Evaluating a NonRandomized Trial: A Case Study of a Pilot to Increase PreCollegiate Math Course Success Rates Andrew LaManque, PhD Supervisor, Institutional Research De.
Download ReportTranscript Evaluating a NonRandomized Trial: A Case Study of a Pilot to Increase PreCollegiate Math Course Success Rates Andrew LaManque, PhD Supervisor, Institutional Research De.
Evaluating a NonRandomized Trial: A Case Study of a Pilot to Increase PreCollegiate Math Course Success Rates Andrew LaManque, PhD Supervisor, Institutional Research De Anza College De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 1 Outline • Overview of the Pilot • Purpose of the Evaluation • Results from Quantitative Analysis • Demographics of Students • End of Class Survey • Course Success • Findings De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 2 Overview of the Pilot • A Partnership was formed to increase the success rates in Pre-Collegiate math courses • Components: • Math and Counseling faculty • EnableMath – Course Software • Noel Levitz – College Student Inventory • Using technology, provide students timely information on their progress as well as information about their motivations De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 3 Overview of the Pilot • Developmental math sequence consists of pre, elementary, and intermediate algebra • Offer 175 class sections per year of developmental math (37% of all math department courses) • Historically, a 55% success rate in developmental math courses • 31 full-time instructors, 45 part-time instructors • Class size is 40 De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 4 Program Evaluation •Given that the pilot program provides an additional learning choice for students, the question from the Dean is: “do the results demonstrate that pilot students do at least as well as other students” •Using multiple forms of evaluation (e.g. student grades, student surveys) provides feedback to instructors as well as administration on implementation De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 5 Program Evaluation Limitations •Not a randomized trial – possible instructor (although, 12 different instructors participated) and student self selection bias •No independent measure of success •More research is needed to determine the relative effect of each intervention De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 6 Results: Demographics of Students How would you describe your Racial / Ethnic Origin? 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Twice the % of Latino students as college, similar to non-pilot sections African American Asian or Pacific Islander Latino White Prefer not to respond / Other De Anza College CSI Respondents Fall 2005-Spring 2007. N = 1,114. De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 7 Results: Demographics of Students What is the highest level of education completed by your father? 50% 45% 40% Many first-generation college students 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% high school or less 1-3 years of college 4-year degree or more De Anza College CSI Respondents Fall 2005-Spring 2007. N = 1,028. De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 8 Results: Demographics of Students •Similar with regard to Gender, Initial Education Goal and Ethnicity •although Math114 EnableMath had a higher percentage of minority students (54%) compared with the other sections (34%). •EnableMath students are slightly older on average (45% vs 37% born prior to 1987). De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 9 Results: End of Class Survey Time Spent Studying Math at Home Compared to Time Necessary to Get Desired Grade 100% 80% 72% 38% of respondents indicated that they needed to study more to get the grade they wanted, than they actually studied 60% 45% 43% 40% 24% 12% 20% 4% 0% 0-4 hrs/wk outside class 5-9 hrs/wk outside class 10 plus hrs/wk outside class Time at Home Doing Math Time Necessary to Get Desired Grade De Anza College Winter 2006-Spring 2007 Term EnableMath Survey. N = 992 . De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 10 Results: End of Class Survey EnableMath helped me learn more math than I would have without the software 100% 80% 60% 77% Agree or Strongly Agree 40% 20% 0% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree De Anza College Winter 2006-Spring 2007 Term EnableMath Survey. N= 986. De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 11 Results: End of Class Survey Completing the CSI was worth the time 100% 80% 60% 61% Agree or Strongly Agree 40% 20% 0% Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree De Anza College Winter 2006-Spring 2007 Term EnableMath Survey. N=959. De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 12 Results: Course Success De Anza College Math Pilot Sections / Students, Fall 05 - Spr 07 Course Group # Sec HC * Pre-Algebra Pilot Other 14 55 428 1,755 Elem Algebra Pilot Other 21 88 723 3,045 Interm Algebra Pilot Other 27 112 853 3,573 Total 62 255 2,004 8,373 Pilot Other Approx 1 of 5 students * HC for the Pilot only includes students completing the CSI. De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 13 Results: First Course Success Course Success of Fall 2005-Spring 2007 EnableMath / Noel Levitz Sections Compared to All Other Sections, De Anza College Course Group Pre Algebra Pilot Other Elementary Algebra Pilot Other Intermediate Algebra Pilot Other Pass Grades Percent Did Not Pass Grades Percent Withdrew Grades Percent Total Grades Percent 308 1,012 72% 58% 76 391 18% 22% 44 352 10% 20% 428 1,755 100% 100% 514 1,660 71% 55% 138 664 19% 22% 71 721 10% 24% 723 3,045 100% 100% 641 1,977 75% 55% 140 675 16% 19% 72 921 8% 26% 853 3,573 100% 100% Includes end of term grades of students enrolled at census (3rd week). Note: Students in the Pilot group used the EnableMath Software and completed the CSI. De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 14 Results: Second Course Success De Anza College EnableMath Pilot, Fall 2005-Winter2007 Second Course Pass Rate for Students Successful in First Course First Course Pass Course Group Grades % Row Pre to Elementary Algebra Pilot 94 45% Other 305 55% Elementary to Intermediate Algebra Pilot 168 64% Other 545 66% Intermediate Algebra to College Pilot 85 50% Other 301 56% Did Not Pass Grades % Row W Grades % Row Total Grades % Row 59 106 28% 19% 57 148 27% 26% 210 559 100% 100% 45 137 17% 17% 49 146 19% 18% 262 828 100% 100% 36 97 21% 18% 48 142 28% 26% 169 540 100% 100% Note: Considers only the first attempt of both courses. De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 15 Results: Second Course Success De Anza College EnableMath Pilot, Fall 2005-Winter2007 Second Course Pass Rate for Students Successful in First Course by Group Course First Course Second Course Group Group Pre to Elementary Algebra Pilot Pilot Control Control Pilot Control Elementary to Intermediate Algebra Pilot Pilot Control Control Pilot Control Pass Did Not Pass W Total Grades % Row Grades % Row Grades % Row Grades % Row 60 34 52% 36% 36 23 31% 24% 20 37 17% 39% 116 94 100% 100% 47 258 64% 53% 14 92 19% 19% 12 136 16% 28% 73 486 100% 100% 97 71 80% 50% 17 28 14% 20% 7 42 6% 30% 121 141 100% 100% 95 450 74% 64% 24 113 19% 16% 9 137 7% 20% 128 700 100% 100% De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 16 Findings • Students currently in the project want to take next class in sequence • These classes are filled before other math classes • Participating instructors & counselors want to continue • More faculty are wanting to participate De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 17 Findings • No increased costs – taking existing resources and using them differently • Regular class period / time • Counseling time in the class instead of counseling center De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 18 Findings • Overall, the data suggests that there is value in offering a different approach to students, but claims of improved learning, especially the long term retention of material, can not be substantiated. • Difficult to evaluate a non-randomized trial • Math department might focus on improving the transition in pilot sections from PreAlgebra to Elementary Algebra De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 19 Questions For a copy of this presentation please email Andrew LaManque at: [email protected] De Anza Math Pilot Results, 7-9-07 20