Trouble-shooting. (also a science) Things that didn’t go as expected • Gold color did not disappear over 2 hour time rocking at room temperature •
Download ReportTranscript Trouble-shooting. (also a science) Things that didn’t go as expected • Gold color did not disappear over 2 hour time rocking at room temperature •
Trouble-shooting. (also a science) Things that didn’t go as expected • Gold color did not disappear over 2 hour time rocking at room temperature • After reduction and silver step, purple color did not develop • Are there nanowires? What happened?? Clear – what it is supposed to look like! Gold – after two hours of rocking Dark orange – something’s not right “Low hanging fruit” • Phage titered correctly? Concentrations calculated correctly? – T/R lab, John and Bridget went through all of your notebooks looking for these calculations – This is why you always right neatly and make sure to read directions! Only one group remarked on the color change that took place. – End result: even if there were slight calculation errors, all the phage added into the reaction mixture is in the correct order of magnitude Too much gold for the ascorbic acid? • Calculated the number of gold particles (based on molarity of gold solution) • Calculated the number of nucleation sites (based on concentration of phage and number of p8 proteins) • Phage reduces the gold that binds to the mutated p8 protein • Calculated amount of ascorbic acid able to reduce the extra free gold in solution (if there weren’t enough phage) • End result: reducing power is still in excess – this shouldn’t be a problem Problem of “cutting corners * 1000” • If we are an order of magnitude off in terms of phage and an order of magnitude off in terms of gold, does this make the experiment just fail? • End result: Maybe, but nothing so drastic. This “cutting corners * 1000” is more likely to have an effect on the nanoscale and create nanoparticles instead of nanowires…it isn’t something that would change how we’d see the color change Contamination? • Belcher Lab has had issues with E4 contamination in the past – Remember E4? • Normally perform a DNA sequencing analysis to check on this – How could this experiment be done? • End result: phage contamination would not change the goldclear or the purple color change, so this isn’t contributing to our problem pH? • What if the pH of both the water and TBS is off? – Nanopure water vs. DI water • End result: pH of both Belcher solutions and 20.109 solutions were similar (within 0.01) What about the other solutions? • Hmm, that gold looks sort of dark… • Absorbance on a spectrophotometer • Gold solution used T/R was significantly darker (error in solution-making?) • Bridget re-made gold solution for W/F lab • Is this it?? Gold color didn’t disappear. Again. Now what? • What about TBS? I mean, it’s a standard buffer, right? • Apparently not. . . Ionic Strength General Equation: or Biorad 1xTBS: pH = 7.5 0.020M TBS 0.5M NaCl Rockland 1xTBS: pH = 7.5 0.1M TBS(HCl) 0.15M NaCl Therefore, IBiorad TBS = 0.518 IRockland TBS = 0.241 Qualitatively increased ionic strength results in: • Increased ionic charge shielding • Decreased ionic mobility (and diffusivity) These factors should: •Decrease the ability of gold ions to penetrate CTAB bilayer • A high [NaCl] might lead to Na+ binding at p8