Systems (+500W) must use Logistics Fuels
16
11/6/2015
Questions?
Beth Bostic
US Army CERDEC Fuel Cell Team
[email protected]
703-704-1027