Institutional Repositories in the UK Where are we and where are we going? Bill Hubbard, SHERPA Manager, University of Nottingham.

Download Report

Transcript Institutional Repositories in the UK Where are we and where are we going? Bill Hubbard, SHERPA Manager, University of Nottingham.

Institutional Repositories in the UK
Where are we and where are we going?
Bill Hubbard,
SHERPA Manager,
University of Nottingham
Lantern waste
The start of the journey . . .
 Open Access
 Budapest Open Access Initiative
 “An old tradition and a new technology have
converged to make possible an unprecedented public
good . . .”
– http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml
 Lofty principals - can we climb this far?
Why? Because its there?
 Open access benefits
–
–
–
–
–
–
for authors
for researchers
for research processes
for institutions
for research funders
for public
 Offers a sustainable basis for the future
 Some people have gone there and seen it working
The Open Access landscape
 Open Access - definitions
– Open Access Journals
– Open Access Repositories
 Data Providers and Service Providers
– Global repository network to underpin adoption
– Author-led and innovative services to support use
 Stakeholders
– authors, researchers, institutions, funders, learned societies,
public, publishers . . .
The route
The route: institutional repositories
 The OAI-PMH allows a single gateway to search and
access many repositories
– subject-based portals or views
– subject-based classification and search
– institutional storage and support
 Practical reasons
– use institutional infrastructure
– integration into work-flows and systems
– support is close to academic users and contributors
SHERPA Partners
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
University of Nottingham
University of Birmingham
University of Bristol
University of Cambridge
University of Durham
University of Edinburgh
University of Glasgow
London LEAP Consortium
University of Newcastle
University of Oxford
White Rose Partnership
The British Library
AHDS
London LEAP Consortium
– Birkbeck College
– Goldsmiths College
– Imperial College
– Institute of Cancer
Research
– Kings College
– LSE
– Royal Holloway
– Queen Mary
– SOAS
– School of Pharmacy
(SoP)
– UCL
White Rose Partnership
– University of Leeds
– University of Sheffield
– University of York
Affiliates
– Trinity College Dublin
– Cranfield University
– University of Exeter
– University of Leicester
– University of Liverpool
– Sheffield Hallam University
– University of St Andrews
– CCLRC
Projects and Services







SHERPA Partnership
SHERPA Plus
SHERPA DP, DP2
RoMEO
JULIET
OpenDOAR
UKCoRR






Repositories Support Project
DRIVER
The Depot
Intute Repository Search
DART-Europe
ETHOS
Russell & 1994 Groups













University of Bath
Birkbeck
University of Birmingham
University of Bristol
University of Cambridge
Cardiff University
University of Durham
University of East Anglia
University of Edinburgh
University of Essex
University of Exeter
University of Glasgow
Goldsmiths














Imperial College
King's College London
Lancaster University
University of Leeds
University of Leicester
University of Liverpool
Loughborough University
LSE
University of Manchester
University of Newcastle
University of Nottingham
University of Oxford
Queen Mary
Queen’s University











University of Reading
Royal Holloway
University of St Andrews
University of Sheffield
SOAS
University of Southampton
University of Surrey
University of Sussex
University of Warwick
UCL
University of York
Repositories by Continent
European Repositories
Repository Types
Where we have gone so far
 JISC FAIR programme, and many others . . .
 GNU eprints, TARDIS, DAEDALUS, EThOS,
VERSIONS, Repository Bridge, DRIVER, et al
 Overseas and international initiatives
 Advocacy and engagement
 Policy development
 Growth of OA Community
 Conferences galore!
Joining the party
 Institutional mandates
 Funding mandates
– RCUK
– Wellcome Trust
– Arthritis Research Campaign and more
 Parliamentary Select Committee Report
 European Commission
– 'Study on the Economic and Technical Evolution of the
Scientific Publication Markets of Europe‘
– Petition - 22,000 signatures
 NIH Mandate
Path graphic
Looking back down the path
 Process of setting up repositories is ok
 Systems works - put things in and get them out
 Copyright was not the unbridgeable crevasse we
feared . . .
 Achieved regional, national, international support
 OA academic approval at over 80%
but . . .
The difficulties
 A good case is not enough
 The way across Copyright Crevasse was too narrow
for authors’ comfort
 The view from Base Camp was hard to shake
– subject basis, quality control, plagiarism




Reluctance to leave well-trodden paths
The Search party didn’t turn up
The view from here is still too restricted
Authors want sherpas to carry the load
How far to the summit graphic
How far to the summit?
 Need high percentage ingest - how high?
 Need authors to save their critical versions - how do
we achieve this?
 Need clear messages of support and facilities to all
academics - how do we reach them?
 Need sherpas to take the load, or strong leadership
to get authors to take responsibility
 Need clear development paths for everyone to follow
Obstacles graphic
Obstacles & tricky conditions






Embargoes
Double-charge access becoming embedded
“Crevasse of Copyright” is still unsettling
Loss of focus within repositories
Metadata-only entries cloud the view
Author engagement cf approval
Assistance










SHERPA - www.sherpa.ac.uk/update
RoMEO - www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo
JULIET - www.sherpa.ac.uk/juliet
OpenDOAR - www.opendoar.org and ~/search
RSP - www.rsp.ac.uk
The Depot - depot.edina.ac.uk
Intute Repository Search - irs.ukoln.ac.uk
BASE - digital.ub.uni-bielefeld.de/index.php
DRIVER - www.driver-support.eu
UKCoRR - www.ukcorr.org
Next stage
 Search teams are forging up the slopes
 Mandates will help us along - support them
– be aware of scale and schedule
– engage research support offices
– clear services for academics
 Assistance is available
 Development paths becoming clearer . . .
Development path - ingest







Research papers - published
Conference papers
Book chapters
eTheses
Research data
Learning and teaching materials
Grey literature
Development path - use
 Access
–
–
–
–
– integration with library provision
exposure
– research management
publication lists
– research audit
shop-windows
integration with information environment
 Open Access
 Re-use support
– data-mining
– evidence-based work
 Overlay journals
 Citation services
Halfway up . . .





Lengthy climb
But if we had asked how long it would take . . .
Paths do appear unexpectedly
Other social forces also at work
Beginning to see the view
Funders
Projects
[email protected]