DUCT EFFICIENCY AND HEAT PUMP PERFORMANCE Paul Francisco David Baylon Ecotope, Inc. House Assumptions • House over crawl space – 1350 square feet – 3.5 ton heat.
Download ReportTranscript DUCT EFFICIENCY AND HEAT PUMP PERFORMANCE Paul Francisco David Baylon Ecotope, Inc. House Assumptions • House over crawl space – 1350 square feet – 3.5 ton heat.
DUCT EFFICIENCY AND HEAT PUMP PERFORMANCE Paul Francisco David Baylon Ecotope, Inc. House Assumptions • House over crawl space – 1350 square feet – 3.5 ton heat pump or electric furnace – 10% leakage on both supply and return sides • House with half basement – Approx. 2200 square feet – 3.5 ton heat pump or electric furnace – 5% supply leakage, no return leakage Equipment Assumptions • 3.5 ton heat pump is rated at HSPF of 8.2, SEER of 14 • For heating, resistance added to meet load, compressor used as much as possible • Electric resistance furnace sized to meet load • Some prototypes use different heat pumps, both bigger and smaller Effect of Ducts • Duct losses add to the load that must be met by the heat pump or furnace – supply leakage and conduction result in capacity that does not make it to the house – return leakage and conduction result in changed entering conditions at the equipment Effect of Ducts • Ducts in buffer spaces see different ambient conditions than the house – in heating season, crawl space often warmer than outside but colder than house – in cooling season, crawl space often cooler than house or outdoors – in cooling season, attic often hotter than house or outdoors Savings from added insulation Portland electric furnace Heating - 1350 ft^2 house - EFA Pre-1980 Uninsulated ducts -31.2% Add R-4 Supply 6.0% Add R-11 Supply 10.3% Add R-4 Return 0.5% Add R-11 Return 0.8% R-4 to R-11 Supply R-4 to R-11 Return 4.6% 0.3% Heating - half-basement house - EFA Pre-1980 Uninsulated ducts -12.6% Add R-4 Supply 3.2% Add R-11 Supply 5.5% Add R-4 Return 0.0% Add R-11 Return 0.0% R-4 to R-11 Supply R-4 to R-11 Return 2.4% 0.0% 1980-1993 -33.8% 6.4% 11.0% 0.5% 0.9% Post-1993 -33.8% 6.4% 11.0% 0.5% 0.9% 5.0% 0.4% 5.0% 0.4% 1980-1993 -13.8% 3.4% 6.0% 0.0% 0.0% Post-1993 -13.8% 3.4% 6.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% Duct Loss for Electric Furnace 50 Crawl Space House Half Basement House Uninsulated Ducts With R-11 added to Supply 30 20 10 Location ou la Mi ss ne Sp ok a Bo ise nd Po rtla le Se att ou la Mi ss ne Sp ok a Bo ise nd Po rtla le 0 Se att Loss due to Ducts, % 40 Duct Loss for Cooling 30 Crawl Space House Half Basement House Uninsulated Ducts With R-11 added to Supply 20 15 10 5 Location Sp ok an e Mi ss ou la Bo ise Po rtla nd Se att le Sp ok an e Mi ss ou la Bo ise Po rtla nd 0 Se att le Loss due to Ducts, % 25 Duct Loss for Heating (Heat Pumps) 120 Crawl Space House Half Basement House Uninsulated Ducts With R-11 added to Supply 80 60 40 20 Location la Mi ss ou ka ne Sp o Bo ise lan d Po rt ttle Se a la Mi ss ou ka ne Sp o Bo ise lan d Po rt ttle 0 Se a Loss due to Ducts, % 100 Summary of Duct Effects • Duct insulation can account for up to about 1/3 of duct losses at these levels of leakage • Return insulation has little impact • Ducts have little impact in prototype with half basement • Duct efficiency changes between heating and cooling, with cooling being higher • Largest impact of duct loss is for heating with heat pump due to greater use of resistance at warmer temperatures this effect very large in colder climates (more than doubles energy use in Missoula if ducts are uninsulated) • Duct efficiency and percentage savings not heavily dependent on house vintage Heat Pump Performance • Heating performance dependent on outdoor temperature. – Heating capacity of compressor reduces 30% between 47oF and 30oF o – Air delivery temperature is reduced by 10 F to less than 85oF resulting in severe comfort problems – Electric resistance is brought on to increase heating capacity and delivery air temperature – To control these effects the manufactures recommend a “Low Ambient Cutout” control set to about 30oF that transfers turns off the compressor and uses the elements only. Seattle 80 1600 Total Integrated 1400 1200 1000 40 800 600 20 400 200 0 -10 0 10 20 30 40 Outdoor Temperature 50 60 0 70 Hours Capacity, MBtuh 60 Portland 80 1600 Total Integrated 1400 1200 1000 40 800 600 20 400 200 0 -10 0 10 20 30 40 Outdoor Temperature 50 60 0 70 Hours Capacity, MBtuh 60 Boise 80 1600 Total Integrated 1400 1200 1000 40 800 600 20 400 200 0 -10 0 10 20 30 40 Outdoor Temperature 50 60 0 70 Hours Capacity, MBtuh 60 Spokane 80 1600 Total Integrated 1400 1200 1000 40 800 600 20 400 200 0 -10 0 10 20 30 40 Outdoor Temperature 50 60 0 70 Hours Capacity, MBtuh 60 Missoula 80 1600 Total Integrated 1400 1200 1000 40 800 600 20 400 200 0 -10 0 10 20 30 40 Outdoor Temperature 50 60 0 70 Hours Capacity, MBtuh 60 Heat Pump Performance Adjustments • Heat pump set-up determines the overall performance – Improper charge and/or air flow results in a 5-12% reduction in COP – Defrost control reduces performance by 2% for demand defrost and 10-12% for timed defrost – Crankcase heater can be similar to defrost in cold climates – QC protocol necessary to insure that proper installation and specification are met Performance Adjustments Partload adjustments by Climate zone: Heating PTCS Installation Specs HSPF ARI Rating 6.8 7.1 8 8.12 8.3 Portland Seattle Boise Spokane Missoula 7.4 7.5 6.5 6.5 6.3 8.3 8.4 7.4 7.3 7.1 8.4 8.5 7.5 7.4 7.2 8.6 8.7 7.6 7.6 7.4 7.1 7.1 6.3 6.2 6.1 Climate adjustment 1.04 1.05 0.92 0.91 0.89 No PTCS Installation Specs: Charge & Flow Portland Seattle Boise Spokane Missoula 6.7 6.8 5.9 5.9 5.7 7.0 7.1 6.2 6.1 6.0 7.9 8.0 7.0 6.9 6.8 8.0 8.1 7.1 7.0 6.9 8.2 8.3 7.3 7.2 7.0 DF&charge adjustment (Proctor, 91) 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 7.4 7.7 5.3 5.2 4.9 Control adjustment 0.906 0.928 0.728 0.719 0.695 No PTCS Installation Specs: Control with Low Ambient Cutout Portland Seattle Boise Spokane Missoula 6.1 6.3 4.3 4.2 4.0 6.4 6.6 4.5 4.4 4.2 7.2 7.4 5.1 5.0 4.7 7.3 7.5 5.2 5.0 4.8 Heat Pump Cooling Performance • Cooling performance rating uses SEER to indicate cooling energy requirements • Actual cooling seasonal COP depends on ambient humidity and temperature in the climate • Effective average for seasonal cooling performance about 65% of the SEER rating – A SEER of 14.0 is 9.1 – Duct performance can reduce this efficiency by 10-30% – Not very dependent on Northwest climate ns Se ly pp Su d Crawl Space R -1 1 te ul a d ly pp Su ns U ni R -1 1 te ul a e e at lim C ns + U ni ib le ed ns ib l Se R at COP Seasonal COP & Ducts Cooling - Spokane 5 Half Basement 4 3 2 1 0 Seasonal COP & Ducts Cooling - Portland 5 Half Basement Crawl Space 4 COP 3 2 1 ly pp Su R11 ula ins Un Su R11 X Data ted ly pp ted ula ins lim +C ibl e Se ns Un ate e ibl ns Se Ra ted 0 Duct Efficiency Impact on Heat Pump Performance • Duct losses can reduce heat pump performance to less than half of rated COP • Much more severe in cold climates • Overall performance depends on quality duct installation as much as quality heat pump installation Seasonal COP & Ducts Heating - Spokane 3 Without cutout With cutout Crawl Space Half Basement COP 2 1 Su pp ly R11 d lat e Un ins u Su pp ly R11 d lat e Un ins u ate Cli m Ra te d 0 Seasonal COP & Ducts Heating - Portland 3 Without cutout With cutout Crawl Space Half Basement COP 2 1 ly R11 Su pp d lat e su Un in ly R11 Su pp d lat e su Un in ate Cli m Ra te d 0 Summary • Overall system efficiency strongly interactive between ducts and conditioning system • Significant duct losses can largely eliminate potential savings from heat pumps • Overall system efficiency requires quality control of both heat pump installation and duct installation • Heat pump controls crucial to overall performance, especially in cold climates • HSPF and SEER rating numbers are poor approximations of actual performance, even with ideal installation • Percentage improvement from lower to higher SEER may be appropriate