Integrating a Child Lens into Economic & Social Policy Analysis – using the Poverty & Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) model -- A Child.

Download Report

Transcript Integrating a Child Lens into Economic & Social Policy Analysis – using the Poverty & Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) model -- A Child.

Integrating a Child Lens into Economic &
Social Policy Analysis – using the Poverty &
Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) model
-- A Child Rights Impact Assessment (CRIA) Tool
for Economic & Social Policies
Margaret Wachenfeld – UNICEF Brussels Office &
Rachel Marcus, Consultant
Looking for Upstream Leverage
Integrate consideration of children into key policies
 especially policies where they are not typically considered
Analyse & highlight the impact of policies on children
Integrate children into the work of other key players
Rationale for Developing Child Rights
Impact Assessment (CRIA) Toolkit
Effects of policy reforms on children not routinely assessed
ex ante
 Although this is an obligation under UN Convention on the
Rights of the Child
 Conceptual Constraints
 Children’s lack of voice & relative powerlessness of
child advocates
 Lack of understanding of importance of protecting
children at early stages of their lives – negative
impacts can have long-term effects on individuals and
society
 Disciplinary bias tending to concentrate on economic
effects
Technical Constraints
 Data constraints (much data is at household level) but
greater disaggregation often possible
Response: Developing Child Rights Impact
Assessment (CRIA) Tool

Integrate consideration of
children into key policies 
 Highlight the impact of
policies on children 
Build on & integrate into existing
approaches to analyse impacts of
proposed policies on the poor & vulnerable
-- Poverty & Social Impact Analysis (PSIA)
 Modify the approach to include specific
consideration of & impacts on children
 Tool can be integrated into PSIA or used
as stand-alone tool
 Integrate children into the
PSIA used by World Bank & other
donors (UK, Germany, Netherlands,
Belgium, Norway)
Added Bonus 
 Improving on approaches used in
existing CRIA tools by basing analysis on
rigorous analysis (quantitative & qualitative)
work of other key players 
Integrating Key Frameworks & Tools
Integrates
 Key Foundation: UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)
 Key Analysis Framework: Poverty & Social Impact Analysis (PSIA)
 Key Tool: Social scientific analysis of intra-household dynamics
and outcomes for children – both qualitative and quantitative
Putting child at the centre of considerations, alongside
other stakeholders
Using Poverty & Social Impact Analysis Approach
to illuminate impacts on children
Using the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
as the overarching framework
Existing Poverty & Social Impact Analysis
(PSIA) Conceptual Framework
Policy Reforms & Programmes
Transmission
Channels:
•Employment
Impacts transmitted
through
•Prices
•Assets
•Transfers &
Taxes
•Access to goods
& services
•Public Financing
•Authority
CRIA Conceptual
Framework
Summary diagram here (will be slightly revised
version)
Child
Specific
What is Different About a Child Lens?
Expanding Attention to Children in PSIA
Key Concepts:
 Challenging assumption that impacts on
children mirror impacts on households more
generally – disaggregating beyond household level
 Paying attention to possible impacts of policies
on all areas of children’s rights
 Involving children as participants in policy making
process as stakeholders
What is Different About a Child Lens?
Understanding Impacts on Children at All Levels:
 *Micro-level: Expands understanding of intra-household
processes that lead to impacts on children
 Meso-level: Focusing on transmission channels that have
a particular importance for children such as access to
services or transfers to households
 Macro-level: Highlighting how macroeconomic policy &
trends acts through transmission channels to have an
impact on the proximate causes of child well-being eg
policy changes such as devaluation can affect prices of key
goods, and thus consumption patterns and children's
wellbeing.
What is Different About a Child Lens?
 Addressing Missing Dimensions that are Important to
Children
 Considering not just short or medium term, but also
longer-term effects of policy, including intergenerational effects
 Deepening the analysis of indirect, 2nd & 3rd order
effects of policy that are often important for children
 Highlighting the role of social capital in children’s
development
 Analysing social risks for children arising from social
arrangements or cultural norms
What is Different About a Child Lens?
Conclusion:
 Need to highlight 3 areas in which further
work is needed to understand how policy
effects are transmitted to children
 Intra-household processes to go beyond
household level analysis
 Analyse & bring in greater understanding of
wider social processes and how they affect
children eg changing social capital, social
inequality
 Outcomes for children, particularly in terms
of development, participation and protection
Steps in a CRIA/Child Sensitive PSIA
especially children & young people
 Consultation with stakeholders,
Broadly follows PSIA sequence
 Start with scoping assessment
 Develop Conceptual Framework
 understand transmission channels
 Ask the right questions
 Gather data and information
 on micro-level impacts, intermediary
processes and political & institutional
context
 Analyse Impacts
 Make Recommendations
 including possible mitigation or
compensation measures and risk
assessment
 Foster Policy Debate
 Monitor & Evaluate
Ask the Right Questions
About PSIA Transmission Channels
And adding questions on:
 Household responses
 ex: changing patterns of consumption that have effects
on children like school expenditures, changing patterns of
labour allocation, changes in caring activities
 Access to services
 ex: with a focus on quality in addition to accessibility
 Social capital / cohesion
 ex. changing patterns of reciprocal child care in the
community as result of breakdown in social cohesion
Ask the Right Questions
Additional Questions (con’t)
 Mediating Factors – getting these more explicitly into both
questions and analysis
 Outcomes for Children
 Survival & development
• Ex impacts on health & nutrition
• Ex impacts on emotional well beingn
 Protection
• Ex impacts on child labour rates, insufficient care
 Participation
• Ex access to information
Analyse Impacts on Children
Guidance on quantitative analysis will include:
 Building child-focused vulnerability profiles from
household data
 Estimating scale and magnitude of likely responses to
policy change among particular types of households
with children
 Predicting longer-term feedback effects on economy
and how these may alter responses predicted in the short
to medium term relevant to children
 Quantifying effects on public service provision where
relevant to children’s well-being
Analyse Impacts
Qualitative analysis  of impacts eg service providers’ views of how service provision
may be affected and possible effects on children
Risk analysis –
 indicating possible longer-term negative social effects on
certain groups eg if reforms may lead to social unrest and
dislocation
Institutional and political analysis  eg understanding the balance of interests in favour of/ against
child-specific mitigatory measures
Engaging Children and Young People as
Stakeholders
 Recognising
 Children & young people as legitimate stakeholders – like other
groups of stakeholders
 Their right to participate enshrined in CRC
 That their perspectives may be quite different from adults
Guidance on
 Ethical issues of child & young people’s participation
 Engaging as stakeholders in different parts of the process
 Collecting data from & with children & young people
 Analysis & developing recommendations with children
Rapid CRIA
CRIA-lite v. Full CRIA
 Screening to establish what is likely to be critical for children
and what isn’t
 Consider fewer issues and focus on a few strategic priorities
 Less likely to involve new data collection or complex
analysis of existing primary data
 More likely to draw principally on existing literature
 Probably involves less stakeholder participation
 May concentrate more on short-term effects
CRIA Experience: Proposed Electricity
Tariff Reform, Bosnia & Herzegovina
2 Objectives
 pilot CRIA approach & make recommendations on
methodology
 identify possible impacts of reforms on children
Methodology




literature review
analysis of existing quantitative data (LSMS, HBS, MICS)
new survey with sub-sample of MICS households
qualitative research with children, parents & service
providers, focusing on disadvantaged groups
BiH CRIA: Lessons Learnt
Mixed (qual-quant) methodology effectively integrated
and improved quality of findings.
 Each type of data helped contextualise findings of others &
filled gaps
Integration with federal statistical infrastructure very
helpful (survey could use experienced interviewers)
Greater integration with other research policy initiatives
would have been helpful
More time needed for training qualitative researchers –
implications for budgeting, also for quality of analysis
possible in rapid CRIA
Issues for Discussion
Key Concepts: Conceptual framework & guidance on
framing questions & data gathering – are there missing
elements?
Rapid CRIA: Is it possible to specify core elements of a
rapid CRIA? Is it entirely context-specific?
Sector Specific Annexes: what would be good test
cases/ examples?
Uptake: How to maximise integration with existing
processes and initiatives, to increase likelihood of CRIA
being carried out?