ARCH-377 Energy, Environment and Buildings TOOLS LEED IN DETAIL Kevin Hydes P Eng Guido Petinelli.
Download ReportTranscript ARCH-377 Energy, Environment and Buildings TOOLS LEED IN DETAIL Kevin Hydes P Eng Guido Petinelli.
ARCH-377 Energy, Environment and Buildings TOOLS LEED IN DETAIL Kevin Hydes P Eng Guido Petinelli Energy, Environment and Buildings Lecture Schedule – Winter 2007 -January 5 Sustainability and Architecture: an Introduction - January 12 History of Assessment Tools: LEED in Detail - January 19 Sustainable Sites Site Visit: Caisse de Dépôt, Montreal - January 26 Water Efficiency & Green Roofs - February 2 Mechanical Services: an Overview of Standard Practices - February 9 Energy Efficiency & Emerging Systems - February 16 Materials and Embodied Energy - February 23 No classes – STUDY BREAK - March 2 Integrated Design Process (IDP) - March 9 Renewable Energy - March 16 Indoor Environmental Quality and the Human Factor - March 23 Advanced Buildings: Integration of Passive and Mechanical Systems Towards Energy Efficiency - March 30 Schulich School of Music – McGill University -April 6 Good Friday – EASTER THIS WEEK - Changes to the Lecture Schedule - Course Outline -Deadlines and Important Dates - Reading #2 - Project 1 - Special Permission to take/drop ARCH-377 Changes to the Lecture Schedule Energy, Environment and Buildings Lecture Schedule – Winter 2007 -January 5 Sustainability and Architecture: an Introduction - January 12 History of Assessment Tools: LEED in Detail - January 19 Sustainable Sites Site Visit: Caisse de Dépôt, Montreal - January 26 Water Efficiency & Green Roofs - February 2 Mechanical Services: an Overview of Standard Practices - February 9 Energy Efficiency & Emerging Systems - February 16 Materials and Embodied Energy - February 23 No classes – STUDY BREAK - March 2 Integrated Design Process (IDP) - March 9 Renewable Energy Course Outline – Winter 2007 1. Lectures 2. Field Lectures 3. Design Workshop 4. Final Presentations 5. Three Project Assignments - Project 1 Sustainable energy: an architectural precedent - Project 2 - Project 3 Sustainable energy: design objectives Sustainable energy: design presentation 6. Lecture and Reading Material 7. Online Information Deadlines and Important Dates Friday 19 January 2007 Please e-mail your choice of topic for Assignment #1 to the TA for approval. Friday 26 January 2007 Hand in hard copy of Assignment #1 and a digital (CD) “WORD” version to the TA. Also, include a copy of your PowerPoint presentation in the same CD. Friday 9 February 2007 Hand in the hard copy of Assignment #2 and email the “WORD” version to the TA. Friday 30 March 2007 Hand in a digital copy (CD) of your final Assignment #3 PowerPoint presentation. Reading # 2 LEED CANADA-NC Green Building Rating System Version 1.0, December 2004 www.CaGBC.org http://www.cagbc.org/uploads/FINAL_LEED%20CANADANC%201.0_Green%20Building%20Rating%20System.pdf Project 1 Sustainable energy: an architectural precedent Please e-mail your choice of topic for Assignment #1 to the TA for approval. This assignment consists of the preparation of a report on an energy system. Students are asked to explore a topic (i.e. passive solar systems, wind energy, recycled materials, green roofs , etc.) through the use of architectural precedents. For this portion of the assignment, students will make a brief presentation (no more than 5 minutes -PowerPoint) during the second part of the lectures. Assignment is to be completed in groups of 3 or 4. Percentage of final mark: 30% Due Friday 26 January 2007 Permission to take/drop EEB - MUST see Mary !!! and add your name to the waiting list - If you’ve taken a similar class on exchange, bring the course outline and your term work for review - Speak with me at the END of the class CONTACT ME [email protected] Office Hours by Appointment Available at the School all day on Fridays -- Part 1 -- Context Toll on the Environment Because of this unlimited consumption of natural resources today: Global Warming Ozone Depletion “Every living system is in decline and the rate of decline is increasing.” -The Union of Concerned Scientists Notable problems include: • Global warming • Ozone depletion • Acid rain • Soil, water, and air pollution Air Pollution Soil Erosion & Water Pollution • Loss of biodiversity in soil and groundwater resources Global Warming World Wide Energy Consumption Map Energy Energy Consumption Total - US Energy Consumption Energy Used in the Life of a Building 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 50 40 30 40% of the Total Energy Consumption is in Building Energy Consumption 40 30 20 20 10 10 0 0 Rocky Mountain Institute Rocky Mountain Institute 20% Embodied Energy 80% Operating Energy Buildings Contribute to: • 17% of fresh water flow • 25% of wood harvested • 50% of CFC production • 33% of total CO2 emissions • 40% of landfill material • 30% of building suffer from “sick building syndrome” • 40% of the world’s energy annually • 60% of the world’s electricity annually • 5 billion gallons of water per day to flush toilets Buildings Typical North American commercial construction causes: • 2.5 pounds of solid waste for every square foot of floor space • Land and habitat disruption • Water run-off & pollution • Soil erosion This energy consumption results in: • Pollution • Ozone depletion • Global warming • Human health problems C.I.R.S. BUSBY, PERKINS & WILL C.K.Choi Building: 5.4 Post Occupancy Evalutions 100 75 How satisfied are you with the building overall? 50 25 0 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Liu Centre: 3.92 The average score of 2000+ responses on buildings in CBE database was 4.78 4.0 is a neutral score. 100 Choi occupants are more satisfied than average at 5.4 75 Liu occupants are slightly dissatisfied at 3.92 50 25 0 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Techniques Do what is right - not what everyone else is doing Seek the correct solution out of the box thinking Triple Bottom Line Consider three bottom lines instead of just one (initial construction costs): Social Environmental Economical The Interface of Sustainability and Design General Motors Building, Detroit, 1921, Albert Kahn, Inc., Architects 1970’s Green Building Movement The “Green Building” movement began as a reaction to: Bateson Building, Sacramento, California, 1977, Sim van der Ryn Village Homes Subdivision, Davis, California, 1973 • Oil shortages • Political events • Environmental events The early part of the movement focused on energy conservation. Farallones Institute, Occidental, CA, 1970, Sim Van der Ryn Architect Timeline of the Green Building Growth within Canada -- Part 2 -- Organizations www.worldgbc.org New Zealand GBC WGBC Current Members USGBC CaGBC CaGBC: What We Are About • Delivering built environment that is: – – – – healthier more economical more productive less environmental impact • Accelerating the change in the buildings market USGBC & CaGBC Momentum USGBC: Dec. 2003 CaGBC Membership Trend 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 USGBC has about 4,100 member organizations 500 400 300 200 100 0 Ja n Fe -03 bM 03 a Ap r-03 M r-03 a Ju y-03 nJu 03 Au l-03 Se g-0 p 3 Oc -03 No t -03 De v-0 c 3 Ja -03 Fe n-04 b M -04 ar Ap -04 M r-04 a Ju y-04 nJu 04 Au l-04 g04 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 CaGBC growing ~10% per month: currently 450 + member organizations Fe b03 M ar -0 3 Ap r03 M ay -0 3 Ju n03 Ju l-0 Au 3 g03 Se p03 O ct -0 3 N ov -0 3 D ec -0 3 Ja n04 Fe b04 M ar -0 4 Ap r04 M ay -0 4 Ju n04 Ju l-0 Au 4 g04 Se p04 O ct -0 4 N ov -0 4 D ec -0 4 Ja n05 Fe b05 M ar -0 5 Ap r05 M ay -0 5 Ju n05 Ju l-0 Au 5 g05 CaGBC Momentum CaGBC: Sept. 2005 1000 900 800 700 600 CaGBC growth ~10% per month: currently 890+ member organizations 500 400 300 200 100 0 Interesting Architectural Features - SUNPIPE Interesting Architectural/Mechanical Features Multi-Service Chilled Beam News Headline CaGBC Membership CaGBC Universities Retail Governments Manufacturers Builders Research inst. Real Estate Bldg. Controls Bldg. Owners Non-Profits Financial Contractors Utilities Bldg. Controls Prof. Firms • The Council is a broad-based inclusive coalition of representatives from different segments of the design and building industry. CaGBC Membership – October 2004 Saskatchewan Yukon US Alberta Quebec PEI Ontario Nunavut Northwest Territories Manitoba Nova Scotia Nefoundland & Labrador New Brunswick BC CaGBC Membership – October 2004 Building Controls 0% Financial 0% Colleges 1% Environmental Non-profit 2% Contractors, Builders 7% Federal Agencies 1% Municipal & Regional Gov. 3% Utilities 1% Universities & Research Institutes 2% Real Estate 1% Retail 1% Product Manufacturers 7% Provincial Agencies 1% Professional Firms 73% -- Part 3 -Global Tools C2000/R2000 Green leaf BOMA go green LEED Rating systems C2000 C2000 The C-2000 Program for Advanced Commercial Buildings was a small demonstration program for high-performance buildings, developed and sponsored by the CANMET Energy Technology Centre (CETC) of Natural Resources Canada. The emphasis of the program was on energy performance and water conservation, but criteria was also developed for maintenance of site ecology and improved levels of indoor environmental quality. C2000 Since the program launch in 1993, 24 buildings were designed using the C-2000 requirements, twelve of which achieved the design targets and were constructed. C2000 Initially it was thought that new technologies would be the key to high performance, the experience of the program, however, showed that the design process itself is the most important contributor to the realization of high performance buildings. C2000 The initial phase of the C2000 program is now closed. The knowledge and expertise resulting from this green building demonstration program are now serving to prepare Integrated Design Process (IDP) guidelines and energy performance assessment tools. Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED)® • A leading-edge consensus-based system for designing, constructing, operating and certifying the world’s greenest buildings. • Created by US Green Building Council, adapted for Canada by Canada Green Building Council • LEED examines and assigns points in: – Sustainable Sites, Water Efficiency, Energy & Atmosphere, Materials & Resources, Indoor Environmental Quality and Design Excellence Market Transformation Model (MXM) LEED Canada-NC 1.0™ • Towards Green Buildings in Canada Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED)® • A leading-edge consensus-based system for designing, constructing, operating and certifying the world’s greenest buildings. • Created by US Green Building Council, adapted for Canada by Canada Green Building Council • LEED examines and assigns points in: – Sustainable Sites, Water Efficiency, Energy & Atmosphere, Materials & Resources, Indoor Environmental Quality and Design Excellence Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED)® • Four Performance levels: – – – – Platinum Gold Silver Certified PLATINUM GOLD SILVER Certified What are the Advantages of LEED® ? • Relatively simple to implement • Not overly prescriptive • Can be modified for local climate and standards (LEED™ Canada) • It has legitimacy and consistency • It has momentum: – the use of LEEDTM is growing rapidly across North America LEED Uptake in Canada • • • • • • • • • • • • APEGG BC Vancouver 2010 Bid Committee GVRD City of Vancouver City of Victoria Dockside Lands University of BC BC Buildings Corporation Alberta Infrastructure Schools Pilot City of Calgary Sustainable Buildings Policy Manitoba Hydro $150 million building Public Works & Government Services Canada, Capital Projects > $10 million La Société Immobillière du Québec, Pilots for New Construction & Renovations LEED-NC® in the USA • State Government Use: – – – – – – – California Maryland Massachusetts New Jersey New York Oregon Pennsylvania Municipal Use of LEED® • Local Government LEED™ Users – – – – – – – – – – Austin, TX Arlington, VA Boulder, CO Cook County, IL Los Angeles, CA Portland, OR San Diego, CA San Jose, CA San Mateo, CA Seattle, WA Economic Benefits: the Hard Numbers • • • • • • Reduce operating costs Future Proofing Reduce or neutralize first costs Enhance asset value & increase profits Optimize life cycle economic performance Reduced Liability risk Economic Benefits: the Soft Numbers • Increase retail sales with daylighting – Studies have shown ~40% improvement² • Impact on Schools and Education/ HealthCare • Improve productivity – Estimated $29 –168 billion in national productivity losses per year¹ • Reduce absenteeism and turnover – Providing a healthy workplace improves employee satisfaction Green Buildings & Occupants 140 130 120 $/sq.ft Annual* 100 80 60 40 21 20 1.81 1.53 1.37 0 Salaries Rent Total Energy Electricity O&M * 1991 Source: BOMA, EPRI, Statistical Abstract in RMI "Greening the Building and the Bottom Line, 1994 BUILDING PERFORMANCE: Relative costs of life cycle elements Productivity gains of only 3.7% can pay for all facility costs over a 30 year period. $/work space after 30 years $2.9 million 3.7% = $107.3K First cost Operating cost (energy, tax, cleaning) Maintenance & Repair Payroll Cost $49K + $9.8K + $48.5K = $107.3K Source: U.S. Secretary of Defense ATHENA Institute Capital Cost Impact Increase Project Size LEED Target Level Small Base Cost Platinum Green Market Maturity Gold Silver Certified Owner / Spec Flexibility Large New Advanced Climate Zone Low High Building Type Moderate Extreme Team Experience Low Energy High Energy Total Cost Increase All Scenarios: Best Case: 0% Worst Case: about 10% None Lots LEED BC Gold Project City of Vancouver National Works Yard Vancouver, BC 12-acre Engineering Operations Facility LEED version 2 Gold Project Vancouver Island Technology Park Victoria, British Columbia, Canada 165,000 gsf Commercial Office Building LEED version 2 Gold Project White Rock Operations Building White Rock, BC 6,545 gsf Municipal Operations Building LEED version 2 Gold Project Semiahmoo Library & RCMP Station Surrey, BC 30,000 gsf Institutional Building VIDEO • Building Green in Pennsylvania Lessons Learned: The First Years South Central Regional Office Building Cambria Office Building CaGBC – Market Transformation Green Building Markets 0.12 0.08 0.06 Regulations Proportion of Market Attaining 0.1 Typical Practice The Majority 0.04 Certified 75% 0.02 Law Breaker s 0 0 LEEDers 25% Silver Gold Platinum 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Inovators Risk Takers 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Green Standards LEED® Products Customers for New Construction For building owners and design teams that address the new building design and construction or major renovations process. Also referred to as LEED 2.0. for Existing Buildings for Commercial Interiors For building owners and service providers that address building operation and on-going upgrades and performance improvements. For building owners, tenants and design teams that address commercial interiors design and installation process. (Note: process can be driven by either owners or tenants.) for Core and Shell For developers and design teams that address the new building design and construction process for buildings where the interiors are not part of the initial design process. for Homes For residential building owners, developers and design teams that address the new residential building design and construction process. LEED® Products Customers for New Construction Canadian Adaptation Complete LEED CanadaNC 1.0, MURB Application Guide too! For building owners and design teams that address the new building design and construction or major renovations process. Also referred to as LEED 2.0. for Existing Buildings for Commercial Interiors For building owners and service providers that address building operation and on-going upgrades and performance improvements. For building owners, tenants and design teams that address commercial interiors design and installation process. (Note: process can be driven by either owners or tenants.) Existing Building Study happening, evaluation on whether to adapt for Canada to come in 2006 for Core and Shell For developers and design teams that address the new building design and construction process for buildings where the interiors are not part of the initial design process. Plan and timeline being developed, LEED-CI likely in 2006 for Homes For residential building owners, developers and design teams that address the new residential building design and construction process. No plan for Canada yet Being reviewed by CaGBC Residential Committee LEED Point Distribution Indoor Environmental Quality 21% Materials & Resources 20% Innovation & Design Process 7% Sustainable Sites 20% Water Efficiency 7% Energy & Atmosphere 25% 26-32 Certified | 33-38 Silver | 39-51 Gold | 52 + Platinum Division of documentation effort Commissioning Agent, 5% Contractor, 21% Owner, 3% Landscape, 4% Electrical, 1% Civil, 6% • • • • • • • Spec Plan Letter Narrative Drawing Calculation Product Info Architect, 35% M echanical, 25% LEED Certification Process A three step process: •Step 1: Project Registration •Welcome Packet and on-line project listing •Step 2: Technical Support •Credit Rulings •Step 3: Building Certification •Upon documentation submittal and USGBC review LEED Certification Awards • Four levels of certification – – – – LEED certified Silver level Gold level Platinum level – 70 possible points 26 - 32 points 33 - 38 points 39 - 51 points 52 + points Certification Benefits Recognition of Quality Buildings and Environmental Stewardship •Third party validation of achievement •Qualify for growing array of state and local government incentives •Contribute to growing knowledge base •LEED Certification plaque to mount on building •Official Certificate •Receive marketing exposure through USGBC Web site, case studies, media announcements LEED Resources •LEED Green Building Rating System •Training Workshop •Reference package •Professional Accreditation •Welcome Packet •Credit Rulings •Website (www.leedbuilding.org) Green Building Rating System Green Building Rating System • Technical Review LEED Rating System • 5 sustainable categories of concern – PLUS design process & innovation • Rating system contains: – – – – 7 prerequisites 32 credits with 65 core points 4 design process & innovation points 1 LEED accredited professional point LEED Point Distribution Indoor Environmental Quality 21% Materials & Resources 20% Innovation & Design Process 7% Sustainable Sites 20% Energy & Atmosphere 25% Water Efficiency 7% LEED Canada-NC 1.0 Credits 8 3 6 8 8 Sustainable Sites Water Efficiency Energy & Atmosphere Materials & Resources Indoor Environmental Quality Design Process & Innovation LEED Accredited Professional Total Points Available Points 14 5 17 14 15 65 4 1 70 Sustainable Sites Indoor Environmental Quality 21% Innovation & Design Process 7% Sustainable Sites 20% Water Efficiency 7% Materials & Resources 20% Energy & Atmosphere 25% Sustainable Sites • Goals – – – – – Develop only appropriate sites Reuse existing buildings and/or sites Protect natural and agricultural areas Reduce need for automobile use Protect and/or restore sites Sustainable Sites Prerequisites: Erosion & Sedimentation Control 14 possible points Credits: • Site Selection • Urban Redevelopment • Brownfield Redevelopment • Alternative Transportation • Reduced Site Disturbance • Stormwater Management • Landscape to Reduce Heat Islands • Light Pollution Reduction Sustainable Sites Credit • Erosion and Sedimentation Control • Site Selection • Development Density • Redevelopment of Contaminated Site • Alternative Transportation • Reduced Site Disturbance • Stormwater Management • Heat Island Effect • Light Pollution Reduction 14 Point(s) Required 1 1 1 1-4 1-2 1-2 1-2 1 Total 14 Water Efficiency Indoor Environmental Quality 21% Innovation & Design Process 7% Materials & Resources 20% Sustainable Sites 20% Energy & Atmosphere 25% Water Efficiency 7% Water Efficiency • Goals – Reduce the quantity of water needed for the building – Reduce municipal water supply and treatment burden Water Efficiency Prerequisites: N/A 5 possible points Credits: • Water Efficient Landscaping • Innovative Waterwater Technologies • Water Use Reduction Water Efficiency Credit • Water efficient landscaping • Innovative wastewater technologies • Water use reduction Point(s) 1-2 1 1-2 Total 5 Energy and Atmosphere Indoor Environmental Quality 21% Innovation & Design Process 7% Sustainable Sites 20% Water Efficiency 7% Materials & Resources 20% Energy & Atmosphere 25% • Goals – – – – Energy and Atmosphere Establish energy efficiency and system performance Optimize energy efficiency Encourage renewable and alternative energy sources Support ozone protection protocols Energy & Atmosphere Prerequisites: Fundamental Building Systems Commissioning Minimum Energy Performance CFC Reduction in HVAC&R Equipment 17 possible points Credits: • Optimize Energy Performance • Renewable Energy • Additional commissioning • Ozone Depletion • Measurement & Verification • Green Power Energy & Atmosphere Credits • Fundamental building systems commissioning • Minimum energy performance • CFC reduction in HVAC&R equipment • Optimize energy performance • • • • • Renewable energy Best practice commissioning Ozone protection Measurement and verification Green power Point(s) Required Required Required 2-10 1-3 1 1 1 1 Total 17 Materials and Resources Indoor Environmental Quality 21% Innovation & Design Process 7% Sustainable Sites 20% Water Efficiency 7% Energy & Atmosphere 25% Materials & Resources 20% Materials and Resources • Goals – Reduce the amount of materials needed – Use materials with less environmental impact – Reduce and manage waste Materials & Resources Prerequisites: Storage and Collection of Recyclables 13 possible points Credits: • Building Reuse • maintain all or part of existing shell • maintain a portion of non-shell components • Construction Waste Management • Resource Reuse • Recycled Content • Local/regional Materials • Rapidly Renewable Materials • Certified Wood Products Materials and Resources Credit • Storage and collection of recyclables • • • • • • • • Building reuse Construction waste management Resource reuse Recycled content Regional materials Rapidly renewable materials Certified wood Durable Building Point(s) Required 1-3 1-2 1-2 1-2 1-2 1 1 1 Total 14 Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) Indoor Environmental Quality 21% Innovation & Design Process 7% Sustainable Sites 20% Water Efficiency 7% Materials & Resources 20% Energy & Atmosphere 25% Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) • Goals – – – – Establish good indoor air quality Eliminate, reduce, manage the sources of indoor pollutants Ensure thermal comfort and system controllability Provide for occupant connection to the outdoor environment. Indoor Environmental Quality 80 to 90% of time indoors Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Monitoring Increase Ventilation Effectiveness •Sick Building Syndrome – SBS •Building Related Illness – BRI •Multiple Chemical Sensitivity – MCS Indoor Environmental Quality Prerequisites: Minimum IAQ Performance Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control 15 possible points Credits: • • • • • • • • Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Monitoring Increase Ventilation Effectiveness Construction IAQ Management Plan Low-Emitting Materials Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control Controllability of Systems Thermal Comfort Daylight and Views Indoor Environmental Quality Credit • Minimum IAQ performance • Environmental tobacco smoke control • Carbon dioxide monitoring • Ventilation effectiveness • Construction IAQ management plan • Low-emitting materials • Indoor chemical & pollutant source control • Controllability of systems • Thermal comfort • Daylight and views Point(s) Required Required 1 1 1-2 1-4 1 1-2 1-2 1-2 Total 15 Innovation & Design Process Prerequisites: N/A 5 possible points Credits: • Innovation in design • LEEDTM Accredited Professional -- Part 4 -Tools for Comparative Analysis SHADES OF GREEN Market Building: Standard building envelope, mechanical system, and lighting. Leed Silver Building: Improved building envelope high performance glass, and increased insulation. Open office plan. Improved mechanical system high efficiency equipment, alternate air systems (underfloor air) Improved lighting - high efficiency lighting fixtures, reduced lighting loads. Gold Building: Improved building envelope high performance glass, and increased insulation. Operable windows for natural ventilation Reduced or no mechanical system natural ventilation, water saving strategies, increased temp. tolerance by occupants, solar control Improved lighting - high efficiency lighting fixtures, reduced lighting via natural daylighting. Leed Platinum Building: Improved building envelope high performance glass, and increased insulation alternate envelope systems (sod roof). Open office plan. Reduced or no mechanical system - alternate energy sources for systems (PV’s), Aggressive water strategies. Improved lighting - high efficiency lighting fixtures, task lighting, aggressive daylighting scheme. Restorative Building Living Building Living/Restorative Building Improved building envelope high performance glass, and increased insulation alternate envelope systems (sod roof). Significant open office plan. Reduced or no mechanical system - significant alternate energy sources for systems (PV’s, Fuel Cells, Wind), Water strategies which give back what’s taken. Improved lighting - high efficiency lighting fixtures, task lighting, aggressive day lighting scheme. Sustainability Matrix