Risk Management Team Gay Infanti/John Driessnack Northrop Grumman 3 May 2005 Internal Information Services.

Download Report

Transcript Risk Management Team Gay Infanti/John Driessnack Northrop Grumman 3 May 2005 Internal Information Services.

Risk Management Team

Gay Infanti/John Driessnack Northrop Grumman 3 May 2005 Internal Information Services

Agenda

• • •

New charter Execution plan and schedule

Plan will address prior working group’s recommendations in three areas: policy, process, and training

• •

Objectives for this team Notional schedule Membership

2

Charter

Develop and recommend integrating techniques, policy, guidance, and training to support the integration of risk management with earned value management. Work with the risk management community to achieve process integration.

3

Policy

• •

Previous team recommended policy changes, along with implementing guidance, to identify benefits of integration and remove barriers such as lack of management commitment, internal/external culture, and emotional Objectives

Review existing EVM policy, standards, and guidance to identify where risk management is/could be addressed

Identify existing risk management policy, standards and guidance to identify where process integration is/could be addressed

Perform a gap analysis and identify opportunities for

New policy/guidance (to ensure achievement of integration and benefits thereof)

Placement of new guidance

Develop and recommend policy/guidance for incorporation into the PM (EVM & RM) body of knowledge using results/recommendations of process sub-team

Criteria for successful integration

Guidance that addresses how to integrate

4

Process

• •

Prior working group identified two process-related issues

A need for solutions, i.e., guidance for how to integrate risk management and EVM

A major organizational barrier to process integration

• •

RM and EVM usually have different process owners RM and EVM usually have different process champions Objectives

Reach out and partner with other communities to create the demand for process integration through cross-functional cooperation and to develop solutions

Involve PMI and INCOSE Risk SIGs to gain cooperation

Involve Tool suppliers to encourage implementation

Develop process solutions to facilitate integration

Pilot proposals with programs, gain feedback on usefulness

Encourage criteria based risk process similar to Earned Value

5

Training

• • • • • •

Previous team recommended training improvement to overcome: Barriers associated with lack of process maturity and lack of knowledge/skills needed to achieve process integration Perception that EVM is a financial tool, rather than a PM tool; both EVM and RM are core program management processes Lack of understanding of the benefits available from RM and EVM integration Lack of techniques and tools for achieving process integration

• • • •

Objectives Survey trainers within both communities to identify how the other addresses the EV or RM process within their curriculum Identify the gaps in the training of both processes Identify the areas within each process where process integration should be addressed, again using process sub-teams results Recommend training improvements to address the integration of EV and RM

6

• •

Notional Schedule

• • •

Initial Effort First meeting 17 March – drafted charter and objectives in three areas Opened workspace on DAU Community of Practice (CoP)

http://acc.dau.mil/rmevm Scheduled dinner meeting with PMI RISK SIG representatives on 3 May

• • •

Planned Effort Form three sub-groups for Policy, Process, Training

Each sub-group will further develop its objectives and schedule

Subteams to meet virtually over CoP site/telecons monthly Full working group meetings quarterly in DC area

• • •

Collaborate and participate in meetings, conferences, etc., as opportunities present themselves PMI CPM Spring Conference – 10-13 May 05 DAU Executive Risk Sessions (periodic) Fall IPM Conference – Nov 05

7

• •

RM Working Group Membership

Membership

Wayne Abba, Abba Consulting

• •

Gene Adams, Northrop Grumman Ivan Bembers, NGA

• • •

Dick Coleman, Northrop Grumman John Driessnack, MCR (Co-Lead) Gay Infanti, Northrop Grumman (Co-Lead)

Richard Kitterman, Northrop Grumman and INCOSE RM WG

• •

Craig Peterson, MITRE and PMI Risk SIG Tom Rosati, Hamilton Sundstrand

Harry Sparrow, PMA Associates

• •

Deborah Tomsic, OUSD (AT&L)/ARA/AM Wilma Uribe, HQ DCMA

• •

Dr. Steve Van Drew, NAVAIR Greg Ward, Dekker Ltd.

• •

Dennis White, Robbins Gioia Mike Zsak, OSD, SE and Decisive Analytics Other members needed, especially from industry

8