External Second Gate, Fourier Transform Ion Mobility Spectrometry: “FT-IMS” Next Generation Ion Mobility Spectrometer Edward E.
Download ReportTranscript External Second Gate, Fourier Transform Ion Mobility Spectrometry: “FT-IMS” Next Generation Ion Mobility Spectrometer Edward E.
External Second Gate, Fourier Transform Ion Mobility Spectrometry: “FT-IMS” Next Generation Ion Mobility Spectrometer Edward E. Tarver, Ph.D. Analytical Material Sciences Department Sandia National Laboratories-Livermore, California Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum Ion Mobility Spectrometry Real-time response: few seconds analysis time. Sensitivity: low part-per-billion detection without pre-concentration. Versatility: simultaneous/universal response. Simplicity of electronics: no vacuum pumps/chromatographs. Field portability: low power, size and weight. Battery powered military and commercial units available. Unattended monitoring: perimeter and network defense. Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum Drift Gas Exhaust 63Ni Sample Inlet Ionization Region High Voltage Repeller - Entrance Gate Air Drift Gas Inlet Faraday Collector Signal Out Ion Drift Region Focusing Rings Aperture Grid Commercial/Military IMS Drift Tube Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum Ion Gating in Signal Averaging IMS open closed 0.2 ms 20-25 ms 1. Gate is pulsed open to admit ions less than < 1% of the duty cycle. 2. Greater than 99% of the ions formed in the source are not detected. 3. Given the initial quantities, the sensitivity loss can be devastating. Reference: United States Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. “Technology Against Terrorism: The Federal Effort”, (1991) Page 84. Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum Signal intensity and spectral resolution generated by conventional (signal averaging) IMS. Signal Av eraging IMS Reactant Ion and Calibrant Peaks 12 Intensity 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 5 10 15 Drif t Time (ms) 20 The observed peak tailing is due to ion-molecule reactions occurring during time-of-flight and further compounded by the signal averaging process. Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum 25 Fourier Transform Ion Mobility Spectrometry Increased Sensitivity, Lower Detection Limits: Sensitivity depends on the duty cycle. FT-IMS operates with 50% ion gating efficiency compared to 1% with conventional IMS. Fifty times more ions transmitted and detected than conventional IMS. Improved Resolution, Fewer False Alarms: FT-IMS dual-gate design eliminates broadening due to ion-molecule reactions and averaging process. Conventional IMS sums all variations in ion velocity, broadening peaks and reducing resolution. No need to average with FT-IMS. Suited for Miniaturization: FT-IMS performance allows miniaturization of detectors. Adaptable to Current IMS Systems: No hardware modifications to drift tube. Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum Ion Gating in FT-IMS LOW FREQUENCY HIGH FREQUENCY CYCLE REPEATED (IF DESIRED) open Entrance gate pulse closed open Exit gate pulse closed 1. Gates are open and closed for equal amounts of time no matter how frequently they are pulsed. 2. Ion collection during half of the analytical cycle time, i.e., 50% duty cycle. 3. Low frequency greater Signal/Noise, High frequency better Resolution. Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum Fourier Transform of the Ion Mobility Interferogram 1.0 1b. 10 kHz FT-IMS Spectrum 100 0.8 0.6 80 0.4 Fourier Transform 0.2 60 0.0 40 -0.2 -0.4 20 -0.6 -0.8 0 0 1 2 3 0 4 Ion Mobility Interferogram Atoms to Continuum 10 15 Drift Time (ms) Frequency / kHz Materials & Engineering Sciences Center 5 Ion Mobility Spectrum 8 20 25 Conventional IMS vs. FT-IMS 1a. Signal Averaged IMS Spectrum 1b. 10 kHz FT-IMS Spectrum 100 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 0 5 10 15 Drift Time (ms) Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum 20 25 0 5 10 15 Drift Time (ms) 20 25 FT-IMS Allows Tunable Resolution 1d. 40 kHz FT-IMS Spectrum 1c. 20 kHz FT-IMS Spectrum 100 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 20 20 0 0 0 5 10 15 Drift Time (ms) Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum 20 25 0 5 10 15 Drift Time (ms) 20 25 Signal Averaging IMS Open * Closed * * * ** ** ** *** **** **** **** **** **** Fourier Transform IMS Open Closed **** ***** Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum ***** ***** ***** **** *** *** *** ** * * ** * TNT Response as a Function of Scanning Time Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum PETN Response as a Function of Scanning Frequency Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum HNS Response at 10kHz and 20kHz Scanning Frequency Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum HMX Response: Frequency Range and Scan Time Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum 20 RDX Response as a Function of Frequency Range Scanned Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum Resolution vs. Aspect Ratio as Indicator of Peak Quality RESOLUTION (R): R = Drift Time (ms) / Peak Width at Half Height (ms) •Resolution calculation ignores peak broadening below Half Height where peak tailing and overlap limits ability to separate adjacent peaks. •Drift time dependent: broad, low intensity peaks with long drift times can give higher Resolution (R) than strong, sharp peaks with short drift times. •Misleading indicator of instrumental resolving power. ASPECT RATIO: AR = Peak Height (h) / Peak Width at Base (w) •Unbiased indicator of peak quality, includes peak width below Half Height. •Aspect Ratio is Independent of drift time and describes actual peak shape. Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum Resolution Number (Drift Time/w1/2) 0 R = 5/2 = 2.5 R = 20/2 = 10 AR = 3.25/.375 = 8.6 AR = 8.6 5 10 15 Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum vs. 20 25 Drift Time (ms) Aspect Ratio (Peak Height/wb) R = 32/2 = 16 AR = 8.6 30 R = 40/2.5 = 16 AR = 0.235 35 40 45 Resolution in IMS Selected Bench-top IMS Instruments IMS 5000 UVIMS-MCC Itemiser Draeger Safety Co. Germany G.A.S. Technol. Germany G.E./Ion Track Tritium 63Ni 50 30-60 U.S.A. or UV AirSentry SAES/Molecular Analytics Italy IonScan 400B Smiths Detection U.K. 63Ni 63Ni 63Ni NA 25 44 Selected Handheld IMS Instruments RAID-M IMS Mobile µIMS Bruker Daltonics Germany Draeger Safety Co. Germany G.A.S. G.E./Ion Track Implant Sciences Technol. Corporation Germany U.S.A. U.S.A. Smiths Detection 63Ni Tritium 63Ni Laser Corona 50 NA 30+ 50 30-60 Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum VaporTracer Quantum Sniffer 63Ni NA LCD3.2 U.K. Reference: Analytical Chemistry, Product Review. October 1, 2003. Pages 435-438A Peak Quality Determines False Alarm Rate Peak Resolution: R = td/w1/2 Aspect Ratio: AR = h/wb PEAK IMS Ko =1.84 TNT PETN HNS HMX RDX Averages: SA 40.97 41.23 41.94 41.35 -----41.37 10K 30.27 28.74 28.74 28.57 28.84 29.03 20K 40K 36.59 39.56 34.31 40.98 50.92 37.72 SA 10.74 13.68 5.98 3.02 -----8.35 10K 156.8 209.8 188.4 185.6 113.4 170.8 20K 40K 101.6 18.88 130.2 36.56 31.89 63.82 Ko =1.54 TNT PETN HNS HMX RDX Averages: 45.59 38.20 45.70 42.04 46.33 43.57 30.41 37.42 26.86 31.76 -----31.61 30.75 41.40 40.67 41.49 34.11 37.68 9.12 5.68 12.8 7.52 9.32 8.88 156.8 47.14 51.70 147.4 -----100.8 134.0 75.90 77.13 56.84 17.86 72.34 Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum X2G-FT-IMS 42.47 ----------65.99 75.27 61.24 IMS X2G-FT-IMS 56.87 ----------29.81 ----------- Signal Av eraging IM S 100ppb RDX in acetone 6 acetone 5 Intensity 4 RDX reactant ion peak 8.5 ms 3 2 1 0 0 5 Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum 10 15 Drif t Time (ms) 20 25 Comparison of FT-IMS and Signal Av eraging IMS Sample 100 ppb RDX 6 8.5 ms 5 RDX Intensity 4 Signal Averaged IMS 3 Fourier Transform IMS 2 1 0 -1 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Drift Time (ms) Note the comparative resolution of the peak a 8.5 ms. FT-IMS is able to resolve both species Present whereas signal averaging cannot. The peak at 12 ms is residual acetone. Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum Handheld FT-IMS Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum FT-IMS: Rear View Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum FT-IMS: 9-Volt Batteries in Parallel Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum FT-IMS: Interior View Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum FT-IMS: Vertical Battery Arrangement Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum Acknowledgements Sandia National Laboratories, Research Foundations & Laboratory Directed Research and Development Grants Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore CA Analytical Material Sciences Department Dr. Jim Wang, Mr. Anh Phan, Dr. Kent Pfeiffer, Mr. John Warmouth Professor Herbert Hill, Washington State University, Pullman WA Professor David Harris, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont CA United States Department of the Navy: Contract N4175603GO14803 Materials & Engineering Sciences Center Atoms to Continuum