VOTable discussions Concerns about how units date/time (ISO8601) -- no new datatype! sexagesimal are expressed in VOTable and other VO components need common.
Download ReportTranscript VOTable discussions Concerns about how units date/time (ISO8601) -- no new datatype! sexagesimal are expressed in VOTable and other VO components need common.
VOTable discussions Concerns about how units date/time (ISO8601) -- no new datatype! sexagesimal are expressed in VOTable and other VO components need common solutions in VO components! Concerns about VOTable recursivity (kept) Concerns about conservation of VOTable structures in applications (TOPcat) will be fixed The utype question incorporated in VOTable 1.1 (VOTable is a serialization of parameters which may originate from any part of the VO) Role = give a fully detailed meaning by a reference to an external data model, e.g. systems in which values are expressed (photometry) reference frames used for space / time / etc (STC) (ucd = broad semantics) Used in other VO components (DAL), look for generic and common solutions. utype example for Regions (static model) <stc:Circle> <stc:Center unit="deg"> <stc:C1>233.737917</stc:C1> <stc:C2>23.503330</stc:C2> </stc:Center> <stc:Radius pos_unit="arcsec">12.0</stc:Radius> </stc:Circle> <FIELD ID="Col1" name="cRA" utype="stc:Circle.Center.C1" ucd="pos.eq.ra" unit="deg" datatype="double" /> <FIELD ID="Col2" name="cDec" utype="stc:Circle.Center.C2" ucd="pos.eq.dec" unit="deg" datatype="double" /> <PARAM name="targetRadius" utype="stc:Circle.Radius" ucd="pos.angDistance" datatype="double" unit="arcsec" value="12.0"/> utype example for Regions (dynamic model) <stc:Polygon> <stc:Vertex> <stc:Position> <stc:C1>233.737917</stc:C1> <GROUP name="myPolygon" utype="stc:Polygon"> <stc:C2>23.503330</stc:C2> </stc:Position> <FIELDref ref="vert1"> </stc:Vertex> <FIELDref ref="vert2"> <stc:Vertex> <FIELDref ref="vert3"> <stc:Position> ... </GROUP> ... ... ... <FIELD ID="Vert1" name="point1" </stc:Polygon> utype="stc:Polygon.Vertex" ucd="pos.eq" unit="deg" arraysize="2" datatype="double" /> <FIELD ID="Vert2" name="point2" utype="stc:Polygon.Vertex" ucd="pos.eq" unit="deg" arraysize="2" datatype="double" /> [...] STC reference via utype <GROUP ucd="pos"> <PARAM utype="stc:AstroCoordSystem.SpaceFrame.Name" datatype="char" arraysize="*" name="coosys" value="ICRS" /> <FIELDref ref="col1"/> <FIELDref ref="col2"/> <PARAM name="Epoch" utype="stc:AstroCoordSystem.SpaceFrame.Epoch" datatype="double" value="1991.25" /> </GROUP> <FIELD ID="col1" name="RA" datatype="double" utype="stc:AstroCoords.Position2D.C1" unit="deg" /> <FIELD ID="col2" name="Dec" datatype="double" utype="stc:AstroCoords.Position2D.C2" unit="deg" /> VOTable Roadmap Referencing STC via utype proposal (Jonathan) June 2006 discussion of proposals (July -- August) take a decision at next IVOA in September 2007 Toward a new schema (to be discussed in September) details about utype conventions and recommended usage deprecate COOSYS rationalized (closer to Java usage)