SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut February 28, 2011 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org.
Download ReportTranscript SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut February 28, 2011 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut February 28, 2011 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.swis.org Greater focus on all students Increased problem awareness Good “things” about Bullying efforts More curriculum development & research More emphasis on prevention Labeling kids Too much attention on student, not enough on recipients Non-data based intervention decisions Over-emphasis on student responsibility for change Limited assessment of context Generic intervention responses Limited examination of mechanism SWPBS is Framework for enhancing adoption & implementation of Continuum of evidencebased interventions to achieve Academically & behaviorally important outcomes for All students IMPLEMENTATION W/ FIDELITY CONTINUUM OF CONTINUOUS EVIDENCE-BASED PROGRESS INTERVENTIONS MONITORING RtI UNIVERSAL SCREENING Reducing Bullying DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING & PROBLEM SOLVING CONTENT EXPERTISE & FLUENCY PREVENTION & EARLY INTERVENTION Intensive Targeted Universal Few Some All Dec 7, 2007 Continuum of Support for ALL ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS ~5% ~15% TERTIARY TERTIARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Function-based support •• Wraparound •• Person-centered planning •• •• SECONDARY SECONDARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Check in/out •• Targeted social skills instruction •• Peer-based supports •• Social skills club •• ~80% of Students PRIMARY PRIMARY PREVENTION PREVENTION •• Teach SW expectations •• Proactive SW discipline •• Positive reinforcement •• Effective instruction •• Parent engagement •• Continuum of Physical Intimidation Support for Intensive “Manuella” Harassment Targeted Literacy Social Studies Adult Relations. Universal Computer Lab Attendance Label behavior…not people Dec 7, 2007 OUR BEHAVIORAL PERSPECTIVE “Context” or environment Context manipulation Learning history “Do” Data-based decision making Prevention 1 • Teach effective, efficient, relevant social skills 2 • Remove triggers of problem behavior 3 • Add triggers for social skills 4 • Remove consequences that maintain problem behavior 5 • Add consequences that maintain social skills Integrated Elements Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior “BULLY BEHAVIOR” PRACTICES Supporting Student Behavior Reconceptualizing Bullying from Behavior Analytic Perspective for SWPBS Emphasize overt observable behavior Consider sets of behavior w/ similar function Examine behavior in context Specific relationship between behavior & context Describe behavioral learning histories Change context to change probability of behavior What is “bullying?” Remember “Label behavior, not people…’ So, say, “bully behavior” Behavior Verbal/physical aggression, intimidation, harassment, teasing, manipulation Why do bully behavior? Get/obtain Escape/avoid E.g., stuff, things, attention, status, money, activity, attention, etc. E.g., same…but less likely Why is “why” important? PREVENTION Teach effective, efficient, relevant alt. SS Remove triggers of BB Add triggers for alt. SS Remove conseq. that maintain BB De-emphasis on adding consequence for problem behavior Add conseq. that maintain SS Target Initiator Continuum of Behavior Fluency Context or Setting Bystander Staff Is Behavior an Issue? Step 1 • Implement SWPBS continuum w/ fidelity • Review SW data at least monthly Step 2 • Modify implementation plan based on data • Implement modifications w/ fidelity Step 3 • Monitor implementation fidelity • Monitor student progress & responsiveness • Modify as indicated by data Doesn’t Work • Label student Works • Exclude student • Teach targeted social skills • Blame family • Reward social skills • Punish student • Teach all • Assign restitution • Individualize for non-responsive behavior • Ask for apology • Invest in positive school-wide culture 1. Teach common strategy to all • “Stop-Walk-Talk” • “Talk-Walk-Squawk” • “Whatever & Walk” www.pbis.org 2. Precorrect Before • • • • • • Analyze problem setting Describe problem behavior Identify triggers & function Identify acceptable alternative behavior Modify setting to prevent Check-in w/ student to remind of desired behavior During • • • • Monitor Remind Reinforce Redirect After • • • • Correct Reinforce approximations Reteach Remind 3. Actively Supervise • Move • Scan • Interact positively • Model expectations • Reward appropriate behavior • Remind & precorrect PBIS Prevention Goals & Bullying Behavior • Establish positive, predictable, consistent, rewarding Goal 1 school culture for all across all settings • Teach social skills that work at least as well as or better than problem behavior Goal 2 • Respond to nonresponsive behavior positively & differently, rather than reactively & more of same Goal 3 • Actively supervise & precorrect for problem behaviors & settings, especially nonclassroom Goal 4 Goal 5 • Individualize support based on responsiveness & effect