Using a Wiki to Promote Collaboration and Critical Thinking Janine Lim, PhD blog.janinelim.com [email protected] Skype: outonalim Twitter: outonalim What is a wiki? A quick way to make a website… others can.

Download Report

Transcript Using a Wiki to Promote Collaboration and Critical Thinking Janine Lim, PhD blog.janinelim.com [email protected] Skype: outonalim Twitter: outonalim What is a wiki? A quick way to make a website… others can.

Using a Wiki to
Promote
Collaboration
and Critical
Thinking
Janine Lim, PhD
blog.janinelim.com
[email protected]
Skype: outonalim
Twitter: outonalim
What is a wiki?
A quick way to make a
website… others can edit if you
choose.
Hawaiian for “quick”
Critical Thinking
Through Online Collaboration
NSSE Taxonomy of Learning
 Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods
 Analyzing basic elements of an idea or
theory
 Synthesizing and organizing ideas
 Making judgments about value of
information
 Applying theories or concepts
Source: Lynn Merklin’s Feb. 27 General Faculty Assessment Presentation
Critical Thinking
Through Online Collaboration
Learning Outcome
Active Verbs
Analyze: Compare,
Contrast, Calculate,
Test, Analyze
Evaluate: Argue,
Assess, Defend,
Judge, Evaluate
Create/Synthesize:
Construct, Compose
Create, Design,
Propose
Source: http://uwf.edu/cutla/assessstudent.cfm
Critical Thinking Through Online

Collaboration
Collaboration is the process of two or more people
collectively creating emergent, shared
representations of a process and or outcome that
reflects the input of the total body of contributors.
Elliott, M. A. (2007). Stigmergic collaboration: A theoretical framework for mass collaboration, from http://markelliott.net/blog/?page_id=24
Elliott, M. A. (2007). Stigmergic collaboration: A theoretical framework for mass collaboration, from http://markelliott.net/blog/?page_id=24
Critical Thinking and Collaboration
Learning Outcome
Active Verbs
Analyze: Compare,
Contrast,
Calculate, Test,
Analyze
Collectively
create,
compose,
construct
Evaluate: Argue,
Assess, Defend,
Judge, Evaluate
Create/Synthesize:
Construct,
Compose
Create, Design,
Propose
Compare,
analyze,
integrate
Assess,
evaluate,
integrate
Collaboration is
the process of
two or more
people
collectively
creating
emergent,
shared
representations
of a process
and or
outcome that
reflects the
input of the
total body of
contributors.
Sample Wiki Uses
 Individual
writing/creation collected in
one class space
 Manage group projects
 Collaboration with another class (another
institution or even internationally)
 Committees and other collaborative work


Program review
Tracking work
 Peer
editing
Example: What If? Scenarios

Learners review a situation and predict what
would be the outcome or consequences if one
or more factors are changed.





What if Hitler had not attacked the Soviet Union?
What would happen if you added more heat to a
sealed container?
Works best with two to four students.
Decide if all groups work on the same scenario
or each group does a different scenario.
Students must first identify the factors with an
impact on the current scenario before they can
take the changed scenario.
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Example: Case Studies





Case studies encourage students to evaluate
the strengths and limitations of a situation or
problem, and to suggest alternative solutions
and actions.
Key is to have an open-ended problem or
question that has many different yet valid
answers or solutions.
Explain clearly the guidelines students need to
follow. Use an assessment rubric.
Wiki will need case material pages and case
solution pages for each group.
Student will need space to research, analyze,
and write the case solution.
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Example: Debate


Debates allow
students to explore
opposing sides of
an issue.
Wiki needs space
for the debate
question,
background
information, and a
structure for
framing arguments.
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Example: Collaborative
Research Paper





Group research paper or presentation. The wiki
facilitates the group work and tracks input by
each member.
Include a group planning page with research
topic, group member roles, goals and outlines.
Research page to track research and highlight
resources.
The paper/presentation page to hold the final
product.
Best tools: GoogleDocs or Google Presentations.
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Example: Evaluation or
Research Study
A
collaborative space can expedite the
review process and provide a robust
environment for mentoring.
 Organization: research topic, background
and significance, method, instrument,
resources such as cited sources, suggestions
from mentors, etc.
 Use the commenting option of the wiki for
feedback.
 Use the document history to review
progress.
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Wiki
Frames
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using
wikis for online collaboration. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Collaborative Creation Tools
 Wikis:
www.wikispaces.com,
www.pbworks.com,
GoogleSites
 GoogleDocs: word
processing,
spreadsheets, forms
(data collection),
drawing
Comparison of Asynchronous
Communication Tools
Wikis
Blogs
Threaded
Discussions
Collaborative
authorship
Single author
Multiple authors
Dynamic
Static
Static
Nonlinear and
multipage
construction
Linear
construction
Threaded
construction
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Preparation Tips
 Select
a wiki service, choose a wiki URL,
and invite contributors
 Establish a purpose for the wiki project
 Define the wiki project’s learning goals
 Design a rich context and problem (frame)
 Prepare students for the work
 Promote a collaborative process
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Framing the Assignment





Goals and outcomes
Guidelines for teams: group roles and ground
rules
Team process pages (ice breakers, group
planning pages, profiles)
Scaffolding: organizational headings, initial
content, questions to answer, structure
Assessment: Rubrics (1st process check, 2nd
process check, project outcomes), selfassessments
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Managing the process
 Overcome
fear and building trust
 Encourage prewriting: outlines, lists, nonperfect examples of writing
 Provide informal feedback to groups
 Teach constructive editing
 Monitor workload division in groups
(unique wiki ability)
 Resolve or mediate conflicts
 Encourage reflection
Cautions and Guidelines





FERPA / HIPPA or any other legally protected data
should never be stored in the cloud.
Credit card numbers, financial identifying information,
identification numbers such as social security numbers,
etc. should never be stored in the cloud.
Caution should be exercised when storing institutional
and personal intellectual property in the cloud.
Realize that with any non-contracted free service, your
data can disappear at any time, and can be visible to
anyone that company decides to share it with.
Consult with School of Distance Education instructional
technology team before using cloud services.
Wikis are much more
than an online fad.
Because wikis
represent a
combination of three
stable concepts –
collaboration, writing,
and constant Web
access – the wiki will
remain a staple of the
Web and will continue
to evolve in it’s
usefulness for online
education and the
workplace (p. 127).
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bibliography







Cole, M. (2009). Using wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from
the trenches. Computers and Education, 52(2009), 141-146. doi:
10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.003
Elliott, M. A. (2007). Stigmergic collaboration: A theoretical framework for mass
collaboration. http://mark-elliott.net/blog/?page_id=24
Engstrom, M., & Jewett, D. (2005). Collaborative learning the wiki way. TechTrends,
49(6), 12-15. doi: 10.1007/bf02763725
De Pedro, X., Rieradevall, M., Lopez, P., Sant, D., Pinol, J., Nunez, L., & Llobera, M.
(2006). Writing documents collaboratively in higher education using traditional vs. wiki
methodology (I): Qualitative results from a 2-year project study. Paper presented at
the International Congress of University Teaching and Innovation, Barcelona.
West, J. A., & West, M. L. (2009). Using wikis for online collaboration. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki:
Evaluating student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of
Educational Technology, 39(6), 987-995. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00799.x
Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students'
performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher
Education, 11(3-4), 186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.005
Visit my blog for direct links to articles: Lim, Janine. (2012). Using wikis for online collaboration. http://blog.janinelim.com/?p=4414