Mika Waris Towards Better Practices in Innovation Process - Finnish IPR-strategy Mika Waris WIPO Forum on IP and SMEs for IP Offices and other relevant.
Download
Report
Transcript Mika Waris Towards Better Practices in Innovation Process - Finnish IPR-strategy Mika Waris WIPO Forum on IP and SMEs for IP Offices and other relevant.
Mika Waris
Towards Better Practices in Innovation Process
- Finnish IPR-strategy
Mika Waris
WIPO Forum on IP and SMEs for
IP Offices and other relevant Institutions in OECD
14.-15.9.2009
Mika Waris
Presentation
1.
Explain background of InnoInfo-project
2.
Illustrate some conclusions
3.
Finnish National IPR-strategy
Mika Waris
The essential part of innovation environment
is the IP-system
Employment
Productive business,
competitiveness,
growth
Ideas,
entrepreneurship
Innovationfriendly
environment
Innovation environment INTEGRATION
- financing
- support services
- environment of know-how
- network of expertise
- IP-system
- information sources
- ways of protection
Enterprise
Finland
IdeaPilot
Enterprise
Europe
Network
Mika Waris
IP-system
• means to empower
marketing
• tool for
product development
• necessity for
networking
• means to
control business
patent
utility modelt
design right
trade mark
trade name
copyright
competitor information
trade secret
technical information
informal protection
Mika Waris
Innovation process
Fuzzy-front-end
Detailed
planning
Marketing
After
sales
Concept
planning
NPD = New Product Development
TSG = Technology Stage Gate
Lähde:
Production
Mika Waris
Development commits the costs
Mika Waris
Applied and granted patents - 92 - 01
domestic companies in Finland
100 %
90 %
80 %
70 %
60 %
50 %
Myönnetty
Granted
40 %
30 %
20 %
10 %
0%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Mika Waris
INNOINFO research project
Objectives
●
The literature study of the theoretical and empirical background of innovation
activities and innovation policy.
●
The exploration of reasons, content, characteristics and extent of doubling R&D and
patenting efforts
(e.g. strategic protection of knowledge, lack of information of parallel projects, bias
of overlapping R&D in certain technological, industrial or scientific fields, etc.)
●
Empirical investigation of patent decisions by NBPR
●
The identifying of the main reasons for “unhealthy” overlapping R&D efforts and the
exploration of opportunities to reduce “unhealthy” overlapping patenting and
innovation in national innovation environment.
Participants
● Tekes, NBPR, VTT INF, VTT Innovation Studies
IP Landscape
Mika Waris
Domestic patent applications 2000 - 2005
In Finland
11 775
33,2 % of R
10,4 % 537 kpl
no state-of-art
& D is redundant
89,6 %
existing
state-of-art
4 609 kpl
it means 2 billion euros/year
23 %
withdrawn
33,2 %
lack of
novelty
Applications
11 775
Granted patents
5 144
(43,7 %)
Mika Waris
Conclusions
By developing relevant information services and service
providers
Remarkable improvement effects are expected to
company, branch and macro level performance of
industries
In particular, the improvement of competitiveness of SMEs
is expected
Mika Waris
These conclusions led
to remarkable contributions
in
Finnish National IPR-strategy
Mika Waris
Finnish National IPR-strategy
Target areas for measures
• Skills
- IPR-training in universities and polytechnics
- Business strategy – new business literacy
- International contractual competency in IPRs
- Exploitation of patent information
• The efficiency and clarity of the rights
- The legislation concerning IPRs
- Patent quality
- The high standar and speed of court proceedings
Mika Waris
Finnish National IPR-strategy
Target areas for measures …
• Competition policy and functionality of markets
based on IPRs
- Use of IPRs as company assets
- Valuation of IPRs
- The usability of patent information
• Functional and economic efficiency of IP-system
- Public financing and counselling actors to promote
the IPR competence and use of patent information
- Especially among start-ups
- Covering also copyrights and informal protection
Mika Waris
Finnish National IPR-strategy
Main message
New business paradigm!
New Business Literacy!
IP Landscape
Mika Waris
Open innovation vs. closed innovation
Source:
Mika Waris
Closed innovation vs. open innovation paradigm:
1) R&D in Finland
2) R&D in the ROW
0,7 %
99,3 %
IP Landscape
Mika Waris
Source:
Conclusion: Integration of IP in business
Mika Waris
= New Business Literacy
IDEA
DEVELOPMENT
IMPLEMENTATION
FEED-BACK
Technical development
Commercialization, marketing
Technology
surveys
State-of-art
Screening
Competitor
survey
Trade secrets
Freedom
to
operate
Search
for
technical solution
Partners
search
MOBdecisions
Novelty
search
Patent,
design,
trade mark
Copyrights
Informal protection
Control strategy
Competitor
follow-up
Licencing
MARKET
Opposition
search
Mika Waris
Thank you!