Taking Charge: Effective Oversight Structures for Plan Implementation- The Chicago Continuum of Care Gabe Bodzin Senior Program Associate Chicago Continuum of Care [email protected] Presented at the National Alliance.

Download Report

Transcript Taking Charge: Effective Oversight Structures for Plan Implementation- The Chicago Continuum of Care Gabe Bodzin Senior Program Associate Chicago Continuum of Care [email protected] Presented at the National Alliance.

Taking Charge:
Effective Oversight Structures for
Plan Implementation- The Chicago
Continuum of Care
Gabe Bodzin
Senior Program Associate
Chicago Continuum of Care
[email protected]
Presented at the National Alliance to End Homelessness National Conference
July 18, 2006

The Chicago Continuum of
Care
History
 Structure
 Representation

The Chicago Continuum of Care

The Chicago Continuum of Care
consists of over 400 organizations
and individuals whose work directly
impacts the homeless service
system in the City of Chicago. The
collaborative is a public-private
partnership that directs the provision
of services and funding for the
homeless service delivery system.
Chicago Continuum of Care

History

1997: Partnership to End Homelessness
began to be formed.


Provider led
2000 – 2002: Strategic Planning Process




Foundation and City Funded
Public and Private Involvement
Basis of the Continuum Structure
Development of the 10 Year Plan
Chicago Continuum of Care

History Cont.

2002: Structure of the Continuum Developed





Director
Governing Board
Sets the groundwork for the plan
Approves the articulation of the plan – “Getting
Housed;Staying Housed”
2003: Mayor Daley Signs The Plan



Appoints a Mayor’s Liaison on Homelessness
Continuum structure solidifies
Plan Implementation Begins
The Chicago Continuum of Care

The Continuum is organized for two
purposes:


Monitor and work to enhance funding that
is designed to address homelessness in
Chicago including HUD SuperNOFA funds
Monitor the implementation of the 10 year
plan to end homelessness
The Continuum’s Organization
The
Governing
Board
Chair of the
Governing Board
Continuum
Staff
HMV
Committee
Evaluation
Committee
Executive
Committee
Plan Advisory
Committee
Resource
Development
Committee
Governance
Committee
Governance

Develops and approves policies and priorities for
Chicago’s Plan to End Homelessness and the HUD
funding process

28 representatives





Government Sector
Consumer Sector
Provider Sector
At-Large/Other Sector
5 Officers


Chair, Vice Chair, Past Chair, Secretary, Treasurer
Parliamentarian appointed.
Representation

Board Members Represent Constituency
Groups such as:
Government
Federal Departments of
Veteran Affairs and Labor
Provider
Chicago Community Based
Black Caucus
Government
City Housing and Human
Services Departments
Provider
Mental Health providers
Government
State of Illinois
Provider
Homeless Families
Homeless
Homeless Caucus
Provider
Interim Housing Providers
Homeless
Homeless Youth Consumer
Group
Provider
Latino Caucus
At-Large
Funders Forum
Provider
Permanent Supportive
Housing
At-Large
Partnership to End
Homelessness
Provider
Wrap Around Services
Constituency Group
Board Responsibilities






Provide open lines of communication to
facilitate implementation of Plan
Elect Executive Committee
Provide general oversight of key functions of
the Continuum
Stay informed about activities of the
Continuum
Ratify all funding priorities under purview
Ratify all general policy and advocacy
decisions
Executive Committee



Consists of 5 Board officers
Prepares agendas for Governing Board
and All Continuum meetings
Chair of the Continuum rotates between
the 3 representative groups



Provider
Government
Consumer
Standing Committees


Carry out the components of plan
implementation and create appropriate
policy and procedure for Governing
Board approval.
Committee membership



12 appointed members
Representative Composition
Report directly to the Governing Board

Committee chairs must be GB members
Staffing the Plan

Chicago Continuum of Care Staff

Executive Director



Program Associates




Leads all major collaborative efforts of the Chicago
Continuum of Care for the Plan to End Homelessness
With the Chicago Department of Housing, develops and
ensures a coordinated funding strategy for the
implementation of the Plan
Facilitate committee and task group work, training,
evaluation, coordination of system collaboratives
Manage the application process for the HUD SuperNOFA
each year
Conduct one on one and group training sessions to
assist providers in converting their programs to the Plan
Administrative
Staffing The Plan Cont.

Chicago Department of Housing

Mayor’s Liaison on Homelessness


Manages several staff positions that work on
Plan implementation
Directs city response to the Plan



Funding Initiatives
Press materials
Coordinating City Departments
The Plan and
Implementation
Process
10 Year Plan Vision


The Goal: In 10 years, all individuals and
families at risk of homelessness in Chicago
will have access to quality affordable housing
and supportive services.
Our concerted action will:



Stop the growth of homelessness through new
and establish safeguards for those at risk,
Provide a safe, fast, and dignified way out of
homelessness for those already impacted,
Prevent the recurrence of homelessness.
Getting Housed, Staying Housed Model
Implementing the Plan…through
Blueprints for System Change

Adopt a schedule for implementation




Develop blueprint for change





Finalized Implementation Schedule January 2005
Outlined goals, tasks, targets for Continuum partners
Focuses on the plans’ tenets: Prevention, housing first,
supportive services; and system infrastructure elements
including training, communications, conversion, advocacy,
funding, evaluation
Developed baseline numbers in Fall 2003
Initial blueprint developed (Feb 04): outlines the change
needed in the system over next 10 years
Blueprint revisited in 2005-2006
New numbers developed and approved in early 2006
Create dynamic framework for conversion
Implementation Schedule
Housing First: Moving to Permanent Housing
Vision for 2012: Establish a housing system that quickly and intentionally moves individuals and families who are homeless
into appropriate, permanent, affordable, and safe housing and provides access to appropriate supportive services to
meet the needs
Date
Complete
Accountable
Strategic
Goal 1
Ensure a range and quantity of interim
housing and permanent housing models (per
Models Chart) that meet the needs and are
readily available
4th quarter
2007
Chicago Dept.
of Housing,
Chicago
Continuum of
Care
Corporation for
Supportive
Housing,
Partnership to End
Homelessness
Subgoal
1
Determine the type of existing supportive
housing programs and intake eligibility
criteria
3rd quarter
2005
Chicago
Continuum of
Care
Chicago Dept of
Housing, Chicago
Dept of Human
Services
Task
Determine what type or models of supportive
housing units that we have available to our
system and the gaps of supportive housing
models that exist
3rd quarter
2005
Chicago
Continuum of
Care
Chicago Dept of
Housing, Chicago
Dept of Human
Services
ID
Task Name
Support
Blueprint For Change

Identifies Quantities of Housing Needed

Permanent Supportive Housing (Units)
2005
Actual
2006
Goal
2007
Goal
2008
Goal
2009
Goal
2010
Goal
2011
Goal
2012
Goal
4,303
5,397
6,492
7,586
7,586
7,586
7,586
7,586

Interim Housing (Beds)
2005
Actual
2006
Goal
2007
Goal
2008
Goal
2009
Goal
2010
Goal
2011
Goal
2012
Goal
1,497
1,802
2,107
2,412
2,717
3,022
3,327
3,632

Emergency Shelter (Beds)
2005
Actual
2006
Goal
2007
Goal
2008
Goal
2009
Goal
2010
Goal
2011
Goal
2012
Goal
1,223
1,091
959
827
696
564
432
300
Implementing the Plan…through
Program Transition

Program Models


Consistency Review of HUD programs


Provide specific program elements, timeframes,
and populations served and outline expected
outcomes for each model
All programs must be consistent with 10 year plan
to be eligible for HUD funding; those in transition
may apply for waivers
Training and Technical Assistance

To convert programs to models consistent with the
plan
Program Models

Identifies All Models Consistent with the 10
year Plan (Permanent Housing Example)
Program
Type
Program Description
Permanent
Housing with
Short-Term
Support
(PHwSS)
Rolling Stock
Permanent
Housing
Housing and service
model that provides a
short-term housing
subsidy (up to 2 years)
with wrap-around
supportive services.
Units may be
scattered-site or
project-based.
At end of program
subsidy term, client
assumes lease.
Housing subsidy
transitions to new
client.
Essential Program
Elements
•Provision of rent subsidies
•Provision of or linkage to
agency-based Permanent
housing property
management
•Provision of or linkage to
intensive community-based
case management services
scaling down over time as
household becomes more
independent.
•Assistance in accessing
housing relocation
resources/supports (security
deposits, utilities)
Time Limits
Population
Outcomes
Up to 2 years of
housing subsidy
and intensive
case
management. 6
months of
follow-up
services
provided.
All
consumers.
Outcome:
Clients remain
in permanent
housing.
No time limit on
housing unit.
Indicator:
75% of clients
assume the
apartment
lease (or
maintain other
independent,
stable
housing)
within 2 years.
75% of clients
increase their
income within
2 years
Program Models Outcomes

Program Models Chart highlights
Outcomes and Indicators for every
program Model


Used to determine performance of
programs in funding evaluations
Used to determine system indicators of
plan implementation
Program Models Outcomes

Interim Housing

Outcome: Clients are placed in permanent
housing.


Indicator: 50% of adult clients are placed in
permanent housing. 70% of clients remain
housed at the six-month follow-up. 75% of
youth are placed in permanent housing
(includes family and/or community reunification,
long-term housing, and residential programs).
Outcome: Clients are connected to needed
services and/or resources.

Indicators: 85% of clients are assessed for
benefits eligibility. 65% of youth are enrolled in
benefits programs.
Program Models Outcomes

Project Based Permanent Supportive
Housing

Outcome: Clients will remain in permanent
housing.




Indicators:
85% of clients will remain permanently housed for
12 months. 65% of clients will remain permanently
housed for 24 months.
85% of those without a reliable source of income at
program entry will increase their income within the
first year through acquisition of benefits,
employment, or a combination of both.
70% of those with serious mental illness and/or
substance users will avoid inpatient treatment.
Implementing the Plan…through
Evaluation of Progress and Programs

Develop system-wide score card


Measures progress under four main areas
including demographics, finances,
satisfaction, and coordination
Conduct program level evaluation


Evaluate all renewal projects annually
Conduct evaluations of individual program
models and apply lessons learned
System Scorecard


The State of the Continuum report is
comprised of four categories: homeless
services delivery, the system’s financial
viability, satisfaction with housing and
services, and the Continuum’s administration.
The report will help the Continuum
understand where we are, where we are
going and how far we are from the goal.
In total, the report will provide information on
24 questions, or indicators.
System Scorecard
Indicators
Outcome
Data
Source
Reporting
Collection
Notes
Annually
Continuum
staff
This would be
new information
collected by the
Continuum staff
in 2004.
Intake
workers
and case
managers
The goal is no
more than 120
days
Learning and Growth
Percent of
organizations
in the
continuum that
understand the
objectives of
the ten-year
plan
The
Continuum
effectively
communicat
es about the
Plan and its
objectives
Annual
Surveys
Business Process
Average
number of
days to place
people in
permanent
housing from
the point of
entry
Clients move
quickly to
permanent
housing
HMIS
Data
Quarterly
Program Evaluation

Every project applying for HUD McKinneyVento funding must be evaluated


2006 Chicago Continuum of Care Evaluation
Instrument
11 Priority Areas:

1. Project Performance; 2. Client Focus/
Representation; 3. Priority Populations; 4. Flexible
Delivery of Services; 5. Leveraging; 6. Project
Operations; 7. Accessibility; 8. Housing to Service
Ratio; 9. HMIS; 10. Staff Support; 11. Continuous
Quality Improvement
Program Evaluation Cont.
Performance Measures




Worth 20% of total points
Taken From Program Models Chart
Two parts: Housing and Income

Projects awarded points based on an
absolute measure or according to quartile
ranking in relation to peers
Program Evaluation Cont.


Housing Example: Have at least 75% of the
clients remained stably housed for at least 12
months in permanent housing? If not, has
the project increased the length of stay in
permanent housing compared to the previous
year? Data from APR 12B
Income Example: Of the clients who left the
program in the last year, at least 50% have
left with financial resources? If not, has the
project increased the amount of clients
leaving with financial resources compared to
the previous year? Data from APR 11D
Implementing the Plan…through
System-wide Coordination






Coordinate with Mainstream Partners
Develop discharge planning protocols
Develop better Prevention Responses
Coordinate Advocacy Efforts
Examine funding priorities for system
Conduct Homeless Count for better
understanding of population
Implementing the Plan…through
Funding Opportunities

City funding



Federal HUD SuperNOFA




CDHS RFP: $17-18 million
CDBG Funding for services
SHP Dollars: $34-38 million
S+C Dollars: app $5-6 million/year
State funding for Prevention
Pursue other opportunities


Chronic Homeless Collaborative
Prevention Funding
Moving Ahead to
Implement the 10 Year
Plan in Chicago
Moving Forward

Key Opportunity: Commitment of a
strong group of individuals and
organizations dedicated to ending
homelessness.

Public and Private investment has
remained strong in Chicago

Many outlets for involvement and contribution



Committees
Task Groups
Constituency Groups
Moving Forward…

Prevention




Prevention Call Center: People at risk of homelessness are
provided centralized access to homeless prevention
assistance
Increased Prevention funding
New strategies regarding discharge planning building on
recommendations out of Mayor’s Office report on Reentry
Housing First Initiatives


Supportive Housing Initiative: 5-year initiative (completed
year 3) to develop 788 units of new Permanent Supportive
Housing
Rental Housing Support Program: Newly signed into law, the
program will provide 1000 subsidies for the homeless
system
Moving Forward…

Housing First Initiatives Continued



Housing Locator: City-wide collaborative to
provide quick access to affordable, market rate
housing for consumers of homeless services
Harm Reduction: Efforts are underway to provide
training and technical assistance to examine the
applicability of Harm Reduction strategies to
increase access to housing for all consumers
Wraparound Service Initiatives to be
launched in 2007 with a pilot focusing on
families
Moving Forward…

Challenges




Identifying strategies to maximize existing
resources
Securing additional funding for permanent
housing and supportive services
Maximizing mainstream services through
improved coordination
Transitioning programs while ensuring
system coverage
Moving Forward

Challenges Continued


Honoring representation while not
becoming gridlocked by process
Continued maintenance of public and
private partnership
Continuum Contact Information
Website: www.chicagocontinuum.org
Patricia Crowley, OSB
Executive Director
312-573-8819
[email protected]
Gabe Bodzin
Senior Program Associate
312-573-8817
[email protected]
Taking Charge:
Effective Oversight Structures for
Plan Implementation- The Chicago
Continuum of Care
Gabe Bodzin
Senior Program Associate
Chicago Continuum of Care
[email protected]
Presented at the National Alliance to End Homelessness National Confernece
July 18, 2006