Fort Leonard Wood Innovations in Sustainability US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG®
Download ReportTranscript Fort Leonard Wood Innovations in Sustainability US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG®
Fort Leonard Wood Innovations in Sustainability US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Overview Army Sustainability 6 ISSP Goal Teams & Objectives Fort Leonard Wood System Projects Sustainability Analyses Conclusion 2 Army Sustainability Focus on Net Zero 3 6 Installation Strategic Sustainability Goals Goal 1: Sustainable Development and Redevelopment at Fort Leonard Wood Goal 2: Adequate Manning, Equipment, Technology, and Facilities to Sustain Mission Services in Support of the Training and Deployment Missions Goal 3: Full and effective community engagement Goal 4: Service Members, Families and Civilians: resilient in mind, body and spirit Goal 5: A Culture of Pride and Trust throughout the Fort Leonard Wood Workforce Goal 6: Modern, adaptable and high-performance training facilities, ranges, land and air space 4 Integrated Army Goals Soldier, DA Civilian, and Family Readiness Installation Readiness Community Transformation 5 MSCoE Net Zero & Energy Security Plan Infrastructure 6 Land Use System: Sustainable Development UPH PAL PAL FAMILY HOUSING PAL PAL PAL REC MSCo REC E Warehouse Hospital SPORTSMAN’S CENTER Industrial Downtown PAL Tech Park TECH PARK USAR BT/OSUT Airport AIT NG NG CENTRAL RECREATION AREA COMMUNITY UPH AIT FAMILY HOUSING PAL USAR FORSCOM Operational Area 7 Thanks to the Corps of Engineers Wins International Holcim Award in 2010 Lead: Ms. Lyndsey Pruitt (HQUSACE) 8 http://www.usace.army.mil/Media/NewsArchive/tabid/204/Article/146/usace-team-receives-international-award.aspx Downtown Modeling Now Future 9 Net Zero Optimization Model 1 • • • • • • • Execute, Track, Measure Establish Planning Goals Building Geography Utilities Cost Data Water Waste Greenhouse Gas 5 Iterate over Building Measures Produce Integrated Plan Leveraged R&D 4 Optimize Supply and Distribution System Mix 10 • Integrated Plan • Projects • Sequence • Schedule • Costs • Risk •DD1391 Net Zero Energy Opportunities Leads: Mr. Ben Barnes & Dr. Matt Swanson (ERDC-CERL) 16 Downtown Area Development 12 High Performance Sustainable Buildings Mixed use development: Residential Administrative and Education Retail Sustainable Transportation Applied Robotics for Infrastructure and Base Operations (ARIBO) 14 Continuous Meal Transit System (CMTS) • Continuous, automated electric buses that shuttle Soldiers between barracks and dining facilities (DFAC) • Operate continually • Cost for buses and charging systems - $1.6M • Payback 1.1 years – consolidation of one DFAC (better if more than one DFAC can be consolidated) saving contract and energy cost 15 Convoy Lunch Transportation System (CLTS) • Convoy system where automated, electric tractors pulling Troop Transporters follow lead, driven tractor trailer • Operates during lunch • Provides high-performance, hybrid tractors for use during off-times • Cost for 2 hybrid electric trucks and charging systems $370,000 • Payback – 2 years: reduced fuel, .5 driver labor Automated Materiel Transport System (AMTS) • Automated hybrid vehicle to deliver materiel to TAs and ranges • Scheduled operation • Multi-purpose to deliver meals, fuel, select ammunition • Potential for two vehicles from TARDEC ($2M) • Cost $100K (w/o vehicles) for charging systems • Payback – 6 mo with savings from contracted labor Automated Visitor Transit System (AVTS) • Automated buses to bring visitors from off-post to onpost • Partnership where community obtains four buses to transport visitors, TARDEC will automate system • Routes to bring visitors onpost to graduation venue, other locations on-post, and then back to hotels • Buses and chargers $1.4M • Payback – 19 years vRIDE: Vanpooling Progress Lead: Ms. Lidia Baker (FLW PAIO) 19 Communities in Sustainability Ozark Partnership 20 Training Lands & Ranges Projects Completed JLUS (Joint Land Use Study) Updated Master Plan Next: engage with SOP and others on ACUB (Army Compatible Use Buffer) Leads: Ms. Lisa Stewart (FLW DPTM) & Mr. Keith Campbell (FLW Range Mgr) 21 Sustainable Land Use Develop trail system around Installation Recreation, maintain buffer, increase connection to community Being surveyed 22 Food Shed Magnitude FLW is a large local market for food products . FLW military dining facilities serve about 26K meals/day, except for 15 days in December when the daily meals drop to 250. Table 1. Dining Facilities Food Consumption Product Monthly Annually Unit Lettuce/spinach 50,000 600,000 Pounds Tomatoes 14,040 168,000 Pounds Cucumbers 9,022 108,000 Pounds Peppers 6,734 81,000 Pounds Carrots 2,210 27,000 Pounds Chicken 65,800 757,000 Pounds Beef 75,600 869,400 Pounds Pork 41,500 477,800 Pounds Eggs 8,000 92,200 Dozens 32,000 367,600 Gallons Dairy - Milk Sustainable and Secure Foodshed ► Vertical farming ► Farmer’s market ► Veteran to Farmer Training ► Community gardening ► Range rehabilitation 24 Net Zero Waste - Food Waste Composting 25 Building Deconstruction 26 Net Zero Water 27 Taking a Hard Look at Water 28 Water/Wastewater & Precipitation Sewage system I&I Data Source: Fort Leonard Wood DPW 2013; Fort Leonard Wood Airport 2013 29 Estimated Water Use by Facility Type* FLW – FY2013 Family Housing Barracks Dependent Schools Medical Industrial and Maintenance Transient Housing/ Lodging/UEPH Administrative/ Moderate Users Community and Commercial: Non-food related (indoor) Community and Commercial (food-related) Storage Fire Hydrant Flushing Training (Pools, Wash Racks, etc) Losses * Excludes irrigation 30 Bldg 6101: AIT Barracks Night showers Sunday laundry time 31 Potable Water Leak Detection Tasks Completed/In Progress Literature Review ► Historical and ongoing efforts on leak detection in potable water distribution system ► Leak detection case studies ► Cost/benefit analysis for leak detection ► Methodologies, hardware and software requirements 32 Energy Cost of Water Tasks Completed/In Progress •Inventory of water treatment plant and distribution system equipment. •Physical survey of equipment. •Plans for any water treatment plant upgrades/replacements. •Collect/review historical water use, waste water generation, and installation population. •Interview water treatment plant personnel for operating parameters. Strategic Water Metering Tasks Completed/In Progress •Interviews with DPW personnel. •Inventory existing meters including parameters: •Size •Model •Age •Calibration status. •Plans for installation of new meters. Conclusions 35 Questions? 36