Unfulfilled Promises: Affordable Housing in Metropolitan Washington Presentation to the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Mary Anne Sullivan, Partner Deepika Ravi, Associate April 17, 2015

Download Report

Transcript Unfulfilled Promises: Affordable Housing in Metropolitan Washington Presentation to the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Mary Anne Sullivan, Partner Deepika Ravi, Associate April 17, 2015

Unfulfilled Promises: Affordable
Housing in Metropolitan Washington
Presentation to the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
Mary Anne Sullivan, Partner
Deepika Ravi, Associate
April 17, 2015
Introduction
• Collaboration between Hogan Lovells and the
Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights
and Urban Affairs
– Report does not seek to provide a comprehensive
analysis of all affordable housing tools in every jurisdiction
in metropolitan Washington.
• Focus: a handful of tools that
– do not require substantial new funding, and
– can, if used effectively, begin to address the large unmet
need in the region for affordable housing.
www.hoganlovells.com
2
Jurisdictions Studied
•
•
•
•
•
•
District of Columbia
Alexandria
Fairfax County
Arlington County
Prince George’s County
Montgomery County
www.hoganlovells.com
3
Recommended Affordable Housing Tools
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Housing Production Trust Funds
Public Land for Public Good
Public/Private Partnerships
Inclusionary Zoning
Accessory Dwelling Units
Workforce/Employer Assisted Housing
Rapid Rehousing and Emergency Rental
Assistance
www.hoganlovells.com
4
Housing Production Trust Funds
• Many different names; key is dedicated source of
funds for additions to affordable housing
– Often tied to real estate transfer or similar taxes
– Can take funding out of annual budget scrum
– Can be used to meet the needs of the most needy
• Challenges
– Subject to diversion in tight budget times
– Limited funding levels
• Path forward
– Adopt in Prince Georges
– Fully fund in all jurisdictions
www.hoganlovells.com
5
Accessory Dwelling Units
• Independent living quarters on single family lots
– No need for public funds
– Allow elderly to stay in their homes
– Potential to increase affordable housing by 10%
• Challenges
– Sharply restricted by zoning rules
– Generally not suitable for large families
• Path forward
– Ease zoning; tie to affordability
– Build public support
www.hoganlovells.com
6
Public Land for Public Good
• Public land holdings can represent an important
asset in the effort to increase affordable housing
– Unused public land and buildings, surplus land adjoining
public facilities, land near or at transit stations
• Challenges
– Mature region, limited unused assets
– Ongoing need to enforce requirements
• Path forward
– Surveys to understand available assets
– Commit to use for affordable housing
www.hoganlovells.com
7
Inclusionary Zoning
• Capitalizes on local development, trading zoning
flexibility for affordable housing units.
• Challenges
– Excessive exemptions/exceptions
– Short control periods
– Lack of land for new development
• Path Forward
–
–
–
–
Adequate control periods
Local government purchase rights
Low trigger thresholds
Limit exemptions
www.hoganlovells.com
8
Public/Private Partnerships
• Used for construction of new affordable housing and
management of existing developments.
• Challenges
– Execution
– Small Scale
• Path Forward
– Accountability
– Longer Control Periods
www.hoganlovells.com
9
Workforce/Employer-Assisted Housing
• Typically provides workers with rental assistance or
forgivable, low- or zero-interest loans or grants to
assist with initial costs of home purchase.
• Challenges
– Lack of understanding/familiarity
– Unfavorable tax laws
• Path Forward
– Advocacy
– Link EAH to regional economic growth
www.hoganlovells.com
10
Conclusions
• The region is losing ground
– Some programs eliminate more affordable housing than
they replace
• Exceptions, exemptions, grandfathering are a
significant impediment to progress
• Focus on rental units offers more promise of longterm affordability
• Problem is most severe at the lowest income levels
www.hoganlovells.com
11
www.hoganlovells.com
Hogan Lovells has offices in:
Alicante
Amsterdam
Baltimore
Beijing
Brussels
Budapest*
Caracas
Colorado Springs
Denver
Dubai
Dusseldorf
Frankfurt
Hamburg
Hanoi
Ho Chi Minh City
Hong Kong
Houston
Jakarta*
Jeddah*
Johannesburg
London
Los Angeles
Luxembourg
Madrid
Mexico City
Miami
Milan
Monterrey
Moscow
Munich
New York
Northern Virginia
Paris
Philadelphia
Rio de Janeiro
Riyadh*
Rome
San Francisco
São Paulo
Shanghai
Silicon Valley
Singapore
Tokyo
Ulaanbaatar
Warsaw
Washington DC
Zagreb*
"Hogan Lovells" or the "firm" is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and their affiliated businesses.
The word "partner" is used to describe a partner or member of Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP or any of their affiliated entities or any employee or consultant with equivalent standing. Certain individuals, who are
designated as partners, but who are not members of Hogan Lovells International LLP, do not hold qualifications equivalent to members.
For more information about Hogan Lovells, the partners and their qualifications, see www.hoganlovells.com.
Where case studies are included, results achieved do not guarantee similar outcomes for other clients. Attorney Advertising.
© Hogan Lovells 2015. All rights reserved.
*Associated offices