Radiation Belt Electron Transport & Energization Slot region outer belt inner belt Mary K. Hudson, Magnetospheric Thrust Participants Coupled Modeling Scheme.
Download ReportTranscript Radiation Belt Electron Transport & Energization Slot region outer belt inner belt Mary K. Hudson, Magnetospheric Thrust Participants Coupled Modeling Scheme.
Radiation Belt Electron Transport & Energization Slot region outer belt inner belt Mary K. Hudson, Magnetospheric Thrust Participants Coupled Modeling Scheme Solar Cycle of SAMPEX 2-6 MeV Electrons Li et al., GRL, 2006 Response to Solar Wind Forcing 2-3 day lag at Geo Paulikas & Blake, 1979 Prompt peak L ~3 Vassiliadis et al., 2003 SAMPEX/Vsw correlation 2-6 MeV fluxes ULF Wave-Relativistic Electron Correlation Rostoker et al., GRL, 1998 Direct Coupling of Solar Wind ULF Waves Kepko & Spence, JGR, 2003 Or Convective Growth Magnetopause K-H Waves Miura, JGR, 1992; Claudepierre et al., JGR, 2008 LFM time series analysis Halloween ’03 2-6 and >10 MeV Electrons See filling of slot region on storm timescale (days) at 2-6 MeV (Baker et al., 2004) SAMPEX observes > 2 month delay in high > 10 MeV fluxes at low altitude (longer loss time) Halloween ’03 Shock Injection LFM-test particle simulation W ~ 5 MeV 15 MeV R ~ 6 RE 2.5 RE E = - B/t : Bz/t E Kress et al., JGR, 07 Halloween ’03 Shock Injection of >10 MeV (W0=1-7 MeV) Electrons Kress et al., 2006 Low altitude SAMPEX observations at > 10 MeV electrons, injected 10/29/03 Looper et al., ‘06 Simulated pitch angle distribution-> Kress et al., 2006 MHD Fields Inject RadBelt Electrons Plasmasheet el injection Elkington et al., JASTP, 2004 MHD Fields Injection of RadBelt Electrons Elkington et al., JASTP, 2004 PSD calculations for other storms… September 1998 (final) January 1995 •The (big) September 1998 storm shows a significant change in trapped PSD as a result of coupling to the plasmasheet. •The more moderate storm of January 1995 showed almost no coupling with the plasmasheet. Elkington et al., 2008 Diffusion Rates vs. L Radial diffusion rates in model ULF wave fields D_LL ~ Radial diffusion rates in model ULF wave fields DLL ~ D0LN ## LN Perry et al., JGR, 05, includes δEφ, δBr, δB//, freq and L-dependent power ULF wave DLL studies: Elkington et al., 2003; Ukhorskiy et al., 2005; Fei et al., 2006 Tau(L,E) Summers 04; Tau = days/Kp Shprits 05 Braughtigam & Albert, 2000, N = 10; Perry et al., 2006 F. Chu et al., AGU, F 07 = 1000 MeV/G ↑ Radial Diffusion for Nov 04 Storm Baker et al., GRL, 07 2 df f 2 f L D L ll dt L L July & Nov 04 Differ by SSC Plasmapause Control of Electron Flux Peak and Slot Region Shprits et al., JASTP 2008 Local accel and pitchangle scattering due to VLF/ELF waves (Whistler, EMIC) Magnetospheric SEP Simulations SEP Cutoffs: Brian Kress poster SEP Cutoff rigidities calculated in a CISM CMIT simulation of 14 May 1997 storm IGRF field embedded within MHD inner boundary Handoff to Forecast Transition Radial diffusion model with DLLdetermined by LTR ULF wave power tabulated by vsw or Kp switch SEP cutoffs in solar-wind parametrized MHD field snapshots Neither involve pushing millions of particles in time-dependent MHD fields in real time using appropriate input spectra; Given input spectra, e.g. SEPs from COHREL+parametrized shock model SEP cutoffs Given continuously available geo fluxes radbelt f at peak flux, typically L~3-4 at 2-6 MeV, determined from radial diffusion code including time-dependent plasmapause loss term