Retrieving Actions in Group Contexts Tian Lan, Yang Wang, Greg Mori, Stephen Robinovitch Simon Fraser University Sept.
Download ReportTranscript Retrieving Actions in Group Contexts Tian Lan, Yang Wang, Greg Mori, Stephen Robinovitch Simon Fraser University Sept.
Retrieving Actions in Group Contexts
Tian Lan, Yang Wang, Greg Mori, Stephen Robinovitch Simon Fraser University Sept. 11, 2010
Outline • Contextual Representation of Actions • Action Retrieval as Ranking • Results and Future Work
Nursing Home • Fall analysis in nursing home surveillance videos – a system automatically rank the videos according to the relevance to fall action is expected
Action-Action Context
What other people are doing ? Context
Actions in Group Context • • Motivation – human actions are rarely performed in isolation, the actions of individuals in a group can serve as context for each other.
Goal – explore the benefit of contextual information in action retrieval in challenging real-world applications
Action Context Descriptor τ z +
Focal person Context action action
Action Context Descriptor
Feature Descriptor
e.g. HOG by Dalal & Triggs
Multi-class SVM
action class action class
max
action class action class
Outline • Contextual Representation of Actions • Action Retrieval as Ranking • Results and Future Work
Classification or Retrieval • Previous Work – Most work in human action understanding focuses on action classification.
Classification or Retrieval • • Most surveillance tasks are typical retrieval tasks – retrieve a small video segment contains a particular action from thousands of hours of videos.
The “action of interest” is rare event – Extremely imbalanced classes
Action Retrieval Query : fall Rank according to the relevance to falls
Learning • Input: document-rank pair (x i ,y i ) • Optimization Joachims, KDD 06
Ranking SVM • Ranking function h(x) h(x) Rank r1 Rank r2 Rank r3
Action Retrieval - training irrelevant relevant very relevant
Outline • Contextual Representation of Actions • Action Retrieval as Ranking • Results and Future Work
Dataset • • Nursing Home Dataset • 5 action categories: walking, standing, sitting, bending and falling. (per person) • • 18 video clips.
Query: fall Collective Activity Dataset (Choi et al. VS. 09) • 5 action categories: crossing, waiting, queuing, walking, talking. (per person) • • 44 video clips.
Query: each of the five actions
• Dataset Nursing Home Dataset
Dataset • Collective Activity Dataset
System Overview
Video Person Detector Person Descriptor v u
• • Pedestrian Detection by Felzenszwalb et al.
Background Subtraction • • HOG by Dalal & Triggs LST by Loy et al. at cvpr 09
Rank SVM
Baselines • • Context vs No Context – Action Context Descriptor – Original feature descriptors, e.g. HOG (Dalal & Triggs at CVPR 05) , LST (Loy et al. at CVPR 09) RankSVM vs SVM • Methods – Context + RankSVM (our method) – – Context + SVM No Context + RankSVM – No Context + SVM
Retrieval Results Nursing Home Dataset
Retrieval Results Collective Activity Dataset
Retrieval Results Collective Activity Dataset
Retrieval Results Collective Activity Dataset
1 3 2 4
5 7 6 8
Action Classification [10] Choi et al. in VS. 09 Collective Activity Dataset
Conclusion • A new contextual feature descriptor to represent actions – action context (AC) descriptor • Formulate our problem as a retrieval task.
Future Work • • Contextual Feature Descriptors – How to only encode useful context?
Rank-SVM loss, optimize the NDCG score
Thank you!
5 7 6 8