Process Selection and Facility Layout Chapter 6 Learning Objectives • You should be able to: 1.
Download ReportTranscript Process Selection and Facility Layout Chapter 6 Learning Objectives • You should be able to: 1.
Process Selection and Facility Layout Chapter 6 Learning Objectives • You should be able to: 1. Explain the strategic importance of process selection 2. Describe the influence that process selection has on the organization 3. Compare the basic processing types 4. Describe the basic layout types, and the main advantages and disadvantages of each 5. Solve simple line-balancing problems 6. Develop simple process layouts Instructor Slides 2 Process Selection 3 Process Selection • Process selection – Deciding on the way production of goods or services will be organized – Occurs when: • Planning of new products or services • Technological changes in product or equipment • Competitive pressure 6-4 Process Selection Process choice is demand driven: 1. Variety – How much? 2. Equipment flexibility – To what degree? 3. Volume – Expected output? 6-5 Process Selection • Goal: • Have process capabilities match product/service requirements. • Major implications: • • • • Capacity planning Layout of facilities Equipment Design of work systems 6-6 Process Selection and System Design Forecasting Capacity Planning Product and Service Design Technological Change Facilities and Equipment Layout Process Selection Work Design 6-7 Process Types • Job shop – Small scale, intermittent – e.g., doctor, tailor, veterinarian • Batch – Moderate volume – e.g., bakery, cinema, airline • Repetitive/assembly line – High volumes of standardized goods or services – e.g., automobiles • Continuous – Very high volumes of non-discrete goods – e.g., petroleum products, steel, sugar, salt, electricity, Internet • Project (leave it to later chapter) – Non-routine, with a unique set of objectives to be accomplished in a limited time frame – e.g., consulting, launching a new product, publishing a book, building a bridge 6-8 Types of Processing Repetitive/ Assembly Job Shop Batch Continuous Description Customized goods or services Semistandardized goods or services Standardized goods or services Highly standardized Goods or services Advantages Able to handle a wide variety of work Flexibility; easy to add or change products or services Low unit cost, high volume, efficient Very efficient, very high volume Disadvantages Slow, high cost per unit, complex planning and scheduling Moderate cost per unit, moderate scheduling complexity Low flexibility, high cost of downtime Very rigid, lack of variety, costly to change, very high cost of downtime • Goal: – Have process capabilities match product/service requirements. 6-9 Product-Process Matrix Variety Volume • The diagonal represents the “ideal” match • Hybrid process are possible (e.g., job-shop & batch) • Process choice may change as products goes through its life-cycles 6-10 Process Choice Effects Activity/ Function Job Shop Batch Repetitive Continuous Projects Cost estimation Difficult Somewhat routine Routine Routine Simple to complex Cost per unit High Moderate Low Low Very high Equipment used General purpose General purpose Special purpose Special purpose Varied Fixed costs Low Moderate High Very high Varied Variable costs High Moderate Low Very low High Labor skills High Moderate Low Low to high Low to high Marketing Promote capabilities Promote capabilities; semistandardized goods and services Promote standardized goods/service s Promote standardized goods/service s Promote capabilities Scheduling Complex Moderately complex Routine Routine Complex, subject to change Work –in-process inventory High High Low Low Varied 6-11 Product and Service Profiling Product or service profiling Linking key product or service requirements to process capabilities Key dimensions relate to Range of products or services that will be processed Expected order sizes Pricing strategies Expected frequency of schedule changes Order-winning requirements 6-12 Product and Service Profiling Product/Service Process Ice-cream manufacturer Batch Automatic carwash Repetitive Steel Continuous Books Batch Cafeteria line Repetitive Airlines Batch Veterinarian Job-shop Movie theater Batch Sugar Continuous TVs Repetitive Cookies Batch Flour Continuous 6-13 Facilities Layout 14 Facilities Layout • Layout – the configuration of departments, work centers, and equipment, with particular emphasis on movement of work (customers or materials) through the system – Facilities layout decisions arise when: • Designing new facilities • Re-designing existing facilities 6-15 The Need for Layout Planning • Inefficient operations High cost Bottlenecks Accidents or safety hazards Changes in product or service design Introduction of new products or services Changes in output volume or product mix Changes in methods or equipment Changes in environmental or other legal requirements • Morale problems • • • • • • 6-16 Layout Design Objectives Basic Objective Facilitate a smooth flow of work, material, and information through the system Supporting objectives: 1. Facilitate product or service quality 2. Use workers and space efficiently 3. Avoid bottlenecks 4. Minimize material handling costs 5. Eliminate unnecessary movement of workers or material 6. Minimize production time or customer service time 7. Safety 6-17 Importance of Layout Decisions • Requires substantial investments of money and effort • Involves long-term commitments • Has significant impact on cost and efficiency of short-term operations 6-18 Basic Layout Types • Product layout – Layout that uses standardized processing operations to achieve smooth, rapid, highvolume flow • Process layout – Layout that can handle varied processing requirements • Fixed Position layout – • Layout in which the product or project remains stationary, and workers, materials, and equipment are moved as needed Combination layouts 6-19 Repetitive Processing: Product Layout (repetitive and continuous processes) 20 Product Layouts • Product layout – Layout that uses standardized processing operations to achieve smooth, rapid, highvolume flow http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVoQJrz0sH8 Raw materials Station Station Station Station or customer – 1 Material and/or labor Material and/or labor 2 Material and/or labor 3 4 Finished item Material and/or labor Used for Repetitive Processing Repetitive or Continuous 6-21 A U-Shaped Production Line In 1 2 3 4 5 Workers 6 Out 10 9 8 7 6-22 • An operation in a sequence of operations whose capacity is lower than that of the other operations Bottleneck Operation 1 20/hr (3 min/unit) Operation 2 10/hr (6 min/unit) Operation 3 15/hr (4 min/unit) Maximum output rate limited by bottleneck 10/hr (6 min/unit) 5-23 Line Balancing Line balancing The process of assigning tasks to workstations in such a way that the workstations have approximately equal time requirements Goal: Obtain task grouping that represent approximately equal time requirements: minimizes idle time along the line results in a high utilization of equipment and labor Input Tasks sequencing (precedence diagram) Tasks time Operating time 6-24 Real-World Case Instructor Slides 25 Precedence Diagram • Precedence diagram – A diagram that shows elemental tasks and their precedence requirements Task Duration (min) Immediate predecessor a serve main 0.1 - b serve side 1.0 a c serve drink 0.7 - d wrap 0.5 b, c e bill 0.2 d 6-26 Cycle Time • Cycle time – The maximum time allowed at each workstation to complete its set of tasks on a unit • Minimum Cycle Time = longest task time = 1.0 min • Maximum Cycle Time = Σt = sum of task time = 2.5 min 6-27 Desired Output Rate • Establishing the desired output rate of a line: Operating time per day Output rate Cycle time Operating time per day Cycle time Desired output rate 6-28 How Many Workstations are Needed? • The required number of workstations is a function of: – Desired output rate – The ability to combine tasks into a workstation • (theoretical) Minimum number of stations N min t Cycle time where N min theoretica l minimum number of stations t Sum of task time s 6-29 Assigning Tasks to Workstations Some Heuristic (Intuitive) Rules: Assign tasks in order of most following tasks Count the number of tasks that follow Assign tasks in order of greatest positional weight. Positional weight is the sum of each task’s time and the times of all following tasks. 6-30 Example 1: Assembly Line Balancing • Arrange tasks shown the figure into workstations. - Assign tasks in order of the most number of followers 6-31 Determine the Minimum Number of Workstations Required Assume: OT (Operations Time per Day)=8 hours=8*60=480 minutes D (Desired output rate)=480 units CT (Cycle Time)=OT/D=480/480=1.0 minutes per unit ( t) (0.1 1 0.7 0.5 0.2) N= 2.5 3stations CT 1.0 t = sum of task time 6-32 Example 1 Solution Assign tasks in order of the most number of followers Time Workstation Remaining 1 1.0 Eligible Revised Assign Time Task Remaining Station Idle Time a, c 2 3 6-33 Example 1 Solution Assign tasks in order of the most number of followers Time Workstation Remaining 1 1.0 Eligible Revised Assign Time Task Remaining a, c a Station Idle Time 0.9 2 3 6-34 Example 1 Solution Time Workstation Remaining 1 1.0 0.9 Eligible a, c c, b Revised Assign Time Task Remaining a Station Idle Time 0.9 2 3 6-35 Example 1 Solution Time Workstation Remaining 1 1.0 0.9 Eligible Revised Assign Time Task Remaining a, c c, b a c Station Idle Time 0.9 0.2 2 3 6-36 Example 1 Solution Time Workstation Remaining 1 1.0 0.9 0.2 Eligible a, c c, b b Revised Assign Time Task Remaining a c Station Idle Time 0.9 0.2 2 3 6-37 Example 1 Solution Time Workstation Remaining 1 1.0 0.9 0.2 Eligible Revised Assign Time Task Remaining a, c c, b b a c - Station Idle Time 0.9 0.2 0.2 2 3 6-38 Example 1 Solution Eligible Revised Assign Time Task Remaining 1.0 0.9 0.2 a, c c none a c - 1.0 b Time Workstation Remaining 1 2 Station Idle Time 0.9 0.2 0.2 3 6-39 Example 1 Solution Eligible Revised Assign Time Task Remaining 1.0 0.9 0.2 a, c c none a c - 0.9 0.2 1.0 b b 0.0 Time Workstation Remaining 1 2 Station Idle Time 0.2 0.0 3 6-40 Example 1 Solution Eligible Revised Assign Time Task Remaining 1.0 0.9 0.2 a, c c none a c - 0.9 0.2 2 1.0 b b 0.0 3 1.0 d d 0.5 Time Workstation Remaining 1 Station Idle Time 0.2 0.0 6-41 Example 1 Solution Eligible Revised Assign Time Task Remaining 1.0 0.9 0.2 a, c c none a c - 0.9 0.2 2 1.0 b b 0.0 3 1.0 0.5 d e d e 0.5 0.3 Time Workstation Remaining 1 Station Idle Time 0.2 0.0 6-42 Example 1 Solution Eligible Revised Assign Time Task Remaining 1.0 0.9 0.2 a, c c none a c - 0.9 0.2 2 1.0 b b 0.0 3 1.0 0.5 0.3 d e - d e - 0.5 0.3 Time Workstation Remaining 1 Station Idle Time 0.2 0.0 0.3 Idle time per cycle=0.5 6-43 Example - Layout Task a&c b d&e (0.1+0.7) (1.0) (0.5+0.2) Duration (min) Immediate predecessor a serve main 0.1 - b serve side 1.0 a c serve drink 0.7 - d wrap 0.5 b, c e bill 0.2 d 6-44 Measuring Effectiveness • Balance delay (percentage of idle time) – Percentage of idle time of a line Idle time per cycle Balance Delay 100 N actual Cycle time where N actual Actual number of stations • Efficiency – Percentage of busy time of a line Efficiency 100% - Balance Delay 6-45 Example - Measuring Effectiveness Eligible Revised Assign Time Task Remaining 1.0 0.9 0.2 a, c c none a c - 0.9 0.2 2 1.0 b b 0.0 3 1.0 0.5 0.3 d e - d e - 0.5 0.3 Time Workstation Remaining 1 Station Idle Time 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.5 Percent idle time = X 100 16.7% (3)(1.0) Efficiency = (1– 0.167)x100=83.3% 6-46 Product Layouts Advantages Disadvantages High rate of output Low unit cost Labor specialization Low material handling cost per unit High utilization of labor and equipment Established routing and scheduling Routine accounting, purchasing, and inventory control Creates dull, repetitive jobs Poorly skilled workers may not maintain equipment or quality of output Fairly inflexible to changes in volume or product or process design Highly susceptible to shutdowns Preventive maintenance, capacity for quick repair and spare-parts inventories are necessary expenses Individual incentive plans are impractical 6-47 Non-repetitive Processing: Process Layout (Job Shop and Batch Processes) 48 Process Layouts • Process layouts (Non-repetitive Processing) – Layouts that can handle varied processing requirements Dept. A Dept. C Dept. E Dept. B Dept. D Dept. F Used for Intermittent processing Job Shop or Batch 6-49 Information Requirements • In designing process layouts, the following information is required: 1. A list of departments to be arranged and their dimensions 2. A projection of future work flows between the pairs of work centers 3. The distance between locations and the cost per unit of distance to move loads between them 4. The amount of money to be invested in the layout 5. A list of any special considerations 6. The location of key utilities, access and exit points, etc. 6-50 Designing Process Layouts • The main issue in designing process layouts concerns the relative placement of the departments • Measuring effectiveness – A major objective in designing process layouts is (trying) to minimize: • Transportation cost • Distance • Time 6-51 Designing Process Layouts Minimize Transportation Costs • Goal: – Assign departments 1, 2, 3 to locations A, B, C in a way that minimizes transportation costs. A B C • Heuristic: – Assign departments with the greatest interdepartmental work flow first to locations that are closet to each other. 6-52 Example: Minimize Transportation Costs 40 Distance Trip Location From\ To A A B C A-B 20 - 20 40 B-C 30 - 30 A-C 40 B C closest A 20 B 30 C Place dept. 1&3 in A&B - Work flow From\ 1 2 3 To Department Pair Work flow 1 2 3 1-3 170 - 30 170 2-3 100 - 100 1-2 30 Highest work flow 6-53 Example: Minimize Transportation Costs 40 • Place departments 1&3 in A&B • 2&3 have higher work flow than 1&2 (100>30) A • 2&3 should be located closer than 1&2 • B closer to C than to A (30<40) 20 Trip • Solution: B 30 C Pair Work flow A-B 20 1-3 170 B-C 30 2-3 100 A-C 40 1-2 30 30 1 A 170 3 B 100 2 C 6-54 Closeness Ratings (Relationship Diagramming) • Allows the considerations of multiple qualitative criteria. • Input from management or subjective analysis. • Indicates the relative importance of each combination of department pairs. Muther’s grid 6-55 Closeness Ratings A E I O U X Production O A Offices U Shipping and receiving I E O Stockroom Absolutely necessary Very important Important Ordinary importance Unimportant Undesirable A A X U U U O O Locker room O Toolroom 6-56 Closeness Ratings : Example Dept. 1 A Dept 2. E Dept 3. Dept 4. X O Dept. 5 A A U A A X I X U A O Dept 6. Assign department using the heuristic: Assign critical departments first (they are most important) 6-57 Closeness Ratings : Example 1. List critical departments (either A or X): Dept. 1 A X 1-2 1-4 Dept 2. 1-3 3-6 Dept 3. 2-6 3-4 Dept 4. 3-5 4-6 5-6 Dept. 5 Dept 6. A A E X U U X O I A A O X A A 6-58 Closeness Ratings : Example 2. Form a cluster of A links (beginning with the department that appears most frequently) A 1-2 Dept. 1 1-3 Dept 2. 2-6 3-5 4 2 4-6 5-6 6 5 3. Take the remaining A links in order and add them to this cluster where possible (rearranging as necessary) Form separate clusters for departments that do not link with the main cluster. A A E X U U X O I A A O X A A Dept 3. Dept 4. Dept. 5 Dept 6. 4 2 1 6 5 3 6-59 Closeness Ratings : Example 4. Graphically portray the X links 1 3 4 X 1-4 Dept. 1 3-6 Dept 2. 3-4 A E X U U X O I A A O X A A Dept 3. Dept 4. 6 Dept. 5 Dept 6. 5. Adjust A cluster as necessary. (in this case, the A cluster also satisfies the X cluster). A 4 2 1 6 5 3 6-60 Closeness Ratings : Example 4 2 Dept. 1 6 1 5 Dept 2. 1 3 3 4 Dept 3. Dept 4. 6 6. Fit cluster into arrangement (e.g., 2x3) may require some trial and error. Dept. 5 Dept 6. A A E X U U X O I A A O X A A Departments are considered close not only when they touch side to side but also when they touch corner to corner. 1 2 6 3 5 4 7. Check for possible improvements 6-61 Process Layouts Advantages Can handle a variety of processing requirements Not particularly vulnerable to equipment failures General-purpose equipment is often less costly and easier and less costly to maintain It is possible to use individual incentive systems Disadvantages In-process inventories can be high Routing and scheduling pose continual challenges Equipment utilization rates are low Material handling is slow and inefficient Complicates supervision Special attention necessary for each product or customer Accounting, inventory control, and purchasing are more complex 6-62 Fixed Position Layouts • Fixed Position layout – Layout in which the product or project remains stationary, and workers, materials, and equipment are moved as needed Dam Ship 6-63 Combination Layouts • Some operational environments use a combination of the three basic layout types: – Hospitals • process + fixed – Supermarket • process + product • Some organizations are moving away from process layouts in an effort to capture the benefits of product layouts – Cellular manufacturing – Flexible manufacturing systems 6-64 Service Layout • Service layouts can be categorized as: – product – process – fixed position • Other common service layouts: – Warehouse and storage layouts (easy access to items in high demand) – Retail layouts (influence sales, customer attitude, customer flow, avoid customer confusion) – Office layouts 6-65