Advances in Polarized Electron Sources for High-Energy Accelerators Jym Clendenin CharlieFest SLAC, January 27, 2006
Download ReportTranscript Advances in Polarized Electron Sources for High-Energy Accelerators Jym Clendenin CharlieFest SLAC, January 27, 2006
Advances in Polarized Electron Sources for High-Energy Accelerators Jym Clendenin CharlieFest SLAC, January 27, 2006 Contents of talk SLC era Progress since SLC R&D plans for ILC Polarized electron sources for high-energy accelerators must provide: High polarization High peak current Operational simplicity and stability Nearly zero downtime 3 elements to a GaAs-type source Vacuum structure (i.e., electron gun) Photocathode Laser system Photoemission from p-type semiconductors F for GaAs a few eV, reduced to ~1 eV with Cs,O Bands bend down with p doping, ~0.75 eV for GaAs Net result: Vacuum level below CBM in bulk (negative electron affinity) Spicer’s 3-step model Polarization for bulk GaAs Energy vs Momentum Symmetry at G Polarization vs excitation photon energy Spin-orbit split-off band below VBM by DSO=0.35 eV Pmax = (3-1)/(3+1)=0.5 Surface Charge Limit Cannot increase charge in a single pulse by simply increasing the laser energy! Surface charge limit depends on QE The first SLC run with polarized e- Re-cesiated (C) when QE not sufficient to maintain required charge (~81010 e-) Re-activated (A) when re-cesiation cycles became too short P~25%, source availability ~90% Gun improvements begun in ’92 Load lock Channel cesiators Nanoammeters Low field electrodes Larger diameter GaAs cathodes Lower cathode temperature Load lock attached to rear of gun with top of corona shield removed Single-layer Strained GaAsP/GaAs Bi-axial compressive strain lifts the degeneracy of the hh and lh bands at G da~1% yields d of 50-80 meV SLC YAG-pumped Ti:sapphire laser system The Ti:sapphire laser cavity QE lifetime extended by cooling cathode SLC 1993-1998 P~80% using GaAsP/GaAs cathode I at source ~8x1010 e- for each of the 2 micropulses With LL, no need to re-activate Availability >97% Operated entirely by MCC staff except for YAG flashlamp changes every few weeks Toward the next collider Charge requirements at source Parameter at Source ne Dz Impulse, avg Impulse, peak SLC Design nC ns A A 20 3 6.7 11 (SCL) NLC ILC NC-SB SC-LB 2.4 0.5 4.8 6.4 2 3.2 NLC/ILC peak current < SLC, but total charge per macropulse much higher NLC: 2.9x1012 e- in 270 ns ILC: 1.1x1014 e- in 0.94 ms Uniformly doped, unstrained, 100-nm GaAs cathodes. QE=0.45, 0.9, 0.4, 0.4% in order of increasing dopant density. Laser energy increases in equal steps to 150 W/cm2. SCL not visible for dopant concentration ≥21019 cm-3 But higher doping depolarizes spin. GaAs0.64P0.36/GaAs SL with 5-nm GaAs final layer doped to 51019 cm-3 6 Peak current exceeds that required for the NLC micropulse SVT-4353 780nm,14mmØ 5 Current (A) 4 Same flashlamp-pumped Ti:sapphire laser as for E-158 3 2 With Q-Switching (75 ns) Without Q-Switching 1 (250 ns) 0 0 1 2 Laser Power (kW) 3 4 QE performance of SVT-4249 (E158-III cathode) after ~1 year QE profile for SVT-4249 August 21, 2003 June 28, 2005 CTS Measurements Pe max CTS/Møller): 86(90)% 81(85)% QE at Pe max: 1.2% 0.3% GaAs0.64P0.36/GaAs SL (4+4 nm x 12) grown by SVT using MBE GaAs0.66P0.34/GaAs0.95P0.05 single strained-layer 90-nm grown by SVT using MBE ILC R&D Plans Photocathodes for higher polarization and/or QE: AlInGaAs/AlGaAs SL highstrain or low CB offset; AlInGaAs/GaAsP SL strain-compensated; grided cathodes; GaN based cathodes for robustness Higher voltage gun: new materials for DC gun; prototype RF gun Lasers: generate ILC macropulse in visible Workshop on Polarized Electron Sources, Mainz, Germany, Oct., 2004