Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP Conducting Campus Investigations Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP Standards Of Proof     Beyond a reasonable doubt Clear and.

Download Report

Transcript Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP Conducting Campus Investigations Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP Standards Of Proof     Beyond a reasonable doubt Clear and.

Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Conducting
Campus
Investigations
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Standards Of Proof




Beyond a reasonable doubt
Clear and convincing
evidence
Preponderance of the
evidence
Good faith investigation /
Reasonable conclusion
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Initial Meeting
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Initial Meeting Purpose / Objective




Identifying all issues
Gathering all material facts
Determining if formal or
informal investigation is
needed
Instilling confidence in the
system and you
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Confidence In You As Investigator
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
“To tell you the truth, I don’t
feel that you are the right
person to handle this
issue. Only an African
American can understand
the kind of discrimination
minorities at this College
face every day of the
week.”
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
The Initial Meeting

Who?

What?

When?

Where?

Why?
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Issue Confirmation Memo Key Points



Identify issues (confirmation)
Identify facts provided by
employee to support issue
Confirm these are all issues
raised
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Issue Confirmation Memo Key Points (continued)



Identify name of person
investigating issue and confirm
his/her impartiality and fairness
Identify roadmap for
investigation
Outline the College’s
expectations for the employee
raising the issue
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Planning the Investigation
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Planning the Investigation Important Considerations




What facts / documents can you
unilaterally gather?
Who should conduct the
investigation?
Who should be interviewed?
How should the interviews
be conducted?
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Carrying Out An Effective
Investigation
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Preparing For And Conducting An
Effective Investigation



Contracting for expectations
Showing sensitivity toward
interviewee
Putting interviewee at ease
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Preparing For And Conducting An
Effective Investigation



Stressing that no
conclusions have been
reached
Minimizing risk of retaliation
Protecting the
investigation’s integrity
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Meeting With
The Accused
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Meeting With The Accused:
Outlining Your Approach

OUTLINE YOUR ISSUES -carefully analyze all issues
raised
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Meeting With The Accused:
Outlining Your Approach


LIST THE FACTS that relate
to each issue.
LEAVE ROOM underneath
each fact to work in the
individual’s answers.
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Meeting With The Accused:
Outlining Your Approach

NOTETAKING IS CRITICAL -do the best you can to get down
key facts during the interview
and complete your notes
IMMEDIATELY after the interview
is completed while the
information is still fresh.
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Asking Effective Questions

Broad to narrow questions

Leading questions

Tough questions

Follow-up questions

Avoid compound questions

Committing interviewee to a story /
chronology
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
What If The Accused Denies
Wrongdoing?


Explore possible ill-motives
Ask:
“Do you have any idea why she/he
would make this up?”

Ask:
“Have you had any conflicts or
problems with her/him?”
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Concluding Interview

Offer general time frame for
investigation

Encourage the supplying of facts

Stress need for confidentiality

Stress no retaliation
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Interviewing Witnesses
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Interviewing Potential Witnesses
- Different Kinds



Reluctant witness
Witness who loves the
limelight
Witness with an axe to
grind
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Assessing Credibility
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Assessing Credibility


Demeanor
Logic / consistency of
story

Corroborating evidence

Circumstantial evidence
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Reaching A
Conclusion
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Reaching A Conclusion
DON’T BE
AFRAID
TO BE WRONG!
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Reaching A Conclusion

Timeliness

Pattern & Practice

Motivation

Truthfulness
Curiale Dellaverson Hirschfeld Kelly & Kraemer, LLP
Wrap- Up And Conclusion