Underutilization of Employee Assistance Programs: An untapped resource Workplace Health Promotion Aimee Grigsby, MEd, CHES Department of Health Promotion & Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia EAP Methods Background Objective Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) offer a tremendous service to the workforce when.
Download ReportTranscript Underutilization of Employee Assistance Programs: An untapped resource Workplace Health Promotion Aimee Grigsby, MEd, CHES Department of Health Promotion & Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia EAP Methods Background Objective Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) offer a tremendous service to the workforce when.
Underutilization of Employee Assistance Programs: An untapped resource Workplace Health Promotion Aimee Grigsby, MEd, CHES Department of Health Promotion & Behavior, College of Public Health, University of Georgia EAP Methods Background Objective Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) offer a tremendous service to the workforce when utilized; however, employees do not seek out the resources provided by EAP. As seen in Figure 1, EAP programs are not at a minimum, yet the rate of usage is at a steady decline. The objective of this study was to examine the rates of EAP utilization and ascertain the reasons for usage and the lack of usage. Annual data are reported on employed individuals regarding the use of EAP. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted for the fiscal year 2007/2008 report (N=88). Anonymous data were analyzed on individuals seeking out EAP resources via telephone, face-to-face, or intranet mediums. The reasons for seeking out EAP resources were recorded as well. Results From 2007 to 2010 the rate of depression in the workforce has increased from 7% to 9.4%.1 EAP is able to identify and treat behavioral and related health problems that may affect this increase in depression. Stress was the number one source of concern for 24% of users. Figure 1: Employers offering an employee assistance plan in 2009, by employer size.2 Metal health was the second leading source of concern for 21% of users. 100 93% Figure 2: EAP Sources of Concern The leading source of referral was a family member. EAP Programs (%) 60 Legal/Financial 5% The age group that most utilized EAP was 26-35 years of age with 33%. 67% 70 Parent/Child 4% Grief/Loss 3% 51% 50 Mental Health Problems 21% Family Life Issues 18% Marital Issues 15% Parent/child 5% 90 80 Stress 24% 36% 40 Conclusion 30 20 10% 10 Figure 3: EAP Models 0 10 to 49 50 to 199 200 to 499 500 to 19,999 ≥ 20,000 Size (Number of employees) References 1Bender, A., & Farvolden, P. (2010). Depression and the workplace: A progress report. Current Psychiatry Reports, 10, 73-79. 2Teich JM, Buck JF: Evaluating employee assistance programs. Eval Prog Planning 5:255267, 2009. 3Roman PM, Blum TC: Formal intervention in employee health: comparisons of the nature and structure of employee assistance programs and health promotion campaigns. Soc Sci Med 26(5):503-514, 1988. There is a critical need for mental health services that can be found within EAP. 88 of 2,000 employees took advantage of EAP in 2007. The rate of underutilization is staggering when mental health issues are EAP top reported concerns and the rate of depression in the workplace is climbing. Concentrated efforts to bridge workplace health promotion with EAP should be implemented, and a closer look at the existing models of EAP should be conducted to determine if the widely used approaches are the most suitable. (Figure 3)3 External EAP; Independent 40% Internal; Staff-provided services 29% Internal EAP; Vendorcontracted 24% External EAP; Managed care services 7%