Current Strategies for Management of GVHD Dr K M Chang MRCP, FRCPA(Haem) Haematology Department Hospital Ampang.
Download ReportTranscript Current Strategies for Management of GVHD Dr K M Chang MRCP, FRCPA(Haem) Haematology Department Hospital Ampang.
Current Strategies for Management of GVHD Dr K M Chang MRCP, FRCPA(Haem) Haematology Department Hospital Ampang Solid organ vs stem cell transplants Immunoablative/suppressive conditioning High passenger donor Iymphocyte State of immune tolerance GVHD • Graft must contain immunologically competent cells • Recipient express tissue antigens not found in donor • Patients too immunosuppressed to reject this response/cells GVHD T cells – the main cause Can occur in other settings • Transfusions, DLI, immunocompromised Recognise genetically different proteins • Class I HLA (A,B,C) and Class II HLA(DR,DP,DQ) • mHA – HY and HA-3 expressed on all tissues – HA-1 and HA-2 on blood cells Cytokine polymorphism • TNFa, IL-10 and INF-g Increasing incidence Advanced disease Patient age Expanding donor pool – Non HLA id donors, unrelated Donor lymphocyte infusions Use of alternative sources – PBSC>BM>Cord Definition Category Time to onset aGvHD features cGvHD features aGvHD Classic <=100d Yes No Persistent,recurr >100d ent, late onset cGvHD Yes No Classic No time limit No Yes Overlap synd No time limit Yes Yes Frequency of Gd II-IV aGvHD in HLAmatch HSTx 70 60 50 40 Gd II-IV % 30 20 10 0 Sibs Unrelated DLI Marrow harvesting PBSC harvesting PBSC collected by apheresis 2X donor blood volume processed 4-6 days of G-CSF 1-3 apheresis procedures Cord blood 1st case 1988 Fanconi’s anaemia EBMT 1997 NEJM 78 recipients survival 63% 1year GVHD 9% HLA matched 50% HLA unmatched Pathophysiology of aGvHD Conditioning effect • Epithelial cell damage • Injury to GIT • APC activation T-cell activation • Donor T cells CD4+ and CD8+ • IL-2, IFNg, TNF Effector phase • Cytokine storm – TNFa, IFNg, IL-1, NO • CTLs CD8+ • NK cells AGVHD Presentation – Skin, liver, GI tract, nausea Skin Upper GIT • Anorexia, nausea Lower GIT • Watery diarrhoea >500ml • Sever abd pain • Bloody diarrhoea Liver • Cholestatic hyperbilirubinaemia Grading system Stage Skin Rash Liver Bilirubin Gut Diarrhoea + <25% 2 – 3mg/dl >500ml/d ++ 25 – 50% 3 – 6mg/dl >1000ml/d +++ > 50% 6 – 15mg/dl >1500ml/d ++++ Generalised erythroderma, bullae >15mg/dl Abd pain, ileus Grading system (Glucksberg) Grade Degree of organ inv I Skin + to ++ 3y OS 74% II Skin + to +++ Gut and/or liver + Mild decrease in performance 3y OS 64% III Skin ++ to +++ Gut and/or liver ++ to +++ Marked decrease in clinical performance 3y OS 37% IV Skin ++ to ++++ Gut and /or liver ++ to ++++ Extreme decrease in clinical performance 3y OS 10% Chronic GVHD > 100 days or less 35-50% Onset - de novo progressive quiescent explosive CGVHD Pathogenesis unclear donor alloreactive T-cells vs mHA aberrant thymic edn Th2 activation B cells Incidence HLA-id sibs 40% partial match related 50% Matched unrelated 70% >100d, rarely >500d CGVHD risk factors HLA disparity Age of recipient – <10y 13%, >20y 46% Prior AGVHD PBSC 54% vs 32% Latent CMV Marrow boosts, DLI Short course CSA Target organs Skin Mouth Eyes Liver Respiratory tract GI tract Musculoskeletal Neurologic Haemopoietic Genitourinary Infections autoimmune Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) GVHD Biopsy • Experienced pathologists • Exclude concommitant infections, drug toxicity Grading Extent of organ involvement Severity • Life threatening • Organ threatening AGVHD - management Treatment outcome is poor Prophylaxis is mainstay – Minimise tissue damage – T cell reduction • • • • T depletion CD34 selection Antibodies – ATG, Campath Pharmacological AGvHD – prophylaxis CSA – Mtx prophylaxis Incidence GVHD 20 - 30% Other combinations CSA-Mtx-steroids CSA-steroids ATG-CSA-Mtx FK506- Mtx CSA-MMF AGvHD - therapy First line therapy: steroids + calcineurin inh • MP 2mg/kg/day • CR 25-40% • 53% ptt hv durable response Failure of response or severe GVHD • • • • • • Progression after 3 d No change after 7d Incomplete response after 14d Add 2nd line RR 35%-70% 1y OS 30% Second line therapy Methylpred 10-30mg/kg/d Tacrolimus ATG MMF Sirolimus Daclizumab or other IL-2R antagonist anti-TNF e.g Etanercept Pentostatin Extracorporeal photopheresis Non-absorbable steroids - beclomethasone Others – Campath, ABX/CBL, Mesenchymal SC Steroid refractory AGvHD Mycophenolate mofetil • Prodrug of mycophenolic acid, inhibits IMPDH required for de novo purine synthesis • 42-46% RR • 16% 2y survival • 21% early discontinuation for meutropenia, nausea » Nash, Blood 1997 Rapamycin (Sirolimus) • Complexes with FKBP and binds mTOR which regulates S6 kinase and CDK2 • 21 pt, 4-5mg/m2/d X 14d • RR 57%, CR 23%, survival 28% • 23% HUS » Berito, Transplantation 2001 TNF antibodies Infliximab (chimeric human/mouse anti-TNF Ab) Adalimumab (humanised anti-TNF antibody) Etanercept (rh TNF receptor type II fusion protein ) – – – – – TNF infl cytokine Used in 1st and 2nd line Early response Rebound Infections Mesenchymal stem cell therapy Rare stromal popn in BM and adipose tissue Inhibit naïve and memory T-cells effectively Inhibit B-cell proliferation and IL-2 induced NK proliferation APC tolerogenic – – – – 40ptt, Grade III-IV aGvHD Median MSC dose 1.0(0.4-9)106cells/kg 19/40CR, 9/40PR, 4/40 stable, 7/40NR, 1 died 21ptt alive between 6wks to 3.5y » Le Blanc et al, EBMT 2008 Proteomic patterns predict AGvHD after alloHSCT Capillary electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrophotometry (CE-MS) 13 AGvHD samples vs 50 control non-GvHD samples 170 GvHD specific polypeptides were detected and aGvHD specific model consisting of 31 polypeptides 599 blinded samples tested Sensitivity 83.1%, specificity 75.6% • Weissinger et al, Blood 2007;109:5511-5519 ?early screening and preemptive threrapy A biomarker panel for AGvHD Paczesny et al,Blood Jan 2009 Chronic GVHD management Prevention – Reduce AGVDH 15 – 20% vs 40 – 100% – T- cell depletion – HLA matching Treatment – Multidisplinary management – Diagnosis – Evaluation Chronic GVHD management CSA alt Pred (Seattle) Alternative regimens if no improvement in 3mths – – – – – – – – Pentostatin FK506 MMF Extracorporeal photopheresis PUVA Etretinate Plaquenil Anti-CD20 (Rituximab) Pred vs CSA/pred as initial therapy of cGvHD CSA/pred Pred CI discontinued Rx 54% at 5y Survival 5y 67% 53% Median to 1.6y discontinuation Rx Avascular necrosis 18/142 (13%) 2.2y 72% 32/145 (22%), p=0.04 Phase I/II studies in steroid refractory cGvHD Hi dose steroids: 48% major RR Tacrolimus-MMF: 46% RR Sirolimus: 62% RR, side-effects Rituximab – – – – – – Abs vs mHAgs in cGvHD autoAb production by B cells IL-6 production by B-cells lead to sclerosis Cutaneous, rheumatologic No oral or ocular responses Allow prednisolone taper, no fatal infections, well-tolerated, QOL improvement Different assessments and end-points Extracorporeal photopheresis 5 X 109 leucocytes are treated with 8-methoxypsoralen and UVA light Infusion of apoptosis cells induces tolerance and APC modulation Decrease production of proinflammatory cytokines Increase antiinflammatory cytokines Decrease T-cell stimulation Delete cytolytic CD8+ effector cells Induce regulatory T cells ECP AGVHD – what do I do? Grade 1 – watch Grade 2-3 – iv methylpred 2mg/kg/d 7-14d wks, then 1mg/kg/d 2 wks then 25% taper every 2wks – Failure of response D3, progression or relapse with taper, consider iv methylpred 30mg/kg/d or iv MMF or anti-TNF Grade 4 – iv methylpred 30mg/kg/d 3d – + iv MMF – +/- anti-TNF AGVHD - management High index of suspicion – Biopsy, exclude CMV Aggressive institution of treatment – Achieve CR – AGVHD confers no leukaemia-free benefit – Mortality or chronic morbidity Adequate prophylaxis – CMV,fungal, PCP, bacterial IVIG 0.4g/kg weekly till D90 (Sullivan et al) CGVHD – what do I do? Regular physical exam Limited or extensive Organ threatening – lung, liver, keratitis Pred 2mg/kd/d 2 wks then 1mg/kg/d 2 wks then taper 20% every 2 wks CSA 6mths then slow taper MMF – steroid sparer PUVA/ ECP Rituximab CGVHD – what do I do? Oral/dental hygiene Eye care Avoid sun Diet Physiotherapy Infection prophylaxis IVIgG > 500mg/dL Hep B reactivation Ethic difference in TRM Current approaches Donor • Better HLA matches, NK mismatch • Graft source Recipient • Cytokine gene polymorphism Better prophylaxis • Reduced conditioning • Cytokine shields – IL-11, KGF • Drug combination T-cell/ B cell manipulation • Induction of tolerance • Mesenchymal stem cells • Costimulatatory blockade • T regs expansion Preemptive startegy • proteomics