Building upon the Adaptive Capacity to Livelihood Resilience in arid, semi arid and flood prone regions Presented by Aditi Dass Winrock International India May 11, 2006
Download ReportTranscript Building upon the Adaptive Capacity to Livelihood Resilience in arid, semi arid and flood prone regions Presented by Aditi Dass Winrock International India May 11, 2006
Building upon the Adaptive Capacity to Livelihood Resilience in arid, semi arid and flood prone regions Presented by Aditi Dass Winrock International India May 11, 2006 Outline of presentation Case Study on Drought and Flood in India • Risks & vulnerabilities • Adaptation strategies Case Studies States selected on the basis of the level of vulnerability of the states to droughts, floods and cyclones which is a function of damages reported Villages within the most drought prone districts of Rajasthan, Andhrapradesh and Karnataka have been selected. Similarly, a case study in Orissa has been taken up within a flood prone district, which is also susceptible to cyclones. Damages due to extreme events between the period 1900 to 2004 180 1600 no. of events 150 133 1200 No. of events total affected 120 90 60 800 37 37 21 30 0 400 Total no. of people affected 156 0 Extreme Land slides Temperature Wind Storm Flood Drought Number of people affected due to various extreme events in India. Probability of Occurrence of Droughts A perennial feature 19% of area affecting 12% of population annually Frequency of droughts: Tamilnadu, J&K, Telangana, West Rajasthan - every 2.5 years Gujarat, E. Rajasthan & Western Uttarpradesh – every 3 years Other states have droughts every 45 years Based on the rainfall deficiency for the last 100 years Severe droughts in India in last 100 years Year % of country area affected % of less % of less rainfall over rainfall over entire India drought reg. 1918 71 -26 -49 1965 41 -17 -36 1972 47 -25 -35 1979 45 -21 -38 1987 50 -18 -45 After 1987, India experienced severe drought in 2002, where 29% of the area was affected Temporal-spatial spread of drought & impacts Drought is occurring in some or the other part of the country 1984 1986 1997 2000 2001 2002 Primary impacts: water availability, agriculture production, hydropower generation Secondary Impact: Agricultural GDP dips, increase in commodity prices, livelihood of people dependent on rainfed farming (marginal farmers & farm laborers surviving) affected Rainfed areas (61%) – most affected Damages due to droughts 1800 districts /population 1600 2500 1400 2000 1200 1000 1500 800 1000 600 400 500 200 0 0 1984 1985 1986 1987 cropped area affected/ cattle pop. 3000 Number of Districts affected Population affected (lakh) Cropped Area affected (lakh ha) Cattle population affected (lakh) Case study analysis: Risks associated with droughts • Depletion in water resources for agriculture and drinking : women walk 1-2 kms to fetch water • Reduction in crop yields and change in cropping pattern • Dwindling fodder stock and declining income of farmers lead cattle selling; esp. marginal and small farmers who sell at depressed prices • Increased incidences of debt: • Decline in nutrition and health status: malnutrition strikes (esp. among children and women) whenever drought occurs Adaptation Local Level Adaptation Case studies in Rajasthan, Karnataka, Andhrapradesh Level of adaptation not same Government Institutions and policies to combat droughts Central Arid Zone Research Institute (CAZRI) Rural Works Programme Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP) - labor intensive schemes such as medium and minor irrigation, road construction, soil conservation and afforest action Dissemination of technologies relating to soil management, water harvesting, improved agronomic practices and drought-resistant crops - CRIDA Desert Development Programme (DDP) Integrated Watershed Management Programme – rejuvenate depleted natural resources on watershed basis National Watershed Program for Rainfed Areas (NWSDPRA) – around 22 mha Traditional coping strategies in response to drought Physical Household/Community • Migration (15-30%) • Sale of assets (land, livestock, durable assets) • Reduce intake of food and decline in other expenditure • Shift from superior to inferior food grain • Mixed cropping State/Government • Food distribution system • Water supply (tanker, new wells etc) • Employment programs Traditional coping strategies in response to drought (contd.) Social Economic Sharing and cooperation Borrowing Sacrifice by senior hh members New Community relationships Imports/assistance Diversification in source of income Inter and intra community Subsidy/grants exchange programs Relief works Modern coping strategies Farming techniques to retain productivity during droughts • Soil & water conservation practices • Farm Pond : enables storing runoff water • Planting drought resistant varieties: provided by the state Agriculture Univ. • low adaptability of the above Livelihood: Education & skill based diversification of occupation Livestock: ownership pattern changed from few people owning bigger herd size to almost all hh owning few small animals Govt. efforts: area – specific development programs initiated for drought prone areas to mitigate poverty Conclusion - drought • Marginal & small farmers and landless hh are most vulnerable to drought • Middle level farmers in AP have also fallen prey to recurrent droughts due to: – Decline of crop acreage – Fall in water table & water harvesting structures – Fall in employment & purchasing power – Scarcity of food and fodder – Lack of change in cropping pattern & lack of drought resistant seeds – Inability of farmers to repay loans with continuous droughts • Drought in Rajasthan was effectively managed • Dominant strategies in drought prone areas: – Adopting mixed farming system (crop, livestock & agro-forestry) – Resources conservation approach – Collective sustenance 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Area affected (Mha) 1986 1988 2000 1953 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 1953 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 Population affected (millions) Floods in India and its impacts 2001 2003 20 15 10 5 0 150 100 50 0 86.0 80.4 79.3 67.7 63.7 39.3 37.8 25.4 20.9 20.4 18.0 17.6 16.6 8.4 4.8 4.3 3.3 2.4 2.3 1.6 1.3 0.7 0.6 200 148.9 130.0 250 Uttar Bihar West Orissa Kerala Himachal Assam Punjab Rajsthan Gujarat TamilNadu Jammu & Andhra Haryana Karnatka Mahrashtra Arunachal Meghalaya Madhya Tripura Manipur Sikkim Pondicherry Delhi Mizoram Nagaland Govt. spending on irrigation and flood control (RS. IN CRORES) 1974-75 1975-76 1976-77 1977-78 1978-79 1979-80 1980-81 1981-82 1982-83 1983-84 1984-85 1985-86 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 1999-00 0 205.0 Damages in Crores (Crop+houseing_public utilities) Government expenditure and Damages due to floods 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Impact of floods Floods play major role in poverty & vulnerability, esp. of marginalized communities • Damage on Infrastructure: health, sanitation, water supply, roads, educational institutions and opportunities for environment • Loss of individual property: – destroy of ‘kachcha’ houses, stored food & hh goods – Poor looses assets each time flood occurs – Poor have to take loans at high rate of interest for survival • Health: – water borne diseases like cholera, dysentery, typhoid & other gastrointestinal diseases are common – Lack of effective health care system – Unavailable & inaccessible due to prohibitive costs – Lack of clean drinking water, well water mixes with flood water • Effect on women: – loose control over food, fodder, fuel & cattle rearing – In post-disaster recovery phases, women suffer the most – Can’t get loans against lands because it is never in their name Coping with Floods Structural measures:Construction of storage dams, reservoirs, embankments, drainage structures as required at suitable locations •Raising the levels of the roads and constructing houses at higher heights or raising the plinth level of the houses Non-structural measures: •Flood forecasting & warning. The Central Water Commission (CWC) has a flood forecasting system covering 62 major rivers in 13 States with 157 stations for transmission of flood warnings on real time basis. •Post-flood activities for rescue, relief and rehabilitation operations. People’s Participation Case study : Measures taken by Jagatsinghpur in Orissa (worst flood affected in 2001) • Heights of embankments raised by 3-4 ft • Repairing jobs of weak points of embankment was taken up by govt. • Elevated spot “merdha’ were used for immediate shelter to flood affected people • Mud houses which were completely washed away, were rebuilt at an elevated area • Just before onset of monsoon people got ready with dry food reserve and other essential items • Different variety of paddy is sown in flood prone areas which are not destroyed even if the plant remains under water until 10 days Conclusion - flood • 3 successive disasters have seriously affected sustainability of livelihoods in Jagatsinghpur – Super cyclone 1999 – Flood 2001 – Flood 2003 • Loss of thousands of lives • Areas most affected by flood of 2001 and 2003 were areas affected by cyclone in 1999 • Poor disaster preparedness • Restoration works have to extend beyond normal time frame • Devastating flood has given opportunity to reflect gaps in our disaster preparedness methods & mechanisms Mainstreaming Climate Change, Vulnerability & Adaptation Concerns Why Climate change long term & impacts may be irreversible Long gestation period required for adaptation (such as developing drought resistant varieties) Infrastructure lifetimes are long and are at risk Long time scales required for institutional arrangements to be in place for combating impacts of CC (national to village level) Policy Question What do we need to do differently because of the expected adverse impacts of climate change? Thank You