Adequacy and prescription of pediatric peritoneal dialysis Constantinos J. Stefanidis [email protected] “A.& P. Kyriakou” Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece C J Stefanidis .
Download ReportTranscript Adequacy and prescription of pediatric peritoneal dialysis Constantinos J. Stefanidis [email protected] “A.& P. Kyriakou” Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece C J Stefanidis .
Adequacy and prescription of pediatric peritoneal dialysis Constantinos J. Stefanidis [email protected] “A.& P. Kyriakou” Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece C J Stefanidis . 2001 Dialysis adequacy Dialysis adequacy is a concept introduced in the late 1980s linking outcomes of hemodialysis patients to adequacy targets. There is a strong correlation of the the adequacy parameters and: • nutritional intake • bone disease • anemia C J Stefanidis 2001 Optimal and adequate dose of PD Optimal dose: the amount of PD yielding clinical results which cannot further improve Adequate dose: the amount of PD below which there is an increase in morbidity and mortality C J Stefanidis 2001 CANUSA study 680 continuous peritoneal dialysis patients 5% decrease in patient survival with every 0.1 decrease in total weekly Kt/Vurea for Kt/Vurea between 1.5 - 2.3 These predictions assume that renal and peritoneal Kt/Vurea are equivalent. Churchill DN et al. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996 C J Stefanidis 2001 Adequacy and clinical outcome Adequacy targets have been defined in adults because patient mortality and morbidity is much easier to define There are few data to correlate the clinical outcomes with delivered dialysis dose in children C J Stefanidis 2001 Improvement of adequacy on PPD Appropriate organization of PN Center Modify strategies Guidelines Evaluation of the clinical outcome C J Stefanidis 2001 Paediatric Nephrology Centers HD Paediatricians Tx surgeons (early referral) CRI Tx PD Paediatric surgeons (dialysis access) C J Stefanidis 2001 Multi-disciplinary team • Structure Doctors, nurses, dietitians, social workers, psychologists, play therapists, teachers. • Goal To deliver to children the care required for their optimal quality of life. • Team meetings give the entire team opportunity for collaborative decision making. • Networking with other PN centers, multicenter studies and global cooperation C J Stefanidis 2001 Team working improves patient care and enhances the quality of the working life. C J Stefanidis 2001 Improvement of adequacy on PPD Appropriate organization of PN Center Modify strategies Guidelines Evaluation of the clinical outcome C J Stefanidis 2001 Parameters of the efficiency of PD BUN H2O Cr Fill volume (Vf ) Gl Nr of exchanges per day (Nr) Peritoneal permeability C J Stefanidis 2001 Parameters of the efficiency of PD BUN H2O Cr Fill volume (Vf ) Gl Nr of exchanges per day (Nr) Peritoneal permeability C J Stefanidis 2001 Parameters of the efficiency of PD BUN H2O Cr Fill volume (Vf ) (scaled for BSA) Nr of exchanges per day (Nr) Gl Peritoneal permeability (D/P Creatinine) Ultrafilration volume (VUF) Drained volume (VPD ) = (Vf x Nr) + VuF 2L x 5 + 2L C J Stefanidis 2001 Peritoneal equilibration test 95 children 1.1 L/1.73 m2 PD 2.5%. D/P 1 Creatinine 0.88 High 0.77 High avg. 0.64 Low avg. 0.51 0.37 Low 0.8 0.6 0.5 0,8 0,6 0.35 0,4 ` 0.25 0,2 0 0 1 2 Time (hour) 3 4 Warady BA J Am Soc Nephrol 1996 C J Stefanidis 2001 Creatinine adequacy parameters Wt: 70 kg 5 exchanges of 2 L UF 2 L Muscle mass catabolism S. creatinine 12 mg/dl ΤBW Creatinine Creatinine clearance = D/Pcreat. x VPD / S 0.7 60 PD Creatinine x 12 L x7x1.73m2 / 1.7m2 L/1.73m2/week = D/Pcreat. x VPD x S cr /Wt = (0.7 x 120 dl x 12 mg/dl) / 70 kg = 14.4 mg/kg/day C J Stefanidis 2001 Creatinine adequacy parameters Wt: 70 kg 5 exchanges of 2 L UF 2 L Muscle mass catabolism 14 mg/dl ΤBW S. creatinine Creatinine Creatinine clearance = D/Pcreat. x VPD / S 0.6 50 x 12 L x7x1.73m2 / 1.7m2 L/1.73m2/week PD Creatinine = D/Pcreat. x VPD x S cr /`Wt = (0.6 x 120 dl x 14 mg/dl) / 70 kg = 14.4 mg/kg/day C J Stefanidis 2001 Creatinine adequacy parameters Wt: 70 kg 5 exchanges of 2 L UF 2 L Muscle mass catabolism 12 mg/dl ΤBW S. creatinine Creatinine Creatinine clearance = D/Pcreat. x VPD / S 0.6 50 10 x 12 L x7x1.73m2 / 1.7m2 L PD /1.73m2/week L Ur /1.73m2/week PD Creatinine + Urine Creatinine C J Stefanidis 2001 Urine volume (ml) before, 1 and 2 years after dialysis 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 HD PD J Feber et al. Ped Nephrol 1994. C J Stefanidis 2001 Urea adequacy parameters Wt: 70 kg 5 exchanges of 2 L UF 2 L Protein catabolism 70 mg/dl BUN ΤBW BUN Kt/Vurea = D/Purea x VPD / ΤBW = 1 x (10+2) x 7 L / 42 = 2 ΤBW = 0.6 x Wt = 42 L UNA = D/Purea x VPD x BUN / Wt PNA = 6.25 x UNA (g/kg) + 0.5 = 1.2 C J Stefanidis 2001 Urea adequacy parameters Wt: 70 kg 5 exchanges of 2 L UF 2 L Protein catabolism BUN mg/dl ΤBW 70 Kt/Vurea = D/Purea x VPD / 0.6 x Wt = 1 x (10+2) x 7 L / 42 = 2 UNA = D/Purea x VPD x BUN / Wt PNA = 6.25 x UNA (g/kg) + 0.5 = 1.2 C J Stefanidis 2001 Urea adequacy parameters Wt: 70 kg 5 exchanges of 2 L UF 2 L Protein catabolism 70 mg/dl ΤBW BUN Kt/Vurea = 187 x PNA - 0.5 BUN = 2 PNA = 1.2 C J Stefanidis 2001 Weight: 70 kg S=1.7m2 ΤΒW =42 L Weight: 35 kg S=1.2m2 ΤΒW= 21 L BUN 70 Weight: S=0.6m2 ΤΒW: 8.5 L mg/dl 1.7 g/kg/day PNA 1.2 g/kg/day Kt/Vurea = 187 (PNA - 0.5) / BUN 2 3.2 14 kg 2 g/kg/day 4 C J Stefanidis 2001 Weight: 70 kg S=1.7m2 ΤΒW =42 L Weight: 35 kg S=1.2m2 ΤΒW= 21 L BUN 90 mg/dl Weight: S=0.6m2 ΤΒW: 8.5 L Increase of 23% 1.7 g/kg/day PNA 1.2 g/kg/day Kt/Vurea = 187 (PNA - 0.5) / BUN 1.5 2.4 14 kg 2 g/kg/day 3.1 Decrease of 23% C J Stefanidis 2001 Weight: 70 kg S=1.7m2 ΤΒW =42 L Weight: 35 kg S=1.2m2 ΤΒW= 21 L Weight: 14 kg S=0.6m2 ΤΒW: 8.5 L Serum creatinine 12 mg/dl 7 mg/dl 5 mg/dl Creatinine of urine and PD 15 mg /kg/day Creatinine clearance (L/week/1.73m2) 61 76 85 C J Stefanidis 2001 Weight: 70 kg S=1.7m2 ΤΒW =42 L Weight: 35 kg Weight: S=1.2m2 ΤΒW= 21 L S=0.6m2 ΤΒW: 8.5 L 5 mg/dl 6 mg/dl Serum creatinine 12 mg/dl 7 mg/dl Creatinine of urine and PD 14 kg Increase of 16.6 % 15 mg /kg/day Creatinine clearance (L/week/1.73m2) 61 76 85 71 C J Stefanidis 2001 Creatinine and urea adequacy parameters Muscle mass catabolism Protein intake Kt/Vurea Creatinine clearance D/Purea x VPD = ΤBW D/Pcreat x VPD = S = 60 L/1.73m2/week Creatinine of urine and PD =2 PNA C J Stefanidis 2001 Ratio of Creat. Clearance / Kt/Vurea Creat clearance D/Pcr x BW = Kt/Vurea D/Pur XS C J Stefanidis 2001 D/P of urea and creatinine D/P Urea 1.0 0.5 0.9 0.75 0.65 0.5 1 2 Creatinine 4 hours C J Stefanidis 2001 Ratio of Creat. Clearance / Kt/Vurea CAPD Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis D/P cr 0.7 D/P Ur 1 NIPD Kt/Vurea 2 VPD 12 L Nocturnal intermittent peritoneal dialysis D/P cr D/P Ur Day Cr. clearance 60 Night 0.50 0.85 VPD 14 L Cr. clearance 50 Kt/Vurea 2 C J Stefanidis 2001 Ratio of Creat. Clearance / Kt/Vurea CAPD Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis D/P cr 0.7 D/P Ur 1 NIPD Kt/Vurea 2 68 2.1 VPD 12 L Nocturnal intermittent peritoneal dialysis D/P cr D/P Ur Day Cr. clearance 60 Night 0.50 0.85 Cr. clearance 50 Kt/Vurea VPD 14 L RRF 2 Cr. clearance Kt/Vurea 58 2.1 8 0.1 C J Stefanidis 2001 Automated peritoneal dialysis Nocturnal intermittent peritoneal dialysis NIPD Continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis CCPD Continuous optimal peritonal dialysis COPD Night Day C J Stefanidis 2001 Weight: 70 kg Weight: 35 kg S=1.7m2 ΤΒW =42 L Creat clearance S=1.2m2 ΤΒW= 21 L D/P cr x VPD x 1.73m2 /S D/Purea x VPD / BW x0.6 14 kg S=0.6m2 ΤΒW: 8.5 L D/Pcr x = 1.04 x = Kt/Vurea Expected Ratio Weight: BW D/Pur X S 30 21 17 Creatinine clearance Kt/Vurea 60 75 80 2 3 4 Ratio 30 25 20 C J Stefanidis 2001 Ratio of Creat. Clearance / Kt/Vurea Creat clearance D/Pcr x BW = Kt/Vurea Ratio D/Pur XS Ratio Residual renal function Residual renal function PD volume and number of exchanges PD volume and number of exchanges hyperpermeable state C J Stefanidis 2001 Conclusions The residual renal function is an important component of the adequacy parameters. Early initiation of PD might preserve RRF Nephrotoxic medicines deteriorate RRF C J Stefanidis 2001 Conclusions Both Kt/Vurea and creatinine clearance should be used for the assessment of dialysis adequacy The age differences of the ratio cr. clearance /Kt/Vurea have to do with the ratio: ΒWt / S The final outcome might relate with the ratio: MDt/P * * MD time/Patient C J Stefanidis 2001