What to Do With a Patient Who Smokes Steven A. Schroeder, MD Presentation courtesy of The Smoking Cessation Leadership Center and Rx for Change February 2007
Download ReportTranscript What to Do With a Patient Who Smokes Steven A. Schroeder, MD Presentation courtesy of The Smoking Cessation Leadership Center and Rx for Change February 2007
What to Do With a Patient Who Smokes Steven A. Schroeder, MD Presentation courtesy of The Smoking Cessation Leadership Center and Rx for Change February 2007 Topics for Today Facts about smoking Nicotine and dependence Aids for cessation Telephone quitlines Next steps JAMA Article Tobacco’s Deadly Toll 440,000 deaths in the U.S. each year 4.8 million deaths world wide each year 10 million deaths estimated by year 2030 50,000 deaths in the U.S. due to second-hand smoke exposure 8.6 million disabled from tobacco in the U.S. alone Comparative Causes of Annual Deaths in the United States 440 450 400 350 300 250 200 * 150 81 100 50 41 17 19 14 30 0 AIDS Alcohol Motor Homicide Drug Suicide Smoking Vehicle Induced suffer from * Also mental illness and/or Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention substance abuse Annual U.S. Deaths Attributable to Smoking, 1997–2001 Percent of all smokingattributable deaths Cardiovascular diseases Lung cancer Respiratory diseases Second-hand smoke Cancers other than lung Other 137,979 123,836 101,454 38,112 34,693 1,828 31% 28% 23% 9% 8% <1% TOTAL: 437,902 deaths annually Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR 2005;54:625–628. Health Consequences of Smoking Cancers – – – – – – – – – Acute myeloid leukemia Bladder and kidney Cervical Esophageal Gastric Laryngeal Lung Oral cavity and pharyngeal Pancreatic Pulmonary diseases – Acute (e.g., pneumonia) – Chronic (e.g., COPD) Cardiovascular diseases – – – – Abdominal aortic aneurysm Coronary heart disease Cerebrovascular disease Peripheral arterial disease Reproductive effects – Reduced fertility in women – Poor pregnancy outcomes (e.g., low birth weight, preterm delivery) – Infant mortality Other effects: cataract, osteoporosis, periodontitis, poor surgical outcomes U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General, 2004. Smoking Cessation: Reduced Risk of Death Prospective study of 34,439 male British doctors Mortality was monitored for 50 years (1951–2001) Years of life gained 15 On average, cigarette smokers die approximately 10 years younger than do nonsmokers. 10 5 0 30 40 50 60 Among those who continue smoking, at least half will die due to a tobacco-related disease. Age at cessation (years) Doll et al. (2004). BMJ 328(7455):1519–1527. Cumulative risk (%) Reduction in cumulative risk of death from lung cancer in men Age in years Reprinted with permission. Peto et al. (2000). BMJ 321(7257):323–329. Causal Associations with Second-hand Smoke Developmental – Low birthweight – Sudden Infant Death Syndrome – Pre-term delivery Respiratory – Asthma induction and exacerbation – Eye and nasal irritation – Bronchitis, pneumonia, otitis media in children Carcinogenic – Lung cancer – Nasal sinus cancer – Breast cancer (younger, premenopausal women) Cardiovascular – Heart disease mortality – Acute and chronic coronary heart disease morbidity – Altered vascular properties Compounds in Tobacco Smoke An estimated 4,800 compounds in tobacco smoke, including 11 proven human carcinogens Gases – – – – – Carbon monoxide Hydrogen cyanide Ammonia Benzene Formaldehyde Particles – – – – – Nicotine Nitrosamines Lead Cadmium Polonium-210 Nicotine does NOT cause the ill health effects of tobacco. The Real Culprit It is the smoke, tar, and additives that make people sicken and die. Nicotine is dangerous because it leads to addiction, and therefore increased exposure tobacco constituents. Therefore, nicotine replacement therapy is helpful, not harmful. It is a “clean” form of nicotine. STATE-SPECIFIC PREVALENCE of SMOKING among ADULTS, 2005 Illinois 19.9% California 15.2% Kentucky 28.7% Nevada 23.1% New York 20.5% Utah 11.5% Texas 20.0% Indiana 27.3% Florida 21.6% Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). MMWR 55:1148–1151. TRENDS in ADULT SMOKING, by SEX—U.S., 1955–2005 Trends in cigarette current smoking among persons aged 18 or older 60 50 20.9% of adults are current smokers Male Percent 40 30 23.9% Female 20 18.1% 10 0 1955 1959 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 Year 70% want to quit Graph provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1955 Current Population Survey; 1965–2005 NHIS. Estimates since 1992 include some-day smoking. TRENDS in TEEN SMOKING, by ETHNICITY—U.S., 1977–2006 Trends in cigarette smoking among 12th graders: 30-day prevalence of use 50 40 Percent White 30 Hispanic 20 Black 10 0 1977 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 Year Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Monitoring the Future Project www.monitoringthefuture.org TRENDS in ADULT CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION—U.S., 1900–2005 Annual adult per capita cigarette consumption and major smoking and health events First Surgeon General’s Report Number of cigarettes 5,000 Broadcast ad ban End of WW II 4,000 Master Settlement Agreement; California first state to enact ban on smoking in bars 3,000 Nonsmokers’ rights movement begins 2,000 Cigarette price drop 20 states have > $1 pack tax 1,000 Federal cigarette tax doubles Great Depression 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Year Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). MMWR 48:986–993. Per-capita updates from U.S. Department of Agriculture, provided by the American Cancer Society. PREVALENCE of ADULT SMOKING, by RACE/ETHNICITY—U.S., 2005 32.0% American Indian/Alaska Native* 21.9% White* 21.5% Black* 16.2% Hispanic 13.3% Asian* 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% * non-Hispanic. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). MMWR 55:1145–1148. PREVALENCE of ADULT SMOKING, by EDUCATION—U.S., 2005 25.5% No high school diploma 43.2% GED diploma 24.6% High school graduate 22.5% Some college 10.7% Undergraduate degree 7.1% Graduate degree 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). MMWR 55:1145–1148. Number of Smokers = New Smokers + Old Smokers - Quitters Number of Quitters = Number of Quit Attempts X Price Clinician advice Counter Marketing Clean indoor air % of Quitters Counseling Medications Ways to Help Smokers Quit Raise prices (taxes) Clean indoor air Create counter-marketing Provide cessation aids: counseling and pharmacotherapy, alone or in combination – Directly by clinician in individual or group session (office or hospital) – Toll-free telephone quitlines Reasons for Not Helping Patients Quit 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Too busy Lack of expertise No financial incentive Most smokers can’t/won’t quit Stigmatizing smokers Respect for privacy Negative message might scare away patients I smoke myself Responses to Patient Who Smokes Unacceptable: “I don’t have time.” Acceptable – Refer to a quit line – Establish systems in your office and hospital – Become a cessation expert The 5 A’s: Review ASK about tobacco USE ADVISE tobacco users to QUIT ASSESS readiness to make a QUIT attempt ASSIST with the QUIT ATTEMPT ARRANGE FOLLOW-UP care Fiore et al. (2000). Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, PHS. Measurements of Smoking Intensity Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence Biochemical – Serum, urinary, or saliva cotinine testing – Carbon monoxide testing Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence Item Response Options 1. How soon after you awaken do you smoke your first cigarette? 2. 3. Do you find it difficult to refrain from smoking in places where it is forbidden? Which cigarette would you hate most to give up? 4. How many cigarettes per day do you smoke? 5. 6. Do you smoke more frequently during the first hours after waking up than during the rest of the day? Do you smoke if you are so ill that you are in bed most of the day? within 5 minutes 6-30 minutes 30-60 minutes after 60 minutes yes no first one in morning any other 10 or less 11-20 21-30 31 or more yes no yes no Points 3 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 3 1 0 1 0 Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström K-O. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991;86:1119–1127. Nicotine Absorption Absorption is pH dependent In acidic media – Ionized poorly absorbed across membranes In alkaline media – Non ionized well absorbed across membranes At physiologic pH (7.3–7.5), nicotine is readily absorbed. Nicotine Distribution Nicotine reaches the brain within 11 seconds Plasma nicotine (ng/mL) 80 70 Arterial 60 50 40 30 Venous 20 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Minutes after light-up of cigarette Data from Henningfield et al., Drug Alcohol Depend 1993;33:23-29. Graph reprinted with permission, Rx for Change, The Regents of the University of California, University of Southern California, and Western University of Health Sciences. Nicotine Metabolism H N N 70–80% cotinine CH3 10–20% excreted unchanged in urine ~ 10% other metabolites Metabolized and excreted in urine Adapted and reprinted with permission. Benowitz et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994;268:296–303. Nicotine Pharmacodynamics Central nervous system – Pleasure – Arousal, enhanced vigilance – Improved task performance – Anxiety relief Other – Appetite suppression – Increased metabolic rate – Skeletal muscle relaxation Cardiovascular system – Heart rate – Cardiac output – Blood pressure – Coronary vasoconstriction – Cutaneous vasoconstriction Dopamine Reward Pathway Prefrontal cortex Dopamine release Stimulation of nicotine receptors Nucleus accumbens Ventral tegmental area Nicotine enters brain Chronic Administration of Nicotine: Effects on the Brain Human smokers have increased nicotine receptors in the prefrontal cortex. High Low Nonsmoker Smoker Image courtesy of George Washington University / Dr. David C. Perry Perry et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1999;289:1545–1552. Damage to the Insula Disrupts Addiction to Cigarette Smoking* 19 smokers with brain damage to insula region, compared with 50 smokers with brain damage elsewhere Smoking rates lower in insula-damaged patients (odds ratio=2.94) but not statistically significant (low #s) But addictive cravings much lower in insula damaged patients (OR=22; p<.0005) *Naqvi et al. Science 2007; 315:531-534 Nicotine Pharmacodynamics: Withdrawal Effects Depression Insomnia Irritability/frustration/anger Anxiety Difficulty concentrating Restlessness Increased appetite/weight gain Decreased heart rate Cravings* * Not considered a withdrawal symptom by DSM-IV criteria. Most symptoms peak 24–48 hr after quitting and subside within 2–4 weeks. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). DSM-IV. Hughes et al. (1991). Arch Gen Psychiatry 48:52–59. Hughes & Hatsukami. (1998). Tob Control 7:92–93. Nicotine Addiction Cycle Reprinted from Med Clin N Am 76(2), Benowitz NL, Cigarette smoking and nicotine addiction, pp. 415–437, Copyright 1992, with permission from Elsevier. Nicotine Addiction Tobacco users maintain a minimum serum nicotine concentration in order to – Prevent withdrawal symptoms – Maintain pleasure/arousal – Modulate mood Users self-titrate nicotine intake by – Smoking more frequently – Smoking more intensely – Obstructing vents on low-nicotine brand cigarettes Cognitive Strategies for Cessation Reframe the way a patient thinks about smoking Review commitment to quit, focus on downsides of tobacco use Distractive thinking Positive self-talks, “pep talks” Relaxation through imagery Mental rehearsal, visualization Behavioral Strategies for Cessation (Avoiding Stimuli that Trigger Smoking) Stress – Anticipate future challenges – Develop substitutes for tobacco Alcohol – Limit or abstain during early stages of quitting Other tobacco users – Stay away – Ask for cooperation from family and friends Behavioral Strategies for Cessation (Part 2) Oral gratification needs – Use substitutes: water, sugar-free chewing gum or hard candies Automatic smoking routines – Anticipate routines and develop alternative plans, e.g., with morning coffee Weight gain after cessation – Anticipate; use gum or bupropion; exercise Cravings – Distractive thinking; change activities Pharmacologic Methods: First-line Therapies Three general classes of FDA-approved drugs for smoking cessation: Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) – Nicotine gum, patch, lozenge, nasal spray, inhaler Psychotropics – Sustained-release bupropion Partial nicotinic receptor agonist – Varenicline Currently, no medications have an FDA indication for use in spit tobacco cessation. Nicotine Gum Advantages Disadvantages Gum use may satisfy oral cravings. Gum may not be socially acceptable. Gum use may delay weight gain. Gum is difficult to use with dentures. Patients can titrate therapy to manage withdrawal symptoms. Patients must use proper chewing technique to minimize adverse effects. Transdermal Nicotine Patch Advantages The patch provides consistent nicotine levels. Disadvantages The patch is easy to use and conceal. Fewer compliance issues are associated with the patch. Patients cannot titrate the dose. Allergic reactions to adhesive may occur. 16-hr patch may lead to morning nicotine cravings. Patients with dermatologic conditions should not use. Nicotine Lozenge Advantages Lozenge use may satisfy oral cravings. The lozenge is easy to use and conceal. Patients can titrate therapy to manage withdrawal symptoms. Disadvantages Gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, hiccups, and heartburn) may be bothersome. Nicotine Nasal Spray Advantages Patients can easily titrate therapy to rapidly manage withdrawal symptoms. Disadvantages Nasal/throat irritation Dependence can result. Patients must wait 5 minutes before driving or operating heavy machinery. Patients with chronic nasal disorders or severe reactive airway disease should not use the spray. Nicotine Inhaler Advantages Patients can easily titrate therapy to manage withdrawal symptoms. The inhaler mimics hand-to-mouth ritual of smoking. Disadvantages Initial throat or mouth irritation. Can’t store cartridges in very warm conditions or use in very cold conditions. Patients with underlying bronchospastic disease must use with caution. Combination NRT Combination NRT – Long-acting formulation (patch) Produces relatively constant levels of nicotine PLUS – Short-acting formulation (gum, lozenge, inhaler, nasal spray) Allows for acute dose titration as needed for withdrawal symptoms Bupropion SR + NRT The safety and efficacy of combination of varenicline with NRT or bupropion has not been established. Because many of the remaining smokers are very addicted, use of combination therapies is becoming normalized. Nicotine Agonist—VARENICLINE Chantix, marketed by Pfizer Partial nicotinic receptor agonist – Approved by the FDA May 2006, to hit the market in the fall of 2006 – Much DTC marketing anticipated in 2007 Early trials (JAMA) show better results than bupropion Lessens withdrawal symptoms and inhibits the “buzz” from a smoke Main side effect is nausea VARENICLINE: Mechanism of Action Binds with high affinity and selectivity at 42 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors – Stimulates low-level agonist activity – Competitively inhibits binding of nicotine Clinical effects – symptoms of nicotine withdrawal – Blocks dopaminergic stimulation responsible for reinforcement & reward associated with smoking VARENICLINE: Dosing Patients should begin therapy 1 week PRIOR to their quit date. The dose is gradually increased to minimize treatment-related nausea and insomnia. Treatment Day Initial dose titration Dose Day 1 to day 3 0.5 mg qd Day 4 to day 7 0.5 mg bid Day 8 to end of treatment* 1 mg bid * Up to 12 weeks VARENICLINE: Adverse Effects Common side effects (≥5% and twice the rate observed in placebo-treated patients) include: – Nausea – Sleep disturbances (insomnia, abnormal dreams) – Constipation – Flatulence – Vomiting VARENICLINE: Advantages and Disadvantages ADVANTAGES Varenicline is an oral formulation with twice-aday dosing. Varenicline offers a new mechanism of action for persons who previously failed using other medications. Early industry-sponsored trials suggest this agent is superior to bupropion SR. DISADVANTAGES May induce nausea in up to one third of patients. Post-marketing surveillance data not yet available. BUPROPION SR: Mechanism of Action Atypical antidepressant thought to affect levels of various brain neurotransmitters – Dopamine – Norepinephrine Clinical effects – craving for cigarettes – symptoms of nicotine withdrawal BUPROPION SR: DOSING Patients should begin therapy 1 to 2 weeks PRIOR to their quit date to ensure that therapeutic plasma levels of the drug are achieved. Initial treatment 150 mg po q AM x 3 days Then… 150 mg po bid Duration, 7–12 weeks BUPROPION SR: Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages Easy to use. Bupropion SR can be used with NRT. Might be beneficial for patients with depression. Disadvantages Seizure risk is increased. Bupropion SR should be avoided or used with caution in patients with: History of seizures or cranial trauma Anorexia or bulimia nervosa Medications that lower seizure threshold Severe hepatic cirrhosis Concurrent use of any form of Wellbutrin, or any MAO inhibitor in preceding 14 days – Patients undergoing abrupt discontinuation of alcohol or sedatives – – – – – Combination Therapy for the Heavily Addicted Smoker—Mayo Clinic Style Nicotine patch – Strongest dose, can use more than one Shorter acting nicotine replacement Bupropion SR Comparative Daily Costs of Pharmacotherapy Inhaler $6.07 Gum $5.81 Bupropion SR $5.73 Lozenge $5.26 Cigarettes (1 pack/day) $4.26 Varenicline $4.22 Patch $3.91 Nasal spray $3.67 0 2 4 6 Cost per day, in U.S. dollars 8 Graph reprinted with permission, Rx for Change, The Regents of the University of California, University of Southern California, and Western University of Health Sciences. Long-Term (6 month) Quit Rates for FDA-Approved Cessation Medications 30 Active drug Placebo Percent quit 25 20 23.9 22.5 20.0 19.5 17.1 16.4 14.6 15 11.8 11.5 10 8.6 9.1 8.8 10.2 9.4 5 0 Nicotine gum Nicotine patch Nicotine lozenge Nicotine nasal spray Nicotine inhaler Bupropion Varenicline Data adapted from Silagy et al. (2004). Cochrane Database Syst Rev; Hughes et al., (2004). Cochrane Database Syst Rev.; Gonzales et al., (2006). JAMA and Jorenby et al., (2006). JAMA Graph reprinted with permission, Rx for Change, The Regents of the University of California, University of Southern California, and Western University of Health Sciences. Combination Therapy: Patch Plus Bupropion SR Percentage of patients quit at 12 months after cessation Nicotine patch plus bupropion 35.5% Bupropion 30.3% Nicotine patch 16.4% Placebo 15.6% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Jorenby et al. N Engl J Med 1999;340(9):685–691. Effects of Clinician Interventions Compared to smokers who receive no assistance from a clinician, smokers who receive such assistance are 1.7–2.2 times as likely to quit successfully for 5 or more months. Estimated abstinence at 5+ months 30 20 2.2 1.7 10 1.0 1.1 (1.5,3.2) (1.3,2.1) (0.9,1.3) 0 No clinician Self-help Non-physician clinician Type of clinician Physician clinician n = 29 studies Fiore et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Clinical Practice Guideline. USDHHS, PHS, 2000. New Medications in the Pipeline Rimonabant – – – – – Cannabinoid receptor inhibitor Blocks reinforcing effects of nicotine Also suppresses appetite In phase III trials Not approved for smoking cessation by FDA Nicotine Vaccine – Produces antibodies to nicotine – Reduces nicotine levels in animals CYP246 Inhibitors – CYP246 is a hepatic enzyme that metabolizes nicotine – Higher blood nicotine levels per cigarette smoked – Could also increase potency of NRT JCAHO Core Measures Community-Acquired Pneumonia Acute MI CHF Pediatrics National Rates for AMI, Heart Failure and Pneumonia Adult Smoking Cessation Counseling Measures 1 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 AMI Heart Failure Pneumonia 2Q 20 05 20 05 1Q 20 04 4Q 20 04 3Q 20 04 2Q 20 04 1Q 20 03 4Q 20 03 3Q 20 03 2Q 20 03 1Q 20 02 4Q 20 02 0 3Q Rate 0.7 Adult Smoking Cessation Counseling for Acute MI Patients 1 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 JCAHO (Nat'l) UHC UCSF 2Q 20 05 20 05 1Q 20 04 4Q 20 04 3Q 20 04 2Q 20 04 1Q 20 03 4Q 20 03 3Q 20 03 2Q 20 03 1Q 20 02 4Q 20 02 0 3Q Rate 0.7 Adult Smoking Cessation Counseling for CHF Patients 1 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 JCAHO (Nat'l) UHC UCSF 2Q 20 05 20 05 1Q 20 04 4Q 20 04 3Q 20 04 2Q 20 04 1Q 20 03 4Q 20 03 3Q 20 03 2Q 20 03 1Q 20 02 4Q 20 02 0 3Q Rate 0.7 Adult Smoking Cessation Counseling for PN Patients 1 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 JCAHO (Nat'l) UHC UCSF 2Q 20 05 20 05 1Q 20 04 4Q 20 04 3Q 20 04 2Q 20 04 1Q 20 03 4Q 20 03 3Q 20 03 2Q 20 03 1Q 20 02 4Q 20 02 0 3Q Rate 0.7 Treating Tobacco Dependence: 2003 Community •TOFCO •Oregon Quitline •Business Case Hospital-Based Health System •Inpatient Program •Behavioral Health/CD •Research > $800K •Leadership: ATMC RWJF, CDC, AAHP •Formal HSI Program Target Groups •Disease Management •PHS employees •Web-Based •Women & Children •Clinical Programs Cessation SMOKER (who wants to quit) Providers •5 A’s Training/Education •Reimbursement •Physician Leadership •Group Classes •Free Medications •Telephone Support •Self-Help Materials •Prov-RN Clinics Evaluation •C.O.R.E. •Utilization •Grant Writing •5 A’s Training •EMR Resources •Dissemination (TAR) •Resources: Primary Care, Specialties, Pediatrics, OB/GYN Smoking Prevalence: Providence Health Plan vs. Oregon 24% 23% 22% 21% 20% 19% 18% 17% 16% 15% '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 2000 State of Oregon (BRFS) Providence Health Plan: Oregon The National Quitline Card — Toll-free Quitline Numbers 1-800 NO BUTTS (California number) 1-800 QUIT NOW (National number) Efficacy and Average Sample Size of Tobacco Cessation Studies Reviewed by the Cochrane Library† Type of Intervention Odds Ratio (95% CI*) Average Sample Size, per trial Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT, n=98*) 1.74 (1.64, 1.86) 385 Telephone Counseling (TC, n=13*) 1.56 (1.38, 1.77) 1,100 *n indicates number of studies; CI. Confidence interval. †Based on Silagy et al. (2004) and Stead et al. (2004). The Cochrane Library. Knowledge of Tobacco Cessation Programs Among California Smokers† Unaided Recall Aided Recall % (95% CI*) % (95% CI*) Telephone quitline 4.5 (1.1) 38.7 (2.6) NRT 59.5 (2.5) -- Hypnosis 9.8 (1.5) -- SmokEnders 4.5 (1.1) -- Others 46.3 (2.9) -- METHOD † Data from the California Tobacco Survey, 1999. For the unaided recall question, survey respondents were asked, “Can you name up to 3 programs that are helpful to people who are trying to quit smoking?” The aided recall question was asked only in reference to the quitline: “Have you ever heard of the 1-800-NO-BUTTS (or, in Spanish, 1-800-45-NOFUME) phone number?” * CI = confidence interval. Call Volume to the Quitline in response to New York City Free Patch Give-Away Program 236840 (>425,000 calls in first 3 days!!!) 300000 250000 150000 41182 100000 50000 5877 969 3010 1526 1258 1326 991 389 251 749 844 875 801 5374 1269 674 2034 1025 993 856 799 391 301 874 810 705 661 595 1984 287 894 862 636 611 2342 428 1368 910 613 613 99558 200000 0 /0 2 / 4 3 /0 9 / 4 3 /03 6 4/1 /03 3 4/2 /03 0 4/3 /0 7 / 5 3 /03 4 5/1 Barriers to Successful Cessation Provider inattention/pessimism Co-dependency and mental illness No coverage for cessation medications Improper use of the medications Ignorance of toll-free tobacco quitlines Strategies for Increasing Quit Rates Reframe expectations of success Help businesses to help their employees quit Focus on mental health/substance abuse population Improved marketing of quitlines Develop new medications Create better systems Provide clinical champions Partnership for Prevention: Additional QALYs Saved if Current % Receiving Services Increased* Services (short name) Current % receiving services nationally Additional QALYs saved if current % receiving services increased to 90% Tobacco Use Screening and Brief Intervention 35% 1,300,000 Colorectal Cancer Screening 35% 310,000 Influenza Vaccine—Adults 35% among adults 50-64 yrs 65% among adults 65+ yrs 110,000 Breast Cancer Screening 68% 91,000 Cervical Cancer Screening 79% 29,000 Pneumococcal Vaccine—Adults 56% 16,000 Cholesterol Screening 87% 12,000 *Priorities for America’s Health: Capitalizing on Life-Saving Cost-Effective Preventive Services. Power of Intervention ⅓ to ½ of the 44.5 million smokers will die from the habit. Of the 31 million who want to quit, 10 to 15.5 million will die from smoking. Increasing the 2.5% cessation rate to 10% would save 1.2 million additional lives. If cessation rates rose to 15%, 1.9 million additional lives would be saved. No other health intervention could make such a difference!