3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building Prepared by Nizar Abed Al-Majeed Salameh Mohamed Khaled Abu-Al Huda Supervisor Dr.
Download ReportTranscript 3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building Prepared by Nizar Abed Al-Majeed Salameh Mohamed Khaled Abu-Al Huda Supervisor Dr.
3D-Dynamic design for reinforced versus prestress concrete for Al-Huriya building Prepared by Nizar Abed Al-Majeed Salameh Mohamed Khaled Abu-Al Huda Supervisor Dr. Imad Al-Qasem CHAPTER ONE INTROUCTION The project is a structural analysis and 3D-Dynamic design of an office building in Ramallah city, known as AL-Huriya, which consists of a seven stories, with 3.5 height except the first floor with 4m story height. The building will be first designed under a static load, after that we will study the building for dynamic , finally a prestress concrete will be used to design the building to compare it with the reinforcement concrete, to conclude many factors that should be taken into consideration in designing any structure. These include economic factors , durability and the safety of its inhabitants. Materials System Part F’c fy Reinforced Concrete Slab 250 kg/cm2 4200 kg/cm2 Beams 250 kg/cm2 4200 kg/cm2 Columns 500 kg/cm2 4200 kg/cm2 Footings 250 , 500 kg/cm2 4200 kg’cm2 slab 6000Psi 243Ksi Columns 500 kg/cm2 4200 kg/cm2 Footings 250 , 500 kg/cm2 4200 kg/cm2 Prestress Concrete Loads Live load 0.4ton/m2 Super imposed load 0.3ton/m2 CHAPTER TWO SLAB One way solid slab is used only as slab system Use slab thickness of 17cm , according to deflection requirement In design phase of the slab, there are two strip(1m) taken as a model. Loads distribution Strip I Wu=1.51 [email protected] Strip II Wu=1.51 [email protected] Moment distribution Strip I Strip II Use 4Ф12mm for negative and positive moment CHAPTER THREE BEAMS Beams in this part of the project will be designed using reactions from beam model in SAP2000. The girder system is used to design the building, and all of the beams are dropped; multi span and large space beams are used in all floors. The system of the building consist of a four beams group (B1, B2, B3, B4) And a two group of girders (G1, G2). Moment Design Parameter Dimensions Mn As Vn Vc Vs Av S Units cm ton.m cm2 ton ton ton cm2 cm Design for Moment Positive Moment Negative Moment Final Results Exterior spans Ρ 0.0102 As 25.45 Mn 1.31 Interior span ρ 0.0033 As 7.62 Interior supports Mn ρ As 58.76 0.0091 22.90 0.0112 58.88 3.44 0.0033 14.70 152.17 0.0113 49.06 183.76 0.0141 63.78 - - - 129.34 0.0094 44.16 263.26 0.0133 78.50 - - - - - - Beams B1 Dimensions 30x80 Mn 65.61 B2 50x90 168.82 B3 50x90 B4 60x100 Positive Moment Final Results Girders Dimensions Exterior spans Negative Moment 1st interior spans Mn ρ As Mn ρ As 2nd interior spans Mn ρ 1st interior supports 2nd interior supports As Mn ρ As Mn ρ As G1 50x90 164.24 0.0123 53.97 51.99 .0036 19.63 117.93 .0085 39.25 163.62 0.0123 53.97 141.8 0.0104 40.06 G2 90x100 384.78 0.0129 112.54 219.22 .0069 64.31 62.57 32.15 411.27 0.0141 120.58 209.44 0.0066 56.27 .0033 Shear Design Design for Shear Final Results Exterior spans Interior span Beams Dimensions Vn Vc Vs Av S Vn Vc Vs Av S B1 30x80 31.746 18.855 12.890 1.57 35 21.250 18.855 2.395 1.57 35 B2 50x90 80.10 35.61 44.49 3.14 25 54 35.61 18.39 3.14 40 B3 50x90 77.22 35.61 41.61 3.14 25 25.10 35.61 14.875 3.14 40 B4 60x100 69.69 47.76 21.43 3.14 45 - - - - - Final Results Exterior spans Vs 1st interior spans Girders Dimension s Vn Vc Av S G1 50x90 93.49 35.61 57.88 3.14 20 75.44 35.61 39.83 3.14 G2 90x100 229.1 71.64 157.4 3.14 202.6 71.64 5 Vn Vc Vs 131 Av 3.14 2nd interior span S Vn Vc Vs Av S 25 92.26 35.61 56.65 3.14 20 5 99.52 71.64 27.88 3.14 45 Final Results For positive moment (span) Negative moment (support) Beam Exterior 1st interior 2nd interior 1st interior 2nd interior B1 10Φ18 3Φ18 - 9Φ18 - B2 12Φ25 3Φ25 - 10Φ25 - B3 13Φ25 - - 9Φ25 - B4 16Φ25 - - - - G1 11Φ25 4Φ25 8Φ25 11Φ25 10Φ25 G2 14Φ32 8Φ32 4Φ32 15Φ32 7Φ32 CHAPTER FOUR COLUMNS sixteen columns having a rectangular section, and eight columns having a circular section, will be designed. All the columns in this project are classified into two groups depending on the ultimate axial load and the shape. The ultimate axial load on each column is from the Reaction of beams Columns number Ultimate load(ton) C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 144.24 60.96 179.18 452.71 287.65 Ultimate loads from seven stories(ton) 1009.68 426.72 1254.26 3168.97 2013.55 Group (1) C1,C2,C3 Rectangular Group (2) C4,C5 Circular Final Results Summary of result Group Pu (ton) Dimensions(h*b)(cm) spirally (D)(cm) ρ As(cm2) # of bars Shear reinforcement I 1254.26 100*50 0.0152 76.04 16 Φ25mm 4 Φ10mm/30cm II 3168.97 Spiral, D=100 0.0206 267.41 34 Φ32mm Φ10mm(spirally) CHAPTER FIVE FOOTING In this chapter the footing will be designed, all footings in this part of the project will be isolated (single) footings. The design will depend on the total axial load carried by each column. The footings are classified into two groups Group ID Columns included Loads (ton) Dead load Live load F1 C1,C2,C3 726 203 F2 C4,C5 1698 504 Group F1 Design Flexure Design X-Y Direction Steel Design Mu = 107.12 ton.m ρ= As = As min = 0.0023 25.62 21.6 cm2 cm2 Use As = 25.62 cm2 Bar Diameter 25 mm # of Bars Needed 6 Spacing 16.67 Use Main Steel 6ф25/ m Or 1ф25/16cm Shrinkage Steel 5ф25/20cm cm Group F2 Design Flexure Design X-Y Direction Steel Design Mu = 274.80 ton.m ρ= As = As min = 0.0025 43.24 32.4 cm2 cm2 Use As = 43.24 cm2 Bar Diameter 32 mm # of Bars Needed 6 Spacing 16.67 Use Main Steel 6ф32/ m Or 1ф32/16cm Shrinkage Steel 5ф32/20cm cm Final Results Footing ID Footing Dimentions (m) Bottom Steel Top Steel Width Length Thickness Long dir. Short dir. Long dir. Short dir. F1 4.6 5.1 1.2 6ф25/ m 6ф25/ m 3ф25/20cm 3ф25/20cm F2 7.45 7.45 1.8 6ф32/ m 6ф32/ m 3ф32/20cm 3ф32/20cm Ground Beam Design Final Result Dimensions Bottom & Top Steel G.B Width(m) Depth(m) exterior interior Support G.B I 0.4 0.7 7Ф20 5ф18 7Ф25 G.B II 0.5 0.75 9Ф25 5ф18 10ф25 Static vs. Dynamic analysis Static analysis Our representative element will be the bending moment at the mid span of the interior span in the 2nd frame for each model. We will take model for three stories , seven stories and ten stories then read the moment due to dead load and live load. Moment due Three Stories Seven Stories Ten Stories Average Live Load 9.7 9.52 9.72 9.54 9.82 9.66 Dead Load 25.38 24.93 25.46 24.99 25.77 25.31 As the result shows, the common practice is correct for interior floors in static analysis Columns Comparison Our representative element will be the axial force due to live load . We will take model for three stories , seven stories and ten stories ,then read the axial force for corner , edge and interior columns in the bottom of each model. SAP 2000 Analysis Results Axial Force For Three Stories Seven Stories Ten Stories Corner Column 43.32 ton 105.98 ton 157.76 ton Edge Column 86.68 ton 207.98 ton 302.27 ton Interior Column 241.98 ton 485.37 ton 676.77 ton Tributary area Tributary area Results Live Load = 0.4 ton/m2 Axial Force For Three Stories Seven Stories Ten Stories Corner Column 43.03 ton 100.41 ton 143.44 ton Edge Column 93.66 ton 218.53 ton 312.19 ton Interior Column 187.31 ton 437.06 ton 624.38 ton Dynamic Analysis Using SAP 2000 Software # of Stories One Three Seven Ten Seven+Elcento T(sec) Mass Participation Ratio Direction 0.534228 0.995042 X-Direction 0.435512 0.996652 Y-Direction 1.099129 0.965566 X-Direction 0.882423 0.970756 Y-Direction 2.092426 0.932716 X-Direction 1.65703 0.938386 Y-Direction 2.806996 0.913832 X-Direction 2.21439 0.91895 Y-Direction 2.092426 0.932716 X-Direction 1.65709 0.938386 Y-Direction CHAPTER SEVEN PRESTRESS CONCRETE Introduction Prestress concrete is not a new concept, it’s backing to 1872. (Jackson), an engineer from California, patented prestressing system that used a tie rod to construct beams or arches from individual blocks. The most practical development in prestressed concrete occurred from (1920 – 1960). We will design the prestress building for gravity loads only, and the punching shear excluded from this study. (ACI units is used) Material properties and loads Material properties:f’c =6000 Psi fpu = 270 Ksi fpe= 159 Ksi Use strands = 1.0 inch. Loads:live load (LL) = 80 Psf Super Imposed Load (SID) = 60 Psf f’ci = 4200 Psf fpy =243 Ksi fy = 60000 Psi Pe= 257597 Ib Slab thickness = Slab thickness = = 13.13 inches. Take slab thickness = 13.5 inches. Slab Design for prestress system Check stresses:1) check allowable stresses for the prestressing force and the slab own weight. 2) Check the ultimate strength . Columns design for Prestress system Sixteen columns having a rectangular section, and eight columns having a circular section, will be designed. All the columns in this project are classified into two groups depending on the ultimate axial load and the shape. The ultimate axial load on each column is from the Tributary area. Columns number C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 Ultimate loads from seven stories(ton) 606.06 1119.30 s 1210.70 1725.00 2240.00 Group (1) C1,C2,C3 Group (2) C4,C5 Final Results Summary of result Group Dimensions(h*b)(cm) spirally (D)(cm) ρ As(cm2) # of bars Shear reinforcement I 95*55 0.0123 28.16 8 Φ22mm 4 Φ10mm/25cm II Spiral, D=90 0.0142 3 128.68 16 Φ32mm Φ10mm(spirally) Footing design for prestress system All footings in this part of the project will be isolated (single) footings. The design will depend on the total axial load carried by each column. The footings are classified into two groups Group ID F1 F2 Columns included C1,C2,C3 C4,C5 Loads (ton) Dead load Live load 694 236 1284 437 Group F1 Design Flexure Design X-Y Direction Steel Design Mu = 108.34 ρ= 0.0020 As = 24.34 cm2 As min = 23.4 cm2 Use As = 24.34 cm2 Bar Diameter 25 mm # of Bars Needed 5 Spacing 20 Use Main Steel Or 5ф25/ m 1ф25/20cm Shrinkage Steel 5ф25/20Cm ton.m cm Group F2 Design Flexure Design X-Y Direction Steel Design Mu = 222.97 ρ= 0.0031 As = 42.71 cm2 As min = 27 cm2 Use As = 42.71 cm2 Bar Diameter 28 mm # of Bars Needed 7 Spacing 14.29 Use Main Steel Or 7ф28/ m 1ф28/14cm Shrinkage Steel 5ф28/20cm ton.m cm Final Results Footing Dimentions (m) Bottom Steel Top Steel Footing ID Width Length Thickness Long dir. Short dir. Long dir. F1 4.65 5.05 1.3 5ф25/ m 5ф25/ m 3ф25/20cm F2 6.6 6.6 1.5 7ф28/ m 7ф28/ m 3ф28/20cm Short dir. 3ф25/20c m 3ф28/20c m