Transcript GMES and GEO an update Mark Doherty European Space Agency GMES Solutions EO Public Policy Needs Needs Space Agencies Scientific Community Aerospace Industry Value Adding Industry European Service & IT Industry Governments, EU International Organisations Regulatory Bodies Industry General Public.

GMES and GEO
an update
Mark Doherty
European Space Agency
GMES
Solutions
EO
Public
Policy
Needs
Needs
Space Agencies
Scientific Community
Aerospace Industry
Value Adding Industry
European
Service & IT Industry
Governments, EU
International Organisations
Regulatory Bodies
Industry
General Public
Exapnding
Europe’s
Earth Observation
Capacity & Hertiage
1991
1995
2002
ERS 1
ERS 2
ENVISAT
Oceans
Sea Ice
Cryosphere
Land Surface
Climatology
+ Global Ozone
+ Ocean
Colour
+ Atmospheric
Constituents
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0 1992
Users: 7000+
1994
1996
1998
2000
Use of ERS &ENVisat data in 131
Countries
Number of Scientific Publications
Number of New Users
A World-wide Earth Observation User Community
10000
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
Publications,
Papers 10 000
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Advancing Observation capability
and Scientific Understanding
 a wealth of science and application results
 technological progress
 consolidation of a large EO user community
 basis for long-term environmental monitoring established
(13+ years measurementS and data archives)
 establishment of Europe and ESA’s contribution to
global monitoring
A European Success
European
Commission
European
Space Agency
European and national
user agencies
GMES mission statement
European independent access to timely and
reliable policy-relevant information services
on the status and the evolution of the Earth
environment and on the security of its citizens
at all scales from local to national and global
European and national
space organisations
Industry
R&D institutions
…. and other partners
GMES
 Autonomous Global Monitoring Capability for Europe
 Environment and Security
 by 2008
 Multinational Partnership




GMES Partners
ESA-EC coordinated
GMES Service Element
FP5 / FP6 Projects
 GMES Interim Report / Communique
 GMES is Europe’s Contribution to EOS/GEO
GMES Overall Schedule
Initial Period
2001
2002
Implementation Period
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
• By 2003: to identify the strengths and
weaknesses of the current GMES servicing
capacity and the needs for improvement
[… Final Report of the Initial Period (2001-2003)]
• 2004-2007: “implementation period”
• By 2008: to establish a European capacity
(autonomous and operational) for Global
Monitoring of the Environment and Security.
GMES Initial Period (2001-2003)
GMES National Groups
5 GSC Working Groups
analysis
GMES Steering Committee
(GSC)
10 ESA GSE projects
dialogues
3rd - Athens, June 2003
15 FP5 thematic projects
2nd - Noordwijk, Jan 2003
4 cross-cutting assessments
1st - Brussels, June 2002
Projects Leaders
GMES Forums
Support Team
Input
Material
Final
Report
Structured
dialogues
GMES Services Element
(GSE)
– ESA Programme dedicated to GMES
• Approved: ESA Ministerial Council Nov 2001
• Earthwatch element
– Deliver Operational Services
• Support for environmental & security policies
– Budget
• 83 Meuro
• 5 years
GSE Programme sequence
User Consultations
consolidation
full operationalisation
New Services
preparation
GSE contracts
ITT
service
reviews
GMES
forum 4
service
reviews
service service
reviews reviews
inputs to
GMES report
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
GSE Service Consolidation:
Scope
Select a first set of service-portfolios
Perform all necessary consolidation activities
10+ Service-portfolios
10+ Policy-sectors
10+ Contracts
20 months each
consolidated European E&S service-offering
inputs to GMES initial report (2003)
inputs to Earthwatch definition
basis for full GMES service implementation
Cardinal Requirement
Service Consolidation
• Complete, clear & convincing answers
• What information is needed?
• What services can be provided?
• What are the benefits for Europe’s Citizens?
• Do the benefits justify the costs
• Geographic scope
• Global; continental; regional; national; local
• Timescale
• Present + 10 years
Data & Methods
• EO
• In-situ / airborne
• Socio-Economic
• Models / Assimilation
• Monitoring / Assessment / Forecasting
Service Sustainability
• Available
• readily accessible to users when needed
• now & in future
• Reliable
• consistently meet user-defined quality
• & standards
• Affordable
• overall benefits justify Costs
ESA GSE: GSE Services in consolidation


CoastWatch
ROSES



ICEMON
Satellite-based sea-ice monitoring
Northern View Artic Environmental Management
Forest Monitoring Forest monitoring for forest
Integrated Coastal zone management
Real time ocean services for oil spill monitoring &
coastal waters quality assessment
management and Kyoto Reporting

SAGE
Provision of advanced Geo-information for soil and
inland water management

Risk-EOS
Earth Observation based services for flood and fire risk
management

TerraFirma
Pan-European Ground Motion Hazard Information
Service

GUS
Satellite Earth Observation for urban environmental
management

Food Security Satellite support services for Food Security early
warning
ROSES
User Organizations
CEDRE
NDF
NSF
IMR
P of Gijon
Puertos Estados
Min. Fomento
UKEA
MCA
BfG
Min Mer. Marine
FIMR
FEI
Coastwatch
User Organizations
IMR
BSH
RIKZ
BRGM
ETC-TE
EUCC
ICEMON
User Organizations
DNV
NPI
RC (SMHI)
FMA
Northern View
User Organizations
Env Can
Parks Canada
NW&E
Int. Ice Patrol (Int)
GRID Arendel (Int)
Yes but…
How ?
Team Organisation
Prime Contractor
Project
Manager
Service
Strategy
Group
Research
Partners
System
Developers
Operational
Service
Providers
Core Users
Group
Communication – Cooperation - Coordination
The GSE Consolidation Scheme
Science Review
Promotion
& Training Plans
Policy Foundations Review
Global User Needs Directory
Promotion
& Training Reports
Key User segment Profiles
Validation
Protocol
Validation
Reports
User
Standards
Handbook
Service prospectus
Core User Needs
Service Utility Reports
Service prospectus
appraisal
SLA
Cost
Benefit
Analysis
Portfolio
Specifications
Service Portfolio
Service Partnership
protocol
Methods
compendium
Strategic
Plan
Operational scenarios
System Standards
Guidelines
Data needs & availability
prospectus
data access
agreements
Infrastructure systems
analysis
precursor systems
Inventory
data sources
Inventory
ESA GSE: Consolidation schedule
C
o
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
GSE
Orientation
co-location
J
P
R
O
G
R
E
S
S
F
KO
M
A
GMES 2004-2008
inputs
co-location
M
PM
J
J
A
S
O
PM
N
PM
D
GSE Programme
Review
co-location
J
F
M
A
PM
M
J
J
PM
A
S
O
FR
M
T
S
contracts phase 1
contracts phase 2
N
Distribution of Roles in GSE teams
86
User Organisations
Service Providers
62
System Developers
30
Research Organisations
Expert Consultants
40
20
175 organisation in 238 different roles
Nature of User Organisations in GSE
International
20
41
National
9
Sub-National
11
Local
Private Sector
5
Nature of User Organisations in GSE
International
20
40
National
8
Sub-National
11
Local
Private Sector
8
4
3
9
th
6
Framework Programme
2002-2006
Focussing and integrating
Community Research
Contribution to GMES
What’s Next ?
New GSE Services in consolidation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Food Security
Risk-EOS
TerraFirma
Urban Services
Forest Monitoring
SAGE
CoastWatch
ROSES
ICEMON
Northern View
RESPOND (Humanitarian Aid)
PROMOTE (Atmospheric compositon)
Scaling up GSE Services
• Rationalization service-portfolios
• Merging supply teams
• Gaining operational acceptance
– Service validation
• Improving performance & benefits
• Addressing sustainability
GSE co-location week 3
(Frascati May 03-07)
Based on phase 1 experience (Documented user-feedback)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Critical review of services
User federation, communities & leadership
Supply-side synergies
Service-level agreements, service partnership agreements
Service validation, standards, certification…
Infrastructure & Data Needs
Benefits
Sustainability
Critical Inputs for next phase of GSE 2005-2007
Key questions…
• What makes a GMES Service a “GMES Service”
• Do we have a complete view of user needs & the user
base for GMES Services
• How strong is the user demand, how cohesive is the
user base ?
• Organize around the users or around the supply ?
Different answers => different implementation approach
GMES Interim Report
Recommendations
Way forward 2004-2008
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Establish GMES Organizational Framework
Mechanisms for permanent dialogue with Users
Start to implement Priority Services
Strategy on GMES Data & Information
Capacity & interfaces for improved access
Develop required space capabilities (2008)
Assess & develop relevant in-situ capabilities
Organize & fund Underpinning RTD activities
Develop International partnership
Appropriate funding mechanisms
Continuity of Observations
•
Sine-qua-non constraint,
–
•
stated repeatedly by many end-user organizations
participating in the GMES Service Element,
They cannot today move towards greater
reliance on satellite-based surveillance (SAR
or otherwise), without having an assurance of
effective continuity of the observation data
sources in the future.
GMES Space Component
Drivers for Observations continuity
2008 onwards…
• C-Band SAR
• Ocean, Ice, Geohazards (INSAR)
• Continuity ERS, ASAR observations
• Medium-res multispectral
• SPOT, Landsat class observations
• Ocean-colour / Radar Altimetry
• MERIS, MODIS class
• ERS RA, RA-2 class
• LEO Atmospheric Monitoring
• Stratosphere, profiles,
• Continiuity GOMOS, MIPAS, Scia limb
• GEO Atmospheric Monitoring
• Pollution, hi-res temporal & spatial
ESRIN
Fen 2004
Mark Dohertry
ESA EO Programmes
Group on Earth Observations
(GEO)
Group on Earth
bservations
Earth Observation Summit
U.S. Department of State, Washington DC
July 31, 2003
Group on Earth
bservations
The Earth Observation Summit
Washington DC, July 31, 2003
The Summit represented a high level governmental/political commitment to move toward a comprehensive,
coordinated, global network:
•
Issued declaration to support this concept
•
Launched development of 10-year implementation plan
•
Established the ad hoc intergovernmental Group on Earth Observations (GEO) with 4 Co-Chairs:
1) U.S. – Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher Jr., Administrator
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
2) EC – Director General Achilleas Mitsos
Directorate General for Research
3) Japan – Mr. Akio Yuki, Deputy Minister, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science,
and Technology (MEXT)
4) South Africa – Dr. Rob Adam, Director-General,
Department of Science and Technology
Group on Earth
bservations
EO Summit Declaration
• Affirmed need for timely, quality, long-term, global information as a basis for sound decision making.
• Recognized need to support:
1) Comprehensive, coordinated, sustained Earth observation system or systems;
2) Coordinated effort to address capacity-building needs related to Earth obs;
3) Exchange of observations in a full and open manner with minimum time delay and minimum cost; and
4) Preparation of a 10-year Implementation Plan, building on existing systems and initiatives
1) Framework for Tokyo ministerial, April or May 2004
2) 10-year plan for Brussels ministerial in late 2004.
• Established ad hoc Group on Earth Observations (GEO) to develop Plan
• Invited other governments to join.
Group on Earth
bservations
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Argentina
Australia
Belize
Brazil
Canada
China
Denmark
Egypt
European Commission
France
Gabon
Germany
India
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Member Governments
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Kazakhstan
Mexico
Morocco
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Republic of Congo
Republic of Korea
Russian Federation
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Thailand
Ukraine
United Kingdom
United States
Group on Earth
bservations
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Central American Commission for the Environment and Development (SICA/CCAD)
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS)
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)
European Space Agency (ESA)
European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites (EUMETSAT)
Global Climate Observing System (GCOS)
Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS)
Global Terrestrial Observing System (GTOS)
Integrated Global Observing Strategy Partnership (IGOS-P)
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC)
International Agency for the Development of Environmental Information (ADIE)
International Council for Science (ICSU)
International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP)
International Group of Funding Agencies for Global Change Research (IGFA)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)
World Bank (IBRD)
World Climate Research Programme (WCRP)
World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
Participating International Organizations
Group on Earth
bservations
GEO Structure
GEO
US, EC, Japan, South Africa (Co-Chairs)
Architecture Subgroup
GEO Secretariat
(US providing
Administrative
Secretariat,
with support
from other
countries and
international
organizations)
Capacity Building Subgroup
Data Utilization Subgroup
International Cooperation
Subgroup
User Requirements and
Outreach Subgroup
Group on Earth
bservations
Earth Observation Elements
Climate
Ecosystems
Disasters
Health
Ocean
Atmosphere
Land
Group on Earth
bservations
Earth Observation Components
National
Requirements
International
Requirements
GEO Subgroups
GEO Secretariat
Earth
Observation
10-year Implementation Plan
GEO
Earth Observation
Summit II, III
Group on Earth
bservations
Key GEO Documents
• Framework Document
• (April 2004)
• GEO Report
• (April 2004)
• Implementation Plan (10 yr)
• (V1: Oct 2004; V2: Jan 2005; Final: Feb 2005 )
Group on Earth
bservations
Framework and Plan Development
• GEO Members & Participant Organizations provide inputs via Subgroups
• GEO Subgroups provide draft chapters to the GEO Secretariat
• GEO Secretariat provides draft I&P chapters and way forward
• Framework will be basis for 10-year Plan
• GEO Meetings review and approve draft chapters for Framework and 10year Plan
GEOSS Implementation Plan Development
Group on Earth
bservations
Earth Obs Summit I
GEO II
Draft Framework
Document components
and GEO I
- UNITED STATES -
Work review
Baveno
Nov 2003
Draft Framework Doc
Subgroup reports.
- S.AFRICA Feb 2004-
Architecture
Subgroup
Earth Obs Summit II
& GEO IV
Data Utilization
Subgroup
Int’l Cooperation
Subgroup
GEO Report
Framework Document
for approval
- JAPAN April 2004-
Earth Obs Summit III
GEO Secretariat
User
Requirements &
Outreach
Subgroup
Draft Framework Doc
GEO III
Establishes
Capacity Building
Subgroup
Subgroups & Secretariat compose
GEOSS Implementation Plan
for Approval by EOS
- Europe 2005 -
Drafting GEOSS
Implementation Plan
Task team
GEO sun-groups
GEO V
GEO VI
GEOSS Implementation Plan.
Europe Feb2005
Governments Review
GEOSS Implementation Plan
GEOSS
Implementation Plan V1
- Oct 2004 -
Group on Earth
bservations
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Societal Benefits
(roadmap)
Reducing loss of life and property from natural and human-induced disasters
Understanding environmental factors affecting human health and well being
Understanding environmental factors affecting human health and well being
Improving management of energy resources
Understanding, assessing, predicting, mitigating, and adapting to climate
variability and change
Understanding, assessing, predicting, mitigating, and adapting to climate
variability and change
Improving weather information, forecasting, and warning
Supporting sustainable agriculture and combating desertification
Understanding, monitoring, and conserving biodiversity
Group on Earth
bservations
Global Earth Observation
System of Systems (i)
• Comprehensive
– by including observations and products gathered
from all components required to serve the needs
of participating members
• Coordinated
– in terms of leveraging resources of individual
contributing members to accomplish this system,
whose total capacity is greater than the sum of its
parts
• Sustained
– by the collective and individual will and capacity of
participating members
Group on Earth
bservations
Global Earth Observation
System of Systems (ii)
• Socio-economic benefits as roadmap
– by including observations and products
gathered from
• Incremental architetural model
– Build on existing systems, distributed
• Fill critical gaps
– e.g: parameters, geographic, access,
specs
Group on Earth
bservations
Global Earth Observation
System of Systems (iii)
• Full & open exchange of observations
– Minimum cost, minmum delay
• Assure data utility & useabilty
– Calibration, valdation, spatial & temporal resolution
• Assured continuity of observations
– Of many prameters & products already in place
• Robust regulatory framework for EO
– Eg protection of radio frequencies for EO
Group on Earth
bservations
GEO Calendar
Earth Observation Summit-1 July 31
United States
Initial GEO Meeting—August 1-2
GEO-2
Italy
November 28-29
=
GEO-3
S.Africa
Feb 2004
Document Milestones
= GEO Secretariat
=
Complete Framework Document
Earth Observation Summit-2
Japan
Complete10-Year
Implementation Plan
Meetings
GEO-4
Tokyo
Apr 2004
GEO Meetings planned
G-8
GEO-6
Europe
Feb 2005
GEO-5
Apr 2004
= GEO Meetings notional
= Significant Events
A
S
O
2003
N
Earth Observation Summit-3
Europe
D
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
2004
A
S
O
N
D
J
2005
GMES & GEO
Make it happen…
Recommendations for the 2004-2007 period
I.
Establish a GMES organisational framework
II.
(end 2004) Establish mechanisms for a permanent
dialogue with users
III.
Begin implementation of priority services
(EC FP6 and ESA GSE)
IV.
(mid 2005) Develop a strategy with respect to data
and information needed for and produced by GMES
services (data policies and IPRs)
V.
(end 2004) Establish a policy for GMES international
partnerships
Recommendations for 2004-2007
VI.
(2008) Develop the required elements of space
capabilities for GMES
VII.
Assess the existing in-situ capabilities of relevance
for GMES and prepare an implementation plan for
complementary adaptations / deployments
VIII. Organise and fund research, technology
demonstration and demonstration activities at a
level sufficient to underpin quality and progress of
GMES services
IX.
(end 2004) Establish a policy for GMES international
partnerships
X.
(end 2006) Ensure sustainability of GMES services
through appropriate funding mechanisms
GMES Components Funding (2004-2007)
A. Implementation of the GMES Priority services
B. Preparatory and implementation activities related
to future space observing systems
C. Preparatory and implementation activities related
to future in-situ observing systems
D. Progressive build-up of GMES Data Integration
and Information Management
E. R&D activities in support of GMES
F. Management of the GMES implementation