TPB SCENARIO STUDY Progress on “What Would it Take?” & “CLRP Aspirations” Scenarios Monica Bansal and Michael Eichler Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the.
Download ReportTranscript TPB SCENARIO STUDY Progress on “What Would it Take?” & “CLRP Aspirations” Scenarios Monica Bansal and Michael Eichler Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the.
1 TPB SCENARIO STUDY Progress on “What Would it Take?” & “CLRP Aspirations” Scenarios Monica Bansal and Michael Eichler Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB December 17, 2008 2 The Two New Scenarios What Would it Take? CLRP Aspirations Starts with COG regional CO2 goals and assesses what scales and combinations of interventions will be necessary to achieve the goal for the transportation sector. Draws on past studies and public outreach to provide an ambitious yet attainable vision of land use and transportation for the 2010 CLRP update and to eventually serve as an unconstrained long range plan. 3 Study Timeline 4 The Two New Scenarios What Would it Take? CLRP Aspirations Starts with COG regional CO2 goals and assesses what scales and combinations of interventions will be necessary to achieve the goal for the transportation sector. Draws on past studies and public outreach to provide an ambitious yet attainable vision of land use and transportation for the 2010 CLRP update and to eventually serve as an unconstrained long range plan. 5 Setting up the WWIT Scenario Goal: To reduce CO2 emissions by 10% in 2012, and 20% and 80% below 2005 levels in 2020 and 2050 respectively 3 categories of strategies to reduce mobile CO2 emissions USE of FLEET FLEET Fuel Efficiency Beyond CAFE standards [currently 35 mpg by 2020] Fuel Carbon Intensity Travel Efficiency Alternative fuels (biofuels, hydrogen, electricity) Reduce VMT through changes in land use, travel behavior, prices Reduce congestion Improve operational efficiency 6 Analyzing the WWIT Scenario 3 categories of analysis for each strategy 1. Effectiveness 2. Cost-effectiveness 3. Timeframe for Implementation 7 Products “Sliders” metaphor Different combinations of interventions can be assessed for cost-effectiveness and feasibility. 8 An Example Combination: Represents the minimum reductions from current national policies and, therefore, the maximum regional burden. 9 10 11 12 Further review of 1st 2 categories What could the maximum look like? EU will have 47 mpg gasoline car fleet fuel efficiency in 2012 (China currently is at 43 mpg) Penetration of new technologies possibly high Plug-in hybrids at 80% of fleet in 2050? Reduces emissions by up to 70% 13 Analyzing the WWIT Scenario 3 categories of analysis for each strategy 1. Effectiveness 2. Cost-effectiveness 3. Timeframe for Implementation 14 Cost-effectiveness How can we begin to prioritize strategies? Initial analysis of cost-effectiveness of Transportation Emissions Reduction Measures ($ per ton of CO2 reduced) Number Category Description CO2 Cost Effectiveness Range * 1 Telecommute Programs $10 to $40 2 Signal Optimization $30 to $50 3 Park & Ride Lots (Transit and HOV) $100 to $500 4 Transit Service improvements $100 to $800 15 The Two New Scenarios What Would it Take? CLRP Aspirations Starts with COG regional CO2 goals and assesses what scales and combinations of interventions will be necessary to achieve the goal for the transportation sector. Draws on past studies and public outreach to provide an ambitious yet attainable vision of land use and transportation for the 2010 CLRP update and to eventually serve as an unconstrained long range plan. 16 17 Building the Scenario Goal: To move jobs and housing closer together to create highly accessible and developed areas, and achieve more efficient transportation systems Land Use Decisions Pricing Options • Concentrating projected growth in activity centers and existing/planned transit stations • Address congestion through pricing of new and/or existing lanes • Consistent review and refinement by planning directors • Provide alternatives through enhanced transit Supportive Transit • Use menu of transit options from past scenarios • Connect activity centers • Review by Regional Bus Subcommittee 18 19 20 21 Moving Forward Review from Planning Directors Have approval on current process Will provide TAZ level growth alternatives in coming month for review 22 Existing System Existing system of activity centers and high quality transit shows mismatch. Many transit stations without activity and many activity centers without high-quality transit. 23 Studied Network of Variably Priced Lanes A value pricing study completed by the TPB in February of 2008 evaluated a regional network of variably priced lanes, made up of new capacity and selected existing facilities. 24 Transit Network Recommended for Scenario Study A regional network of BRT operating mostly on the priced lanes will provide highquality transit service to nearly all activity centers in the region. Additional transit service provided by CLRP and RMAS projects. 25 BRT to Provide Rail-Like Level of Service Physical bus stations will provide high quality of service and encourage TOD BRT stations will provide many features to decrease boarding time: • All-door, level boarding • Off-board payment • Room for 60’ articulated multi-door buses The Shirlington Transit Station in Arlington, VA.