Transcript Environmental Scan --Strategic Planning 2009- 2010 •FT/FT Freshman – Fall 2008 Percentage of Total Enrollment •6-Year Graduation Rates -- Fall 2003 Cohort •Residential.

Environmental Scan
--Strategic Planning 2009- 2010
•FT/FT Freshman – Fall 2008 Percentage of Total Enrollment
•6-Year Graduation Rates -- Fall 2003 Cohort
•Residential Students – Fall 2008 First-Time, First-Year & All Undergraduates
•Undergraduate Minority Students -- Fall 2008
•Acceptance versus Enrollment – Fall 2008 First-Time, Full-Time Students
•Acceptance versus Enrollment – Fall 2008 Transfer Students
•Top 10 universities USI students transfer from
•Student / Faculty Ratio – Fall 2008
24%
23%
23%
24%
22%
17%
18%
19%
15%
USI
IUPU - Ball State Indiana Indiana Purdue
Fort
State U. University
Wayne
Southern
Ill U.
Murray
State
Western
Kentucky
U.
73%
43%
72%
43%
45%
49%
47%
35%
26%
USI
IUPU Fort *Ball State Indiana
Indiana Purdue
Wayne (Fall 2002) State U. University
Southern
Ill U.
Murray
State
Western
Kentucky
U.
98%
91%
89%
79%
73%
70%
74%
63%
43%
38%
36%
33%
30%
Indiana
Indiana
State U. University
Purdue
Southern
Ill U.
28%
36%
31%
20%
7%
USI
IUPU Fort
Wayne
Ball State
Freshman
All Undergraduates
Murray Western
State
Kentucky
(Fall '07)
U.
25%
20%
20%
17%
15%
11%
12%
11%
9%
USI
IUPU Fort Ball State Indiana Indiana
Purdue
Wayne
State U. University
Southern
Ill U.
Murray
State
Western
Kentucky
U.
Acceptance Rate
Enrolled Rate
96%
94%
88%
86%
73%
66%
58%
72%
71%
69%
48%
46%
28%
USI
IUPU Fort Ball State
Wayne
26%
24%
Indiana
Indiana
State U. University
24%
Purdue
45%
23%
Southern Murray
Ill U.
State
Western
Kentucky
U.
Acceptance Rate
Enrolled Rate
96%
81%
78%74%
63% 64%
80%
61%
60%
53%
51%
42%
32%
25%
USI
IUPU Fort Ball State
Wayne
85%
Indiana
Indiana
State U. University
45%
41%
30%
Purdue
Southern
Ill U.
Murray
State
Western
Kentucky
U.
Name of Institution
# of Transfer Students
1
Ivy Tech Community College – Evansville Campus
120
2
Vincennes University
117
3
University of Evansville
52
4
Henderson Community College
44
5
Indiana University – Bloomington Campus
40
6
Southeastern Illinois College
33
7
IECC Wabash Valley College
27
8
Indiana State University
27
9
Owensboro Community and Technical College
27
10
Indiana Univ./Purdue Univ. Indianapolis
26
Total Fall 2009 Transfer Students:
1200
22
17
USI
16
IUPU Fort Ball State
Wayne
18
19
18
17
16
Southern
Ill U.
Murray
State
14
Indiana
Indiana
State U. University
Purdue
Western
Kentucky
U.
•For Students
•For Programs
•USI Programs in proposal stage for 2009- 2011 implementation
The % of students who sent SAT scores to USI and
other schools when applying for colleges









45%
39%
30%
29%
26%
20%
13%
12%
7%
IU Bloomington
Ball State
Purdue - W. Lafayette
Indiana State University
IUPUI
University of Evansville
Vincennes University
University of Indianapolis
Butler University
Source: College Board: 2009 College-Bound Seniors College/University Basic Report for USI

Additional bachelor degrees at Vincennes U
 Education, Nursing, Technology
• Indiana State University online-only programs
 10 undergraduate, 7 Masters level, and 18 certificate programs
• University of Evansville has some majors we do not
offer:
 Executive MBA, Civil/Electrical/Mechanical Engineering, Classical
Studies, Environmental Administration, Latin American Studies,
Music, Neuroscience, Physical Therapy doctoral degree, and
Religion.

Undergraduate
 Anthropology
 Arts & Heritage







Management
Biochemistry*
Business Economics
Business/Engineering
Health Informatics
International Business
Respiratory Therapy
Sports Management
* Already approved by ICHE

Graduate
 Communication
 MSW in Administration
 Special Education
/Exceptional Needs
•Top 10 Higher Education State Policy Issues for 2010
•Top 10 national trends for higher education
•Impact of the Spelling’s Report
•Impact of the Core Transfer Library
1.
2.
States’ fiscal crises
President Obama’s American Graduation Initiative
(lead the world in college grads by 2010 & all adults complete at least 1 year of college or
training).
Tuition policies & price increases
Record enrollment
Reduced funding for state student aid programs
Focus on & expanded funding for community colleges
Expansion of statewide data systems and new
reporting metrics
8. Veterans Education – Post 9/11 GI bill
9. Academically unprepared students
10. Concerns about K-12 teacher quality
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
21st Century Trends for Higher Education
1. Students as Early Adopters: Adults ages 18–26 are typically the
first to adopt new technologies and their schools to have the infrastructure
to support the latest technologies.
2. Globalization: The demand for higher education globally has increased
and will continue to grow and universities are competing internationally for
resources, faculty, the best students, and education funding. Overseas
expansion creates opportunities for students and faculty in terms of exchange
programs and expanded campus environments.
3. Technical and information literacy:
Ongoing need to create a
campus culture that encourages faculty to use computers, smart devices, and
other innovative tools in their curricula. Students may be device-savvy, but
they may not necessarily be information-savvy.
Top 10 National Trends
in Higher Education (# 4 - 6)
4. Enrollment, retention, and branding:
Growing recognition
that the Internet is a viable way to market academic programs to prospective students
while enhancing the school’s brand. The presence of schools in virtual online
communities such as Second Life helps enhance the brand and YouTube’s education
channels and iTunes U are effective not only for teaching and learning, but also for
marketing a university’s strengths.
5. Mobility:
One-third of the 97 percent of college students who own a cell
phone no longer use land lines to make voice calls. Tasks range from administrative
(registration), to academic (downloading class materials), to social (instant messaging),
to functional (checking transportation schedules), to keeping track of ideas
(www.evernote.com).
6. Pedagogical centers and innovative campus
commons Creating social gathering, computer gaming areas, and collaborative
seating arrangements. Campus commons are evolving to become key locations where
technologies can be showcased and explored.
7. Evolution of teaching and learning: Ongoing evolution from oneto-one (teacher to student) to collaborative learning. Open source course-management
systems such as Moodle (http://moodle.org) and similar systems on Facebook are just
some applications being reconfigured to support more content and student Open-content
initiatives—such as OpenCourseWare from MIT, and the Research Impact Initiative and
open content website from UC Berkeley—continue to grow, along with book digitization
programs first initiated by Google.
8. Collaboration:
Universities are seeking new ways to facilitate collaboration to
enhance research, classes, foreign exchanges, alumni relationships, and private sector
partnerships. A variety of venues have emerged to make collaboration easier and more
accessible by using virtual meeting-place and application-sharing tools such as Cisco®
WebEx® TelePresence enables participants to conduct virtual meetings from nearly any
location worldwide, creating a sense of “being there in-person.” Virtual locations in Second
Life are creating alternative collaboration spaces, and emerging technologies are paving
the way to integrate, or blend, virtual and physical realities.
9. Strategic plans and technology: Budget and efficiency are ongoing
concerns in higher education. “Cloud computing”—a process that allows files and data to be
stored on a remote network using the Internet—is one approach that may potentially lower
certain costs (e.g. IT).
10. Edutainment:
Higher-education content and entertainment (edutainment) are
becoming more intertwined. Professors are now using iTunes & YouTube podcasts videos
that contain both educational and entertainment value. More than 120 schools have a
presence in Second Life, using these virtual spaces for socializing, teaching, learning, and
branding.




A significant push to expand access, by reducing academic
and non-academic barriers to entry.
Performance based outcome measures will increasingly be
used to gauge effectiveness/funding allocations.
Called to produce innovation in pedagogies, technologies,
and curricula (particularly in STEM).
http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/final-report.pdf
USI is well positioned because of our niche as a
high-access, affordable institution.
We are continually improving quality, and are already
innovative in these areas.





CTL is a list of courses that will transfer among all Indiana public colleges &
universities.
Over 80 courses have been approved to come into USI—primarily core
courses or introductory courses. USI tends to be an “importer” of credits.
Growing numbers of students have at least some of their course work
completed elsewhere, which is significant for completion of the Core
curriculum.
Increase in the “swirl,” as students have coursework from multiple
institutions, transferring from place to place or taking simultaneous courses
from various universities.
CAP and early college courses further enhance/complicate the transfer
picture.
Over the next 5 years, USI will continue to grapple with the
changing nature of transfer students and how to best
serve them.
•National Trends
•USI Enrollment in Distance Education Courses
•USI Distance Education Offerings
•USI Degrees available primarily through distance education

Increased competition for online courses from for-profits
and certification entities (ex. University of Phoenix)

Software costs have skyrocketed resulting in increased
use of open-source alternatives for providing online
courses

Increased concerns regarding validity of student work in
online environments, resulting in new products and
services to verify student identity.

Develop of new technologies and techniques for teaching
applied courses such as chemistry labs, biology
dissection, etc.
# of students taking 1 or more DE courses
4000
3560
3500
2815
3000
2421
2500
2009
2000
1538
1500
1000
500
0
293 432
731
981
1196
3101 3223
3804
# of USI students enrolled in only DE coursescourses
1200
1000
800
642
600
426
400
200
0
321
42
132
152
204
503
723
807
874
950
1009
450
408
400
367
350
300
250
338
338
342
335
298
298
246
200
133
150
100
338
324
158
183
178
188
208
83
50
0
# of unique DE courses offered
# of DE sections offered

Undergraduate Degree Programs
 Health Services
 Nursing
 Radiologic and Imaging Sciences

Master’s Degree Programs




Health Administration
Nursing
Occupational Therapy
Social Work
•Comparison of Indiana State Schools – Tuition versus State Appropriations
•State Funding Issues
•Changes in State Funding Formulas
$20,000
$18,000
$16,000
$7,749
$14,000
$8,280
$7,186
$12,000
$7,516
$10,000
$8,000
$5,078
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$0
Tuition '08-'09
Appropriation '08-'09
$9,749
$4,982
USI
$5,078
$4,982
Indiana
State
$7,186
$9,749
$10,987
$7,437
$9,252
Ball State
Purdue
IU
$7,516
$7,437
$7,749
$10,987
$8,280
$9,252

Significant decrease in state funding for USI 2010-2011
biennium
 4.70% or 3.9 million dollars (including a 1-time reversion of
$1,071,891)


No increases state operating appropriations in near
future
Changes in state funding formulas from enrollment to
performance based
Despite decreases and changes in state funding,
USI is well-positioned to weather the current
economic storm
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Increase in Degrees Incentive
Time to Degree Incentive
Low Income Degrees
Enrollment/Successfully Completed Credit Hours
Two-Year Transfer Incentive
Economic Development: Non-Credit Instruction –
Two Year Institutions Only
Research Support Incentive – Research Inst.
•External Grant Submissions
•External Grant Awards
2007-2008
2006-2007
2004-2005
2003-2004
2002-2003
2001-2002
2001-2002
2000-2001
1999-2000
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
1998-1999
2007-2008
2006-2007
2004-2005
2003-2004
2002-2003
2001-2002
2001-2002
2000-2001
1999-2000
1998-1999
Number Submitted
Percentage Funded
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
$3,000,000
$2,500,000
$2,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,000,000
$500,000
$0
•Carnegie Foundation Classification
•Extended Services
•College Achievement Program
•Extended Services – Program Expansion
•Extended Services – Key Partnerships
•Engagement of Faculty, Staff & Students 2007 -2009
•Service Learning Faculty, Staff and Student Engagement
•Regional Connectivity
•Extended Services Program Enrollments / Contracts 2009

On December 18, 2008, The Carnegie Foundation for the
Advancement of Teaching announced the University of
Southern Indiana was successful in its application for the
Community Engagement Classification.

This achievement recognizes USI’s ongoing collaboration
with the tri-state community and beyond in both
curricular engagement and outreach & partnerships.

Extended Services outreach activities comprised a
significant part of the application to the Carnegie
Foundation
Enrollments
Credit Hours
High Schools
Courses
Instructors
6000
6000
5000
100
4355
4000
3000
114
120
90
80
2866
65
60
2000
2000
977
1450
40
1000
20
0
0
30
15
42
39
22
26
*Spring 2010 semester numbers are estimated


1974 - Outreach programming beginning with the founding of
the Office of Continuing Educ.
2000 – Evolved into the Division of Extended Services with 4
core programming areas: Academic programs; Continuing education;
Cultural tourism; & Southern IN Japanese School

Since 2001, eight new comp0nents have been added, expanded
or reorganized:
 2001 - ROTC
 2006 - Connect with Southern Indiana & Center for Applied Research
 2007 - Center for Continuing Education, Center for Education Services &
Partnerships , Center for Human Resource Development, & Service
Learning
 2008 – USI at Innovation Pointe
Higher Education Partner @ Innovation Point
National Surface Warfare Center - Crane
 Town of New Harmony
 Indiana’s Historic Pathways
 Various P-12 schools and regional school corporations
 Tri-State Industrial Safety Council
 Mesker Park Zoo & Wesselman Nature Center
 Growth Alliance for Greater Evansville (GAGE)
 WIRED
 WorkOne / higher education partner for displaced Whirlpool
worker retraining
 And numerous other not-for-profit & for-profit organizations
throughout the region


700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Students
Staff
Faculty
Historic
Southern
Indiana
22
3
15
Applied
Research
134
21
87
Education
Services &
Partnerships
283
9
30
Continuing
Education
408
40
178
Human
Resource
Development
0
2
9
Historic New
Harmony
92
32
19
2500
2064
2000
1736
1500
870
1000
500
43
68
3
0
2007
87
7
2008
Faculty
Students
28
2009
Staff
Division of Extended Services Innovative Approaches
Connect with Southern Indiana regional leadership development program
Hi-Tech Incubator @ Innovation Pointe
Tech Transfer partnership with NSWC Crane and federal research labs
Cultural Tourism through Historic New Harmon & Historic Southern Indiana
Innovation Discovery Process collaboration with NSWC Crane
Support for expanding STEM outreach throughout the region
Broad spectrum of programming for children from preschool through high school
Support for Seeking and securing grant for outreach projects
Engagement of faculty and students through applied research
Funding faculty outreach research and adult learner scholarships
Investing program revenue in new program development and community service
Day on the Bus – a regional tour for faculty from USI and other institutions
Convener of regional higher education collaboration for workforce development / displaced
worker retraining efforts
15,000+
• Noncredit Enrollments
93
• Companies/Organizations Served
through Contracts
38
• Contracts for Applied Research
23
• Contracts for Human Resource
Development
•5 Year Trends in giving
•5 year private and public donations and grants
•Employee Donation Trends

Average annual support raised over past 5 years = $8,454,670

Private gift revenue is 6.7% of USI’s expenditures. This exceeds the
national average of 5.6% for public, master’s institutions.

Individuals provided approximately 58% public and private support

Foundations and Corporations provided an average of 31% USIF support,
with governmental grants providing the remaining 11%

Average fundraising cost is 18 cents per dollar raised.

The average return on investment is 531.6%.

Bequests to the University of Southern Indiana Foundation have
comprised an average of 32% of gifts from individuals over the past five
years. Nationally, bequests comprised 20% of gifts from individuals to
higher education in 2008.
FY 2005
FY 2006
FY 2007
FY 2008
FY 2009
Private Gifts
$7,582,162
$9,520,151
$5,406,216
$6,819,452
$3,547,416
Lilly Endowment
Grants
$2,676,446
$1,843,786
$0
$479,768
$0
Total for Private
Support
$10,258,608
$11,363,937
$5,406,216
$7,299,220
$3,547,416
$570,700
$294,438
$1,029,756
$929,925
$1,573,132
$10,829,308
$11,658,375
$6,435,972
$8,229,145
$5,120,548
Govt. Grants
Total for Public &
Private Support
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
$1,600
$1,400
$1,200
$1,000
$800
$600
$400
$200
$2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
2005
2006
2007
2008 2009
% of FT Adminstrators Donors
Avg Total Gift Per Adminstrator
% of FT Faculty Donors
Avg Total Gift Per FT Faculty
% of FT Support Staff Donors
Avg Total Gift per Support Staff
•Employee Headcount
•Employee Ethnicity
•Employment Activity
•Retirement Forecast
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
% Increase
Support staff
337
335
349
359
357
6%
Administrative
226
240
252
262
266
18%
Faculty
314
315
330
346
352
12%
Full-Time Benefit
Eligible Employees
877
890
931
967
975
11%
Retirees
113
119
129
147
155
37%
Headcount figures as of 12/31 of respective year at R:\HR\Budget\Budget work 200910\HRStatsAltStudthru2008.xlsx
Faculty
Administrative
Support
Staff
Nonresident alien
26
5
2
Black, non-Hispanic
4
7
11
American Indian/Alaska
Native
1
0
0
Asian/Pacific Islander
10
4
0
Hispanic
3
2
3
277
247
348
2
1
2
White, non-Hispanic
Race and ethnicity unknown
Ethnicity figures as of 11/1/08 from 2008 IPEDS
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Support staff openings
75
95
97
64
53
Administrative openings
36
45
52
33
29
111
140
149
97
82
74
90
81
77
44
185
230
230
174
126
14
10
12
10
11
20
28
39
15
5
3
Total Non-Faculty Openings
Faculty openings
Total Openings
Faculty Promotions
Internal Promotions and
Reclassifications
(non-faculty)
Internal Transfers
(non-faculty)
Age
Faculty
Admin
Support
Total
60 - 64
30
20
31
81
65+
20
5
6
31
Total
50
25
37
112
Total Employees
332
283
359
974
% 60+ yrs
15%
9%
10%
11%
Age
Academic
Affairs
Business Affairs
Student
Affairs
Univ. / Gov't
Rel
Dev/ President
60-64
38
25
10
5
2
65+
28
5
0
0
0
Total
66
30
10
5
2
Total Employees
534
268
98
33
41
% 60+yrs
12%
11%
10%
15%
5%