Exporting Raw/ESD data from Tier-0 Tier-1s Wrap-up The problem (Bernd) • One copy of the LHC raw data for each of the LHC.
Download ReportTranscript Exporting Raw/ESD data from Tier-0 Tier-1s Wrap-up The problem (Bernd) • One copy of the LHC raw data for each of the LHC.
Exporting Raw/ESD data from Tier-0 Tier-1s Wrap-up The problem (Bernd) • One copy of the LHC raw data for each of the LHC experiments is shared among the Tier-1’s • Full copies of the ESD data (1/2 of raw data size) • Total ~10PB/year exported from CERN • The full machinery for doing this automatically should be in place for full-scale tests in 2006 Tier-1 resources TRIUMF • 2 machines purchased, 1Gbit(?) RAL • Gbit link at present • Parallel activities from ATLAS and CMS • Not enough effort to dedicate for the moment • More hardware in September FNAL • Just finished CMS DC – very labor intensive • Enough resources to sustain 2TB/day GridKA • 1Gbit at present, expanding to 10Gbit in October/November • Storage system is ready (dCache + TSM) BNL • SRM service almost ready (in a month) •One gridftp node • OC12 connection, not much used NIKHEF/SARA • 10Gbit since more than a year •Running data challenges for experiments but mainly CPU intensive IN2P3/Lyon • Not yet ready with interface to MSS • 1Gbit Agreed tests 1. 2. 3. 4. Simple disk-to-disk, peer-to-peer Simple disk-to-disk, one-to-many MSS-to-MSS In parallel? a) Transfer scheduling b) Replica catalogue & management Test 1: Simple test • disk to disk: gridftp or bbftp (loadbalanced) • Aggregated peer-to-peer transfers • Files written, deleted and rewritten (process driven from CERN) • ~3 weeks preparation • Goal: 1 week running “without” intervention • Tier-1 responsibility: tune gridftp headnodes for best transfer performance Test 2: simple but one-to-many • Additional Tier-0 complexity: export data to more than one Tier-1 in parallel Test 3: slide in MSS • Issue with SRM interoperability – GGF/GSM WG initiative to define a SRMv1.1 evolution ‘SRM-basic’ • Standardized error reporting Test 4/5 (parallel) • Test 4: slot in transfer scheduling: a scheduling service controls the replication • Test 5: add Replica catalogue and management services Timescales TRIUMF RAL FNAL June July one-to-many? BNL Aug Transfer scheduling Sept Oct SRM-Basic ready(?) Nov Dec Jan’05 Next steps • Statements from the other Tier-1’s – NIKHEF, GridKA, Lyon – PIC, CNAF, others? • • • • Who is driving/coordinating? site contacts? Meetings ? Speed up SRM-basic specification process ...