Fort Leonard Wood Innovations in Sustainability US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG®

Download Report

Transcript Fort Leonard Wood Innovations in Sustainability US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG®

Fort Leonard Wood Innovations in
Sustainability
US Army Corps of Engineers
BUILDING STRONG®
Overview





Army Sustainability
6 ISSP Goal Teams & Objectives
Fort Leonard Wood System Projects
Sustainability Analyses
Conclusion
2
Army Sustainability
Focus on Net Zero
3
6 Installation Strategic Sustainability
Goals
Goal 1: Sustainable Development and Redevelopment at
Fort Leonard Wood
Goal 2: Adequate Manning, Equipment, Technology, and
Facilities to Sustain Mission Services in Support of the
Training and Deployment Missions
Goal 3: Full and effective community engagement
Goal 4: Service Members, Families and Civilians: resilient
in mind, body and spirit
Goal 5: A Culture of Pride and Trust throughout the Fort
Leonard Wood Workforce
Goal 6: Modern, adaptable and high-performance training
facilities, ranges, land and air space
4
Integrated Army Goals
Soldier, DA Civilian, and Family Readiness
Installation Readiness
Community
Transformation
5
MSCoE
Net Zero &
Energy
Security
Plan
Infrastructure
6
Land Use System: Sustainable
Development
UPH
PAL
PAL
FAMILY
HOUSING
PAL
PAL
PAL
REC
MSCo
REC
E
Warehouse
Hospital
SPORTSMAN’S
CENTER
Industrial
Downtown
PAL
Tech Park
TECH PARK
USAR
BT/OSUT
Airport
AIT
NG
NG
CENTRAL
RECREATION
AREA
COMMUNITY
UPH
AIT
FAMILY
HOUSING
PAL
USAR
FORSCOM
Operational Area
7
Thanks to the
Corps of Engineers
Wins International
Holcim Award in
2010
Lead: Ms. Lyndsey Pruitt (HQUSACE)
8
http://www.usace.army.mil/Media/NewsArchive/tabid/204/Article/146/usace-team-receives-international-award.aspx
Downtown Modeling
Now
Future
9
Net Zero Optimization Model
1
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Execute, Track,
Measure
Establish
Planning
Goals
Building
Geography
Utilities
Cost Data
Water
Waste
Greenhouse Gas
5
Iterate
over
Building
Measures
Produce
Integrated
Plan
Leveraged
R&D
4
Optimize
Supply and
Distribution
System Mix
10
• Integrated Plan
• Projects
• Sequence
• Schedule
• Costs
• Risk
•DD1391
Net Zero Energy Opportunities
Leads: Mr. Ben Barnes & Dr. Matt Swanson (ERDC-CERL)
16
Downtown Area Development
12
High Performance Sustainable
Buildings
Mixed use development:



Residential
Administrative and Education
Retail
Sustainable Transportation
Applied Robotics for Infrastructure and Base Operations (ARIBO)
14
Continuous Meal Transit
System (CMTS)
• Continuous, automated
electric buses that shuttle
Soldiers between barracks
and dining facilities (DFAC)
• Operate continually
• Cost for buses and
charging systems - $1.6M
• Payback 1.1 years –
consolidation of one DFAC
(better if more than one
DFAC can be consolidated)
saving contract and energy
cost
15
Convoy Lunch Transportation
System (CLTS)
• Convoy system where
automated, electric tractors
pulling Troop Transporters
follow lead, driven tractor
trailer
• Operates during lunch
• Provides high-performance,
hybrid tractors for use during
off-times
• Cost for 2 hybrid electric
trucks and charging systems $370,000
• Payback – 2 years: reduced
fuel, .5 driver labor
Automated Materiel Transport
System (AMTS)
• Automated hybrid vehicle to
deliver materiel to TAs and
ranges
• Scheduled operation
• Multi-purpose to deliver
meals, fuel, select
ammunition
• Potential for two vehicles from
TARDEC ($2M)
• Cost $100K (w/o vehicles) for
charging systems
• Payback – 6 mo with savings
from contracted labor
Automated Visitor Transit
System (AVTS)
• Automated buses to bring
visitors from off-post to onpost
• Partnership where community
obtains four buses to transport
visitors, TARDEC will
automate system
• Routes to bring visitors onpost to graduation venue,
other locations on-post, and
then back to hotels
• Buses and chargers $1.4M
• Payback – 19 years
vRIDE: Vanpooling Progress
Lead: Ms. Lidia Baker (FLW PAIO)
19
Communities in Sustainability
Ozark Partnership
20
Training Lands & Ranges Projects
 Completed JLUS
(Joint Land Use
Study)
 Updated Master Plan
 Next: engage with
SOP and others on
ACUB (Army
Compatible Use
Buffer)
Leads: Ms. Lisa Stewart (FLW DPTM)
& Mr. Keith Campbell (FLW Range Mgr)
21
Sustainable Land Use
 Develop trail
system around
Installation
 Recreation,
maintain buffer,
increase
connection to
community
 Being surveyed
22
Food Shed Magnitude
FLW is a large local market for food products . FLW
military dining facilities serve about 26K meals/day, except
for 15 days in December when the daily meals drop to 250.
Table 1. Dining Facilities Food Consumption
Product
Monthly
Annually
Unit
Lettuce/spinach
50,000
600,000 Pounds
Tomatoes
14,040
168,000 Pounds
Cucumbers
9,022
108,000 Pounds
Peppers
6,734
81,000 Pounds
Carrots
2,210
27,000 Pounds
Chicken
65,800
757,000 Pounds
Beef
75,600
869,400 Pounds
Pork
41,500
477,800 Pounds
Eggs
8,000
92,200 Dozens
32,000
367,600 Gallons
Dairy - Milk
Sustainable and Secure Foodshed
► Vertical
farming
► Farmer’s market
► Veteran to Farmer Training
► Community gardening
► Range rehabilitation
24
Net Zero Waste - Food Waste
Composting
25
Building Deconstruction
26
Net Zero Water
27
Taking a Hard Look at
Water
28
Water/Wastewater & Precipitation
Sewage
system I&I
Data Source: Fort Leonard Wood DPW 2013; Fort Leonard Wood Airport 2013
29
Estimated Water Use by Facility Type*
FLW – FY2013
Family Housing
Barracks
Dependent Schools
Medical
Industrial and Maintenance
Transient Housing/ Lodging/UEPH
Administrative/ Moderate Users
Community and Commercial: Non-food
related (indoor)
Community and Commercial (food-related)
Storage
Fire Hydrant Flushing
Training (Pools, Wash Racks, etc)
Losses
* Excludes irrigation
30
Bldg 6101: AIT Barracks
Night showers
Sunday
laundry
time
31
Potable Water Leak Detection
Tasks Completed/In Progress
 Literature Review
► Historical
and ongoing efforts on leak detection in
potable water distribution system
► Leak detection case studies
► Cost/benefit analysis for leak detection
► Methodologies, hardware and software requirements
32
Energy Cost of Water
Tasks Completed/In Progress
•Inventory
of water treatment plant and
distribution system equipment.
•Physical survey of equipment.
•Plans for any water treatment plant
upgrades/replacements.
•Collect/review historical water use, waste
water generation, and installation
population.
•Interview water treatment plant personnel
for operating parameters.
Strategic Water Metering
Tasks Completed/In Progress
•Interviews
with DPW personnel.
•Inventory existing meters including
parameters:
•Size
•Model
•Age
•Calibration status.
•Plans for installation of new meters.
Conclusions
35
Questions?
36