PHENIX, STAR AND AN EIC E.C. Aschenauer EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10

Download Report

Transcript PHENIX, STAR AND AN EIC E.C. Aschenauer EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10

PHENIX, STAR AND AN EIC
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
1
The Physics we want to study
 What is the role of gluons and gluon self-interactions in nucleons and
nuclei?
 Observables in eA / ep:
 diffractive events: rapidity gap events, elastic VM production, DVCS
 structure functions F2A, FLA, F2cA, FLcA, F2p, FLp,………

What is the internal landscape of the nucleons?
 What is the nature of the spin of the proton?
 Observables
in ep
 inclusive, semi-inclusive Asymmetries
 electroweak Asymmetries (g-Z interference, W+/-)
 What is the three-dimensional spatial landscape of nucleons?
Observables in ep/eA
 semi-inclusive single spin asymmetries (TMDs)
 cross sections, SSA of exclusive VM, PS and DVCS (GPDs)

What governs the transition of quarks and gluons into pions and
nucleons?
 Observables in ep / eA
 semi-inclusive c.s., ReA, azimuthal distributions, jets
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
2
Kinematic Plane
Need to study hadronic method
to increase y acceptance
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
3
Lepton Kinematics
Follow Hera Convention:
Hadron beam positive z (=> q = 0o)  Lepton beam negative z => q = 180o)
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
4
Hadron Kinematics
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
5
Kinematics of elastic diffraction
no cuts:
4x100
4x50
4x250
cuts: Q2 > 0.1 GeV && y < 0.9 GeV
decay products of r & J/ψ
go more and more
forward with
increasing
asymmetry in
beam energies
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
6
Diffractive Physics: p’ kinematics
t=(p4-p2)2 = 2[(mpin.mpout)-(EinEout - pzinpzout)]
4 x 50
Diffraction:
?
4 x 50
4 x 250
4 x 100
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
7
IP configuration for eRHIC
Nice design for protons from exclusive reactions and nuclear breakup particles
pt > 1.5GeV  main detector
0.1 MeV < pt < 1GeV after dipole
pc/2.5
4.5 cm
neutrons
11.2 cm
q=10 mrad
IP
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Dipole:
2.5 m, 6Tm
q=18 mrad
E.C. Aschenauer
Estimated b*≈ 8 cm
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
8
IR Design
eRHIC - Geometry high-lumi IR with β*= 8cm, l*=4.5 m
and 10 mrad crossing angle
Dipole to separate p/A beam
from “recoil”/breakup particles
D5
5.75 cm
10
17.65 m
20
0.44843 m
0.333 m
0.39065 m
325 GeV p
Or 125 GeV/u ions
30 GeV e-
30
60.0559 m
90.08703 m
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
© D.Trbojevic
9
Current PHENIX Detector at RHIC
MPC
Muon Arms
South:
North:
Central Arms
3.1 < | h | < 3.9
2.5o < Q < 5.2o
1.2 < | h | < 2.4
12o < Q < 37o
10o < Q < 37o
| h | < 0.35
60o < Q < 110o
electrons will not make it
to the south muon arm
 to much material
p/A
E.C. Aschenauer
eEIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
10
What will the current PheniX see
pe: 0-1 GeV
pe: 2-3 GeV
pe: 3-4 GeV
4x100
pe: 1-2 GeV
Current PheniX detector
not really useable for
DIS
acceptance not matched to DIS kinematics
4x100
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
4x100
11
The New PheniX Spectrometer
Design completely driven by AA, dA and pp physics program
ep/A
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
12
What can we detect
pe: 0-1 GeV
pe: 1-2 GeV
pe: 2-3 GeV
pe: 3-4 GeV
4x50
No dependence on hadron beam energy
Q2>0.1GeV2
4GeV  >5o
10GeV  >2o
20GeV  >1o
New PheniX has close to full coverage for scattered lepton
Forward upgrade
identified hadrons
4x100
5 GeVx50GeV
20 GeV x 250 GeV
central arm
unidentified
North m arm
only muons
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
13
The STAR Detector
Tracking: TPC
Particle ID: TOF
Electromagnetic
Calorimetry:
BEMC+EEMC+FMS
(-1 ≤ h ≤ 4)
Upgrades:
Muon Telescope
Detector
Roman Pots Phase 2
Forward Upgrade
Heavy Flavor
Tracker (2013)
Full azimuthal particle identification
E.C. Aschenauer
over a broad range in pseudorapidity
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
Forward Gem
Tracker
(2011)
14
STAR Experiment as of 2014
MRPC ToF Barrel
MTD
EMC Barrel
EMC End Cap
FMS
BBC
FPD
Roman Pots
Phase 2
TPC
computing
DAQ1000
COMPLETE
Trigger and DAQ
Upgrades
E.C. Aschenauer
HFT
FGT
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
Ongoing
R&D
15
STAR Forward Upgrade
proton
nucleus
 Positive η: Drell Yan
 High precision tracking and
background rejection using
calorimetry
 Optimized for p+A and p+p
 High momentum scale
 Negative η: eRHIC
 Optimized for low energy
electrons (~1 GeV)
 Triggering, tracking,
identification
 R&D necessary for optimal
technology choice
nucleus
electron
To fully investigate cold QCD matter, STAR will move forw
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
16
Energy loss in cold QCD matter
Hermes, Nucl. Phys.B 780, 1 (2007)
RA π
Lc ∝ ν: Lc up to few 100 fm
 Complementary probe of mechanism of energy loss
 HERMES: mixture of hadronic absorption and partonic loss
 Hadrons can form partially inside the medium
 eRHIC: light quarks form far outside medium
 Heavy quarks: unexplored to date. Low β: short formation time
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
17
STAR and eRHIC Phase I
 Current detector matches quite well to kinematics of eRHIC
 Particle ID, sufficent pT resolution, etc. at mid-rapidity
 Upgrades in forward direction: increase capability at lower momentum
 Developing plan for effective and compelling use of e+A
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
18
Longer term: STAR and eRHIC
 Forward region critical for higher energy options
 Major upgrades in forward direction would be needed
E.C. Aschenauer
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
19
Summary
 Both, the new PheniX and STAR have reasonable capabilities for
ep/eA collisions
 inclusive measurements
 some initial semi-inclusive measurements as well as for heavy quarks
 BUT no replacement for a dedicated detector
 using STAR and/or PHENIX might help to release some of the
requirements on the dedicated detector
 need still to resolve all the details how to bring the lepton beam
with 10mrad in the detectors for collisions and the non-colliding
beams around.
 STAR seems easier
E.C. Aschenauer
than PHENIX
EIC INT Program, Seattle 2010, Week 10
20