Global Study on Child poverty and disparities Orientation Meeting Presentation Hanoi, 14th March Outline 1. Why? (Background) 2. What for? (Purpose) 3. In what sense? (Conceptual Framework) 4.

Download Report

Transcript Global Study on Child poverty and disparities Orientation Meeting Presentation Hanoi, 14th March Outline 1. Why? (Background) 2. What for? (Purpose) 3. In what sense? (Conceptual Framework) 4.

Global Study on Child
poverty and disparities
Orientation Meeting
Presentation
Hanoi, 14th March
2008
Outline
1.
Why? (Background)
2.
What for? (Purpose)
3.
In what sense? (Conceptual Framework)
4. What? (Outputs)
5. How? (Process)
6.
Who? (Organigram)
7.
When? (Timeframe)
1.
Why? (Background)
• Persistence of poverty == weak progress toward the MDGs
• Progress towards MDGs BUT millions of children and women
left-behind
• 50% of children in the developing world severely deprived of
one or more of the following seven dimensions of poverty:
nutrition, health, education, water, sanitation, information, and
housing.
- Need for a Global Study on child poverty and disparities
-> contribute to a comprehensive strategy for making
countries’ development, social protection and sector
strategies more responsive to child poverty
2. What for? (Purpose)
•
•
•
Strengthen the profile of children at the national
policy debates;
Influence the economic and social policies that
affect resource allocations;
Make children a priority in national programs.
Through:
•
Leveraging evidence, analysis, policy and partnership
to deliver results for ALL children.
•
Making policymakers and the public better able to
identify and address gaps in current responses.
•
Identifying how public policies could be more effective
responses for realising children’s rights and ending
child poverty.
Analytical “lens” of the study:
Poverty and disadvantages of families with
children (analysis of poverty at family level)
How public policies could more
effectively reduce child deprivations
(analysis of solutions at both levels)
Increasingly specific
Gaps and opportunities in national PR strategies (overall analysis)
3. In what sense?
(Conceptual Framework)(2)
Analyse the links between economic and social policy and
children’s outcomes:
1. how poverty impacts
children (what factors
explain progress and
disparities in child
outcomes)
2. how public policies,
private and civil society
efforts affect these
outcomes (Who benefits,
who is left out, how?)
3. In what sense?
(Conceptual Framework) (3)
Comprehensive child poverty concept
considers:
1) Income and non-income factors that
determine the fulfillment of child rights
2) Impact of resource scarcity and deprivations
on children
3) Childhood separate from adulthood (life cycle
approach)
4) Children deprived of a safe and caring
environment are also most likely to experience
other deprivations
In what sense?
(Conceptual Framework)(4)
Examine 5 areas of
public policy:
1. Family
income/assets
2. Maternal and child
nutrition
3. Child and parental
health
4. Child Protection
5. Education
4. What? (Outputs)
1.) Policy Template
- assess existing national efforts aimed at reducing child poverty
- assess disparities in MDG progress,
- use national policy documents, including NTP-PRs, budget
documents, reports to UN treaty bodies and sector approaches, etc.
2.) Statistical Template
- compile data on poverty and child outcomes
- Use data from MICS3, VHLSS, DHS, census, etc
3.) Country Analysis Report
- analyse policies and outcomes
- identify the linkages between policy and child outcomes
- Use 1 and 2 above
Outline of country analysis report
•
•
•
•
•
Max. 65 pages
Overview
Chpt 1: main findings, context
Chpt 2: analysis & assessment of child poverty, causes
Chpt 3: review of laws, policies, institutions associated
with outcomes for girls and boys
• Chpt 4: policy strategy and recommendations to achieve
results for girls and boys
• Statistical annex
5. How? (Process)
Policy
Template
Policy experts
(SEDEC Plus)
Statistical
Template
Statistical Experts
(GSO)
Country Analysis Report
Prepared by consultant team
Reviewed by the Country team and reference group
1. Country Team co-leaders: UNICEF, MOLISA
2. Country Expert Team: Consultants (SEDEC), Statistical Experts
(GSO)
3. Reference groups: Policy Experts (ministry focal points)
6. Who ? (Organigram)
UNICEF HQ
IPI
(Guidance, Supervision)
Data Compilation
MOLISA
(Coordination, leadership)
UNICEF Vietnam
(Country focal point/HQ liaison)
GSO
(Statistical
templates)
Country team
(Country analysis
report)
SEDEC
(Policy
templates)
MOF
MOET
MOH
MPI
MOJ
MOLISA
MARD
MOCST
CEM
Policy
expert
(Focal
points)
Policy
expert
(Focal
points)
Policy
expert
(Focal
points)
Policy
expert
(Focal
points)
Policy
expert
(Focal
points)
Policy
expert
(Focal
points)
Policy
expert
(Focal
points)
Policy
expert
(Focal
points)
Policy
expert
(Focal
points)
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
E
x
p
e
r
t
s
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
7. When? (Timeframe)
1) Form the country expert
team (February)
2) Work on the Policy
Template + Stat template
(mainly March-April)
3) Prepare Draft Country
Analysis Report (mainly
May-June 2008)
4) Finalization of the Country
Analysis Report (end
June 2008)