Chapter 9 Intermediate Sanctions and Community Corrections Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th the arguments for intermediate sanctions traditional probation does not work with most offenders; they need more
Download ReportTranscript Chapter 9 Intermediate Sanctions and Community Corrections Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th the arguments for intermediate sanctions traditional probation does not work with most offenders; they need more
Chapter 9 Intermediate Sanctions and Community Corrections Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th the arguments for intermediate sanctions traditional probation does not work with most offenders; they need more but imprisonment is too much: too restrictive for many offenders justice is best served by options between these extremes probation I prison Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th “continuum of sanctions” definition a range of correctional management strategies which vary in degrees of intrusiveness & control over an offender; the offender is moved up or down along the continuum, based on his or her response to correctional programs along the spectrum of options… Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th eg, continuum of sanctions most severe 10 9 8 7 6 5 least severe 4 3 2 1 0 probat. int. supr v. prob. r esti t./ fi ne com m. ser v. subst. abuse tr tmt day r eport. house arr est/ montr . hal fway house boot camp pri son & jail Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th annual costs of prison vs. intermediate sanctions $25,000 $23,707 Data are for Colorado, Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia. $20,000 $17,794 $15,000 $12,494 $12,494 $10,000 $2,781 $2,759 $2,292 $2,011 $5,000 $869 $402 $0 boot cam p pri s on h alfway h ou se jai l day reptg com m. s erv. ISP e le ct. probat. mon i tor h ou se arre s t Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th “community corrections acts” definition legislative enactments in a number of states which provide financial incentives for local governments to keep offenders in local corrections agencies/programs, rather than sending them to state prisons eg, old “California Probation Subsidy” program Minnesota = 1st CCA, 1973; currently 27 states 3 aims: keep people out of prison; by providing help in community reduce tax revenues spent on corrections reduce prison populations; save beds for hard-core offenders Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th administration of intermediate sanctions? the judiciary the community the institution • restitution • pretrial diversion • fines (>$1billion/yr) • forfeiture (RICO; >$1 billion-drugs) • intensive supervision • work furlough • electronic monitoring • medical treatment • home confinement • drugs • day reporting centers • psychological • probation center • day reporting ctr • restitution center • shock incarceration • fire, forestry camps • boot camp • intermittent sent. Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th “day fine” definition a financial criminal penalty based on the amount of income an offender earns in a day’s work; in X days of income effect, offender is sentenced to a specified number of days’ worth of income, irrespective of his or her individual income level Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th “restitution” definition compensation for financial, physical, or emotional loss caused by an offender, in the form of either monetary payment to the victim (or a public fund for crime victims) or work at a service project in the community Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th problems with intermediate sanctions selecting selecting the agency (who administers?) offender (who should receive?) selecting the sentence widening the net based on offense severity? based on offender needs? the troublesome issue of “stakes” problem of interchangeability wider nets (catch more offenders) stronger nets (harder to escape control) different nets (different kinds of control) Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th “stakes” definition the potential losses to victims & CJS if offender fails; stakes include injury from new crimes + public pressure resulting from negative publicity relevance: most “appropriate” sentence may not be “available” because of public/political pressure/concerns. eg, high-profile offender simply can’t be paroled or put on probation. Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th “principle of interchangeability” definition idea that different types of intermediate sanction can be calibrated so that they may be compared quantitatively with one other, despite significant differences in approach Are these the same? Which is equivalent to another? 4 months of boot camp? or 12 months of home confinement? or 8 months of community service? or $10,000? Clear & Cole, American Corrections, 6th