Neutrino Factory Target Vessel Concept Update V. Graves T. Lessard Target Studies EVO June 26, 2012
Download ReportTranscript Neutrino Factory Target Vessel Concept Update V. Graves T. Lessard Target Studies EVO June 26, 2012
Neutrino Factory Target Vessel Concept Update V. Graves T. Lessard Target Studies EVO June 26, 2012 Review – Last Week’s Concept Downstream Beam Window Inner Tungsten Shield Double wall mercury containment inside tungsten shielding chambers 2 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Mercury Pool Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012 Review - Mercury Module Extraction 3 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012 Review - Cryostat Modules Outer Tungsten Module Inner Tungsten Module Mercury Module 4 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012 New Concept – Changed Shape of Mercury Module • Outer sleeve now bell-shaped to match inner Hg chamber • Combined inner & outer tungsten shield modules 5 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012 Cooling Channel Within Shielding Module 6 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012 Mercury Module Comparison • Increased inner chamber size, simpler geometry • Added segment vanes throughout interstitial space 7 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012 Beam Entrance Pipe Complicates Interior • Beam enters from side, passes through interior vane in this concept • Number and location of vanes TBD, but this issue will worsen if additional beams incorporated Beam Entrance Pipe Opening 8 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012 Upstream End of Mercury Chamber Beam Entrance Pipe Opening Mercury Nozzle Opening Mercury Drain Openings 9 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012 Current Mercury Module • Requires more mercury than before • Top no longer matches beam pipe taper • Provides room for additional side shielding • Bottom slope incorporated in both walls for draining • Downstream end can be shortened, assuming the window cooling is adequate 10 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012 Remote Handling Features Incorporated • Consideration given towards installing mercury module inside shielding module • Accurate, repeatable final positioning required • Assumes cryostat and shielding module are accurately located • Added 2.5cm open space around mercury module (increased size of hole in shielding module) • Incorporates “rough” and “precision” guides • Adds features to both the mercury and the tungsten modules • Assumes a handling cart/mechanism with minor vertical motion capability 11 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012 Initial Guide Concept Rough Guides Module Support Pads Precise Guides Mercury Weight Support Pad 12 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012 Summary • Mercury Module now provides double-wall mercury containment with no leak path into tungsten cooling channels • Module is independent, requires its own helium cooling capability • No consideration yet for structural and/or cooling issues • Initial look into schemes for precision location of module within tungsten shielding 13 Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy Target Vessel Update 26 June 2012