MAGTF Expeditionary Family of Fighting Vehicles (MEFFV) Thomas H. Miller Program Manager MEFFV Marine Corps Systems Command 703-432-4032 [email protected] This presentation contains reference to the United States.
Download ReportTranscript MAGTF Expeditionary Family of Fighting Vehicles (MEFFV) Thomas H. Miller Program Manager MEFFV Marine Corps Systems Command 703-432-4032 [email protected] This presentation contains reference to the United States.
MAGTF Expeditionary Family of Fighting Vehicles (MEFFV) Thomas H. Miller Program Manager MEFFV Marine Corps Systems Command 703-432-4032 [email protected] This presentation contains reference to the United States Government military capabilities that may not be authorized for release or sale. Mention of these capabilities in no way implies that the United States Government will release or consider release of them or any associated classified or unclassified information pertaining to them. 1 Overview • What is MEFFV? • Future Combat System/MEFFV Joint Program Office (JPO) plan • PM MEFFV organization structure • PM MEFFV charter • Overview program schedule 2 What is MEFFV? • Description from MEFFV Mission Need Statement (now archived; to be replaced by a pending Initial Capabilities Document): – The MAGTF Expeditionary Family of Fighting Vehicles (MEFFV) is a combat vehicle replacement project designed to provide the capabilities presently conferred by the Light Armored Vehicle family and the M1A1 Main Battle Tank. – It is envisioned that this family of vehicles will facilitate and enhance the capabilities of Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare through use of technologies to significantly improve efficiency and lessen the impact of operational and tactical logistics. – The family of vehicles will be designed to maximize deployability options while retaining the requisite combat capabilities (lethality, survivability, mobility, sustainability) to perform the roles of the vehicles replaced. – MEFFV should replace the LAV and Tank fleets when they reach their respective End of Service dates (2015 and 2020 respectively). 3 What is MEFFV? FCS/MEFFV Common Technologies Future Combat Systems Maximum 16-18 tons Net Fires = High Survivability Network Centric (Large UAV force) Large Robotic/Autonomous Force (Unmanned) New Conceptual Way to Fight Army Expeditionary: C-130, C-17, C-5 IOC: 2014 MEFFV Family of Vehicles (light/medium/heavy) Commonalities in Modular Leap-Ahead Technology: Swim Capable (Riverine) Transport Advantage Power Trains Direct and Indirect Fires Weapon Systems Survivable and Survivability Sustainable Sensors USMC Expeditionary: System Integration LCU, LCAC, CH-53, MV-22 IOC: ~2015+; ~2020+ 4 FCS/MEFFV JPO Plan Background • 20 Jun 02 Secretary Rumsfeld Memo “My impression is that the Marines and the Army are both looking at tanks and vehicles for the 2015 to 2020 period. Why shouldn’t we require that it be a common chassis and that they do it joint?” • 2 Apr 03 JROCM 086-03 Gen Pace “The JROC request the Army and Marine Corps establish a FCV JPO to satisfy the program requirements of FCS and MEFFV. Request the services return to the JROC with a decision brief by Sep 03.” • 13 May 03 JROCM 111-03 Gen Pace “The JROC assigned a Joint Potential Designator of “Joint” and recommended the formation of a Joint Program Office, assigning Army as the lead service and including US Marine Corps representation.” • 01 Mar 04 JROCM 038-04 Gen Pace “The Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC) reviewed and accepted the Army and Marine Corps FCS/MEFFV JPO proposal. The JPO plan will meet both Services materiel requirements for future combat systems, reduce life cycle costs of these systems, and enhance interoperability between the services.” 5 FCS/MEFFV JPO Plan Key Tenets Captured in the inter-service MOA on FCS / MEFFV Joint Collaboration, signed Aug 2004. • JPO Tenets: – Collaboration with development of the FCS Network Services Integration will be accomplished under the Marine Corps’ participation in the Joint Battle Management Command and Control initiatives. – Build from existing Marine Corps/Army relationships – Leverage Army investment in FCS (to include S&T) – Maximum commonality desired within the scope of the requirements – Interoperability required 6 FCS/MEFFV JPO Plan Phasing 1. JPO Phase I (FY04-08): Define Marine Corps / Joint capabilities/attributes • • • • • • • Ramp up USMC manning (immediate infusion into FCS reqt’s process) Assess common & unique attributes for Future Force and EMW Evaluate trade-space of Increment I vehicles and related systems Use Early Operational Evaluations to influence joint CDD Recommend and resource technologies unique to Marine applications (Joint MOA w/ DARPA) Conduct joint experimentation Identify areas of commonality between FCS/MEFFV 2. JPO Phase II (FY08 and beyond): Acquisition • • • • Manage FCS systems development to meet Joint CDD for FCS and “Increment-Marine” (Marine unique needs) Utilize shared production facilities as much as practical Manage acquisition of FCS/MEFFV systems Manage life cycle of FCS/MEFFV systems with Army and Marine units 7 FCS/MEFFV JPO Plan Network Integration Strategy • • • Future USMC Architecture being developed by MCCDC will coordinate with TRADOC and USJFCOM to ensure MCCDC/ architectures are compatible TRADOC with the joint architecture of land forces. Future C2 Network being developed by C4I/FCS MARCORSYSCOM – SE&I will NSI establish cell at Ft. Monmouth (SE&I to coordinate interoperability LNO) with FCS networks. MEFFV Product Team will include representatives from MEFFV/ MCCDC C2 Integration and FCS MARCORSYSCOM C4II to JPO ensure MEFFV will be well (C4II) integrated into the future network consistent with the future joint architecture MEB-2015 UE/UA Operational Architecture Army Battle Command Oper Arch (Existing) USMC Enterprise Network/ FORCENet (Existing) FCS Network Army Tactical Internet (Existing) Enterprise Integrated Product FCS Vehicles C4I MEFFV C4I Army Battle Command Systems 8 FCS/MEFFV JPO Plan USMC C4II Coordination with PM UA C4I members of the MEFFV IPT integrate systems into the MEFFV. FCS Vehicles MEFFV Vehicles Existing Existing Emerging USMC Army FCS Unit of MEFFV Tactical Data Tactical Vehicles Vehicles Action Network Internet FCS Network MEFFV Network Strategy (TDN) (FBCB2) Vehicles Integration Vehicles FCS/MEFFV JPO Plan USMC LNO to PM UA NSI ensures that UA Wireless Network will support integration with the USMC Tactical Data Network. Operates under MCSC SE&I Joint, Naval, and Coalition Integration Section. 9 PM MEFFV Organization Structure Jointly chartered by MCCDC and MARCORSYSCOM, reflecting close partnership in the JCIDS process. CG MARCORSYSCOM Dir, EFDC MCCDC PM T. Miller JCIDS Team IPT Lead C. Yunker MEFFV PM Team IPT Lead Technology Team H. Bayes IPT Lead E. Miller Acquisition Planning Team Will phase into the USMC component of the FCS/MEFFV JPO. 10 PM MEFFV Team Charter • Independent PM office reporting to CG MARCORSYSCOM (BGen William Catto) • Teaming with MCCDC Expeditionary Force Development Center to support JCIDS • Team Mission: “The MEFFV Team is the Marine Corps’ focal point for conducting concept development and capabilities refinement of mounted and armor units of the MAGTF conducting Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare (EMW) in support of the Joint Warfighting Commander consistent with MAGTF Command and Control Architectures. In conducting these activities, the Team shall consider opportunities to equip MAGTF units conducting combat support, combat service support, and special operations. The team shall conduct acquisition planning in anticipation of initiation of a MEFFV acquisition program. Additionally, the team will be the Command’s focal point for information on the Army’s Unit of Action (UA)/Future Combat Systems (FCS).” 11 MEFFV Program Schedule (Including Joint Activities) FY02 FY04 FY06 FY08 FY10 FY12 FY14 FY16 FY18 FY20 FY22 JPO Phase II: Joint Development and Acquisition - Design commonality to the maximum extent possible, in JPO Phase I: Concept Refinement MCCDC/TRADOC Officer Exchange Joint Concept and Capabilities Development, Joint Experimentation FY24 FY26 systems, sub-systems, and software to reduce life cycle costs. - Potential for shared design and production facilities FCS INCR I IPD#1 MEFFV (INCR – M) IOC FOC (Range) EOS LAV: 2015 EOS M1A1: 2020 JPO MS A MS B IPD IOC (Range) FY04 FY04 FY05 FY05 FY05 FY05 FY06 FY06 FY06 FY06 FY07 FY07 FY07 FY07 FY08 FY08 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR1 QTR2 QTR3 QTR4 QTR1 QTR2 FAA Exp. Armored Forces FNA QTR3 EAF FSA QTR4 EAF ICD Approval Analysis of Alternatives Concept Development & AoA Study Plan Concept Decision Technology Assessment & Strategy Development O&O, OMSMP Development MS A C2 Integration (OVs, SVs, TVs, and Network Integration) FCS Coordination and JPO Planning Systems Engineering Management/Integration Planning Test and Evaluation Planning/Strategy Supportability Concept Planning/Strategy • • • • INCR – Increment (Spiral Acquisition) IPD – Initial Production Decision CDD – Capability Development Document SOS – System of Systems IOC – Initial Operational Capability MS – Milestone -- Milestone Deliverable OMMSP – Operational Mode Summary Mission Profile 12