INDOT Rumble Striping: A Systemic Safety Measure June 4th, 2015 Welcome Rickie Clark, INDOT Office of Public Involvement Purpose/explanation of public meeting Meeting format Visit our.
Download ReportTranscript INDOT Rumble Striping: A Systemic Safety Measure June 4th, 2015 Welcome Rickie Clark, INDOT Office of Public Involvement Purpose/explanation of public meeting Meeting format Visit our.
INDOT Rumble Striping: A Systemic Safety Measure June 4th, 2015 Welcome Rickie Clark, INDOT Office of Public Involvement Purpose/explanation of public meeting Meeting format Visit our sign-in table Contact database to be developed Informational handouts Display area Welcome Introduction of INDOT officials Recognition of our Guests Recognition of elected and local public officials Stakeholders Indiana Department of Transportation Indiana Division Federal Highway Administration Local communities Elected public officials Community residents and citizens Commuters Businesses Trucking industry / freight movement Bicyclists Home / property owners Traffic Fatalities 2012 Statistics from the CDC (Centers for Disease Control): For ages 5–24 Motor Vehicle Crashes are the #1 Cause of Injury Deaths For ages 25-65+ Motor Vehicle Crashes are the #2 Cause of Injury Deaths In 2012 2.5 Million persons were treated for a traffic injury at a cost of $80 Billion Toward Zero Deaths 1,8001969 1,676 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 2014 746 600 2027 496 400 200 0 1969 1978 1988 Indiana Traffic Deaths 1998 2008 2018 Fatalities (Linear Projection at -20) 2028 Severe Crashes – By Type Crashes Resulting in Fatalities or Severe Injuries Crash Type Number of Crashes Percentage of Crashes Run Off Road 5123 27% Head On 3393 18% Opp. Dir. Sideswipe 353 2% Same Dir. Sideswipe 591 3% Right Angle 4100 22% Left and Right Turns 1187 6% Rear End 2824 15% Other 1412 7% Run-Off-Road Collisions Location of Fatal Crashes Monkey 40% Off Road, Shoulder, Median Other Elephant Location of Injury Crashes 21% Monkey Location of PropertyDamage-Only Crashes 16% Monkey Off Road, Shoulder, Median Off Road, Shoulder, Median Other Other Elephant Elephant On the U.S. Highway System based on a 2005 study by NCHRP 1 Head-On Collisions Most Head-On Crashes occur on 2 Lane Roadways similar to SR 46 between Columbus and Nashville Roadway Classification of Head-On Crashes 75% Roadway Classification of Head-On Crashes Monkey Monkey Rural Undivided 2-lane Urban Other Elephant 75% Elephant On the U.S. Highway System based on a 2005 study by NCHRP 1 Distracted and Fatigued Driving Crashes resulting from distraction or drowsiness (fatigue): Are usually run-off-road collisions, head-on collisions, or rear-end collisions Result in higher injury and fatality rates Are less likely to show evidence of the drivers trying to avoid the collision Such as skid marks, for example According to the NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) 1 Pave With Safety Edge Cable Barrier System (CBS) (CBS) ~370 miles Valuable Crash Avoidance Tool Corrected Incursion (Northbound) Corrected Incursion (Southbound) US 50 Edge Line Rumble Stripes US 50 Centerline Rumble Stripes SR 135 Centerline Rumble Stripes Safety Benefits of Rumble Stripes Peer-Reviewed Traffic Safety Studies Shoulder Rumble Strips (e.g. Edge Line Rumble Stripes) reduce Run-Off-Road Fatal and Injury Crashes by 36% on Rural 2-lane Roads (on average)2 Centerline Rumble Stripes reduce Head-On Fatal and Injury Crashes by 44% on Rural 2-lane Roads (on average)2 Rumble Stripe Noise Considerations Admittedly, noise levels near the roadway can sometimes be objectionable. However, the lives that can be saved by rumble stripes must be balanced against this drawback. According to a 2007 study, 13% of the peak rumble stripe noise levels were above the highest noise level measured for a commercial vehicle driving along the roadway (not hitting the rumble stripes)3 FHWA Guidance FHWA recommends and provides funding for the following INDOT safety programs: Centerline rumble stripes system-wide on undivided rural roads with posted speeds of 50 mph or greater (where the sum of the lane and shoulder width for each travel direction is at least 14 feet)2 Edge line or shoulder rumble stripes system-wide on rural highways with posted or statutory speeds of 50 mph or greater2 Sources Used The following sources were used in this PowerPoint presentation: 1) 2) 3) Torbic, D.J., et al. NCHRP Report 641: Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips. Transportation Research Board. (2009). Proven Safety Countermeasures: Longitudinal Rumble Strips and Stripes on 2-lane Roads. FHWA, n.d. Web. 27 May 2015. Finley, Melisa Dayle, and Miles, Jeffrey David. Exterior Noise Created by Vehicles Traveling over Rumble Strips. Transportation Research Board. (2007). Feedback INDOT would like to hear from you Talk with INDOT project team members Comment sheet in information packet E-mail or mail comments to INDOT Sign-in list to be added to project mailing list Visit INDOT Seymour District page at http://www.in.gov/indot/2706.htm All comments are very much appreciated and will be reviewed by INDOT Public Involvement Team INDOT Seymour District Office Communications Division 185 Agrico Lane Seymour, Indiana 47274 (877) 305-7611 [email protected] http://www.in.gov/indot/2706.htm Contact: Glenda Seal INDOT Office of Public Involvement, IGCN Room N642 100 North Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46204 (317) 232-6601 [email protected] http://www.in.gov/indot/2366.htm Contact: Rickie Clark Public Comment Session