Transcript FRENCH MILITARY PERSONNEL RECOVERY COMMAND AND CONTROL AND CSAR 2004 PR Conference Arlington, VA Coalition Panel 1 Sep.

FRENCH MILITARY PERSONNEL
RECOVERY COMMAND AND
CONTROL AND CSAR
2004 PR Conference
Arlington, VA
Coalition Panel
1 Sep. 2004
CDR. Jean-Yves Gasnier
PR and CSAR
• A KEY DECISION
• C2 STRUCTURE
• ORGANISATION
A KEY DECISION
 1990 : Desert Storm, stressed the need to develop CSAR
 1993 : Deny flight (Feb 94 - Jul 97), ended the process
 Dec 1994 : CSAR becomes an Air Force Responsibility
 1998 : CSAR Joint Office is created in Taverny
PR and CSAR
• A KEY DECISION
• C2 STRUCTURE
• ORGANISATION
C2 STRUCTURE
PRESIDENT
Foreign
Affairs
CPR
Chief of the Defence Staff
Liaison
CSAR
Land
Component
Commander
Special Ops
Component
Commander
Maritme
Component
Commander
CR
Air
Component
Commander
PR and CSAR
• A KEY DECISION
• C2 STRUCTURE
• ORGANISATION
ORGANISATION
Command
CDS
Members
Joint CSAR
Committee
Army
Air Force
CSAR OFFICE
Taverny
SOF
Navy
Joint CSAR Squadron
01/067
CAZAUX
PR and CSAR
QUESTIONS?
ER
D EF
FICE
EN
OF
SE
R
NE
WAR/MISSING
OF
P
EL
NN
SO
PR
IS
O
WR J
W RJ
WRJ
WRJ
Title
PERSONNEL
RECOVERY:
UK JPR UDATE
Cdr Jim Hawkins RN
SO1 Joint SERE
Terminology
Joint Personnel Recovery
C2
The
Individual
Survival, Evasion,
Resistance & Extraction
The
Operation
Combat Recovery
Missing in Action
US JPRA
“That others may live…to return with honor”
The Effect
“when required, to recover
personnel who become
isolated in the battlespace,
prior to capture”
Recovery or Captivity?
Iraq 03
“when required, to recover personnel
who become isolated...”
Sierra Leone 2000
Operational Drivers
Interoperability
Joint & Combined
Spread of activity
SERE Training
Post Recovery
The Recovery Force
Doctrine
PERSONNEL RECOVERY
BENIGN
Search
and Rescue
National SAR
DSAR
Combat Recovery
CR
CSAR
SF Ops
Rescue not Search
Capability Steps
The UK Now

Policy

Joint and Combined Doctrine

Command and Control

Standard Operating Procedures

Tactics

Equipment

SERE Training
Coalition Warfare
ONGOING
DEVELOPMENTS
• JSTC
•LOCATION
•MANNING
•WHO TO TRAIN (PTCE LIST)
•BACKLOG
•COURSE ALIGNMENT
•4 CAC COY MANNING
•UK / US CO-OPERATION
•INTERCHANGEABLE
No Front Line
“Survive
Isolation”
“Return with
Honour”
“Rejoin the Fight”
Title
PERSONNEL
RECOVERY:
UK JPR UDATE
Cdr Jim Hawkins RN
SO1 Joint SERE
ER
D EF
FICE
EN
OF
SE
R
NE
WAR/MISSING
OF
P
EL
NN
SO
PR
IS
O
WR J
W RJ
WRJ
WRJ
Dutch Position on PR/CSAR
UNCLAS
Major B.J. Holewijn
INTRODUCTION
UNCLAS
Current situation
Dutch view
Future
CURRENT SITUATION (1)
UNCLAS
Personnel Recovery (PR)
Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR)
Immediate Response Team (IRT)
Non-combatant Extraction operations (NEO)
Downed Aircraft Recovery Team (DART)
Search and Rescue (SAR)
Deployed Search and Rescue (DSAR)
Combat Recovery (CR)
CURRENT SITUATION (2)
NATO
 ATP-10
SAR
 ATP-62 CSAR
 AJP-3.4.2 NEO
 AJP-3.3.8 NATO PR Policy (Initial Draft)
EU
 EAG
training initiative
 ECAP
USA
 JP
3-50 Joint TTP’s for CSAR
UK
3-66 Joint Personnel Recovery
UNCLAS
 JWP
CURRENT SITUATION (3)
NATO CSAR Definition
CSAR is the detection, location, identification and rescue of downed
aircrew in hostile territory in crisis and wartime and when appropriate
isolated military personnel in distress who are equipped and trained
to receive CSAR support, throughout a theatre of operations
USA CSAR Definition
UNCLAS
Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) encompasses reporting,
locating, identifying, recovering and returning isolated personnel to
the control of friendly forces in the face of actual or potential
resistance
CURRENT SITUATION (4)
Personnel recovery is the umbrella term for operations focused on
the task of recovering captured, missing, or isolated personnel from
danger. It is the sum of military, civil, and political efforts to obtain the
release or recovery of personnel from uncertain or hostile
environments and denied areas whether they are captured, missing,
or isolated. That includes U.S., allied, coalition, friendly military, or
paramilitary, and others designated by the National Command
Authorities (NCA). Personnel recovery includes, but is not limited to,
theatre search and rescue (SAR); Combat Search and Rescue
(CSAR); Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE); Evasion
and Recovery (E&R); and the co-ordination of negotiated as well as
forcible recovery options. Personnel recovery may occur through
military action, action by non-governmental organisations, other U.S.
Government-approved action, and diplomatic initiatives, or through
any combination of those options (DOD Directive 2310.2).
UNCLAS
USA PR Definition
DUTCH VIEW (1)
Multi-National approach
Broader approach
 Immediate
recovery
 Different threat levels
 Different types of personnel
 Equipment
UNCLAS
Tactical Recovery of Equipment and Personnel (TREP)
DUTCH VIEW (2)
Different Threat levels
High threat
“Rescue forces expected to be targeted by hostile elements”
Medium threat
“As for no/low threat, but with greater likelihood of the
rescue forces being targeted when hostile elements are
encountered, both on the ground and in the air”
Low threat
No threat
“Environment threat only (e.g. terrain, weather etc)”
UNCLAS
“Threat from disaster or conflict residue, for example flying
debris, ruptured gas-pipes, unstable infrastructure and unexploded
munitions. Possibility of armed elements discharging weapons but
rescue forces are not specically targeted”
DUTCH VIEW (3)
Different types of personnel
 Trained
Personnel
 Non-trained personnel
UNCLAS
Risk assessment
DUTCH VIEW (5)
NATO - EU in sync
Matrix
Trained
Pers
Non-trained
Pers
Equip
High
Threat
Medium
Threat
No
Threat
UNCLAS
Low
Threat
DUTCH VIEW (6)
NATO - EU in sync
Matrix
Trained
Pers
Non-trained
Pers
High
Threat
CSAR
CR
NEO
??
Medium
Threat
CSAR
CR
NEO
??
CSAR
IRT
DSAR
CSAR
IRT
DSAR
CR
IRT
DSAR
CR
IRT
DSAR
No
Threat
DART
DART
UNCLAS
Low
Threat
Equip
FUTURE WORK (1)
Define cells
Survivor
 Training
 Equipment
Rescue assets
 Training
 Equipment
Document set-up
Doctrine
TTP
guide
 Operators guide
 Survivors guide
UNCLAS
 Planners
UNCLAS
QUESTIONS
ER
D EF
FICE
EN
OF
SE
R
NE
WAR/MISSING
OF
P
EL
NN
SO
PR
IS
O
WR J
W RJ
WRJ
WRJ
Coalition Personnel Recovery
The Asia-Pacific Approach
Enhancing Multinational Operations
August 2004
UNCLASSIFIED
Agenda
• Multinational Force (MNF) Operations
• Combined vs Coalition Operations
• Asia-Pacific Environment
• Multinational Planing Augmentation Team (MPAT)
• Multinational Force Standing Operating Procedures
(MNF SOP)
• MNF PR SOP
• Way Ahead
• Summary
UNCLASSIFIED
Multinational Force (MNF) Operations
• Multinational Force (MNF) - Broad Overarching Term
• The entire organization, participating forces, and supporting
organization (includes interagency [aka “interministerial” or
“whole of government”)
• Two Type of MNF Operations
• Combined -Alliance / Treaty-based (e.g., NATO, UNC/CFCKorea) - usually have well-developed tactics, techniques and
procedures (TTPs)
• Coalition - Ad Hoc (e.g., INTERFET in East Timor) - few or no
TTPs
UNCLASSIFIED
Multinational Force (MNF) Operations
• Asia-Pacific MNF Environment
• Nearly 60 % of the world's population.
• 43 countries, 20 territories/possessions, and 10 U.S.
territories.
• 6 largest armed forces: (1) Peoples Republic of China, (2)
United States, (3) Russia, (4) India, (5) North Korea, (6) South
Korea.
UNCLASSIFIED
Multinational Force (MNF) Operations
• 5 of 7 worldwide U.S. mutual defense treaties
• U.S.-Republic of the Philippines (1952)
• ANZUS (Australia - New Zealand - U.S., 1952)
• U.S.-Republic of Korea (1954)
• South East Asia Collective Defense (U.S. - France - Australia New Zealand - Thailand - Philippines, 1955)
• U.S.-Japan (1960)
• Coalition - possible at any time
UNCLASSIFIED
MPAT
A cadre of military planners
from nations with AsiaPacific interests capable
of rapidly augmenting a
multinational force (MNF)
headquarters (HQ)
established to plan and
execute coalition
operations in response to
military operations other
than war (MOOTW) / small
scale contingencies (SSC).
UNCLASSIFIED
MPAT – A Multinational Program
• Multinational venue to share CTF HQ procedures
• Maintains a cadre of MNF planners:
– skilled in common crisis action planning procedures
– available to rapidly augment a CTF HQ during a crisis
• Develops habitual relationships among MPAT cadre
• Meets periodically to:
– share information & develop CTF HQ procedures (MNF SOP)
– practice CTF HQ activation, formation, & planning processes
MPAT PROGRAM BELONGS TO
ALL INTERESTED NATIONS
UNCLASSIFIED
MPAT Objectives & Methods
• Improve Speed of Multinational Crisis Response
• Improve Multinational Force Interoperability
• Increase CTF Mission Effectiveness
• Strengthen & Practice Common Crisis Action
Planning Procedures
• Develop and become familiar with common
Standing Operating Procedures (SOP) for MNF
CTF HQ
UNCLASSIFIED
MNF SOP Parameters
• Multinational Document:
–Ownership by MPAT nations is critical
–Foundation reference for MNF crisis response
• Not prescriptive, binding or directive:
– “Guide” (start point) for multinational operations
– “Lead-Nation” Concept (one nation in lead)
– Living, unsigned, web-based document
UNCLASSIFIED
MNF SOP Parameters
– Focus is Operational Level – Coalition /
Combined Task Force (CTF):
–Primary focus: Military Operations Other Than War
(MOOTW)
–Support full range of small scale contingencies
(SSCs)
UNCLASSIFIED
MNF Focus- Planning and Operations
Strategic: Development & employment of national / multinational level
of resources. Involves national interests and crisis action effects that
impact on a nation’s vital or survival interests.
Operational: Is the “link” between tactical and strategic objectives via
strategies, campaigns, and major operations.
Employment and arrangement of forces in time, space, and purpose
for synchronization and integration at the JTF / CTF, interagency, and
multinational force level.
Tactical: Employment of units at the “execution level” for approved
military Course of Action (COA). Ordered arrangement and maneuver
of units for crisis response at the engagement and battle level.
“MNF SOP focus – Campaign / Major Operations”
UNCLASSIFIED
MNF SOP Focus
Military Operations Other Than War
War
(MOOTW / SSC)
(MRC & SSC)
Combat Operations
Noncombat Operations
MNF SOP “Focus”
Not Involving Use or
Threat of Force (not
inherent in Opns)
>Antiterrorism
>Disaster Relief
>Peace Building
>Humanitarian
>NEO
>Counterdrug
>Domestic Support
Use or Threat of Force
Inherent in Opns
>Peace Enforcement
>Strikes/Raids/Show
of force
>Counterterrorism
>Counterinsurgency
>Peacekeeping
Attack / Defend
Blockades
Combatting
Terrorism
Full Scale War
Small Scale
Contingency (SSC)
Major Regional
Conflict (MRC)
Goal: Fight & Win The Conflict
Goal: Deter / Resolve Conflict
Goal: Promote Stability & Peace
and / or support non-military Opns
MNF SOP – “Applicable” to SSC and MOOTW
UNCLASSIFIED
MNF PR SOP Outline
• A “Guide” for Personnel Recovery in CTFs
• Categories
• Deliberate
• Opportune
• Unassisted
• Responsibilities/Organization
• Concept of Operations
UNCLASSIFIED
MNF PR SOP Outline
• Six Attachments
• Coalition PR Center
• Planning
• Support
• Command and Control
• Reports
• Authentications
UNCLASSIFIED
Validate & Refine MNF SOP (Balikatan, Cobra Gold, Talisman Saber)
MPAT TEMPEST EXPRESS Workshops
TE-1
TE-2
Philippines Thailand
19 nations 19 nations
Future TEs:
TE-3
TE-4
TE-5
TE-6
TE-7
Korea
25 nations
Singapore
25 nations
Mongolia
22 nations
Australia
25 nations
India
26 Nations
“Completed Successfully”
Initial
MPAT
Concept
Development
TBD (Jan 05)
Indonesia (Jul 05)
UK (Nov 05 [T])
Thailand (Mar 06)
Expand MPAT Partnerships
& Multinational Readiness
MNF SOP Workshops
#1
MNF SOP
Development
#2
#3
#4
MNF SOP Collaboration Website
#5
#6
MNFSOP Expansion
& Refinement
“Moving Forward”
1st
Working
MNF SOP Draft
May00
CDW-1
Nov00
TE-1
Version 1
Jul01
SOP Dev
Mar02
SOP-2
Version 1.3
Version 1.4
Aug02
TE-4
Aug03
TE-5
Feb03
SOP-4
#7
Multinational Cooperation & Interoperability
MPAT PR Way Ahead
Jan04
Jul04
SOP-5
TE-7
UNCLASSIFIED
MNF PR Summary
• A “Guide” for Operational Start Points and CTF
procedures
• Not prescriptive, binding, or directive
• Focus on Operational Level – CTF HQs and Command
• Purpose:
• Speed of Initial Response
• Interoperability
• Overall Mission Effectiveness
• MNF SOP is a Multinational Product
• 30 Nations -- Multinational Planning Augmentation Team
(MPAT)
UNCLASSIFIED