Data Collection in the U.S. BLS’ CES Survey New Frontiers for Data Collection October 31 – November 2, 2012 Geneva, Switzerland Ken Robertson, Assistant Commissioner Bureau.

Download Report

Transcript Data Collection in the U.S. BLS’ CES Survey New Frontiers for Data Collection October 31 – November 2, 2012 Geneva, Switzerland Ken Robertson, Assistant Commissioner Bureau.

Data Collection in the U.S.
BLS’ CES Survey
New Frontiers for Data Collection
October 31 – November 2, 2012
Geneva, Switzerland
Ken Robertson, Assistant Commissioner
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Outline

Current Employment Statistics
(CES) Survey Background

A History of Data Collection in CES

Current CES Data Collection
CES Background




Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) CES survey is also
known as the payroll or the establishment survey.
Each month the CES program surveys approximately
141,000 businesses representing 486,000 individual
worksites.
Collection days before first release of the data varies
each month, ranging from 10-16 days.
About 25% of the non-certainty businesses are
rotated out-of-sample each year
Major Uses of CES Data
Economic indicator – one of the earliest
available each month
 These data are used to publish 4 news
releases each month: 2 national, and 2 subnational

Publish employment, hours, and earnings by
industry and geography

Input to other economic series
History of CES Data
Collection

1915 – 1983
Data were collected almost exclusively by Mail in a
decentralized environment
Collection rates were typically between 40%-50%
for 1st release of the data, 90% for the final

A mail shuttle form was utilized
Computer Assisted Telephone
Interviewing

1984: CES CATI – testing started

1987: Large-scale CATI test, involved
11 States, lasted 7 years, and ended
with a test size of 5,500 cases

1995: Collecting about 10,000 cases per
month via CATI
Touchtone Data Entry

1987: CES began to experiment with
TDE as a way to lower collection costs
compared to CATI – but to retain a
higher response rate than achieved by
mail
Voice Recognition

1989 – CES briefly explored voice
recognition as a data collection
alternative
Electronic Data Interchange

1995 – the BLS began to hear from
larger employers, who were
participating in multiple BLS surveys,
that they wanted some way to reduce
their cost of participation

Developed the EDI Center to work with
these large multi-site businesses
FAX

1995: BLS developed FAX collection for
medium size firms.

Used for collection where CATI is too
burdensome, but business is not large
enough for EDI
One Point TDE
1996: BLS developed the One-Point
TDE system to take over the TDE
responsibility for two states. Up to this
point each state had independently
maintained their own TDE system and
helpdesk.
 By 2004 all states transferred their TDE
operations to the One Point TDE

Web
1996: tested Web-based collection system
 1998: decided to support Web collection.
 2004 - CES started using the Internet Data
Collection Facility (IDCF), a centralized
service utilized for multiple BLS surveys

WEB-LITE

2004: CES decided to try a streamlined
version of Web-based collection.
E-Mail & Web-FTP


2006 – tested email collection; utilized embedded
HTML that allowed respondent to access BLS website
Problems encountered because of different HTML
rendering standards employed by different email
clients
Web-FTP


2007: BLS began utilizing a spreadsheet data
collection form that the State of West Virginia had
developed for medium sized firms
Offered to respondents who have at least 5 worksites
but less than 100
A New Form
2011: Started a field test of a major redesign
to the form, which had not changed
significantly from the 1-page grid design since
1939
 New form is a 4-page form, printed on 11” X
17”, folded to produce four 8½” X 11” pages

Collection Form: 1915-2012
New Form - Outside
Front-introduction
Back-Thank You
New Form - Inside
Left -Instructions
Right-Data
History of major innovations
in CES data collection
1915 – 1983: Mail
1984: CATI
1987: Touchtone Data Entry (TDE)
1989: Voice-Recognition
1995: EDI, FAX
1996: One-Point TDE, WEB
2004: Web-Lite, IDCF
2006: Email
2007: WebFTP
2011: New Form
Current CES Data
Collection
Current Methods
 Costs
 Collection Rates

CES Methods: Data Collection
Current CES sample is collected through
a variety of methods: CATI, Fax, TDE,
Web, EDI, WebFTP
 CATI yields highest response rates but
is the most expensive
 Providing options helps sustain
response rates in a voluntary survey
 Collection modes have evolved; away
from mail to automated methods

CES Collection Environment

Challenging, especially for 1st preliminary: CES
has 10-16 days for collection

Reference period is the pay period including the
12th

Collection begins as early as the 13th of the
reference month, continues until 6:00 pm
Monday, for the Employment Situation release,
typically the first Friday of the month
 some firms do not have payroll available until after 1st
preliminary cut-off
AE Collection Rates: 1st and 3rd Closings,
January 2003 to Present
100
90
80
70
60
1st Closing
50
40
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
3rd Closing
2009
2010
2011
2012
CES Collection Over Time
Table 1. Distribution of CES sample by collection mode over time
Collection
Mode
Mail
CATI
TDE
EDI
FAX
WEB
Other
1915
1993
2004
2011
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
86%
4
8
0
0
0
2
3%
20
27
30
14
1
5
0%
18
4
45
5
25
3
CES Collection Over Time
Table 2. Collection rates and costs by mode, 2011 Average
Mode
Collection rates
at first release
On-going
collection cost,
per unit
CATI
90.8%
$10.38
TDE
84.6%
$2.88
EDI
59.2%
$0.50
FAX
85.8%
$5.86
WEB
78.5%
$2.40
Other
Varies
Varies
Concluding Remarks




CES data collection is a very large monthly
operation with critical deadlines leading to
multiple news releases each month
Operations are managed centrally, and conducted
in 4 Data Collection Centers, and an Electronic
Data Interchange Center
Data from about 141,000 businesses representing
486,000 establishments are collected each month
using various modes of collection
Transition from decentralized operations in over
50 states has resulted in substantial efficiencies
Concluding Remarks

Managing multi-modal operations is very
challenging
 must have highly qualified and motivated professional
staff to pay attention to all the moving parts
 must fix problems quickly
 Must monitor distribution among modes closely to
maximize response with available funding

Must continue to innovate and take advantage of
new technologies – where it makes sense
 To maintain high collection rates
 To take advantage of new efficiencies
Contact Information
Ken Robertson
Assistant Commissioner
Industry Employment Statistics
202-691-5440
[email protected]