Regional Industrial Lands Readiness Wetlands Mitigation Solutions Regional Industrial Lands Readiness - Wetlands Mitigation Solutions Coordinated by – Oregon Cascades West Council of Governments In partnership.

Download Report

Transcript Regional Industrial Lands Readiness Wetlands Mitigation Solutions Regional Industrial Lands Readiness - Wetlands Mitigation Solutions Coordinated by – Oregon Cascades West Council of Governments In partnership.

Regional Industrial Lands Readiness Wetlands Mitigation Solutions
Regional Industrial Lands
Readiness - Wetlands
Mitigation Solutions
Coordinated by –
Oregon Cascades West
Council of Governments
In partnership with –
State of Oregon: Gov’s Office, DLCD,
DSL, Business Oregon, OED
City of Adair Village
City of Albany
City of Corvallis
City of Lebanon
City of Millersburg
City of Tangent
Economic Dev Organizations: AMEDC
BL3 Regional Investment Board
PacifiCorp
Overview of key findings...

What is a “wetland”?

How do wetlands impact industrial sites?

What are the issues?

What needs to be “fixed”?

How are we moving forward?
What is a “wetland”?
What about this Corvallis site?
Is this Tangent site likely to be
a wetland?
What is a “wetland”?

May not always be wet –



Seasonal
Altered (farmed, tiled, channeled)
Inundated or saturated with ground or
surface water to support hydrophytes
(aquatic plants)
What is a “wetland”?

Serve important
functions –







Storm water retention
Ground water recharge
Filter contaminates
Wildlife & plant habitat
Recreation
Aesthetics
Goal 5 balancing act
How do wetlands impact sites?

Almost all industrial
sites have areas of
known or suspected
wetlands

Few 10+ acre sites
could be developed
without impacting
likely wetlands area...
How do wetlands impact sites?
Lebanon Rodeo Industrial Park
Total Area of Sites: 120.1 Acres
Delineated Wetlands: 73.1 Acres
How do wetlands impact sites?
South Albany Industrial Park
Total Area of Sites: 247.0 Acres
Delineated Wetlands: 125.5 Acres
What are the issues?
Analysis of wetlands-related
impacts on industrial
development found 
Uncertainty & time to
address wetlands permit
requirements are
impediments to siting
industry

Cost to meet regulations is a
lesser factor for larger buildto-suit development
What are the issues?

Development proposal must work to #1 - Avoid wetlands area
#2 - Minimize impact to wetlands
#3 - Compensate for impact 


Restore wetlands / create new wetlands
Same / more wetlands area
Same / enhanced wetlands functions & values
What are the issues?

Review requires real, detailed,
development plan

Review to possible permit can
take over 1 year
 Recent delineation
 Delineate in rainy season

Must prove non-wetlands sites
aren’t possible

Developer must mediate
between DSL & US ACE
What are we “fixing”?

Forecast future
industrial land demand


Preferred & likely future
Inform local Comp Plan
updates = 20 years

Understand industrial
site wetlands

Address wetlandsrelated uncertainty &
timing impediments
BASELINE
INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT PROJECTION
Broad Economic Trends
State Economic Vision
and Economic Initiatives
The Region’s Assets
Anticipated Growth and
Change in Industrial Sectors
REFINED ECONOMIC FUTURE –
REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT PROJECTION
Community Characteristics and Preferred Economic Future
Evaluate Alternative Views
of Industrial Land Demand
DEMAND FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND
What are we “fixing”?

Industrial Economic Opportunities Analysis


Need ~1,500 acres of vacant land to meet demand &
provide market choice
Inventory requires about 84 sites 



20 sites of 10-acres or more
63 sites of under 10 acres (76% of demand)
Cities inventoried 3,360 acres in 108 sites
Review of wetlands on “key sites”



Toured sample of 20 sites most likely to develop
~100–300 acres will need to be mitigated
Common approach is possible 

All in same Upper Willamette Basin
97% of potential wetlands area is PEM Flats classification
What are we “fixing”?

Regulators prefer larger areas to
individual or on-site mitigation –



Shared maintenance costs
Eased monitoring
Increased long-term success

Securing mitigation bank credits improves part of
certainty issue, but...

In ‘08 almost all existing & planned Upper
Willamette credits were taken, and...

‘08 Upper Willamette credit purchases averaged
$93,654 ($84,500 state-wide)
How will we move forward?
Track A: Regional mitigation
 Cities agree they have a role in providing industrial
development certainty
 Business plan for mitigation banking strategy
 Strong desire to add multiple values into/alongside
public mitigation area
 Cascades West Regional Consortium incorporated
 Seeking project development funding
 State endorsement for this regional effort
 Connections to potential partners
How will we move forward?
Track B: Streamlined permitting
 State priority – great support
 Regulators like regional permit
& RGP provides ~70% certainty
 Gov’s Strategic Reserve Funds
 Solicited for & selected 20 “best” sites for analysis
 Contracted w/Pacific Habitat Services to develop
RGP Proposal
 Continued RSC assistance
 20 sites moving to “Decision-Ready” status
 Professional services for “Certified” readiness
Regional Industrial Lands
Readiness - Wetlands
Mitigation Solutions
Coordinated by –
Oregon Cascades West
Council of Governments
In partnership with –
State of Oregon: Gov’s Office, DLCD,
DSL, Business Oregon, OED
City of Adair Village
City of Albany
City of Corvallis
City of Lebanon
City of Millersburg
City of Tangent
Economic Dev Organizations: AMEDC
BL3 Regional Investment Board
PacifiCorp