X-Rays and Materials A Vision of the Future Joachim Stöhr Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.

Download Report

Transcript X-Rays and Materials A Vision of the Future Joachim Stöhr Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.

X-Rays and Materials
A Vision of the Future
Joachim Stöhr
Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory
The big $$$ Picture:
US Gross Domestic Product: $10 Trillion
In $$$$$'s
Information technology: 800 Billion
Chemical Industry:
400 Billion
Semiconductors:
Magnetic materials:
80 Billion
25 Billion
Pharmaceutical industry: 220 Billion
Biotech Industry:
30 Billion
Modern materials are complex – studies require sophisticated techniques
Present: Size > 0.1 mm, Speed > 1 nsec
Future: Size < 0.1 mm, Speed < 1 nsec
Ultrafast Nanoscale Dynamics
Growth of X-Ray Brightness and Magnetic Storage Density
Why X-Rays? - Chemical Sensitivity
Core level shifts
and
Molecular orbital shifts
Stöhr et.al
Polarization Dependence
C C
E
F
F
C
C
F
F
F
F
Normalized Intensity (a.u.)
Normal
Incidence
Grazing
Incidence
C F
C O
F
F
C
E
C
C
F
F
C F
F8 22°C
290
295
Photon Energy (eV)
300
305
C
F
F
Magnetic Spectroscopy and Microscopy
Real Space Imaging
X-Rays have come a long way……
1895
1993
Photoemission Electron Microscopy – PEEM at ALS
The Future: PEEM3
Resolution
PEEM2
nm
PEEM3
nm
50 nm
< 5 nm
(1% transmission)
Transmission 1%
@ 50 nm
Resolution
50%
Relative
photon flux
1
20
Relative
Flux density
1
>1000
bend
EPU (arbitrary)
Source /
Polarization
PEEM2 on BL 7.3.1.1
4.0.3 PEEM3 Microscope
- total electron yield imaging
- no LEEM mode (as in SMART)
Resolution vs Transmission
Spectromicroscopy of Ferromagnets and Antiferromagnets
AFM domain
structure at
surface of NiO
substrate
s
[010] s
2mm
NiO
XMLD
0.10
8
TEY (a.u.)
TEY (a.u.)
0.15
0.05
Co
XMCD
4
0
0.00
868
870
872
874
Photon Energy(eV)
777
778
779
Photon Energy (eV)
H. Ohldag, A. Scholl et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(13), 2878 (2001).
FM domain
structure in
thin Co film on
NiO substrate
Non Resonant X-Ray Scattering
Relative Intensity: 1
Relative Intensity: (hn / mc2)2
hn ~ 10 keV, mc2 = 500 keV
Fe metal – L edge
Kortright and Kim, Phys. Rev. B 62, 12216 (2000)
Resonant Magnetic Soft X-ray Scattering
e’
Fe
e
M
I
n exp( i q rn ) fn
charge
2
magnetic -XMCD
fn = e'  e Fn(0) - i (e' e) Mn Fn(1)
where Fn(i) are complex
= f1 + i f2
Note: at resonance f1 = 0
Kortright and Kim, Phys. Rev. B 62, 12216 (2000)
Incoherent vs. Coherent X-Ray Scattering
Small Angle Scattering
-40
40
-20
0
20
scattering vector q (mm-1)
Coherence length larger than domains,
but smaller than illuminated area
information
about
domain
statistics
20
0
-20
-40
40
log (intensity)
-40
-20
0
20
40
scattering vector q (mm-1)
Coherence length
larger than illuminated area
-40
40
-20
0
20
scattering vector q (mm-1)
Speckle
true
information
about
domain
structure
20
0
-20
-40
40
log (intensity)
-40
-20
0
20
scattering vector q (mm-1)
40
Present Pump/Probe Experiments
Laser
pulse
• Pump:
Laser
50 ps
• Probe:
delayed photon pulse
• Vary the delay
between laser and xray pulses
330 ns

X-Ray
pulse
Can also produce current pulses
Development of High Energy Physics and X-Ray Sources
-- From storage rings to linacs --
SR
HEP
Storage rings
Single pass linear colliders
Single pass linacs
Free electron lasers
(FELs)
Energy recovery linacs (ERLs)
X-Ray Brightness and Pulse Length
•
X-ray brightness determined by electron beam brightness
•
X-ray pulse length determined by electron beam pulse length
Storage ring
Emittance and bunch length are result of an equilibrium
typical numbers: 2 nm rad, 50 psec
Linac
Normalized emittance is determined by gun
Bunch length is determined by compression
typical numbers: 0.03 nm rad, 100 fs
Linac beam can be much brighter and pulses much shorter
– at cost of “jitter”
• SASE gives 106 intensity gain
over spontaneous emission
l
• FELs can produce ultrafast
pulses (of order 100 fs)
LINAC COHERENT LIGHT SOURCE
0 Km
2 Km
3 Km
Concepts of the LCLS:

Based on single pass free electron laser (FEL)

Uses high energy linac (~15 GeV) to provide compressed
electron beam to long undulator(s) (~120 m) – 200 fs or less

Based on SASE physics to produce 800-8,000eV (up to 24KeV
in 3rd harmonic) radiation - 1012 photon/shot

Analogous in concept to XFEL of TESLA project at DESY

Planned operation starting in 2008
From Molecules to Solids: Ultra-fast Phenomena
Note in quantum regime: 1 eV corresponds to fluctuation time of 4 fs
Chemistry
& Biology:
H2OOH + H
about 10 fs
time depends on
mass and size
Fundamental atomic and molecular reaction and dissociation processes
H
Condensed
Matter:
S
typical vibrational
period is 100 fs
Speed of sound is 100 fs / Å
- coherent acoustic phonons
90o spin precession time
10 ps for H = 1 Tesla
Fundamental motions of charge and spin on the nanoscale (atomic – 100nm size)
X-Ray Photon Correlation Spectroscopy Using Split Pulse
In picoseconds - nanoseconds range:
Uses high peak brilliance
sample
splitter
transversely coherent
X-ray pulse from LCLS
variable delay
t
Contrast
10 ps  3mm
Analyze contrast
as f(delay time)

t
sum of speckle patterns
from prompt and delayed pulses
recorded on CCD
I(Q,t)
Single shot Imaging by Coherent X-Ray Diffraction
Phase problem can be solved by “oversampling” speckle image
Transmission
X-ray
Microscope
Reconstruction
from
Speckle Intensities
 5 mm
(different areas)
S. Eisebitt, M. Lörgen, J. Lüning, J. Stöhr, W. Eberhardt, E. Fullerton (unpublished)
Spin Block Fluctuations around Critical Temperature
Magnetization
Tc
Temperature t = (T-Tc) / Tc
T < Tc
T  Tc
T > Tc
Structural Studies on Single Particles and Biomolecules
Conventional method: x-ray diffraction from crystal
Proposed method: diffuse x-ray scattering from single protein molecule
Neutze, Wouts, van der Spoel, Weckert, Hajdu Nature 406, 752-757 (2000)
Lysozyme
Calculated scattering pattern
from lysozyme molecule
Implementation limited by radiation damage:
In crystals limit to damage tolerance is about 200 x-ray photons/Å2
For single protein molecules need about 1010 x-ray photons/Å2 (for 2Å resolution)
X-Ray Diffraction from a Single Molecules
A bright idea:
Use ultra-short, intense x-ray pulse to produce scattering pattern before
molecule explodes
Just before LCLS pulse
Just after pulse
Long after pulse
The million dollar question: Can we produce an x-ray pulse that is
short enough?
intense enough?
Summary
X-FELs will deliver:
unprecedented brightness and femtosecond pulses
Understanding of laser physics and technology well founded
FELs promise to be extraordinary scientific tools
Applications in many areas:
chemistry, biology, plasma physics, atomic physics,
condensed matter physics
The End