Andrew Nagy, Serials Solutions Scott Garrison, Western Michigan University Master’s level private Catholic university Undergrad enrollment = ~6,000 One main library ~850,000 bibliographic.
Download
Report
Transcript Andrew Nagy, Serials Solutions Scott Garrison, Western Michigan University Master’s level private Catholic university Undergrad enrollment = ~6,000 One main library ~850,000 bibliographic.
Andrew Nagy, Serials Solutions
Scott Garrison, Western Michigan University
Master’s level private Catholic university
Undergrad enrollment = ~6,000
One main library
~850,000 bibliographic records
~300 subscription databases
Voyager, SFX, MetaLib
Carnegie research university
Undergrad enrollment = 25,000+
5 libraries serving multiple sites statewide
1.6M+ bibliographic records
400+ databases
4,500+ print journals
42,000+ online journals
Voyager, SFX, CONTENTdm, Luna
Hasn’t kept up with Web, users’ expectations
Limited customization
Antiquated, rigid search technologies
Designed for known-item searching
Libraries have set expectations, learned to
compensate accordingly
More every year in multiple packages
More alternatives, more confusion
Multiple A-Z lists to maintain, use
Interfaces change regularly
Query syntax varied, requires instruction???
“The version of ______ I teach is _______”
Allows some general, discipline searching
Mixed, incomplete results
As slow as the slower silos
If local, very network-inefficient
Many different metadata schemas, less
sophisticated searching
Vendor acquisitions, consolidation, catch-up
Open source options are emerging
Some products are still years away
All of the above leads to great FUD
dis⋅cov⋅er [di-skuhv-er]
–verb (used with object)
1. to see, get knowledge of, learn of, find, or find out;
gain sight or knowledge of (something previously
unseen or unknown): to discover America; to discover
electricity.
2. to notice or realize: I discovered I didn't have my
credit card with me when I went to pay my bill.
3. Archaic. to make known; reveal; disclose.
Searching for the 21st century
Built on 21st century technology
Highly configurable interfaces
Puts our metadata to better use
Works for OPAC and other silos but relies on
federated search, though evolving
Broad discovery of both known and
unknown items in our collections, not just in
their discipline
Be more like Google: simple, easy, fast
fewer places to look for more kinds of content
big recall is OK as long as most relevant is first
get to the actual item in fewest clicks possible
Provides simple, easy access to the library’s
local collections
Supplements “classic” OPAC
Refines searches with “facets”
Includes external sources and community
features
Wikipedia, tagging
Open source
VuFind
Blacklight
eXtensible Catalog
built on Lucene/Solr/Drupal
Commercial
AquaBrowser
WorldCat Local
Primo
Encore
Endeca
Mellon Award for Technology Collaboration
winner 2008!
ILS-agnostic, runs alongside OPAC
Works for libraries of all sizes
Uses Apache Solr and AJAX
Feature rich
text messaging, Wikipedia author biographies,
tagging and commenting, public lists
alpha fall 2008, beta spring 2009, “1.0” fall 2009
Customized the source in a variety of ways
SolrMARC importer, Voyager driver
search definitions, indexes, facet display
Usability tested 2008-2009
Still tweaking our indexes, relevance
“1.2” version coming spring 2010
Has helped us around limitations in Voyager
Recall => huge adjustment for librarians
Has prompted us to reconsider how we work
Themes from usability testing
fewer failed searches
user less likely to give up searching
users curious about things like tagging
Librarians, users
will use Amazon to find and discover
will use Google to find and discover
will use del.icio.us to find and discover
Then they use the library catalog/website to
find out if the library has it (link resolver
buttons help even if it’s in five silos)
Local index of collections: MARC, OAI, etc.
Simple, elegant interfaces
Customizable
Mashups
Tuned relevancy ranking
Facets
Citation management tools
Links to value-adds like ILL, recommenders
Why only local collections?
What about article content?
What if users want to discover items outside
their discipline-specific databases?
Can’t we do better than federated search?
Web-scale dis⋅cov⋅er [web skeyl di-skuhv-er]
- adjective-noun pairing
Harvesting, ingesting, and normalizing an extensive
amount of container and subcontainer metadata in a
scalable infrastructure that many institutions can share
rather than traditional “hosted services”.
Unifies local and subscription content
digital or physical books, e-journal articles,
databases, etc.
library catalog, publishers, open access, etc.
Web-scale repository
Highly tuned relevancy
Pluggable API for “shopping mall” access
March 2009: became beta partner
April 2009: delivered catalog records
May 2009: had Summon instance
June 2009: used internally, refined e holdings
Summer 2009: kept improving
September 2009: linked to it on our site
Fall 2009: user testing
Even bigger adjustment for library staff
Has reminded us of record problems
Shows known OpenURL target problems
How to present it along with VuFind?
the NGC is a subset of the W-sD
we’ve already tweaked the NGC pretty far
W-sD’s interface is similar to NGC
how to incorporate link resolver data?
Keep the NGC for containers and W-sD for
everything else
use limits in query string to exclude containers
means two separate, different interfaces to
choose from
Use your NGC’s interface to query the W-sD’s
index
radio button for containers vs. non?
unified results, or tabs?
limits you to NGC’s interface? Toggle?
opportunity to tweak the NGC closer to W-sD
subjects and other facets likely vary between
them
Use only the W-sD and scrap the NGC
impractical after heavy NGC investment and
adjustment
Use the APIs you have for the NGC, W-sD,
and link resolver and build your own mashup
of all of them
requires a heavy investment of resources
involves merging functional requirements for
three separate systems into one
requires very careful project management,
keeping scope creep, long tail issues to a
minimum
questions?
[email protected]
[email protected]