Space Elevators Craig Borchard Scott Shjefte 13 April 2004 Reference: http://www.isr.us/Spaceelevatorconference/2003presentations.html Towers • In early 1962 the Convair Division of General Dynamics carried out a feasibility.
Download ReportTranscript Space Elevators Craig Borchard Scott Shjefte 13 April 2004 Reference: http://www.isr.us/Spaceelevatorconference/2003presentations.html Towers • In early 1962 the Convair Division of General Dynamics carried out a feasibility.
Space Elevators Craig Borchard Scott Shjefte 13 April 2004 Reference: http://www.isr.us/Spaceelevatorconference/2003presentations.html Towers • In early 1962 the Convair Division of General Dynamics carried out a feasibility study, to see if very high towers would be of value for astronomy, high altitude research, communications and rocket launching platforms – steel towers could be built up to 6 km high – aluminium ones up to almost 10 km high • Calculations show that a tower built of graphite composite struts could reach the very respectable height of 40 km, tapering from a 6 km-wide base. What is a Space Elevator? • A space elevator is a physical connection from the surface of the Earth, or another planetary body such as Mars, to a geostationary orbit - for the Earth at roughly 35,786 km in altitude. • Video clip at http://www.isr.us/SEanimation.asp Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Bundles Fullerene Nanotubes • 1997: Yakobson, B. I., Smalley, R. E., “Fullerene Nanotubes: C1,000,000 and Beyond,” American Scientist, 85, pp. 324-337, JulyAugust 1997 • Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) • Single-Wall Nanotubes (SWNT) – – – – Strength ( ~ 100 x steel, 10 x kevlar) Electrical conductivity (~ copper) Thermal conductivity (~ diamond) Manufacturing is difficult (now) • Its future in manufactured products… – – – – – – High tensile strength Ultimate laminate Low mass Forms strong fibers Good electrical conductor Excellent thermal conductor Ribbon Deployment Deployment • Small ribbon (10 to 20 cm wide and microns thick) deployed from geosynchronous orbit using four rockets and a magnetoplasmadynamic upper stage – • 230 Climbers (one every 3 to 4 days) add small ribbons alongside the first for 2.3 years – – • – Free-electron laser (840 nm) and 13 m diameter segmented dish with adaptive optics Received by GaAs photocells (80% overall efficiency at this wavelength) on the climber's underside conventional, niobium-magnet DC electric motors and a set of rollers to pull the climbers up the ribbon at speeds up to 200 km/hr. Spacecraft and construction climbers would become counterweights – • Supports 20,000 kg cargo climbers These add to counterweight Power (100kW to 2.4 MW) is beamed up – – • Supports 990 kg payloads Space end of the 100,000 km long ribbon An ocean-going platform would be used for the Earth anchor and located in the equatorial Pacific Deployment of Ribbon 2 • Job 1 for Ribbon 1 • Capacity doubles with new ribbon • Cost for future ribbons declines exponentially – First one costs ~$6B – Second one costs ~$2B Overview of Hazards • Lightning – Placement of base • Meteors – Large – Maneuvering of base – Small – Ribbon design • Wind Loading – Placement of base • Atomic Oxygen – Ribbon design • Radiation – Ribbon design • Induced Oscillations – Tension adjustment in Active Vibration Control (AVC) system Magnetospheric Hazards • Extreme electromagnetic disturbances can move the cable, perhaps by 10’s of kms. • The cable itself is not very vulnerable despite passing through most intense radiation belts. • Radiation effects on electronics (cargo and crawler) can be solved at a cost. • Extremely severe radiation effects on humans have never been faced before (200x Apollo dosage, due to low speed). • If not solved, humans cannot travel on the Space Elevator. Base Location • Initially targeted off the western coast of South America, near the equator, as shown in clips – Lightning strikes minimal – Wind minimal – Floating base can be moved to avoid storms and large debris Planet Accessibility •Flung off the end of the cable •Initial payload (to Mars) could be self-deploying elevator Space Elevators • CNT or SWNT shows promising capability – – – – • • Some manufacturing challenges remain Health hazards completely unknown Robustness to micrometeorites important Orbit “Cleanup Day” Atomic oxygen needs coating development Robotic manufacture of ribbons in situ – Including bonding, coating, QA, repair • • Active control of oscillations and avoidance maneuvers Easier hazards – Lightning – Wind – Radiation (except to humans) • "The Space Elevator: 3rd Annual International Conference" – June 28-30, 2004 in Washington, D.C. – http://www.isr.us/SpaceElevatorConference/aboutSE.html